Bailout Price Tag: $3.5Trillion, 'Real' Cost May Be Much Higher

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

While the government is clearly spending a lot of taxpayers' money to bail out financial firms, the tally is even bigger than most Americans (economists and pundits included) are probably aware or willing to admit.

The bailout bonanza has gotten so big and happened so fast it's the true cost often gets lost in the discussion. Maybe Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke prefer it that way because the tally so far is nearly $3.5 trillion, and that's before a likely handout for the auto industry.

Yes, $3.45 trillion has already been spent, as Bailoutsleuth.com details:

    * $2T Emergency Fed Loans (the ones the Fed won't discuss, as detailed here)
    * $700B TARP (designed to buy bad debt, the fund is rapidly transforming as we'll discuss in an upcoming segment)
    * $300B Hope Now (the government's year-old attempt at mortgage workouts)
    * $200B Fannie/Freddie
    * $140B Tax Breaks for Banks (WaPo has the details)
    * $110B: AIG (with it's new deal this week, the big insurer got $40B of TARP money, plus $110B in other relief)

Tallying up the "true" cost of the bailout is difficult, and won't be known for months if not years. But considering $3.5 trillion is about 25% of the U.S. economy ($13.8 trillion in 2007) and the U.S. deficit may hit $1 trillion in fiscal 2009, hyperinflation and/or sharply higher interest rates seem likely outcomes down the road.

 

Source.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Lulz. It's the end of the world!
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
Much of it depends on how the money is spent (and it all hasn't been spent yet). Congress has been showing favor to the idea of buying stock in these companies as a method of getting something for their money that provides the banks money and gives the taxpayers the chance to sell later a a potential profit.
Avatar image for Dark-Sithious
Dark-Sithious

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dark-Sithious
Member since 2008 • 3914 Posts

Hyperinflation you say? Hmm, didn't I say this before the bailout was passed, and all the great economics on this forum told me that I was wrong.

Also the 800 billion dollar TARP made me lol.

Avatar image for Buddha_basic
Buddha_basic

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Buddha_basic
Member since 2002 • 546 Posts
Regardless of how much money has been injected into the banking system in an effort to encourage the banks to put it back out into the "world"...its just not going to happen. Banks are going to hold on to the money until the economy turns around. So it really is just driving inflation.