BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for proctorsurf
proctorsurf

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 proctorsurf
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/280207timestamp.htm
What happened to building 7?
Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
this is very interesting.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38953 Posts
it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?
Avatar image for Conanfan1
Conanfan1

8014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Conanfan1
Member since 2005 • 8014 Posts
Conspiracies concerning 9/11!? :shock: How unexpected! :|
Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?comp_atkins

If it drops in a controlled fashion that means it was brought down my demolition not from burning. the U.S. government states it came down by fire.

Avatar image for proctorsurf
proctorsurf

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 proctorsurf
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts
Conspiracies concerning 9/11!? :shock: How unexpected! :|Conanfan1
Did you actually look at it?
Avatar image for ej902
EJ902

14338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 EJ902
Member since 2005 • 14338 Posts
it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?comp_atkins
If that's so, then that's probably the explanation. Someone told the BBC "we're bringing this building down", and the BBC mis-interpreted it as "The building's come down".
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38953 Posts

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?SAURON221

If it drops in a controlled fashion that means it was brought down my demolition not from burning. the U.S. government states it came down by fire.

one of the chief engineers for the wtc site said it was decided to bring it down in a controlled way, as well as the building owner agreeing. its his building, he can do what he wants with it. not that big a deal. no one was killed / injured in its collapse.
Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
I see no reason to post this all people do is say your crazy and you don't really know. Most of them don't even look at the proof you present and if they really did take the time to watch the original videoof 9/11 and proof presented by people there minds may just change.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38953 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?EJ902
If that's so, then that's probably the explanation. Someone told the BBC "we're bringing this building down", and the BBC mis-interpreted it as "The building's come down".

exactly.
Avatar image for nickmag
nickmag

6710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 nickmag
Member since 2006 • 6710 Posts
Hundreds of conspiracy theorists are wetting themselves in excitement atm
Avatar image for proctorsurf
proctorsurf

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 proctorsurf
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts
Demolitions take weeks to prepare. Obviously there was prior knowledge of what was going to occur.
Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
[QUOTE="SAURON221"]

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?comp_atkins

If it drops in a controlled fashion that means it was brought down my demolition not from burning. the U.S. government states it came down by fire.

one of the chief engineers for the wtc site said it was decided to bring it down in a controlled way, as well as the building owner agreeing. its his building, he can do what he wants with it. not that big a deal. no one was killed / injured in its collapse.

The original report was fire damage caused it to collapse I believe that is still the report then later the owner of the building said in a report with a tv channel they gave the decision to "pull it'. "pull it" is a demolition term to mean to blow the building up.  Also he still got the insurance policies on the buildings and to my knowledge your not aloud to blow up your own buildings and still get the money.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38953 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="SAURON221"]

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?SAURON221

If it drops in a controlled fashion that means it was brought down my demolition not from burning. the U.S. government states it came down by fire.

one of the chief engineers for the wtc site said it was decided to bring it down in a controlled way, as well as the building owner agreeing. its his building, he can do what he wants with it. not that big a deal. no one was killed / injured in its collapse.

The original report was fire damage caused it to collapse I believe that is still the report then later the owner of the building said in a report with a tv channel they gave the decision to "pull it'. "pull it" is a demolition term to mean to blow the building up. Also he still got the insurance policies on the buildings and to my knowledge your not aloud to blow up your own buildings and still get the money.

well, what do you want from me? silverstien was able to defraud his insurance company... happens a lot.. you dont get to where he is in life by being a nice guy all the time
Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
[QUOTE="SAURON221"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="SAURON221"]

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?comp_atkins

If it drops in a controlled fashion that means it was brought down my demolition not from burning. the U.S. government states it came down by fire.

one of the chief engineers for the wtc site said it was decided to bring it down in a controlled way, as well as the building owner agreeing. its his building, he can do what he wants with it. not that big a deal. no one was killed / injured in its collapse.

The original report was fire damage caused it to collapse I believe that is still the report then later the owner of the building said in a report with a tv channel they gave the decision to "pull it'. "pull it" is a demolition term to mean to blow the building up. Also he still got the insurance policies on the buildings and to my knowledge your not aloud to blow up your own buildings and still get the money.

well, what do you want from me? silverstien was able to defraud his insurance company... happens a lot.. you dont get to where he is in life by being a nice guy all the time

You obviously don't understand the importance of whether or not this building fell from demolition.

Avatar image for Apenoot
Apenoot

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16 Apenoot
Member since 2005 • 2087 Posts

You obviously don't understand the importance of whether or not this building fell from demolition. SAURON221

There's none. Bringing it down in a controlled fashion is better than letting it topple on other buildings. 

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38953 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="SAURON221"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="SAURON221"]

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]it was brought down in a controlled fasion. whats the big deal?SAURON221

If it drops in a controlled fashion that means it was brought down my demolition not from burning. the U.S. government states it came down by fire.

one of the chief engineers for the wtc site said it was decided to bring it down in a controlled way, as well as the building owner agreeing. its his building, he can do what he wants with it. not that big a deal. no one was killed / injured in its collapse.

The original report was fire damage caused it to collapse I believe that is still the report then later the owner of the building said in a report with a tv channel they gave the decision to "pull it'. "pull it" is a demolition term to mean to blow the building up. Also he still got the insurance policies on the buildings and to my knowledge your not aloud to blow up your own buildings and still get the money.

well, what do you want from me? silverstien was able to defraud his insurance company... happens a lot.. you dont get to where he is in life by being a nice guy all the time

You obviously don't understand the importance of whether or not this building fell from demolition.

the owner already said it had! omg! teh conspiracy! seriously, you conspiracy guys are grasping with this one.. the only dubious part of this is that silverstein got away with it. what can i say, he has good lawyers.
Avatar image for proctorsurf
proctorsurf

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 proctorsurf
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts

[QUOTE="SAURON221"] You obviously don't understand the importance of whether or not this building fell from demolition. Apenoot

There's none. Bringing it down in a controlled fashion is better than letting it topple on other buildings.

Did you read my last post? Demolitions take weeks to carry out. That would mean there was prior knowledge as to what was going to happen on 9/11
Avatar image for nintendo_ds_06
nintendo_ds_06

2657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 nintendo_ds_06
Member since 2006 • 2657 Posts
interesting
Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
so its 9/11 Conspiracy Day on GS? ****, I'm outta here, let me know when its Drug Legalization Day again.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38953 Posts
ok i'll indulge. the building was prepared beforehand for implosion weeks in advance because the gov't told them they were going to fake a terrorist attack. so weeks in advance, the building was cleared out of all material, office supplies, furniture, etc.. because all that extra stuff made it difficult for the workers to do thier thing. namely demolishing all non load bearing walls in order to not hinder the collapse. of course, all this is going on while the building is in full use, but none of the occupants seem to mind at all that their walls, furniture, and computers are all gone. now the workers get to stripping the walls down to get to all the steel support columns they need to rig in order to implode the building. the steel columns are rigged with rdx and the blasting caps have all been placed, as well as wiring up all the lead lines for the electrical detonation. again, inside the building, its business as usual for the tenets.. nothing strange at all for them to see this in their office.

Avatar image for Bidiot
Bidiot

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Bidiot
Member since 2003 • 609 Posts
BBC responds, also there's no time stamp in the movie so how can you be so sure? http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html
Avatar image for Conanfan1
Conanfan1

8014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Conanfan1
Member since 2005 • 8014 Posts
so its 9/11 Conspiracy Day on GS? ****, I'm outta here, let me know when its Drug Legalization Day again.NavigatorsGhost
This almost makes me miss Girl Problems Day.
Avatar image for EvanSkanes
EvanSkanes

10942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 EvanSkanes
Member since 2004 • 10942 Posts
Another conspiracy topic? No wai! :roll:.
Avatar image for proctorsurf
proctorsurf

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 proctorsurf
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts
[QUOTE="biocunsumer"]BBC responds, also there's no time stamp in the movie so how can you be so sure? http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html

look at my link...... first paragraph
Avatar image for EvanSkanes
EvanSkanes

10942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 EvanSkanes
Member since 2004 • 10942 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"]so its 9/11 Conspiracy Day on GS? ****, I'm outta here, let me know when its Drug Legalization Day again.Conanfan1
This almost makes me miss Girl Problems Day.

Saturday's Religion day, if you forgot.
Avatar image for Bidiot
Bidiot

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Bidiot
Member since 2003 • 609 Posts
ok the video they're using is different then some of the other ones CTers suse but my link still stand. Also how stupid does any one have to be to plan such a massive conspiracy and not have a single person come forward to talk about it, yet they'll give information to a newstation in a different continent?
Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"]so its 9/11 Conspiracy Day on GS? ****, I'm outta here, let me know when its Drug Legalization Day again.Conanfan1
This almost makes me miss Girl Problems Day.



at least those threads can be funny and at the very least sad and pathetic.
Avatar image for proctorsurf
proctorsurf

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 proctorsurf
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts
Another conspiracy topic? No wai! :roll:.EvanSkanes
Oh im sorry, i guess discussing how mountain dew tastes better then Dr. Pepper is way more important then realizing that there was corruption within the government when it came to the death of over 2000 American citizens? wake up
Avatar image for Bidiot
Bidiot

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Bidiot
Member since 2003 • 609 Posts
yes, becuase we're all sheople, Why is it hard to understand that a man who has tried to destroy the WTC before, has said on many occasions how he hates America, then took credit for the attacks afterwards, why couldn't he have done it?
Avatar image for EvanSkanes
EvanSkanes

10942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 EvanSkanes
Member since 2004 • 10942 Posts
[QUOTE="EvanSkanes"]Another conspiracy topic? No wai! :roll:.proctorsurf
Oh im sorry, i guess discussing how mountain dew tastes better then Dr. Pepper is way more important then realizing that there was corruption within the government when it came to the death of over 2000 American citizens? wake up

You're goddamn right it's better. At least there's not a Dr. Pepper thread every ****ing page.
Avatar image for The-Bulldozer
The-Bulldozer

46303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 The-Bulldozer
Member since 2003 • 46303 Posts
Hahaha the government is behind all that.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
So mistakes in time could of been made, do go try to make crazy accusations on something that doesnt have enough backing to really matter.
Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#34 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
Demolitions take weeks to prepare. Obviously there was prior knowledge of what was going to occur.proctorsurf
it was improvied.....they brought tower 7 down quickly so that it wouldn't collapse and potentially hurt more people..what is so hard to understand about that?.....
Avatar image for kitty
kitty

115479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 kitty  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 115479 Posts

[QUOTE="proctorsurf"]Demolitions take weeks to prepare. Obviously there was prior knowledge of what was going to occur.Omni-Slash
it was improvied.....they brought tower 7 down quickly so that it wouldn't collapse and potentially hurt more people..what is so hard to understand about that?.....

some ppl on the OT arent so bright

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Conspiracies concerning 9/11!? :shock: How unexpected! :|Conanfan1
I never saw it coming :o
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="EvanSkanes"]Another conspiracy topic? No wai! :roll:.proctorsurf
Oh im sorry, i guess discussing how mountain dew tastes better then Dr. Pepper is way more important then realizing that there was corruption within the government when it came to the death of over 2000 American citizens? wake up

You, sir, are a dupe of the conspiracy. Dr. Pepper has been PROVEN by multiple videos on Google video to be the superior soda. Why don't people just do some simple research, rather than believing everything Mountain Dew tells them???