Anthropogenic global warming? Fact or fiction?

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Do you agree with the science that man-induced global warming via an increase in greenhouse gases is true? Why or why not? I myself know it to be true as it is based off of one of the most fundamental aspects of climate science, that being the greenhouse effect. What are your opinions?

What would it take you to change your mind?

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Same thing happened on Venus. Was a beautiful planet until their people started driving SUVs. Now it's a greenhouse gas wasteland.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Same thing happened on Venus. Was a beautiful planet until their people started driving SUVs. Now it's a greenhouse gas wasteland.

sonicare

so then you're stating an increase in CO2 is natural and has been natural in the past therefor global warming is false? That's like saying forest fires have happened naturally in the past therefor man can not create a forest fire. Odd logic.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Same thing happened on Venus. Was a beautiful planet until their people started driving SUVs. Now it's a greenhouse gas wasteland.

so then you're stating an increase in CO2 is natural and has been natural in the past therefor global warming is false? That's like saying forest fires have happened naturally in the past therefor man can not create a forest fire. Odd logic.

I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.sonicare
I see. Oddly many people argue exactly what you said and do it seriously.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

Fact: CO2 and other greenhouse gasses trap sunlight.

Fact: Greenhouse gas emissions have increased enourmously since the industrial revolution.

People can nitpick and argue over small issues they have with other parts of global warming science, but in the end it all comes back t those two facts that they can't get around.

Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

Haven't researched enough to have an informed opinion.

And I don't care to because climate science is absurdly boring to me.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.BumFluff122

I see. Oddly many people argue exactly what you said and do it seriously.

Isn't it methane that is the biggest culprit in greenhouse warming and not exhaust from cars? I'm sure CO2 emissions play a role, but I think it is other gasses that may be even worse. However, I am by no means an expert in this area. But unlike many people, I do believe in evolution, global warming, and that the earth is a sphere and not flat. Take that Sarah Palin!
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
The data supports mad made global warming. I'll trust people who dedicate their entire lives to studying Earth's climate over some d bag lobbyist trying to discredit an undeniable fact.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Same thing happened on Venus. Was a beautiful planet until their people started driving SUVs. Now it's a greenhouse gas wasteland.

sonicare

so then you're stating an increase in CO2 is natural and has been natural in the past therefor global warming is false? That's like saying forest fires have happened naturally in the past therefor man can not create a forest fire. Odd logic.

I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.

Some people actually state what you said but actually mean it. I've seen people state "Venus has a greenhouse effect and there aren't SUVs on Venus" or "Mars' icecaps are melting and there aren't SUVs on Mars" or "Climate change has happened in the past therefor the current warming is natural". It's actually quite humourous and some people actually agree with them despite only a few bodies in the solar system warming while some are actually cooling due to known natural cycles or other causes.

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.sonicare

I see. Oddly many people argue exactly what you said and do it seriously.

Isn't it methane that is the biggest culprit in greenhouse warming and not exhaust from cars? I'm sure CO2 emissions play a role, but I think it is other gasses that may be even worse. However, I am by no means an expert in this area. But unlike many people, I do believe in evolution, global warming, and that the earth is a sphere and not flat. Take that Sarah Palin!

methane is the most efficient. The one that does the most damage altogether is water vapour. as for me, I'm still little undecided (although I am definitely more leaning towards human induced global warming), but it doesn't matter because I still think lowering greenhouse emission and doing other acts to preserve our environment is critical
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.sonicare

I see. Oddly many people argue exactly what you said and do it seriously.

Isn't it methane that is the biggest culprit in greenhouse warming and not exhaust from cars? I'm sure CO2 emissions play a role, but I think it is other gasses that may be even worse. However, I am by no means an expert in this area. But unlike many people, I do believe in evolution, global warming, and that the earth is a sphere and not flat. Take that Sarah Palin!

