BCS to switch to playoff

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts

That is if the Obama administration gets its way. The Justice Department is going to look into the BCS to determine if it violates anti-trust laws. There's a pretty good chance college football could switch to a playoff soon.

SOURCE

Thoughts? Do you want a playoff in college football?

Avatar image for TehSupaBeatz
TehSupaBeatz

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 TehSupaBeatz
Member since 2010 • 487 Posts

Finally! The BCS was so messed up.

Avatar image for Alex3796
Alex3796

2669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 1

#3 Alex3796
Member since 2009 • 2669 Posts

I know how everybody hates the BCS and what not, and I don't agree with how they choose #1 and 2, but I think that having bowls at the end of the season is a "tradition" and I don't think we should break it. I like watching all the different bowls during the post-season and I think it'd be a shame to see it go to a playoff.

Avatar image for TaCoDuDe
TaCoDuDe

3239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 TaCoDuDe
Member since 2006 • 3239 Posts

First of all, it's unlikely anything will happen. The administration knows that there are more important things to do than worry about college sports.

I would love for a playoff, but I don't think I want the government spending money on this.

Avatar image for jjj13
jjj13

2399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#5 jjj13
Member since 2005 • 2399 Posts
This is probably the best thing I heard in a long time! I HATE the BCS. It is the worst system they can have. I cant wait for a playoff system. Then maybe then!, Pitt will have a chance! Say bye tot he NFL because of the salary cap and hello NCAA!
Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts
The government spends our money on worse things---why not the BCS? :)

First of all, it's unlikely anything will happen. The administration knows that there are more important things to do than worry about college sports.

I would love for a playoff, but I don't think I want the government spending money on this.

TaCoDuDe
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#7 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
If anything could fix Obama's current popularity issues, it would be reforming college football's postseason.
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
A playoff system for college football would be the new greatest thing since sliced bread.
Avatar image for batman_is_aweso
batman_is_aweso

2762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 batman_is_aweso
Member since 2009 • 2762 Posts

That is if the Obama administration gets its way. The Justice Department is going to look into the BCS to determine if it violates anti-trust laws. There's a pretty good chance college football could switch to a playoff soon.

SOURCE

Thoughts? Do you want a playoff in college football?

Maniacc1

pshh as long as its not as bad as NFL's overtime

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

As bad as the BCS is playoffs just don't work in football. Basically you're looking at 1 extra month of games for ever 8 teams. Considering there's about 25 conferences, and come playoff time you'd have to fly teams out for each game it's pretty hectic.

Now some of you might argue that if basketball can do it w/ march madness then football could also. The problem w/ this is Basketball teams can easily play 2 or 3 times a week. A football team might be able to play 2 game a week w/ a week off, but typically never more than once a week. Also basketball teams rosters are 13 players on scholarship, and there's less support staff (trainers, coaches, help). Football teams can have up to 70 players on their roster, and have much much more staff, and equipment.

While it might be doable w/ the top 8 teams that's not really going to change much in the way of the BCS rankings being BS.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

Why is Obama worrying about college football right now?

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

If anything could fix Obama's current popularity issues, it would be reforming college football's postseason.nocoolnamejim
What's frightening is it actually will. If it happens his popularity will go through the roof again for about a day.

Avatar image for Elephant_Couple
Elephant_Couple

1404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Elephant_Couple
Member since 2010 • 1404 Posts

Do I want a playoff in college football? Yes.

Do I want the freaking PRESIDENT to waste his and our time trying to make it happen? **** NO. What is wrong with this guy? Why would you even leak the possibility of an investigation into COLLEGE ****ING FOOTBALL when you have THIS sort of stuff going on?!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100201/ap_on_bi_ge/us_budget

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/01/31/iran.protests/index.html?section=cnn_latest

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60U18R20100131?type=politicsNews

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a711d64f4c9e98c38f7cdfaa01fa246b.341&show_article=1

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aqLMEUObhysc

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100202/ap_on_re_us/us_nuclear_lab_budgets_1

Good god, what a twisted, ignorant, narcissistic, badly prioritized administration.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

Do I want a playoff in college football? Yes.

