Athiests,Would having a religion even change your life in a major way?

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for UnrealSin_X
UnrealSin_X

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 UnrealSin_X
Member since 2008 • 925 Posts
Since you already do not believe,what would having a religion change?
You would be on the safe side just in case it was all true
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
Wouldn't that be copping out?
Avatar image for Erasorn
Erasorn

14502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Erasorn
Member since 2004 • 14502 Posts
Yeah, I've been told that god(s) usually think the ones that only pretend to believe in them are totally awesome. I follow all religions at once just to be sure.
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
No, because my views would have to be different. Plus I'd also be in the same boat as people who walk down the street with signs round their neck saying "God kills sinners"...
Avatar image for Gamefreak1296
Gamefreak1296

1670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Gamefreak1296
Member since 2005 • 1670 Posts

" I follow all religions at once just to be sure."Erasorn

lmao!

Avatar image for Wetall_basic
Wetall_basic

4086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Wetall_basic
Member since 2003 • 4086 Posts
Sure,I have my safty net of Jesus in place. I'm a completely against his faith,but ya know,just in case.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
You can be atheist and still have a religion.
Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts

Jesus is the one and true path :)

At least to me that is.

Avatar image for Video_Game_King
Video_Game_King

27545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#9 Video_Game_King
Member since 2003 • 27545 Posts
Quite a lot. And how do I know its the safe side?
Avatar image for Erasorn
Erasorn

14502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Erasorn
Member since 2004 • 14502 Posts

Jesus is the one and true path :)

At least to me that is.

123625
You're not a very good atheist then.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts

its not faith if its a hedge against doom...

thats a big problem with many religions.. its the bribe of eternal life in heaven for faith and the threat of eternal punishment for disbelief.... how about no reward for belief and no punishment for disbelief? then the faithful can be faithful freely and the unfaithful faithless freely. its not faith if its a safty net or bribery.

Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"]

Jesus is the one and true path :)

At least to me that is.

Erasorn

You're not a very good atheist then.

Lmao

Avatar image for lycrof
lycrof

6393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 lycrof
Member since 2005 • 6393 Posts
Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Since you already do not believe,what would having a religion change?
You would be on the safe side just in case it was all true
UnrealSin_X

Because we call that being a COWARD. No being should reward a person for being controled by fear..

Avatar image for Fireball2500
Fireball2500

3421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Fireball2500
Member since 2004 • 3421 Posts
No, because my views would have to be different. Plus I'd also be in the same boat as people who walk down the street with signs round their neck saying "God kills sinners"...Bourbons3
I assume you live near the Westboro Baptist Church?
Avatar image for Fireball2500
Fireball2500

3421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Fireball2500
Member since 2004 • 3421 Posts

Double post, great...

Avatar image for joao_22990
joao_22990

2230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 joao_22990
Member since 2007 • 2230 Posts

That's like asking a legless man if he wants some legs.

"You already can't walk, but at least you'll have legs to walk".

It's illogical. If i got into any religion, it would be different because i'd start to be theist, not being atheist anymore.

Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts

Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life lycrof

State of Eternal nothingness?

Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts
I don't think you really understand this issue. Most atheists aren't atheists because they wish to rebel against authority or something. They're atheists because they are unable to believe that a supernatural realm exists without first hand evidence of its existence. It would be like asking you to believe the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real.
Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life 123625

State of Eternal nothingness?

If nothingness is what awaits you, then why would it matter to you? It's not like you'd be aware of your non-existence. And quite frankly, if that's your fate, that's your fate, no matter how much you wish it weren't. If there's no supernatural realm, believing in one won't make it real.

Avatar image for UnrealSin_X
UnrealSin_X

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 UnrealSin_X
Member since 2008 • 925 Posts

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life 123625

State of Eternal nothingness?

Which is worse psychologically

Avatar image for Shiggums
Shiggums

21436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#22 Shiggums
Member since 2007 • 21436 Posts
Probably wouldn't change my life in a major way, but I just don't wanna bother. I should think people would at least respect my decision :roll:
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life UnrealSin_X

State of Eternal nothingness?

Which is worse psychologically

Apparently not, sense most athiests constantly do not think about death.. Its a waste of time and energy.

Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#25 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life UnrealSin_X

State of Eternal nothingness?

Which is worse psychologically

lol there would be no mind to effect psychologically.

