American VI

I was wondering if anyone knew anything about Johnny Cash's upcoming American VI. Wikipedia has the track listing but nothing else. Does anyone know the release date or even the rest of the title (IV was the man comes around, III was solitary man,, etc).

i dont understand your sig. No one is being pwnt. There is pwnage to come (maybe), but as of the moment of the picture shoot, no pwnage.BiancaDK

The tank is pointing its gun at the man, who's throwing stuff at it.

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]i dont understand your sig. No one is being pwnt. There is pwnage to come (maybe), but as of the moment of the picture shoot, no pwnage.-_Rain_-

The tank is pointing its gun at the man, who's throwing stuff at it.

But thats not pwnt? If there was a smoldering crater and two smoking shoes, that would be pwnt?

[QUOTE="-_Rain_-"]

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]i dont understand your sig. No one is being pwnt. There is pwnage to come (maybe), but as of the moment of the picture shoot, no pwnage.BiancaDK

The tank is pointing its gun at the man, who's throwing stuff at it.

But thats not pwnt? If there was a smoldering crater and two smoking shoes, that would be pwnt?

I think the "pwnt" comes in the difference in artillery. The man has a brick, the tank has a cannon.

I think the "pwnt" comes in the difference in artillery. The man has a brick, the tank has a cannon.-_Rain_-

pwnt is something that has happened, pwnage is something that is happening.

"oh he got pwnt" "he is pwning" "i am pwnage"

You cant say "i am pwnt" or "he is pwnting". Its completely out of whack?

The correct term would be "pwnage/pwning" in that signature, not "pwnt", since no one has yet to be pwnt in it, only about to be pwned.

it is the forshadow of pwnage to come, as in seconds the person will be obliterated. Pwnage exists in the abstract here, as a looming thought that will soon become a reality in a matter of moments. Pwnage exists when the other person realizes that they will get pwnt, thus they must be alive to realize the amterial manifestation of pwnage, so the picture does in fact contain pwnage.priestinacloset

I wasn't aware that "pwnt"

1. Is a word

2. Has a past, present and future tense, like real words.

But the man has been pwnt. The firing of the cannon is an unnecessary formality. If the tank simply chooses to drive by, then the boy has still been pwnt because his efforts have gone to waste and his petty display of civil disobedience is futile. priestinacloset

I wasn't aware that "pwnt"

1. Is a word

2. Has a past, present and future tense, like real words.

-_Rain_-

[QUOTE="priestinacloset"]But the man has been pwnt. The firing of the cannon is an unnecessary formality. If the tank simply chooses to drive by, then the boy has still been pwnt because his efforts have gone to waste and his petty display of civil disobedience is futile. BiancaDK

He has been PWNT because that rock in his hand will not do anything to that tank. It is not even worth the cost of firing the tank to kill that boy because that kid is so worthless. That is the essence of the picture, that child is so worthless, it is not even worth the cost to end his waste of an existence. Thus he has been pwnt. Just because the child is unlikely to have perceived the ramifications of this event, does not mean that the pwnage is yet to occur. That boy lives in a dump of a country and thinks it is a good idea to throw a rock at a tank. The boy had been pwned his entire life up to that picture.priestinacloset

I dont think that's a "story" I think it is a logical conclusion based on the picture. And I am not the one who chose to argue petty semantics.priestinacloset

Booo, way to make this thread unfun.

Girls!

[QUOTE="DeathHeart95"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] Your avatar. I dont get it.BiancaDK

Or was I?:shock:

Wow, was there seriously just a flame war over someone's signature? EPPPPPIIIIICCCCC FAAAAAIIIILLLLL!!!! Let the flaming over this post BEGIN!DeathHeart95

There was a flame war? I must have missed it.

[QUOTE="DeathHeart95"]Wow, was there seriously just a flame war over someone's signature? EPPPPPIIIIICCCCC FAAAAAIIIILLLLL!!!! Let the flaming over this post BEGIN!-_Rain_-

There was a flame war? I must have missed it.

[QUOTE="-_Rain_-"]

[QUOTE="DeathHeart95"]Wow, was there seriously just a flame war over someone's signature? EPPPPPIIIIICCCCC FAAAAAIIIILLLLL!!!! Let the flaming over this post BEGIN!BiancaDK

There was a flame war? I must have missed it.

So I'm glad there isn't a single relavent post in this thread. :P