While methane is roughly 20x more powerful a greenhouse gas molecule by molecule than CO2, the reasoning for this is because the warming due to greenhouse gases is logarithmic. As you increase the greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere less energy will be trapped by that greenhouse gas per unit. If you had one greenhouse gas that trapped 20x per molecule and you add 1 gigaton more then that greenhouse gas would trap, say, 10x per molecule. as you increase the amount of greenhouse gases, less energy is trapped per molecule.

The CO2 concentration of the atmosphere is currently standing at about 392 parts per million. The Methane concentration of the atmosphere currently stands at about 1.4 parts per million.

Avatar image for TreebucketLumi
TreebucketLumi

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TreebucketLumi
Member since 2005 • 907 Posts

Coal plants, factories, etc. release GHG emissions. GHGs contribute to global warming. Seems pretty logical to me.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]I see. Oddly many people argue exactly what you said and do it seriously.

funsohng

Isn't it methane that is the biggest culprit in greenhouse warming and not exhaust from cars? I'm sure CO2 emissions play a role, but I think it is other gasses that may be even worse. However, I am by no means an expert in this area. But unlike many people, I do believe in evolution, global warming, and that the earth is a sphere and not flat. Take that Sarah Palin!

methane is the most efficient. The one that does the most damage altogether is water vapour. as for me, I'm still little undecided (although I am definitely more leaning towards human induced global warming), but it doesn't matter because I still think lowering greenhouse emission and doing other acts to preserve our environment is critical

I'm with you on that. I have no problem with countries developing green and renewable sources of energy. Fossil fuels are finite and will eventually run out anwyay. We should be looking for altenative fuels.

Avatar image for Human-after-all
Human-after-all

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Human-after-all
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts
Here is the problem with the global warming debate (I think man has effects but not nearly as large as what is projected). It is such a corporate driven science you can't find exact truth any more. Everyone is getting their paychecks from either : Oil corps: Global warming is not happening. New age fuels: Global warming is happening and happening fast. There is not very much actual neutral science being done on it, if at all. It is a sad debate. This debate should have been over and done with a long time ago but nobody just gets together for the science and experimentation of it any more, they just go with the option that pays them the money. There are many facts and what we do to the Earth at the moment is pretty atrocious and I am all for change but how much we actually affect the process of global warming is a mystery.
Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
I agree. I just don't think its possible to pump this much greenhouse gas into the atmosphere over the past couple centuries with no effect.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Here is the problem with the global warming debate (I think man has effects but not nearly as large as what is projected). It is such a corporate driven science you can't find exact truth any more. Everyone is getting their paychecks from either : Oil corps: Global warming is not happening. New age fuels: Global warming is happening and happening fast. There is not very much actual neutral science being done on it, if at all. It is a sad debate. This debate should have been over and done with a long time ago but nobody just gets together for the science and experimentation of it any more, they just go with the option that pays them the money. There are many facts and what we do to the Earth at the moment is pretty atrocious and I am all for change but how much we actually affect the process of global warming is a mystery.Human-after-all
There is actually quite a lot of science being done in the field. Here are just some examples.

http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~fuessel/download/cc08_published.pdf

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/sst/papers/Merged.Recon.v8.pdf

and so on.

There is also continuous satellite measurements and ground based measurements of ice mass, downward longwave radiation, outbound longwave radiation, atmospheric CO2 concentration, etc...

These are all ongoing studies.

Avatar image for Human-after-all
Human-after-all

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Human-after-all
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts

[QUOTE="Human-after-all"]Here is the problem with the global warming debate (I think man has effects but not nearly as large as what is projected). It is such a corporate driven science you can't find exact truth any more. Everyone is getting their paychecks from either : Oil corps: Global warming is not happening. New age fuels: Global warming is happening and happening fast. There is not very much actual neutral science being done on it, if at all. It is a sad debate. This debate should have been over and done with a long time ago but nobody just gets together for the science and experimentation of it any more, they just go with the option that pays them the money. There are many facts and what we do to the Earth at the moment is pretty atrocious and I am all for change but how much we actually affect the process of global warming is a mystery.BumFluff122

There is actually quite a lot of science being done in the field. Here are just some examples.

http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~fuessel/download/cc08_published.pdf

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/sst/papers/Merged.Recon.v8.pdf

and so on.