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
I don't think you really understand this issue. Most atheists aren't atheists because they wish to rebel against authority or something. They're atheists because they are unable to believe that a supernatural realm exists without first hand evidence of its existence. It would be like asking you to believe the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real.pianist
But the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real! :cry:
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
Man, Pascal's Wager gets trotted out here at least once a week
Avatar image for Fireball2500
Fireball2500

3421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Fireball2500
Member since 2004 • 3421 Posts

Man, Pascal's Wager gets trotted out here at least once a weekxaos
I can see why someone would use it at a service, problem is, it doesn't work at OT.

BTW, when you say Pascal's Wager, I mean the usage of using "what happens after death" by that.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"]Man, Pascal's Wager gets trotted out here at least once a weekFireball2500
I can see why someone would use it at a service, problem is, it doesn't work at OT.

I would think it would be considered cynical and craven at a church service as well; maybe some believers here can correct me, though.
Avatar image for Fireball2500
Fireball2500

3421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Fireball2500
Member since 2004 • 3421 Posts
[QUOTE="Fireball2500"][QUOTE="xaos"]Man, Pascal's Wager gets trotted out here at least once a weekxaos
I can see why someone would use it at a service, problem is, it doesn't work at OT.

I would think it would be considered cynical and craven at a church service as well; maybe some believers here can correct me, though.

I see why someone would use that is what I said, I didn't say it was good to say that.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life 123625

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life comp_atkins

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that mean we have soul?

Avatar image for Food_Nipple
Food_Nipple

8379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Food_Nipple
Member since 2003 • 8379 Posts
I'd no longer feel superior to people who blindly believe whatever they're told while denying what's right in front of their faces just because it happens to contradict their "faith". That's too much for me to give up.
Avatar image for hip-hop-cola2
hip-hop-cola2

2454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 hip-hop-cola2
Member since 2007 • 2454 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life 123625

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that we mean we have soul?

what do you consider a soul?

Avatar image for DeeJayInphinity
DeeJayInphinity

13415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 DeeJayInphinity
Member since 2004 • 13415 Posts
I still haven't found a religion that I agree with on everything. Until I do, I'm not a religion kind of person and having a religion without wanting one would make my life more miserable. Pascal's Wager is illogical bye the way, and it would not work on most of the gods people believe in.
Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life hip-hop-cola2

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that we mean we have soul?

what do you consider a soul?

A spirit that inhabits our bodies, you know. somehting along those lines.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life 123625

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that we mean we have soul?

?? "so that we mean we have soul" that sentence sense not make

Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#38 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life comp_atkins

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that mean we have soul?

?? "so that we mean we have soul" that sentence sense not make

Rofl sorry. Corrected it.

Avatar image for Food_Nipple
Food_Nipple

8379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Food_Nipple
Member since 2003 • 8379 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life 123625

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that we mean we have soul?

That's the problem right there. People will believe what they think makes the most sense as long as it tells them their conciousness will exist after they die. Ignorance is bliss and who doesn't want to be blissful?

Avatar image for Fireball2500
Fireball2500

3421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Fireball2500
Member since 2004 • 3421 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life Food_Nipple

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that we mean we have soul?

That's the problem right there. People will believe what they think makes the most sense as long as it tells them their conciousness will exist after they die. Ignorance is bliss and who doesn't want to be blissful?

I don't believe just because of that....and I'm not in the mood for arguing right now.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life 123625

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that mean we have soul?

?? "so that we mean we have soul" that sentence sense not make

Rofl sorry. Corrected it.

:) nah.. i wasn't implying that humans have a soul. my point i was trying to make is if there is nothingness, you really will not care one way or another because you would not have the ability to care, since you are non-existant. like the time before you were born. you have no memory of it because you did not exist. so you could not say that it was bad or good.

Avatar image for bman784
bman784

6755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 bman784
Member since 2004 • 6755 Posts
Yes. I would no longer be able to be a scientist.
Avatar image for Food_Nipple
Food_Nipple

8379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Food_Nipple
Member since 2003 • 8379 Posts
[QUOTE="Food_Nipple"][QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life Fireball2500

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that we mean we have soul?

That's the problem right there. People will believe what they think makes the most sense as long as it tells them their conciousness will exist after they die. Ignorance is bliss and who doesn't want to be blissful?

