[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"] Am I supposed to care?
SmashBrosLegend
Yes. If anything, it should speak to the man's judgement. So far he's been closely associated with racists (Jeremiah Wright), slum lords (Tony Rezko), and former domestic terrorists (Ayers). Anyone who would willingly surround himself with those types of people while running for public office can't have all his marbles.Guilt by association is an incredibly lame thing.
I wonder has anyone actualy looked into the issues in this campaign? I mean, you obviously didn't see as you are supporting Mccain, a man who will throw us into even more war and has next to no knowledge on economics while our economy is in a recession.....
Where did I say guilt by association? I said he was guilty of poor judgement. The guilt by association thing is what most people are stuck on, and if you actually looked into his stances on issues you would know that at least there his judgement isn't poor which is the only thing that matters.
Really? The absolute worst thing you can do for a struggling economy is raise taxes. That's exactly what he'll do with his healthcare and mortgage bail-out policies. And do you know how many innocent lives stand to be lost by our withdrawal from Iraq? No one like war, and our reasons for being there are questionable. But leaving now would be comepletely and totally irresponsible.Seeing as the taxes will be used to pay for healthcare, it really isn't going to be taking much of any extra money out of peoples pockets as then we will be saving on insurance and medical expenses. Staying in Iraq is just going to drain more money from this country and FYI the war is the MAJOR cause of the recession.
Oh good God it isn't going to get any better in Iraq than it is now. No matter what we do when we leave there is bound to be conflict and for now our presence there is just fostering additional conflict.
His stance on Iraq is only my 2nd biggest issue I take with the man. He is ready to start war with Iran WHILE keeping our presence in Iraq. That is just downright stupid as we do NOT need to be starting conlict with Iran especially while trying to keep a presence in Iraq. Attacking Iran could damn well lead to a 3rd World War especially with the way tensions are now not to mention the very least it would do is cripple our economy even more.
1. Over 80% of Americans are already covered by health insurance according to the 2004 US census. His plan would punish the majority with higher taxes. When the upper-class gets heavily taxed, the prices of goods increases. 2. We owe 53 trillion dollars RIGHT NOW on our social security and medicare. Am I to understand that you would sacrifice the lives of 100s of 1000s of Iraqis to save money? 3. Are we to simply sit back and wait for Iran to nuke someone?1) Have you seen Sicko? You do realize that those insurance companies cause the deaths of innocent people, right? They do EVERYTHING in their power to keep from covering you, and examiners are ranked based on how many people the TURN AWAY!!!
The insurance system is downright awful and actually it is this system that drives up the cost of medicen by a ****load. In Sicko, this lady couldn't afford her inhalers here because they were $100. However, when going to Cuba she was able to get them for $5, I think less.
Oh and yeah, our presence there is only delaying the inevitable and causing more deaths at the same time. Not only that, but it is not at all our job to keep them from killing themselves. They have a government, it needs to take some damn responsibility.
2) And those programs will no longer be needed with universal healthcare.
3) ok, you just provide this proof that Iran is even trying to develope nuclear weapons, maybe then I will worry.
As big of a ******* nutjob as Ahmidimejad is, anyone would know that the second they send out a nuke Iran will be blown to the ground.
The threat of mutual destruction proved itself to work throughout the cold war which lasted decades. It will be enough to last till that one leader is gone.
Not to mention, why the hell is force neccessary here? What the hell happened to diplomacy?
Log in to comment