Am I the only one who hates it when average/ below average looking women call...

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yes.

She's curvy and full-figured, not fat.

If she's fat, Beyonce would have to be considered fat as well.

GreySeal9

Ditto.

You really think this is fat?

Eh, not quite. Significantly less so than Kardashian. Could afford to lose a few in select areas.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Have to disagree with you on this one. There's no way that she can be considered fat.

ad1x2

Have you seen her thighs?

While I'm not going to say Kim Kardashian is the hottest woman alive, I will say that she is far from fat. If you can honestly say this is fat-

Then I guess you consider a girl who you can see her ribcage while wearing a bathing suit normal. I'm not going to burn your eyes posting an anorexic or overweight girl.

As for the original question, I could really care less about them. It's just the nature of girls to call each other ugly when they're far from it. It's really no different than somebody saying X football player sucks when in reality that football player can run circles around them in a football game. People will judge people who are better than them in a certain area and will throw out the excuse that person is famous and is opening themselves up to it.

Anorexic girls are ****ing gross. I'd much rather have a filled girl. However, she's chubby. The fact that she is so gorged over is quite perplexing to me given the number of better bodies out there.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yes.

She's curvy and full-figured, not fat.

If she's fat, Beyonce would have to be considered fat as well.

GreySeal9

Ditto.

You really think this is fat?

lil' bit, lil' bit.

(a non-airbrushed/photoshopped photo)

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Ditto.

coolbeans90

You really think this is fat?

Eh, not quite. Significantly less so than Kardashian. Could afford to lose a few in select areas.

Beyonce's curves are part of her appeal for me, so I wouldn't want her to lose a few, but all I'm trying to say is that there's a huge middle ground between skinny and fat. There's no way Beyonce would be constantly praised for her looks if he was even slightly fat (i.e., chubby).

As far as celebrities are concerned, I think that Kelly Osborne (pre-weight lost) is a much better example of what one could consider fat. She was so chubby that even her face was chubby (and still is). Kardashian's face has no chubbiness to it. Like I said, she's just curvy.

I don't know why OT does not like Kim Khardisian. But I would beat it up till next July if I had a chance. That girl and her butt makes me hotter then Hawaii in June.MgamerBD

Does the same thing to me, then I throw up.

Then I feel much better.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Ditto.

F1_2004

You really think this is fat?

lil' bit, lil' bit.

(a non-airbrushed/photoshopped photo)

What is that supposed to prove? She's not fat in that photo.

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]I don't know why OT does not like Kim Khardisian. But I would beat it up till next July if I had a chance. That girl and her butt makes me hotter then Hawaii in June.no_more_fayth

Does the same thing to me, then I throw up.

Then I feel much better.

What is that supposed to prove? She's not fat in that photo.GreySeal9

I don't know why OT does not like Kim Khardisian. But I would beat it up till next July if I had a chance. That girl and her butt makes me hotter then Hawaii in June.MgamerBD

I convince myself that girls I have no chance with are not hot. Makes me feel better.

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]I don't know why OT does not like Kim Khardisian. But I would beat it up till next July if I had a chance. That girl and her butt makes me hotter then Hawaii in June.MgamerBD

Does the same thing to me, then I throw up.

Then I feel much better.

Skinny ones.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]What is that supposed to prove? She's not fat in that photo.F1_2004

She's not even slightly fat in that pic. It's obviously a low quality pic, but her body looks roughly the same as it does in the professional photo. She's curvy, not fat.

Snookie is a good example of a "bit fat" (i.e. chubby).

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

You really think this is fat?

GreySeal9

Eh, not quite. Significantly less so than Kardashian. Could afford to lose a few in select areas.

Beyonce's curves are part of her appeal for me, so I wouldn't want her to lose a few, but all I'm trying to say is that there's a huge middle ground between skinny and fat. There's no way Beyonce would be constantly praised for her looks if he was even slightly fat (i.e., chubby).

