my advice, just because you spend big money on a camera, doesn't make you more of a photographer.
dnafactory
This.
Again...nothing WRONG with spending big money on a camera. But if you don't know what you're doing, that extra money likely isn't going to translate into better pictures.
For a total begginner, I'd recommend an entry-level DSLR. I'd also say, go ahead and get the kit with lens included. Kit lenses usually aren't the best, but if it's a cheap way to get you familiar with various focal lengths, then it's probably pretty good for beginners. Start with an entry level camera, use it a lot, and don't upgrade until you've learned enough to know SPECIFIACLLY what you need in a future camera/lens.
If a DSLR isn't in the budget, then there's no shame in going with a compact camera or one of those "superzoom" cameras that sort of looks like a SLR but doesn't have interchangeable lenses. Those aren't as good, but hey...you work with the budget that you've got. Even those cameras are entirely capable of making good pictures. Just make sure that they allow for full manual operation, because you aren't going to learn anything sticking with the automatic modes.
But yeah...I don't know what that camera is, but I'm sure it's fine. If you're just starting out, though, you could probably go better than something that costs $900. I'm sure that that's a totally fine camera/lens combination. But if you not skilled or knowledgeable enough to utilize the camera's full potential, then some of that money is probably going to waste. Buy it if money really isn't that much of an issue. If money really is an issue, you can probably go significanty cheaper and get results that are just as good.
*shrugs* I guess it just depends on how serious you are about learning photography. If you're serious enough and dedicated to learn it, then go right ahead. Otherwise, stick with the cheap stuff and don't upgrade until you have a real reason to.
Log in to comment