This topic is locked from further discussion.
I didn't think that he might have a gun. If he did, then I think he'd win.The Indian. No question. They have bows and arrows, and depending on the time period, rifles. The gladiator has nothing. :?
Pirate700
That is a great fight combo. But being Native myself (Cree/Ojibwa) i would have to go with the Apache hehe. Reason being is that Natives never stay down, either its to much pride or just plain ignorance for our health lol.
Oh and not to sound like a dink but Indian is a politicaly incorrect term as it was a mistake in the first place. Chris Columbus thought he was in India but was really on the other side of the world lmao. I dont mind that term being used though as many people dont know that fact or just disregard it.
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]I didn't think that he might have a gun. If he did, then I think he'd win.The Indian. No question. They have bows and arrows, and depending on the time period, rifles. The gladiator has nothing. :?
Cherokee_Jack
In their prime, they would have rifles from cowboys and trades.
Gladiators never truly wore full armor. Some of them wore as little as possible. As some have already pointed out Gladiators came in all types. Some are as agile as an Apache fighter while some were quite ponderous and slow but very tough to take down. Gladiators also rarely used ranged weapons other than tridents, javelins and spears. They were trained to entertain while fighting and standing far-off shooting arrows at another gladiator wa something they rarely did, if ever.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment