America is the biggest terrorist country.

  • 51 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#1 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

Osama bin ladin kills a few thousand people, gets labeled as the biggest terrorist.

Bush invades iraq for no reason, kills millions in the process and yet he is not terrorist?

Just because america is in power it doesnt have to justify itself. I wasnt of this thought before but the mess that america has made of iraq is really multitudes worse than what happened on 9/11.

It's all sinking in it's always been like this in history. If germany wins WW2 we would remember the allies as the evil party.

You guys talk about ethics and all and yet forget about them when it comes to punishing your former president. And america also tortures terrorist suspects even though it is supposed to be wrong and immoral but not when it comes to muslim suspects cuz its in the better interest of the nation. How bloody convenient!!

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
Neither president directly hurt anyone, president can't declare war.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#3 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

Osama bin ladin kills a few thousand people, gets labeled as the biggest terrorist.

Bush invades iraq for no reason, kills millions in the process and yet he is not terrorist?

Just because america is in power it doesnt have to justify itself. I wasnt of this thought before but the mess that america has made of iraq is really multitudes worse than what happened on 9/11.

It's all sinking in it's always been like this in history. If germany wins WW2 we would remember the allies as the evil party.

You guys talk about ethics and all and yet forget about them when it comes to punishing your former president. And america also tortures terrorist suspects even though it is supposed to be wrong and immoral but not when it comes to muslim suspects cuz its in the better interest of the nation. How bloody convenient!!

Gambler_3

You make it sound like America was the only country to send troops into Iraq (and we did so for a reason, because we thought Iraq was developing/re-developing weapons of mass destruction). Many nations sent forces into Iraq.

Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts
Neither president directly hurt anyone, president can't declare war.Fightingfan
But they have effectively engaged in military operations that have hurt and killed millions since the first one to do it, ole Harry Truman. But there was also Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama.
Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Neither president directly hurt anyone, president can't declare war.Franklinstein
But they have effectively engaged in military operations that have hurt and killed millions since the first one to do it, ole Harry Truman. But there was also Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama.

What flag doesn't have blood on it?
Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#6 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts
I thought we already knew this. :P
Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Neither president directly hurt anyone, president can't declare war.Fightingfan
But they have effectively engaged in military operations that have hurt and killed millions since the first one to do it, ole Harry Truman. But there was also Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama.

What flag doesn't have blood on it?

The point (that I thought you were making) was that the President doesn't have the power to do that. If that blood would have been on the hands of Congress which is made up of elected representatives from every State, then it wouldn't be as bad to me, because I guess that means the people want it. However, when it is done by the President, I'm not so for it. There is a man, who should not have the power to declare war (or unprovoked military operations, including 'pre-emptive' wars).

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

Fine, then please return the hundreds of billion in aid the world gets each year, then please stop using all our terrorist medical inventions that help save even more lives. Let's stay consistent here.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#9 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

Neither president directly hurt anyone, president can't declare war.Fightingfan
Then imprison everyone involved. If I "accidentally" murder someone I am still liable for punishment!!!

If they punish the people in authority today then it will send a msg for future establishments that how much of a serious thing going to war is and you better be able to justify yourself about it.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#10 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="Franklinstein"] But they have effectively engaged in military operations that have hurt and killed millions since the first one to do it, ole Harry Truman. But there was also Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama.Franklinstein
What flag doesn't have blood on it?

The point (that I thought you were making) was that the President doesn't have the power to do that. If that blood would have been on the hands of Congress which is elected by representatives of every State, then it wouldn't be as bad to me, because I guess that means the people want it. However, when it is done by the President, I'm not so for it. There is a man, who should not have the power to declare war (or unprovoked military operations, including 'pre-emptive' wars).

Actually I think a lot of those wars were authorized by congress. For example Congress passed resolutions authorizing President Bush to use military force against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Osama bin ladin kills a few thousand people, gets labeled as the biggest terrorist.

Bush invades iraq for no reason, kills millions in the process and yet he is not terrorist?

Just because america is in power it doesnt have to justify itself. I wasnt of this thought before but the mess that america has made of iraq is really multitudes worse than what happened on 9/11.

It's all sinking in it's always been like this in history. If germany wins WW2 we would remember the allies as the evil party.