There is also continuous satellite measurements and ground based measurements of ice mass, downward longwave radiation, outbound longwave radiation, atmospheric CO2 concentration, etc...

These are all ongoing studies.

Yes I know there is science... What we don't know is whether or not humans have a large or small impact. We know the Earth is warming on its own what we don't know is how much humans are accelerating the process. I am interested in that paper though, this field isn't my thing.

Avatar image for Rutzfuz
Rutzfuz

1202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Rutzfuz
Member since 2010 • 1202 Posts

its BS

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Honestly, liberals are so heavy-handed about it that I couldn't care less anymore.

On one hand it sounds troubling, and on the other it sounds like a BS scheme to make us buy certain things and pay more taxes to support the government.

I have energy efficient lightbulbs in my entire apartment. That's as far as I'm willing to go.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Yes I know there is science... What we don't know is whether or not humans have a large or small impact. We know the Earth is warming on its own what we don't know is how much humans are accelerating the process. I am interested in that paper though, this field isn't my thing.

Human-after-all

The Earth isn't warming on it's own though. Naturally short term warming and cooling come about due to cyclic natural variations. These cycles include things such as the ENSO or El Nino Southern Oscillation or the North Atlantic Oscillation or the Arctic Oscillation which have to do with natural variability within the system. They bring warmth to one part of the system while taking it away from another. The ENSO brings warmth during El Nino years to the troposphere, During La Nina years that warmth is replaced by colder ocean water from the deep. Ice ages are caused mainly by orbital eccentricity. As the planet orbits the Sun it's orbit changes from elliptical to circular. This brings ice ages approximately every 100,000 years. These are known as Milankovitch Cycles. In the current phase of the Milankovitch cycle we should actually be cooling. As well the Sun has been rather static, outside of the 11 year sunspot cycle, for the last few decades and can not account for the current warming.

On the other hand the mesosphere and lower thermosphere are cooling while the troposphere is warming indicating an internal reason for the warming. On top of that measurements of CO2 concentration are up to 390ppm (parts per million) while measurements of outgoing radiation at CO2 absorption wavelengths are decreasing substantially and measurements of downward radiation at those same wavelengths is increasing. The main absorption frequency of CO2 and the greenhouse effect is centered at about 15 micrometers. This is near the peak of Earth's black-body emission spectrum and is the reason why increases and decreases of CO2, the second most abundant greenhouse gas aside from water vapour, are responsible for major warming and cooling trends. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 is rising at a rate of about 15 gigatonnes per year. Human emission account for about 30 gigatonnes per year.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

Honestly, liberals are so heavy-handed about it that I couldn't care less anymore.

On one hand it sounds troubling, and on the other it sounds like a BS scheme to make us buy certain things and pay more taxes to support the government.

I have energy efficient lightbulbs in my entire apartment. That's as far as I'm willing to go.

airshocker

Why does what liberals think about it at all affect your opinion on it? :?

Avatar image for gangstaa9
gangstaa9

258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 gangstaa9
Member since 2007 • 258 Posts

Do I believe in Global Warming Yes.

Man Made I dont know.

but you have to be careful with global warming. Lots of things that are supposed to be for the environment are really just excuses to make people's wallets fatter *cough* Cap and Trade *cough*

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Why does what liberals think about it at all affect your opinion on it? :?

chessmaster1989

Because I only hear about it from liberals and liberal media. And it comes attached with sayings like "THE END IS NIGH" or "KILL PEOPLE, NOT PLANTS". To be honest I don't know if they've actually said the second thing, but it's plausible!

Seriously, just leave me the f*** alone when it comes to climate-related issues. I have environment-friendly lightbulbs, WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT? And I recycle, but only because the wife forces me to!

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

Why does what liberals think about it at all affect your opinion on it? :?

airshocker

Because I only hear about it from liberals and liberal media. And it comes attached with sayings like "THE END IS NIGH" or "KILL PEOPLE, NOT PLANTS". To be honest I don't know if they've actually said the second thing, but it's plausible!

Seriously, just leave me the f*** alone when it comes to climate-related issues. I have environment-friendly lightbulbs, WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT? And I recycle, but only because the wife forces me to!

- Only "liberals" talk about it because "conservatives" are in the oil companies pockets.

- You changed your lightbulbs? I love your commitment man.

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#26 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

I'm not going to deny it's man made, or that it's not happening, but what I will say is that scientifically we don't understand what is going on. Pay attention to the changes in our co2 emission, and the changes the CO2 levels in the atmosphere.

Pre-industrial co2 levels were at 270ppm according to ice core samples.

In the 1960's co2 levels hit 330ppm and our co2 output STEADILY rose 3 million metric tons.

In 2010 co2 levels hit 390ppm but our co2 output had increased to 9 million metric tons.

So despite having tripled our co2 output our co2 levels have only doubled. Obviously something else is going on.

Avatar image for ZIVX
ZIVX

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#27 ZIVX
Member since 2008 • 2981 Posts

I believe in it. I just find it sad when people dismiss or accept this event to back their own agendas.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#28 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

I believe that humanity's increasing industrialization has an effect on our global climate, yes, and that that impact is only going to become more severe as we become more advanced.

That said, the moral implications of that theory (recycle as much as possible, do not waste; etc) would hold true regardless of whether or not global warming was a real and significant phenomenon.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Do I believe in Global Warming Yes.

Man Made I dont know.

but you have to be careful with global warming. Lots of things that are supposed to be for the environment are really just excuses to make people's wallets fatter *cough* Cap and Trade *cough*

gangstaa9

Cap and trade isn't an excuse to make people wallets fatter. It is a way of dealing with an emission problem with a more open-market technique as opposed to just taxes. Cap and trade works where one company that is a greener company and does not produce many greenhouse gases can sell their carbon credits to another company that is a large emitted of carbon. The end result being a more expensive product for the large carbon producing company and a increase in income for the smaller company. Cap and trade has actually been used before and succeeded. It was instituted in the 1990s to deal with sulfur dioxide emissions and the effects they had in the atmosphere,. The result being scrubbers placed on fossil fuel burning power plants to limit the amount of sulfur they gave off.

http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=1085

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#30 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

Why does what liberals think about it at all affect your opinion on it? :?

airshocker

Because I only hear about it from liberals and liberal media. And it comes attached with sayings like "THE END IS NIGH" or "KILL PEOPLE, NOT PLANTS". To be honest I don't know if they've actually said the second thing, but it's plausible!

Seriously, just leave me the f*** alone when it comes to climate-related issues. I have environment-friendly lightbulbs, WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT? And I recycle, but only because the wife forces me to!

Yes, recycling is such a hassle. :roll:

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

- Only "liberals" talk about it because "conservatives" are in the oil companies pockets.

- You changed your lightbulbs? I love your commitment man.

worlock77

My lightbulbs have been this way for years. I don't mind buying things when they make sense and will have a tangible benefit on my life.

Paying ten dollars a gallon for gas and who knows what to heat my apartment is not something I'm going to buy into.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Yes, recycling is such a hassle. :roll:

chessmaster1989

It actually is in New York.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I'm not going to deny it's man made, or that it's not happening, but what I will say is that scientifically we don't understand what is going on. Pay attention to the changes in our co2 emission, and the changes the CO2 levels in the atmosphere.

Pre-industrial co2 levels were at 270ppm according to ice core samples.

In the 1960's co2 levels hit 330ppm and our co2 output STEADILY rose 3 million metric tons.

In 2010 co2 levels hit 390ppm but our co2 output had increased to 9 million metric tons.