I don't believe just because of that....and I'm not in the mood for arguing right now.

then it's a good thing you're not arguing right now :roll:

Avatar image for DeeJayInphinity
DeeJayInphinity

13415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 DeeJayInphinity
Member since 2004 • 13415 Posts
"..Death is nonexistence, and I already know what that means. What was before me will happen again after me. If there is any suffering in this state, there there must have been such suffering also in the past, before we entered the light of day. As a matter of fact, we felt no discomfort then. And I ask you, would you not say that one was the greatest of fools who believed that a lamp was worse off when it was extinguished before it was lighted? We mortals also are lighted and extinguished; the period of suffering comes in between, but on either side there is a deep peace." -Seneca I think that sums up the "afterlife" quite well.
Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts


You would be on the safe side just in case it was all true
UnrealSin_X

Depends on which religion you're talking about. Just believing in one religion or another doesn't automatically mean that you're on the right one. What if all religions are wrong? Would you still be safe?

Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts

I don't see how it would make a difference. From anybody's perspective, someone who worships a pagan god and follows the "laws" of that god are only following the laws of the men who created that god. If Christians (or any religion for that matter) were asked to follow a pagan religion, they would only be following the law of man. If atheists were asked to follow a religion (pagan or not, it depends on the person and their beliefs), it would only be the law of men (much like the laws they follow now, since they don't have a god to begin with).

The only difference is that to challenge the "law of a god" can be considered sacreligious and some religions condemn it with death or frown upon it in some manner. The "law of man" however is subjected to change when men see that it needs change. The "law of a god" can't be changed (although it can be open to different interpretations) but the "law of man" can.

Therefore, the only difference would be that the laws atheists would live by would be either basic common sense laws (such as "don't lie; don't kill; etc.") that will likely never be changed by neither god or man or primitive laws (such as "don't eat this type of meat").

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life comp_atkins

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that mean we have soul?

?? "so that we mean we have soul" that sentence sense not make

Rofl sorry. Corrected it.

:) nah.. i wasn't implying that humans have a soul. my point i was trying to make is if there is nothingness, you really will not care one way or another because you would not have the ability to care, since you are non-existant. like the time before you were born. you have no memory of it because you did not exist. so you could not say that it was bad or good.

Well this isn't neccesarly true.. It is possible to concieve even as a athiest that you are more then just matter.. The reason for this is our absolute puzzlement of conciousness.. We have no idea what it is nor can we really explain why we are not zombies (in the way of being aware, so more or less why are we not plant like?)

Avatar image for Food_Nipple
Food_Nipple

8379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Food_Nipple
Member since 2003 • 8379 Posts

[QUOTE="UnrealSin_X"]
You would be on the safe side just in case it was all true
Blood-Scribe

Depends on which religion you're talking about. Just believing in one religion or another doesn't automatically mean that you're on the right one. What if all religions are wrong? Would you still be safe?

You'd also be on the safe side constantly hanging on for dear life to anything you can just in case the floor beneath you suddenly disapears. That doesn't mean it's likely to happen or that there's any evidence that it will.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="123625"]

[QUOTE="lycrof"]Believing in no god = No hell = no fear of after life sSubZerOo

State of Eternal nothingness?

meh.. thats what it was for me before i was born. i can go back to that. its not like before birth i was sitting around like "man, this sucks.. there's nothingness!"

So that mean we have soul?

?? "so that we mean we have soul" that sentence sense not make

Rofl sorry. Corrected it.

:) nah.. i wasn't implying that humans have a soul. my point i was trying to make is if there is nothingness, you really will not care one way or another because you would not have the ability to care, since you are non-existant. like the time before you were born. you have no memory of it because you did not exist. so you could not say that it was bad or good.

Well this isn't neccesarly true.. It is possible to concieve even as a athiest that you are more then just matter.. The reason for this is our absolute puzzlement of conciousness.. We have no idea what it is nor can we really explain why we are not zombies (in the way of being aware, so more or less why are we not plant like?)

i wasn't saying i knew for sure. just my opinion :)

Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts
[QUOTE="Blood-Scribe"]

[QUOTE="UnrealSin_X"]
You would be on the safe side just in case it was all true
Food_Nipple

Depends on which religion you're talking about. Just believing in one religion or another doesn't automatically mean that you're on the right one. What if all religions are wrong? Would you still be safe?

You'd also be on the safe side constantly hanging on for dear life to anything you can just in case the floor beneath you suddenly disapears. That doesn't mean it's likely to happen or that there's any evidence that it will.

Thus raising the question on how you could possibly define one religion or belief as safe from such a theoretical consequence of not believing. No one knows for sure who's right, who's wrong, or if anyone is even right or wrong. So either way, you're just as safe to believe in one thing to believe in another, or to simply not believe at all.