You guys talk about ethics and all and yet forget about them when it comes to punishing your former president. And america also tortures terrorist suspects even though it is supposed to be wrong and immoral but not when it comes to muslim suspects cuz its in the better interest of the nation. How bloody convenient!!

Gambler_3

Enjoy your bombs.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#12 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

Fine, then please return the hundreds of billion in aid the world gets each year, then please stop using all our terrorist medicals inventions that help save even more lives. Let's stay consistent here. HoolaHoopMan
Huh? Your corporations wont be half of what they are without the world using their products. You know these products arent for free!! And the aids are to allow America to continue to wreck havoc without intervention from some major player.

Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"] What flag doesn't have blood on it?whipassmt

The point (that I thought you were making) was that the President doesn't have the power to do that. If that blood would have been on the hands of Congress which is elected by representatives of every State, then it wouldn't be as bad to me, because I guess that means the people want it. However, when it is done by the President, I'm not so for it. There is a man, who should not have the power to declare war (or unprovoked military operations, including 'pre-emptive' wars).

Actually I think a lot of those wars were authorized by congress. For example Congress passed resolutions authorizing President Bush to use military force against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

Bush had other non-approved military operations. Like... Liberia...?
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#14 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Neither president directly hurt anyone, president can't declare war.Gambler_3

Then imprison everyone involved. If I "accidentally" murder someone I am still liable for punishment!!!

If they punish the people in authority today then it will send a msg for future establishments that how much of a serious thing going to war is and you better be able to justify yourself about it.

Are you suggesting that we imprison the leaders and government officials of the roughly 30 countries that sent forces into Iraq?

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"] What flag doesn't have blood on it?whipassmt

The point (that I thought you were making) was that the President doesn't have the power to do that. If that blood would have been on the hands of Congress which is elected by representatives of every State, then it wouldn't be as bad to me, because I guess that means the people want it. However, when it is done by the President, I'm not so for it. There is a man, who should not have the power to declare war (or unprovoked military operations, including 'pre-emptive' wars).

Actually I think a lot of those wars were authorized by congress. For example Congress passed resolutions authorizing President Bush to use military force against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

You would think right. It amazes me how many Bush haters completely forget that Congress voted to authorize military force in Iraq and act like he alone sent troops there. He may have pushed for the invasion but it wouldn't have happened if Congress refused.

As for the TC, most of those people killed in Iraq were killed by insurgents. Either they were killed by accident while they were aiming for US troops (family of eight in a minivan getting blown up by a pressure plate IED meant for a passing US truck, for example) or they were purposefully killed for not helping insurgents. US troops who killed civilians either did it by accident or if they purposefully killed a civilian and was caught they was court-martialed.
Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"] The point (that I thought you were making) was that the President doesn't have the power to do that. If that blood would have been on the hands of Congress which is elected by representatives of every State, then it wouldn't be as bad to me, because I guess that means the people want it. However, when it is done by the President, I'm not so for it. There is a man, who should not have the power to declare war (or unprovoked military operations, including 'pre-emptive' wars).ad1x2

Actually I think a lot of those wars were authorized by congress. For example Congress passed resolutions authorizing President Bush to use military force against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

You would think right. It amazes me how many Bush haters completely forget that Congress voted to authorize military force in Iraq and act like he alone sent troops there. He may have pushed for the invasion but it wouldn't have happened if Congress refused.

As for the TC, most of those people killed in Iraq were killed by insurgents. Either they were killed by accident while they were aiming for US troops (family of eight in a minivan getting blown up by a pressure plate IED meant for a passing US truck, for example) or they were purposefully killed for not helping insurgents. US troops who killed civilians either did it by accident or if they purposefully killed a civilian and was caught they was court-martialed.

Bush still sent military troops to Liberia in 2003 and Haiti in 2004, without Congressional approval. Could he have gotten approval? Who knows, but he didn't.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#17 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"] The point (that I thought you were making) was that the President doesn't have the power to do that. If that blood would have been on the hands of Congress which is elected by representatives of every State, then it wouldn't be as bad to me, because I guess that means the people want it. However, when it is done by the President, I'm not so for it. There is a man, who should not have the power to declare war (or unprovoked military operations, including 'pre-emptive' wars).Franklinstein

Actually I think a lot of those wars were authorized by congress. For example Congress passed resolutions authorizing President Bush to use military force against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

Bush had other non-approved military operations. Like... Liberia...?