So despite having tripled our co2 output our co2 levels have only doubled. Obviously something else is going on.

jrhawk42

Yes something else is going on. The intake of carbon dioxide by the ocean has increased. The ocean is the main carbon sink on the planet. As CO2 uptake has increased, during a warming period no less when naturally the ocean should be going through a process of CO2 outgassing, it has lost pH making the ocean more acidic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#34 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

Yes, recycling is such a hassle. :roll:

airshocker

It actually is in New York.

I highly doubt it'll take more than a few extra minutes per week. Deal with it.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I highly doubt it'll take more than a few extra minutes per week. Deal with it.

chessmaster1989

No it's not that. It just doesn't get picked up like it's supposed to. And then I have to run it to the recycling plant when they forget it.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

- Only "liberals" talk about it because "conservatives" are in the oil companies pockets.

- You changed your lightbulbs? I love your commitment man.

airshocker

My lightbulbs have been this way for years. I don't mind buying things when they make sense and will have a tangible benefit on my life.

Paying ten dollars a gallon for gas and who knows what to heat my apartment is not something I'm going to buy into.

Hate to break this to you, but unless we get real serious about curbing our fossil fuel consumption real soon it won't be too long until gas is $10 gallon regardless. Climate change aside we only have so much of the stuff and it's gonna start running out.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

I highly doubt it'll take more than a few extra minutes per week. Deal with it.

airshocker

No it's not that. It just doesn't get picked up like it's supposed to. And then I have to run it to the recycling plant when they forget it.

That sounds like an issue with you waste disposal company. If you're able to I suggest switching. Might not be able to though, as some places give a monopoly to such companies (free market FTL apparently).

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I am inclined to think that it is real. Not sold on directly curbing carbon emissions. I don't see a tangible payoff equal to the losses. Incentivising development for cleaner energy sources seems like it could be reasonable.

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#39 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

[QUOTE="jrhawk42"]

I'm not going to deny it's man made, or that it's not happening, but what I will say is that scientifically we don't understand what is going on. Pay attention to the changes in our co2 emission, and the changes the CO2 levels in the atmosphere.

Pre-industrial co2 levels were at 270ppm according to ice core samples.

In the 1960's co2 levels hit 330ppm and our co2 output STEADILY rose 3 million metric tons.

In 2010 co2 levels hit 390ppm but our co2 output had increased to 9 million metric tons.

So despite having tripled our co2 output our co2 levels have only doubled. Obviously something else is going on.

BumFluff122

Yes something else is going on. The intake of carbon dioxide by the ocean has increased. The ocean is the main carbon sink on the planet. As CO2 uptake has increased, during a warming period no less when naturally the ocean should be going through a process of CO2 outgassing, it has lost pH making the ocean more acidic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification

This doesn't explain the changes in co2 output and its levels in the atmosphere, unless the ocean wasn't absorbing as much co2 during the industrial revolution.

Avatar image for Agent-Zero
Agent-Zero

6198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Agent-Zero
Member since 2009 • 6198 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.BumFluff122

I see. Oddly many people argue exactly what you said and do it seriously.

Many people say aliens drove SUVs on Venus?
Avatar image for IntenseGamingAZ
IntenseGamingAZ

469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 IntenseGamingAZ
Member since 2006 • 469 Posts

I believe cutting down trees and dumping waste into the Ocean is bad. We also should re-use stuff more, but I also know the solar fluctuations of the sun not only affect Satellite transmissions but they can affect Heat patterns on the Earth as well.

People fail to realize that "Going Green" is a Trillion dollar trend, and just like the latest Smartphone, is marketed heavily to make more profit.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

That sounds like an issue with you waste disposal company. If you're able to I suggest switching. Might not be able to though, as some places give a monopoly to such companies (free market FTL apparently).

worlock77

State contracts FTL.

They sell the contracts to the cheapest waste disposal company out there and half the time the **** doesn't get picked up.

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

I believe in a link between CO2 emissions and rising temperatures (of course I do, it's a fact). However, I'm pretty sure not even the most intelligent climatologists know what exactly is going on, as it isn't a linear relationship. That said, it is clear that we must limit our emission of CO2 and other "greenhouse gases".

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

This doesn't explain the changes in co2 output and its levels in the atmosphere, unless the ocean wasn't absorbing as much co2 during the industrial revolution.

jrhawk42

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. The point is is that we are emitting more carbon into the atmosphere that has been out of the carbon cycle for eons. The effect it is having is increasing CO2 concentration of the atmosphere while, at the same time, decreasing oxygen in the atmosphere as those oxygen atoms are now forming CO2 instead of O2. These have both been measured and confirmed. The ocean is the largest carbon sink in the world. Meaning it absorbs more CO2 out of all the other carbon sinks, including plants. As the temperature increases more CO2 is released from the ocean and less is taken up. This is the reason why during times of warming CO2 atmospheric concentration increases. It's naturally an effect of warming. As we are emitting unnatural carbon into the atmosphere, however, the ocean is currently absorbing more than it is absorbing during a warming period. This is the reason why the oceans are becoming more acidic.

Basically, normally CO2 goes one way during a warming period. Now however it's going the other way due to increases in atmospheric concentration brought on by the burning of fossil fuels and carbon emissions.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]I'm not saying global warming is false. . . . . I believe I was making a jest. . . . . . You know, humor? It is a good remedy for those who take themselves too seriously.Agent-Zero

I see. Oddly many people argue exactly what you said and do it seriously.

Many people say aliens drove SUVs on Venus?

No. They state things like Venus and Mars are going through warming. There are no SUVs on those planets. Therefor the warming on Earth can;t be due to driving cars or fossil fuel use. It's a silly argument that makes no sense.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I believe cutting down trees and dumping waste into the Ocean is bad. We also should re-use stuff more, but I also know the solar fluctuations of the sun not only affect Satellite transmissions but they can affect Heat patterns on the Earth as well.

People fail to realize that "Going Green" is a Trillion dollar trend, and just like the latest Smartphone, is marketed heavily to make more profit.

IntenseGamingAZ

Solar output can not account for the current warming. Atmospheric physics are a lot more complex than "The Sun shines, Radiation hits the Earth, the planet warms". We also have satellites measuring solar output and we are currently just coming out of a solar minimum while 8 of warmest years on record have been in the last decade.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I believe in a link between CO2 emissions and rising temperatures (of course I do, it's a fact). However, I'm pretty sure not even the most intelligent climatologists know what exactly is going on, as it isn't a linear relationship. That said, it is clear that we must limit our emission of CO2 and other "greenhouse gases".

SgtKevali

You think then that the only way climatologists would know what's going on is if continued greenhouse gas emissions means continued warming? Natural oscillatory patterns are well known to climatologists and the use them in their computer models. This is why in a computer model there is not a steady increase in temperature but ups and downs due to natural cyclic patterns.

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
all in all, I think I can say, I really don't care, because as a Canadian, it means Toronto is going to be less s****y and there is going to be more arable land in the prairies.
Avatar image for quetzalcoatI
quetzalcoatI

627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 quetzalcoatI
Member since 2010 • 627 Posts

Fact: CO2 and other greenhouse gasses trap sunlight.

Fact: Greenhouse gas emissions have increased enourmously since the industrial revolution.

People can nitpick and argue over small issues they have with other parts of global warming science, but in the end it all comes back t those two facts that they can't get around.

theone86
That is basically what t boils down to for me. The effects of the gases may not be as dramatic as some would like us to believe, but at the end of the day if the effects are not good, then why not fix the problem? Unfortunately, we value our economic system more than we value genuine progress in environmental and medical fields.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
No idea. OT has taught me that everything that predicts the end of the world or the end of humanity is laughable and can be filed away under conspiracy theory. On the other hand, I'd have to believe in a huge conspiracy theory anyway to explain the manufacture or manipulation of all this evidence. I'm stumped.