A list of "terror plots" that were actually hatched by the FBI

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Yusuke420"] I refuse to believe a normal person can be "goaded" into doing something like this. If you fall into this OBVIOUSLY you were predisposed to commiting this crime. They would have totally done it given the resources and these operations prove this!

Yusuke420

 

So you're basically saying that a person who is predisposed to commit a crime may as well have already done it?  So what if they're not a "normal person?"  That's a crime now?

If your "problems" make you think that this type of stuff is a GOOD idea, then at the very least you should be extricated from society. I don't really agree that they should be doing hard time, but years in a mental institution should be a given!

 

You do realize that many people reach a point in their lives where they are close to committing criminal acts, but never do, right?  I dare say most people.  

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] It's not impossible for them to say no.....-Sun_Tzu-

 

The law is supposed to respond to REAL threats to REAL victims, not push them into existence when they might never have come to fruition.  

Even just from a purely practical stand point these programs don't make sense. If you think terrorism is a serious problem why would you want law enforcement wasting its time going after people who don't pose a tangible threat? How is this a good allocation of resources?

Generally they have information that said individuals are a risk. They don't just pull names from a hat.....
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#53 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

The law is supposed to respond to REAL threats to REAL victims, not push them into existence when they might never have come to fruition.  

LJS9502_basic

Even just from a purely practical stand point these programs don't make sense. If you think terrorism is a serious problem why would you want law enforcement wasting its time going after people who don't pose a tangible threat? How is this a good allocation of resources?

Generally they have information that said individuals are a risk. They don't just pull names from a hat.....

 

Yes, lists of "risky" people.  That's worked out well.  :roll:

Avatar image for Yusuke420
Yusuke420

2770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#54 Yusuke420
Member since 2012 • 2770 Posts

You think that "thinking" about stealing from a store or something is the same as active participating and trying to organize and execute a major act of mass destruction? 

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Even just from a purely practical stand point these programs don't make sense. If you think terrorism is a serious problem why would you want law enforcement wasting its time going after people who don't pose a tangible threat? How is this a good allocation of resources? hartsickdiscipl

Generally they have information that said individuals are a risk. They don't just pull names from a hat.....

 

Yes, lists of "risky" people.  That's worked out well.  :roll:

You understand so little.....
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#56 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Generally they have information that said individuals are a risk. They don't just pull names from a hat.....LJS9502_basic

 

Yes, lists of "risky" people.  That's worked out well.  :roll:

You understand so little.....

 

You're so full of sh!t.  Typical arrogant, delusional. dystopian prole.  

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#57 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

You think that "thinking" about stealing from a store or something is the same as active participating and trying to organize and execute a major act of mass destruction? 

Yusuke420

 

I think you're assuming way too much.  

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]

You think that "thinking" about stealing from a store or something is the same as active participating and trying to organize and execute a major act of mass destruction? 

hartsickdiscipl

 

I think you're assuming way too much.  

Maybe he should read the guilty until proven innocent thread to see what you consider "justice"....
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#59 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] You understand so little.....LJS9502_basic

 

You're so full of sh!t.  Typical arrogant, delusional. dystopian prole.  

Why because I don't buy into your vague conspiracy comments without factual evidence or your rolling eyes to hide said fact?

 

Yes, Fuhrer, put them on "the list."  They are a threat to our regime!

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#60 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Yusuke420"]

You think that "thinking" about stealing from a store or something is the same as active participating and trying to organize and execute a major act of mass destruction? 

LJS9502_basic

 

I think you're assuming way too much.  

Maybe he should read the guilty until proven innocent thread to see what you consider "justice"....

 

I think it should be required reading.  

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

You're so full of sh!t.  Typical arrogant, delusional. dystopian prole.  

hartsickdiscipl

Why because I don't buy into your vague conspiracy comments without factual evidence or your rolling eyes to hide said fact?

 

Yes, Fuhrer, put them on "the list."  They are a threat to our regime!