As far as celebrities are concerned, I think that Kelly Osborne (pre-weight lost) is a much better example of what one could consider fat. She was so chubby that even her face was chubby (and still is). Kardashian's face has no chubbiness to it. Like I said, she's just curvy.

To each their own, but fat is fat. While it might not be a particularly large amount, that's how "curves" are molded. The fact that people like curvy (i.e. slightly chubby in the right areas) is why they aren't grilled for being fat.

Beyonce has a relatively thin face, but that isn't the only place of the body containing fat, nor is it the part of her body I take issue with. (or in Kardashian for that matter)

[QUOTE="F1_2004"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]What is that supposed to prove? She's not fat in that photo.GreySeal9

She's not even slightly fat in that pic. It's obviously a low quality pic, but her body looks roughly the same as it does in the professional photo. She's curvy, not fat.

Snookie is a good example of a "bit fat" (i.e. chubby).

She was undeniably chubby in that pic.

= much better body. :oops:

no_more_fayth

Her figure is much too boyish IMO.

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

Does the same thing to me, then I throw up.

Then I feel much better.

Skinny ones.

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"] Throw up from excitement right? What type of girl or girls do you find attractive my friend?MgamerBD

Skinny ones.

Not even a little.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"] She is a little bit fat. Fat is not a term reserved for women who have several flabs of skin bulging out of every corner. inb4uloveanorexics.coolbeans90

She's not even slightly fat in that pic. It's obviously a low quality pic, but her body looks roughly the same as it does in the professional photo. She's curvy, not fat.

Snookie is a good example of a "bit fat" (i.e. chubby).

She was undeniably chubby in that pic.

I really don't consider that chubby.

This is chubby (second pic):

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

She's not even slightly fat in that pic. It's obviously a low quality pic, but her body looks roughly the same as it does in the professional photo. She's curvy, not fat.

Snookie is a good example of a "bit fat" (i.e. chubby).

GreySeal9

She was undeniably chubby in that pic.

I really don't consider that chubby.

This is chubby (second pic):

Fat >>> chubby. She was quite remarkably fat, almost whale.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Eh, not quite. Significantly less so than Kardashian. Could afford to lose a few in select areas.

coolbeans90

Beyonce's curves are part of her appeal for me, so I wouldn't want her to lose a few, but all I'm trying to say is that there's a huge middle ground between skinny and fat. There's no way Beyonce would be constantly praised for her looks if he was even slightly fat (i.e., chubby).

As far as celebrities are concerned, I think that Kelly Osborne (pre-weight lost) is a much better example of what one could consider fat. She was so chubby that even her face was chubby (and still is). Kardashian's face has no chubbiness to it. Like I said, she's just curvy.

To each their own, but fat is fat. While it might not be a particularly large amount, that's how "curves" are molded. The fact that people like curvy (i.e. slightly chubby in the right areas) is why they aren't grilled for being fat.

Beyonce has a relatively thin face, but that isn't the only place of the body containing fat, nor is it the part of her body I take issue with. (or in Kardashian for that matter)

Every woman (or man for that matter) has some amount of fat on their bodies. The presence of more fat than skinny women-leading to curves-does not make these women fat overall, especially not when we take into account what is generally thought of as fat.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

She was undeniably chubby in that pic.

coolbeans90

I really don't consider that chubby.

This is chubby (second pic):

Fat >>> chubby. She was quite remarkably fat, almost whale.

That is not remarkably fat. That is very chubby at best.

I hate to subject you to this, but this is remarkably fat:

And that's not even the most remarkably fat woman I could find. It's just that the other ones were spilling out of their clothes in a rather grotesque way and I didn't want to traumatize you. :lol:

Why can't ugly people call other ugly people ugly?

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"] She is a little bit fat. Fat is not a term reserved for women who have several flabs of skin bulging out of every corner. inb4uloveanorexics.coolbeans90

She's not even slightly fat in that pic. It's obviously a low quality pic, but her body looks roughly the same as it does in the professional photo. She's curvy, not fat.

