Are your ancestors fish?

Unfortunately mine are not. I was just wondering if yours are. If they are when do you think the next fish will become a human? flavort

What? Are you an alien then? :roll:

Most fish have two eyes and a circulatory system, So I've say yes.Darthmatt

Fish also have fins. Do you have f****** fins? DO YOU?

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Most fish have two eyes and a circulatory system, So I've say yes.joezer3003

Fish also have fins. Do you have f****** fins? DO YOU?

mine were.

[QUOTE="flavort"]Unfortunately mine are not. I was just wondering if yours are. If they are when do you think the next fish will become a human? agilefalcon16

What? Are you an alien then? :roll:

I know that I am not a fish

I remember my great grand-pappy Gill cuddling me in his fins when I was born....

So yes.

[QUOTE="agilefalcon16"]

[QUOTE="flavort"]Unfortunately mine are not. I was just wondering if yours are. If they are when do you think the next fish will become a human? flavort

What? Are you an alien then? :roll:

I know that I am not a fish

But your basic cell structure is similar to bacteria, which happen to be similar to...fish. :o

[QUOTE="joezer3003"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Most fish have two eyes and a circulatory system, So I've say yes.Darthmatt

Fish also have fins. Do you have f****** fins? DO YOU?

I forget...

I just felt like yelling.

Have a beer.

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="joezer3003"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Most fish have two eyes and a circulatory system, So I've say yes.joezer3003

Fish also have fins. Do you have f****** fins? DO YOU?

I forget...

[QUOTE="joezer3003"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="joezer3003"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Most fish have two eyes and a circulatory system, So I've say yes.Darthmatt

Fish also have fins. Do you have f****** fins? DO YOU?

I forget...

Well actually, they forgot Polend.

Billions of years ago, yes. Now did you really need to start another evolution vs creationism thread? You are probably pretty ignorant on the subject, so please go read some books first before you make an opinion on the topic... and not anti evolution books, real books eondorsed by the scientific community.babyjesus87

I have actually, nice assumption. I believe in evolution. One thing that is obvious is how tall people are now from 50 years ago. I do not at all believe I evolved from a fish. Darwin even stated that if there is no fossil evidence to support his theory the is is not valid. There may be some "possible" evidence. Considering there should be changes over a huge period of time then there should be unlimited evidence. Also since there are new species of animals found all the time then I would question this theory of evolution to the extent some take it.

[QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="agilefalcon16"]

[QUOTE="flavort"]Unfortunately mine are not. I was just wondering if yours are. If they are when do you think the next fish will become a human? The_Ish

What? Are you an alien then? :roll:

I know that I am not a fish

But your basic cell structure is similar to bacteria, which happen to be similar to...fish. :o

Maybe my ancestors are bacteria.

[QUOTE="babyjesus87"]Billions of years ago, yes. Now did you really need to start another evolution vs creationism thread? You are probably pretty ignorant on the subject, so please go read some books first before you make an opinion on the topic... and not anti evolution books, real books eondorsed by the scientific community.flavort

I have actually, nice assumption. I believe in evolution. One thing that is obvious is how tall people are now from 50 years ago. I do not at all believe I evolved from a fish. Darwin even stated that if there is no fossil evidence to support his theory the is is not valid. There may be some "possible" evidence. Considering there should be changes over a huge period of time then there should be unlimited evidence. Also since there are new species of animals found all the time then I would question this theory of evolution to the extent some take it.

No...they weren't.LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="babyjesus87"]Billions of years ago, yes. Now did you really need to start another evolution vs creationism thread? You are probably pretty ignorant on the subject, so please go read some books first before you make an opinion on the topic... and not anti evolution books, real books eondorsed by the scientific community.flavort

I have actually, nice assumption. I believe in evolution. One thing that is obvious is how tall people are now from 50 years ago. I do not at all believe I evolved from a fish. Darwin even stated that if there is no fossil evidence to support his theory the is is not valid. There may be some "possible" evidence. Considering there should be changes over a huge period of time then there should be unlimited evidence. Also since there are new species of animals found all the time then I would question this theory of evolution to the extent some take it.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.CptJSparrow

[QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="babyjesus87"]Billions of years ago, yes. Now did you really need to start another evolution vs creationism thread? You are probably pretty ignorant on the subject, so please go read some books first before you make an opinion on the topic... and not anti evolution books, real books eondorsed by the scientific community.Darthmatt

I have actually, nice assumption. I believe in evolution. One thing that is obvious is how tall people are now from 50 years ago. I do not at all believe I evolved from a fish. Darwin even stated that if there is no fossil evidence to support his theory the is is not valid. There may be some "possible" evidence. Considering there should be changes over a huge period of time then there should be unlimited evidence. Also since there are new species of animals found all the time then I would question this theory of evolution to the extent some take it.

like I said I believe things evolve. I do not believe humans evolved from fish. Darwins theory of evolution does not stand according to him. Absence of proof is not proof of absence, I am a Christian and understand than since I get people giving me crap about scientifically proving God exists.