It seems that the troops were pretty much there as peace-keepers and to leverage U.S. diplomacy. It doesn't seem like a big deal, in fact I haven't heard of it until you mentioned it.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#18 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="ad1x2"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Actually I think a lot of those wars were authorized by congress. For example Congress passed resolutions authorizing President Bush to use military force against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

Franklinstein

You would think right. It amazes me how many Bush haters completely forget that Congress voted to authorize military force in Iraq and act like he alone sent troops there. He may have pushed for the invasion but it wouldn't have happened if Congress refused.

As for the TC, most of those people killed in Iraq were killed by insurgents. Either they were killed by accident while they were aiming for US troops (family of eight in a minivan getting blown up by a pressure plate IED meant for a passing US truck, for example) or they were purposefully killed for not helping insurgents. US troops who killed civilians either did it by accident or if they purposefully killed a civilian and was caught they was court-martialed.

Bush still sent military troops to Liberia in 2003 and Haiti in 2004, without Congressional approval. Could he have gotten approval? Who knows, but he didn't.

The troops in Liberia and Haiti were probably in a peace-keeping role, they weren't part of a big military offensive.

Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#19 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Actually I think a lot of those wars were authorized by congress. For example Congress passed resolutions authorizing President Bush to use military force against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

whipassmt

Bush had other non-approved military operations. Like... Liberia...?

It seems that the troops were pretty much there as peace-keepers and to leverage U.S. diplomacy. It doesn't seem like a big deal, in fact I haven't heard of it until you mentioned it.

That's not the point. You may agree with it, but America (through Congress) might not.
Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="ad1x2"] You would think right. It amazes me how many Bush haters completely forget that Congress voted to authorize military force in Iraq and act like he alone sent troops there. He may have pushed for the invasion but it wouldn't have happened if Congress refused.

As for the TC, most of those people killed in Iraq were killed by insurgents. Either they were killed by accident while they were aiming for US troops (family of eight in a minivan getting blown up by a pressure plate IED meant for a passing US truck, for example) or they were purposefully killed for not helping insurgents. US troops who killed civilians either did it by accident or if they purposefully killed a civilian and was caught they was court-martialed.whipassmt

Bush still sent military troops to Liberia in 2003 and Haiti in 2004, without Congressional approval. Could he have gotten approval? Who knows, but he didn't.

President's deploy limited forces often. The troops in Liberia and Haiti were probably in a peace-keeping role, they weren't part of a big military offensive.

Actually, Liberia was experiencing a Civil War, and in Haiti, it was just a Coup d'etat
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I thought you liked terrorists.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts
Fine, then please return the hundreds of billion in aid the world gets each year, then please stop using all our terrorist medicals inventions that help save even more lives. Let's stay consistent here. HoolaHoopMan
I agree with Hoola. Wonders never cease.....but well said. Anyway....TC you're misapplying the label.
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"]Fine, then please return the hundreds of billion in aid the world gets each year, then please stop using all our terrorist medicals inventions that help save even more lives. Let's stay consistent here. Gambler_3

Huh? Your corporations wont be half of what they are without the world using their products. You know these products arent for free!! And the aids are to allow America to continue to wreck havoc without intervention from some major player.

And half of Asian wouldn't be able to eat with out the help of an American named Norman Borlaug.

The world seems to be buying them because they give them utility. Again, you can pay us your thanks later.

Avatar image for Wilfred_Owen
Wilfred_Owen

20964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#24 Wilfred_Owen
Member since 2005 • 20964 Posts
Its been tallied at a billion now.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#25 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"] Bush had other non-approved military operations. Like... Liberia...?Franklinstein

It seems that the troops were pretty much there as peace-keepers and to leverage U.S. diplomacy. It doesn't seem like a big deal, in fact I haven't heard of it until you mentioned it.

That's not the point. You may agree with it, but America (through Congress) might not.

If Congress disapproved they could've forced Bush to withdraw these troops when they passed the next Defense authorization or Defense appropriations bill. I am not aware of Congress making any such attempts to do so.

Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] It seems that the troops were pretty much there as peace-keepers and to leverage U.S. diplomacy. It doesn't seem like a big deal, in fact I haven't heard of it until you mentioned it.

whipassmt

That's not the point. You may agree with it, but America (through Congress) might not.

If Congress disapproved they could've forced Bush to withdraw these troops when they passed the next Defense authorization or Defense appropriations bill. I am not aware of Congress making any such attempts to do so.

By then the military operations were over with; you really should just accept that I'm correct, I didn't make up those things, they really happened without Congressional approval, as is required by the U.S. Constitution. I'm not hating on Bush Jr. though, because every President (including Obama) since Carter has done it. It just needs to stop happening. The President should not have the power to engage in military operations without Congressional approval.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Its been tallied at a billion now.Wilfred_Owen
Stop covering up the truth. There's been at least a trillion deaths as a result of direct or indirect US action in Iraq. But honestly, the US aren't terrorists. They're just freedom fighters.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Osama bin ladin kills a few thousand people, gets labeled as the biggest terrorist.

Bush invades iraq for no reason, kills millions in the process and yet he is not terrorist?

Just because america is in power it doesnt have to justify itself. I wasnt of this thought before but the mess that america has made of iraq is really multitudes worse than what happened on 9/11.

It's all sinking in it's always been like this in history. If germany wins WW2 we would remember the allies as the evil party.

You guys talk about ethics and all and yet forget about them when it comes to punishing your former president. And america also tortures terrorist suspects even though it is supposed to be wrong and immoral but not when it comes to muslim suspects cuz its in the better interest of the nation. How bloody convenient!!

Gambler_3

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#29 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]Neither president directly hurt anyone, president can't declare war.whipassmt

Then imprison everyone involved. If I "accidentally" murder someone I am still liable for punishment!!!

If they punish the people in authority today then it will send a msg for future establishments that how much of a serious thing going to war is and you better be able to justify yourself about it.

Are you suggesting that we imprison the leaders and government officials of the roughly 30 countries that sent forces into Iraq?

All other countries are just puppets of america. Whats important is to punish the american authorities. And yes a full investigation should be conducted and each and everyone who had been careless about their position should be punished from whichever country.

Its a delusion to think we live in some sort of democratic world, it's still all about power with the likes of america and britian bullying the smaller nations.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#30 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"]Fine, then please return the hundreds of billion in aid the world gets each year, then please stop using all our terrorist medicals inventions that help save even more lives. Let's stay consistent here. HoolaHoopMan

Huh? Your corporations wont be half of what they are without the world using their products. You know these products arent for free!! And the aids are to allow America to continue to wreck havoc without intervention from some major player.

And half of Asian wouldn't be able to eat with out the help of an American named Norman Borlaug.

The world seems to be buying them because they give them utility. Again, you can pay us your thanks later.

I dont need anyone to feed me. And who are to talk about? You are using electronic items made in asia.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#31 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"] That's not the point. You may agree with it, but America (through Congress) might not.Franklinstein

If Congress disapproved they could've forced Bush to withdraw these troops when they passed the next Defense authorization or Defense appropriations bill. I am not aware of Congress making any such attempts to do so.

By then the military operations were over with; you really should just accept that I'm correct, I didn't make up those things, they really happened without Congressional approval, as is required by the U.S. Constitution. I'm not hating on Bush Jr. though, because every President (including Obama) since Carter has done it. It just needs to stop happening. The President should not have the power to engage in military operations without Congressional approval.

The War Powers Resolution gives the President the ability to order military operations without congressional approval, for a sufficient reason, for a 90 day period (60 days of deployment and then 30 days withdraw), so long as he gives inform Congress within 48 hours of the deployment .

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]Then imprison everyone involved. If I "accidentally" murder someone I am still liable for punishment!!!

If they punish the people in authority today then it will send a msg for future establishments that how much of a serious thing going to war is and you better be able to justify yourself about it.

Gambler_3

Are you suggesting that we imprison the leaders and government officials of the roughly 30 countries that sent forces into Iraq?

All other countries are just puppets of america. Whats important is to punish the american authorities. And yes a full investigation should be conducted and each and everyone who had been careless about their position should be punished from whichever country.

Its a delusion to think we live in some sort of democratic world, it's still all about power with the likes of america and britian bullying the smaller nations.

I agree. For the last 2000 years, the malicious actions of any country have been the direct result of american influence. These countries do not actually have their own governments, but rather, they have puppet governments installed by the US. Europe is not independent. It is a US colony. Though the US only came into existence in 1776, through time travel aided by Einsteinian physics their actions have extended back thousands of years. Mount Vesuvius erupting? America. Black Plague? America. Loss of the spanish armada? America. The Mongols? America. The Huns? America.
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"]

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]Huh? Your corporations wont be half of what they are without the world using their products. You know these products arent for free!! And the aids are to allow America to continue to wreck havoc without intervention from some major player.

Gambler_3

And half of Asian wouldn't be able to eat with out the help of an American named Norman Borlaug.

The world seems to be buying them because they give them utility. Again, you can pay us your thanks later.

I dont need anyone to feed me. And who are to talk about? You are using electronic items made in asia.

I'm asking you to be consistent, obviously futile. If the west or US is such a crappy presence in the world quit using everything we've produced. You're a fvcking hypocrite. Please by all means log off the internet, the US created that. K THANK BAI.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#34 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

Its been tallied at a billion now.Wilfred_Owen
what's been tallied at a billion?

Avatar image for mingmao3046
mingmao3046

2683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 mingmao3046
Member since 2011 • 2683 Posts
 .
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#36 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="Wilfred_Owen"]Its been tallied at a billion now.sonicare
Stop covering up the truth. There's been at least a trillion deaths as a result of direct or indirect US action in Iraq. But honestly, the US aren't terrorists. They're just freedom fighters.

Are you being sarcastic? There's not even a trillion people on Earth, so how could the Iraq war have killed a trillion people?

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#37 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"] Are you suggesting that we imprison the leaders and government officials of the roughly 30 countries that sent forces into Iraq?

sonicare

All other countries are just puppets of america. Whats important is to punish the american authorities. And yes a full investigation should be conducted and each and everyone who had been careless about their position should be punished from whichever country.

Its a delusion to think we live in some sort of democratic world, it's still all about power with the likes of america and britian bullying the smaller nations.

I agree. For the last 2000 years, the malicious actions of any country have been the direct result of american influence. These countries do not actually have their own governments, but rather, they have puppet governments installed by the US. Europe is not independent. It is a US colony. Though the US only came into existence in 1776, through time travel aided by Einsteinian physics their actions have extended back thousands of years. Mount Vesuvius erupting? America. Black Plague? America. Loss of the spanish armada? America. The Mongols? America. The Huns? America.

Ya right you are gonna try to make yourself sound more bright by implying things I never said. Go on thats the best you can do!!!

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="Wilfred_Owen"]Its been tallied at a billion now.whipassmt

Stop covering up the truth. There's been at least a trillion deaths as a result of direct or indirect US action in Iraq. But honestly, the US aren't terrorists. They're just freedom fighters.

Are you being sarcastic? There's not even a trillion people on Earth, so how could the Iraq war have killed a trillion people?

He's making fun of the TC pretty much saying all of the problems of the universe are the fault of America and especially George Bush. Surprised people aren't saying Bush blew up Krypton yet....
Avatar image for Wilfred_Owen
Wilfred_Owen

20964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#39 Wilfred_Owen
Member since 2005 • 20964 Posts
Surprised people aren't saying Bush blew up Krypton yet....ad1x2
Sometimes the obvious shouldn't be stated.
Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#40 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"] And half of Asian wouldn't be able to eat with out the help of an American named Norman Borlaug.

The world seems to be buying them because they give them utility. Again, you can pay us your thanks later.

HoolaHoopMan

I dont need anyone to feed me. And who are to talk about? You are using electronic items made in asia.

I'm asking you to be consistent, obviously futile. If the west or US is such a crappy presence in the world quit using everything we've produced. You're a fvcking hypocrite. Please by all means log off the internet, the US created that. K THANK BAI.

I dont hold my own country in high regard so it's kinda difficult for me to follow that line.....