Snookie is a good example of a "bit fat" (i.e. chubby).

She was undeniably chubby in that pic.

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

Skinny ones.

Not even a little.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Beyonce's curves are part of her appeal for me, so I wouldn't want her to lose a few, but all I'm trying to say is that there's a huge middle ground between skinny and fat. There's no way Beyonce would be constantly praised for her looks if he was even slightly fat (i.e., chubby).

As far as celebrities are concerned, I think that Kelly Osborne (pre-weight lost) is a much better example of what one could consider fat. She was so chubby that even her face was chubby (and still is). Kardashian's face has no chubbiness to it. Like I said, she's just curvy.

GreySeal9

To each their own, but fat is fat. While it might not be a particularly large amount, that's how "curves" are molded. The fact that people like curvy (i.e. slightly chubby in the right areas) is why they aren't grilled for being fat.

Beyonce has a relatively thin face, but that isn't the only place of the body containing fat, nor is it the part of her body I take issue with. (or in Kardashian for that matter)

Every woman (or man for that matter) has some amount of fat on their bodies. The presence of more fat than skinny women-leading to curves-does not make these women fat overall, especially not when we take into account what is generally thought of as fat.

Of course people have fat. It's when it looks fat do people find it unattractive. Admittedly the amount of fat, and where it can be had varies. (e.g., some people like "curvy" women)

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"] Hmm...so you don't like curves eh?MgamerBD

Not even a little.

Asian women, white women... that's about it.

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="MgamerBD"] Hmm...so you don't like curves eh?MgamerBD

Not even a little.

Eh, I don't like curves nor am I particularly fond of Asian chicks.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

She's not even slightly fat in that pic. It's obviously a low quality pic, but her body looks roughly the same as it does in the professional photo. She's curvy, not fat.

Snookie is a good example of a "bit fat" (i.e. chubby).

F1_2004

She was undeniably chubby in that pic.

You guys have such a weird scale.

Seriously:

Beyonce/Kardashian (curvy)>>>Kelly Osbourne/Snookie (chubby)>>>Star Jones/Rose O' Donell (fat)

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I really don't consider that chubby.

This is chubby (second pic):

GreySeal9

Fat >>> chubby. She was quite remarkably fat, almost whale.

That is not remarkably fat. That is very chubby at best.

I hate to subject you to this, but this is remarkably fat:

And that's not even the most remarkably fat woman I could find. It's just that the other ones were spilling out of their clothes in a rather grotesque way and I didn't want to traumatize you. :lol:

She's the Loch Ness monster.

[QUOTE="F1_2004"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

She was undeniably chubby in that pic.

GreySeal9

You guys have such a weird scale.

Seriously:

Beyonce/Kardashian (curvy)>>>Kelly Osbourne/Snookie (chubby)>>>Star Jones/Rose O' Donell (fat)

They're all fat.

We have an easier scale.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

To each their own, but fat is fat. While it might not be a particularly large amount, that's how "curves" are molded. The fact that people like curvy (i.e. slightly chubby in the right areas) is why they aren't grilled for being fat.

Beyonce has a relatively thin face, but that isn't the only place of the body containing fat, nor is it the part of her body I take issue with. (or in Kardashian for that matter)

coolbeans90

Every woman (or man for that matter) has some amount of fat on their bodies. The presence of more fat than skinny women-leading to curves-does not make these women fat overall, especially not when we take into account what is generally thought of as fat.

Of course people have fat. It's when it looks fat do people find it unattractive. Admittedly the amount of fat, and where it can be had varies. (e.g., some people like "curvy" women)

The thing is, people would argue that Kardashian/Beyonce don't look fat. It depends on one's scale. With all due respect, I think yours is way too strict.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Fat >>> chubby. She was quite remarkably fat, almost whale.

coolbeans90

That is not remarkably fat. That is very chubby at best.

I hate to subject you to this, but this is remarkably fat:

And that's not even the most remarkably fat woman I could find. It's just that the other ones were spilling out of their clothes in a rather grotesque way and I didn't want to traumatize you. :lol:

She's the Loch Ness monster.

:lol:

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"] no way, Snooki is a humpback whale.no_more_fayth

You guys have such a weird scale.

Seriously:

Beyonce/Kardashian (curvy)>>>Kelly Osbourne/Snookie (chubby)>>>Star Jones/Rose O' Donell (fat)

They're all fat.

We have an easier scale.

Apply that kind of scale to something else and you'll see why it's ridiculous.

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

You guys have such a weird scale.

Seriously:

Beyonce/Kardashian (curvy)>>>Kelly Osbourne/Snookie (chubby)>>>Star Jones/Rose O' Donell (fat)

GreySeal9

They're all fat.

We have an easier scale.

Apply that kind of scale to something else and you'll see why it's ridiculous.

Dark chocolate, white chocolate, and milk chocolate.

They're all chocolate.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Every woman (or man for that matter) has some amount of fat on their bodies. The presence of more fat than skinny women-leading to curves-does not make these women fat overall, especially not when we take into account what is generally thought of as fat.

GreySeal9

Of course people have fat. It's when it looks fat do people find it unattractive. Admittedly the amount of fat, and where it can be had varies. (e.g., some people like "curvy" women)

The thing is, people would argue that Kardashian/Beyonce don't look fat. It depends on one's scale. With all due respect, I think yours is way too strict.

Well, sometimes it's necessary to settle for less than a 10. And I suppose that holding people to a stricter standard than myself is a tad hypocritical. But it doesn't change my visual preferences.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

They're all fat.

We have an easier scale.

no_more_fayth

Apply that kind of scale to something else and you'll see why it's ridiculous.

Dark chocolate, white chocolate, and milk chocolate.

They're all chocolate.

Ridiculous analogy. Honestly, it makes me question whether your serious about the claims you're making.

Those things are all inherently/factually chocolate. There is no way they cease to be chocolate.

On the other hand, my scale are not three levels of fat. If that was true, then every girl that is not extremely thin would be fat. That makes no sense.

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Apply that kind of scale to something else and you'll see why it's ridiculous.

GreySeal9

Dark chocolate, white chocolate, and milk chocolate.

They're all chocolate.

Ridiculous analogy. Honestly, it makes me question whether your serious about the claims you're making.

Those things are all inherently/factually chocolate. There is no way they cease to be chocolate.

On the other hand, my scale are not three levels of fat. If that was true, then every girl that is not extremely thin would be fat. That makes no sense.

You must realize that I'm just busting your balls.

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Apply that kind of scale to something else and you'll see why it's ridiculous.

GreySeal9

Dark chocolate, white chocolate, and milk chocolate.

They're all chocolate.

Ridiculous analogy. Honestly, it makes me question whether your serious about the claims you're making.

Those things are all inherently/factually chocolate. There is no way they cease to be chocolate.

On the other hand, my scale are not three levels of fat. If that was true, then every girl that is not extremely thin would be fat. That makes no sense.

When people use the word "fat," they generally mean "too fat." Or at least I do when i use that term. These vary in magnitude obviously.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Of course people have fat. It's when it looks fat do people find it unattractive. Admittedly the amount of fat, and where it can be had varies. (e.g., some people like "curvy" women)

coolbeans90

The thing is, people would argue that Kardashian/Beyonce don't look fat. It depends on one's scale. With all due respect, I think yours is way too strict.

Well, sometimes it's necessary to settle for less than a 10. And I suppose that holding people to a stricter standard than myself is a tad hypocritical. But it doesn't change my visual preferences.

Well, I'm not talking about preferences as I wouldn't argue about that. What one likes is what one likes.

I'm saying that your scale is strict in that it is very conservative as far as what can be considered not fat or not chubby. It doesn't allow for too much middle ground.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

Dark chocolate, white chocolate, and milk chocolate.