[QUOTE="agilefalcon16"]

[QUOTE="flavort"]Unfortunately mine are not. I was just wondering if yours are. If they are when do you think the next fish will become a human? flavort

What? Are you an alien then? :roll:

I know that I am not a fish

How are you so sure? ;)

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="babyjesus87"]Billions of years ago, yes. Now did you really need to start another evolution vs creationism thread? You are probably pretty ignorant on the subject, so please go read some books first before you make an opinion on the topic... and not anti evolution books, real books eondorsed by the scientific community.flavort

I have actually, nice assumption. I believe in evolution. One thing that is obvious is how tall people are now from 50 years ago. I do not at all believe I evolved from a fish. Darwin even stated that if there is no fossil evidence to support his theory the is is not valid. There may be some "possible" evidence. Considering there should be changes over a huge period of time then there should be unlimited evidence. Also since there are new species of animals found all the time then I would question this theory of evolution to the extent some take it.

like I said I believe things evolve. I do not believe humans evolved from fish. Darwins theory of evolution does not stand according to him. Absence of proof is not proof of absence, I am a Christian and understand than since I get people giving me crap about scientifically proving God exists.

I once saw a man pleasure a fish, I think they were related but I'm not sure :(ConManWithGun

[QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]I once saw a man pleasure a fish, I think they were related but I'm not sure :(CptJSparrow

It was in wisconsin

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.Darthmatt

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]I once saw a man pleasure a fish, I think they were related but I'm not sure :(ConManWithGun

It was in wisconsin

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]I once saw a man pleasure a fish, I think they were related but I'm not sure :(ConManWithGun

It was in wisconsin

[QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]I once saw a man pleasure a fish, I think they were related but I'm not sure :(CptJSparrow

yeah :)

[QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]I once saw a man pleasure a fish, I think they were related but I'm not sure :(CptJSparrow

It was in wisconsin

I know, I couldn't sleep for days

[QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="ConManWithGun"]I once saw a man pleasure a fish, I think they were related but I'm not sure :(Darthmatt

It was in wisconsin

no it was a real fish, it was called the fish act, it was like a bass fish or something

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.flavort

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

[QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="agilefalcon16"]

[QUOTE="flavort"]Unfortunately mine are not. I was just wondering if yours are. If they are when do you think the next fish will become a human? agilefalcon16

What? Are you an alien then? :roll:

I know that I am not a fish

How are you so sure? ;)

so far I am pretty positive about it.

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.flavort

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

mine where balck,german,turkish, and cherokee

AND WOLFS

[QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.CptJSparrow

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

Thats sound like a more reasonable theory to be consistent with the theory of evolution, I would have to have some very impressive evidence to accept it as a possibility. I just have come to a different conclusion through certain things that have happened in my life and alternative readings. Is there anything I can read about this, it sounds very interesting.

[QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.Darthmatt

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

Like i said at the start all these traits are homologous in that they have similar relative position, structure, function and evolutionary origin.

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.flavort

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

Thats sound like a more reasonable theory to be consistent with the theory of evolution, I would have to have some very impressive evidence to accept it as a possibility. I just have come to a different conclusion through certain things that have happened in my life and alternative readings. Is there anything I can read about this, it sounds very interesting.

[QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.CptJSparrow

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

Thats sound like a more reasonable theory to be consistent with the theory of evolution, I would have to have some very impressive evidence to accept it as a possibility. I just have come to a different conclusion through certain things that have happened in my life and alternative readings. Is there anything I can read about this, it sounds very interesting.

I appreciate that.

[QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No...they weren't.CptJSparrow

I understand what you mean but why would animals not have certian traits in general? Are all plants related to a single source?

Thats sound like a more reasonable theory to be consistent with the theory of evolution, I would have to have some very impressive evidence to accept it as a possibility. I just have come to a different conclusion through certain things that have happened in my life and alternative readings. Is there anything I can read about this, it sounds very interesting.

Actually I have read a book that discusses the Miller Experiment. I will have to reread it and look into more of it.