Avatar image for GIJames248
GIJames248

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 GIJames248
Member since 2006 • 2176 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]Then imprison everyone involved. If I "accidentally" murder someone I am still liable for punishment!!!

If they punish the people in authority today then it will send a msg for future establishments that how much of a serious thing going to war is and you better be able to justify yourself about it.

Gambler_3

Are you suggesting that we imprison the leaders and government officials of the roughly 30 countries that sent forces into Iraq?

All other countries are just puppets of america. Whats important is to punish the american authorities. And yes a full investigation should be conducted and each and everyone who had been careless about their position should be punished from whichever country.

Its a delusion to think we live in some sort of democratic world, it's still all about power with the likes of america and britian bullying the smaller nations.

You abject insanity is hilarious.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="Gambler_3"]I dont need anyone to feed me. And who are to talk about? You are using electronic items made in asia.

Gambler_3

I'm asking you to be consistent, obviously futile. If the west or US is such a crappy presence in the world quit using everything we've produced. You're a fvcking hypocrite. Please by all means log off the internet, the US created that. K THANK BAI.

I dont hold my own country in high regard so it's kinda difficult for me to follow that line.....

Irrelevant. Get off the terrorist created World Wide Web.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 was enacted on October 16th, 2002. It basically gave Bush the right to use the military against Iraq.
Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#44 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"] I'm asking you to be consistent, obviously futile. If the west or US is such a crappy presence in the world quit using everything we've produced. You're a fvcking hypocrite. Please by all means log off the internet, the US created that. K THANK BAI. HoolaHoopMan

I dont hold my own country in high regard so it's kinda difficult for me to follow that line.....

Irrelevant. Get off the terrorist created World Wide Web.

Bad people in power does not make the whole nation bad people.You are missing the point you guys act all civilized and ethical and yet ignore what your government does. Atleast I can admit my countries government is full of **** up people with no morals.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="Gambler_3"]I dont hold my own country in high regard so it's kinda difficult for me to follow that line.....

Gambler_3

Irrelevant. Get off the terrorist created World Wide Web.

If all of america can admit to it then I will. You are missing the point you guys act all civilized and ethical and yet ignore what your government.

Bad people in power does not make the whole nation bad people.

Plenty of our population disagrees vehemently about our foreign policy, myself included. But if you're saying we need to admit we're the world's worst terrorists like you said in the OP, well you're just a fvcking moron.
Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#46 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"] Irrelevant. Get off the terrorist created World Wide Web. HoolaHoopMan

If all of america can admit to it then I will. You are missing the point you guys act all civilized and ethical and yet ignore what your government.

Bad people in power does not make the whole nation bad people.

Plenty of our population disagrees vehemently about our foreign policy, myself included. But if you're saying we need to admit we're the world's worst terrorists like you said in the OP, well you're just a fvcking moron.

No what I meant was that if all of america admits to being in support of the goverment's policies then that would make the whole nation bad.

Avatar image for Seraphy-
Seraphy-

1562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Seraphy-
Member since 2011 • 1562 Posts
Assh*les =/= Terrorists Jesus, people.
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="Gambler_3"]If all of america can admit to it then I will. You are missing the point you guys act all civilized and ethical and yet ignore what your government.

Bad people in power does not make the whole nation bad people.

Gambler_3

Plenty of our population disagrees vehemently about our foreign policy, myself included. But if you're saying we need to admit we're the world's worst terrorists like you said in the OP, well you're just a fvcking moron.

No what I meant was that if all of america admits to being in support of the goverment's policies then that would make the whole nation bad.

Not all Americans are in support of its government's policies.
Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]Then imprison everyone involved. If I "accidentally" murder someone I am still liable for punishment!!!

If they punish the people in authority today then it will send a msg for future establishments that how much of a serious thing going to war is and you better be able to justify yourself about it.

Gambler_3

Are you suggesting that we imprison the leaders and government officials of the roughly 30 countries that sent forces into Iraq?

All other countries are just puppets of america. Whats important is to punish the american authorities. And yes a full investigation should be conducted and each and everyone who had been careless about their position should be punished from whichever country.

Its a delusion to think we live in some sort of democratic world, it's still all about power with the likes of america and britian bullying the smaller nations.

No one ever said the world was a democracy.

Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
 .