Like I said....clueless. They are targets because of information regarding their plans. But that doesn't fit your delusional world so you ignore that.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

I think you're assuming way too much.  

hartsickdiscipl

Maybe he should read the guilty until proven innocent thread to see what you consider "justice"....

 

I think it should be required reading.  

So do I...then they will know not to take your seriously.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#63 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Why because I don't buy into your vague conspiracy comments without factual evidence or your rolling eyes to hide said fact?

LJS9502_basic

 

Yes, Fuhrer, put them on "the list."  They are a threat to our regime!

Like I said....clueless. They are targets because of information regarding their plans. But that doesn't fit your delusional world so you ignore that.

 

You're a twisted authoritarian.  

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Yes, Fuhrer, put them on "the list."  They are a threat to our regime!

hartsickdiscipl

Like I said....clueless. They are targets because of information regarding their plans. But that doesn't fit your delusional world so you ignore that.

 

You're a twisted authoritarian.  

No but I'm not wearing a tinfoil hat and thinking innocent people are targeted. Law enforcement tends to get info that the individuals are interested in x. But hey....wear that tin foil proudly.
Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
Dropping in to say hi hart. We haven't talked in a while. Hope you are doing ok
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#66 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Like I said....clueless. They are targets because of information regarding their plans. But that doesn't fit your delusional world so you ignore that.LJS9502_basic

 

You're a twisted authoritarian.  

No but I'm not wearing a tinfoil hat and thinking innocent people are targeted. Law enforcement tends to get info that the individuals are interested in x. But hey....wear that tin foil proudly.

 

Keep talking about that tinfoil hat.  Pretty soon you'll wish you had one of your own.  

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#67 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Dropping in to say hi hart. We haven't talked in a while. Hope you are doing okdave123321

 

Hi Dave, doing great.  Thanks for dropping in.  How have you been?

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

I'm glad I haven't hit the rock bottom of worldviews like TC has

hartsickdiscipl

 

The truth hurts.  

No, people who think like you do is sad to watch

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

You're a twisted authoritarian.  

hartsickdiscipl

No but I'm not wearing a tinfoil hat and thinking innocent people are targeted. Law enforcement tends to get info that the individuals are interested in x. But hey....wear that tin foil proudly.

 

Keep talking about that tinfoil hat.  Pretty soon you'll wish you had one of your own.  

No I'd rather make up my own mind than be spoon fed conspiracy theories like you are....
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
If they're going out of their way to get in contact with these individuals then it's wrong. If the individuals are going out of their way to contact these traps then they were looking to commit anyway and should be charged appropriately. If he's already looking to become involved in a crime there would be no difference if he was in contact with the real deal. Same goes for Pedos.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"]If they're going out of their way to get in contact with these individuals then it's wrong. If the individuals are going out of their way to contact these traps then they were looking to commit anyway and should be charged appropriately. If he's already looking to become involved in a crime there would be no difference if he was in contact with the real deal. Same goes for Pedos.

You are correct....
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#72 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No but I'm not wearing a tinfoil hat and thinking innocent people are targeted. Law enforcement tends to get info that the individuals are interested in x. But hey....wear that tin foil proudly.LJS9502_basic

 

Keep talking about that tinfoil hat.  Pretty soon you'll wish you had one of your own.  

No I'd rather make up my own mind than be spoon fed conspiracy theories like you are....

 

Spoon-fed?  Hardly.  I came to the same conclusions that many others did, completely on my own.  I'm attracted to those people because we are of like mind.  It's because of that like-mindedness that we come to the same conclusions independently.  

You remind me of the kids in math class who used to get pissed off when I or someone else got the right answer first.  They sat there, pounding their pencils into their papers, trying to work the formula.  I took the information and found the solution a different, faster way.  When asked to show my work, I sometimes struggled.  Ultimately the answers were still right.  