They're all chocolate.

coolbeans90

Ridiculous analogy. Honestly, it makes me question whether your serious about the claims you're making.

Those things are all inherently/factually chocolate. There is no way they cease to be chocolate.

On the other hand, my scale are not three levels of fat. If that was true, then every girl that is not extremely thin would be fat. That makes no sense.

When people use the word "fat," they generally mean "too fat." Or at least I do when i use that term. These vary in magnitude obviously.

Yeah, I guess it does depend on how one is using the word fat. I tend to think of things in terms of levels. To me, you have to reach a certain level before being called fat.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

Dark chocolate, white chocolate, and milk chocolate.

They're all chocolate.

no_more_fayth

Ridiculous analogy. Honestly, it makes me question whether your serious about the claims you're making.

Those things are all inherently/factually chocolate. There is no way they cease to be chocolate.

On the other hand, my scale are not three levels of fat. If that was true, then every girl that is not extremely thin would be fat. That makes no sense.

You must realize that I'm just busting your balls.

I suspected it, but I've seen people be way more hyperbolic and they were actually serious, so I can't be too hard on myself.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

The thing is, people would argue that Kardashian/Beyonce don't look fat. It depends on one's scale. With all due respect, I think yours is way too strict.

GreySeal9

Well, sometimes it's necessary to settle for less than a 10. And I suppose that holding people to a stricter standard than myself is a tad hypocritical. But it doesn't change my visual preferences.

Well, I'm not talking about preferences as I wouldn't argue about that. What one likes is what one likes.

I'm saying that your scale is strict in that it is very conservative as far as what can be considered not fat or not chubby. It doesn't allow for too much middle ground.

If I were to define my parameters of fatness according to the images displayed in this thread, I'd say that Beyonce (the good pic) is the middle ground, and Kardashian is on the visually unappealing side of things. (chubby, perhaps fat is slightly too harsh, but it's a tough call)

This thread has made me inadvertently rediscover that Evangeline Lily is the epitome of humanity.

I would say not fat. (admittedly this pic isn't the best example to prove this, but had to be posted)

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Well, sometimes it's necessary to settle for less than a 10. And I suppose that holding people to a stricter standard than myself is a tad hypocritical. But it doesn't change my visual preferences.

coolbeans90

Well, I'm not talking about preferences as I wouldn't argue about that. What one likes is what one likes.

I'm saying that your scale is strict in that it is very conservative as far as what can be considered not fat or not chubby. It doesn't allow for too much middle ground.

If I were to define my parameters of fatness according to the images displayed in this thread, I'd say that Beyonce (the good pic) is the middle ground, and Kardashian is on the visually unappealing side of things. (chubby, perhaps fat is slightly too harsh, but it's a tough call)

I think it depends on the pic. There are a few where you can see a bit of cellulite and other times her (Kardashian) figure looks tighter.

That being said, I don't get all the hype about Kardashian's looks. She's cute, but definitely not one of the hottest out there.

This thread has made me inadvertently rediscover that Evangeline Lily is the epitome of humanity.

I would say not fat. (admittedly this pic isn't the best example to prove this, but had to be posted)

coolbeans90

On my scale, she's barely curvy (from the picture).

Pretty hot girl though. I like the natural look.

And there's something about her that reminds of Katherine Zeta Jones, who is ridiculously hot IMO.

Am I the only one who hates it when average/ below average looking women call celebrities like Megan fox, kim kardashian and all them others ugly? bcroger2

It depends if you like the look of Kim Kardashian and Megan Fox. I myself do like the look of them especially Kim Kardashian yet it doesn't really annoy me because if they are ugly then the person calling them ugly must be fugly if not worse .

Am I the only one who hates it when average/ below average looking women call celebrities like Megan fox, kim kardashian and all them others ugly? bcroger2

I don't see how they look should have any baring on how they think others look.

Yea, you probably are.