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#73 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

If they're going out of their way to get in contact with these individuals then it's wrong. If the individuals are going out of their way to contact these traps then they were looking to commit anyway and should be charged appropriately. If he's already looking to become involved in a crime there would be no difference if he was in contact with the real deal. Same goes for Pedos. Ace6301

 

Nonsense.  Utter nonsense.  All of this "they would have done," and "they could have done," and "the might have done."  It's completely ridiculous.  

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Keep talking about that tinfoil hat.  Pretty soon you'll wish you had one of your own.  

hartsickdiscipl

No I'd rather make up my own mind than be spoon fed conspiracy theories like you are....

 

Spoon-fed?  Hardly.  I came to the same conclusions that many others did, completely on my own.  I'm attracted to those people because we are of like mind.  It's because of that like-mindedness that we come to the same conclusions independently.  

You remind me of the kids in math class who used to get pissed off when I or someone else got the right answer first.  They sat there, pounding their pencils into their papers, trying to work the formula.  I took the information and found the solution a different, faster way.  When asked to show my work, I sometimes struggled.  Ultimately the answers were still right.  

From what I've read here....you seem to not grasp reality so no wonder you think everyone else is pounding their pencils....
Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Dropping in to say hi hart. We haven't talked in a while. Hope you are doing okhartsickdiscipl

 

Hi Dave, doing great.  Thanks for dropping in.  How have you been?

I have doing good. Had a brief idea to take a break from OT after the continued silliness that has been going on. Currently am looking for Airshocker so that I can discuss the latest episode of The Following with him.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#76 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No I'd rather make up my own mind than be spoon fed conspiracy theories like you are....LJS9502_basic

 

Spoon-fed?  Hardly.  I came to the same conclusions that many others did, completely on my own.  I'm attracted to those people because we are of like mind.  It's because of that like-mindedness that we come to the same conclusions independently.  

You remind me of the kids in math class who used to get pissed off when I or someone else got the right answer first.  They sat there, pounding their pencils into their papers, trying to work the formula.  I took the information and found the solution a different, faster way.  When asked to show my work, I sometimes struggled.  Ultimately the answers were still right.  

From what I've read here....you seem to not grasp reality so no wonder you think everyone else is pounding their pencils....

 

 

I seem to be coping with reality pretty well for such a wacko.  

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#77 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Dropping in to say hi hart. We haven't talked in a while. Hope you are doing okdave123321

 

Hi Dave, doing great.  Thanks for dropping in.  How have you been?

I have doing good. Had a brief idea to take a break from OT after the continued silliness that has been going on. Currently am looking for Airshocker so that I can discuss the latest episode of The Following with him.

 

Yes, this place does wear on me too.  Airshocker is around.  I've seen him posting in a couple of threads tonight.  

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Spoon-fed?  Hardly.  I came to the same conclusions that many others did, completely on my own.  I'm attracted to those people because we are of like mind.  It's because of that like-mindedness that we come to the same conclusions independently.  

You remind me of the kids in math class who used to get pissed off when I or someone else got the right answer first.  They sat there, pounding their pencils into their papers, trying to work the formula.  I took the information and found the solution a different, faster way.  When asked to show my work, I sometimes struggled.  Ultimately the answers were still right.  

hartsickdiscipl

From what I've read here....you seem to not grasp reality so no wonder you think everyone else is pounding their pencils....

 

 

I seem to be coping with reality pretty well for such a wacko.  

I don't think that's true....
Avatar image for Yusuke420
Yusuke420

2770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#79 Yusuke420
Member since 2012 • 2770 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]If they're going out of their way to get in contact with these individuals then it's wrong. If the individuals are going out of their way to contact these traps then they were looking to commit anyway and should be charged appropriately. If he's already looking to become involved in a crime there would be no difference if he was in contact with the real deal. Same goes for Pedos. hartsickdiscipl

 

Nonsense.  Utter nonsense.  All of this "they would have done," and "they could have done," and "the might have done."  It's completely ridiculous.  

I just wonder ho much stuff would happen with your "wait and see" approach. Also I love how you advocate for instant execution in the case of drunk drivers, but you have no problem letting off the hook, a guy who shows up without pants and with a six-packs, thinking he's going to be doing some kiddie diddling. 

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#80 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]From what I've read here....you seem to not grasp reality so no wonder you think everyone else is pounding their pencils....LJS9502_basic

 

 

I seem to be coping with reality pretty well for such a wacko.  

I don't think that's true....

 

Why don't you regale me with a story about my failure of a life?  Oh that's right.. You know jack sh!t about my life.  

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]If they're going out of their way to get in contact with these individuals then it's wrong. If the individuals are going out of their way to contact these traps then they were looking to commit anyway and should be charged appropriately. If he's already looking to become involved in a crime there would be no difference if he was in contact with the real deal. Same goes for Pedos. hartsickdiscipl

 

Nonsense.  Utter nonsense.  All of this "they would have done," and "they could have done," and "the might have done."  It's completely ridiculous.  

If there's a forum post that says "Young boy looking for sex with older man" and someone answers that and then attempts to hook up with that supposed boy to the point of going to a location agreed upon do you think that individual is in the wrong? They've clearly intended to have sex with an underage individual. However if the FBI were to mail someone and say "Hey, want to have sex? Come to this location" then yes that's wrong on the FBI's part. One is clearly entrapment and the other is no different than the real deal except the individual is caught.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180215 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

 

I seem to be coping with reality pretty well for such a wacko.  

hartsickdiscipl

I don't think that's true....

 

Why don't you regale me with a story about my failure of a life?  Oh that's right.. You know jack sh!t about my life.  

I know you don't grasp reality....and I get that from YOU.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#83 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]If they're going out of their way to get in contact with these individuals then it's wrong. If the individuals are going out of their way to contact these traps then they were looking to commit anyway and should be charged appropriately. If he's already looking to become involved in a crime there would be no difference if he was in contact with the real deal. Same goes for Pedos. Yusuke420

 

Nonsense.  Utter nonsense.  All of this "they would have done," and "they could have done," and "the might have done."  It's completely ridiculous.  

I just wonder ho much stuff would happen with your "wait and see" approach. Also I love how you advocate for instant execution in the case of drunk drivers, but you have no problem letting off the hook, a guy who shows up without pants and with a six-packs, thinking he's going to be doing some kiddie diddling. 

 

:lol:  LMFAO.. I think I saw that episode.  Such good TV.  

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#84 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]If they're going out of their way to get in contact with these individuals then it's wrong. If the individuals are going out of their way to contact these traps then they were looking to commit anyway and should be charged appropriately. If he's already looking to become involved in a crime there would be no difference if he was in contact with the real deal. Same goes for Pedos. Ace6301

 

Nonsense.  Utter nonsense.  All of this "they would have done," and "they could have done," and "the might have done."  It's completely ridiculous.  

If there's a forum post that says "Young boy looking for sex with older man" and someone answers that and then attempts to hook up with that supposed boy to the point of going to a location agreed upon do you think that individual is in the wrong? They've clearly intended to have sex with an underage individual. However if the FBI were to mail someone and say "Hey, want to have sex? Come to this location" then yes that's wrong on the FBI's part. One is clearly entrapment and the other is no different than the real deal except the individual is caught.

 

You spelled it wrong.  It's "looking for shhhhhhheccccccccccckkkkkkkkksss with older man."  

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Hi Dave, doing great.  Thanks for dropping in.  How have you been?

hartsickdiscipl

I have doing good. Had a brief idea to take a break from OT after the continued silliness that has been going on. Currently am looking for Airshocker so that I can discuss the latest episode of The Following with him.

 

Yes, this place does wear on me too.  Airshocker is around.  I've seen him posting in a couple of threads tonight.  

Yeah. Saw air not too long ago. Hopefully he shows up again soon
Avatar image for solidruss
solidruss

24082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 solidruss
Member since 2002 • 24082 Posts

Notice in the link you posted the part that said OPINION. Debunk, end of story. Bye.