Do I want the freaking PRESIDENT to waste his and our time trying to make it happen? **** NO. What is wrong with this guy? Why would you even leak the possibility of an investigation into COLLEGE ****ING FOOTBALL when you have THIS sort of stuff going on?!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100201/ap_on_bi_ge/us_budget

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/01/31/iran.protests/index.html?section=cnn_latest

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60U18R20100131?type=politicsNews

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a711d64f4c9e98c38f7cdfaa01fa246b.341&show_article=1

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aqLMEUObhysc

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100202/ap_on_re_us/us_nuclear_lab_budgets_1

Good god, what a twisted, ignorant, narcissistic, badly prioritized administration.

Elephant_Couple

I agree completely. And I don't even think it will help his popularity temporarily. At least half of the country doesn't think he's doing a good job. They're all going to see through this and ask why public money is being spent on an investigation into NCAA football. It's this kind of meddling in axiomatically non-governmental affairs that are going to cost the Democrats a lot of seats in Congress this November.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21753 Posts

Get er done.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
Well I think that the Justice Department should be investigating the potential war crimes of the Bush administration rather than looking into the BCS...but there really should be a playoff system. It is ridiculous that there isn't one.
Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

Well I think that the Justice Department should be investigating the potential war crimes of the Bush administration rather than looking into the BCS...but there really should be a playoff system. It is ridiculous that there isn't one. -Sun_Tzu-

Since the Bush administration committed no war crimes in a legal sense, that would be a waste of time too. Go ahead, prosecute a former administration for political differences. That's a great precedent. Then see if anybody does the bidding of Barack Obama when he proposes anything controversial.

Investigating the Bush administration would almost unquestionably lose him the White House in 2012. Only about 15% of America, far-left radical extremists like you, agree with it. That's why we haven't heard anything about it since April.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I want a playoff system, but I dont want a government mandated playoff system. That would be stupid.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Well I think that the Justice Department should be investigating the potential war crimes of the Bush administration rather than looking into the BCS...but there really should be a playoff system. It is ridiculous that there isn't one. Communistik

Since the Bush administration committed no war crimes in a legal sense, that would be a waste of time too. Go ahead, prosecute a former administration for political differences. That's a great precedent. Then see if anybody does the bidding of Barack Obama when he proposes anything controversial.

Investigating the Bush administration would almost unquestionably lose him the White House in 2012. Only about 15% of America, far-left radical extremists like you, agree with it. That's why we haven't heard anything about it since April.

Well there is a pretty obvious reason why Obama and the Justice Department aren't going to investigate the Bush administration, and it doesn't really have anything to do with getting re-elected. This country doesn't really have any love for the Bush administration. You are partially right, Obama doesn't want to set a precedent, but not the kind of precedent that you described. The precedent that they set has to do with accountability and respecting the law. Being unbound from the law is a tremendous amount of power, and Obama doesn't seem to want to give that up. But war crimes were committed by the Bush administration whether or not you want to accept that fact - in fact the Bush administration has become very blatant about it. Water boarding is torture, torture is illegal; i.e. it is a war crime. If the law means anything at all, there should at least, at the bare minimum, be an investigation. That is after all, the job of the Justice Department - to bring justice.

Avatar image for Swanogt19
Swanogt19

24159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 Swanogt19
Member since 2008 • 24159 Posts

politics and sports should not be mixed.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Well I think that the Justice Department should be investigating the potential war crimes of the Bush administration rather than looking into the BCS...but there really should be a playoff system. It is ridiculous that there isn't one. -Sun_Tzu-

Since the Bush administration committed no war crimes in a legal sense, that would be a waste of time too. Go ahead, prosecute a former administration for political differences. That's a great precedent. Then see if anybody does the bidding of Barack Obama when he proposes anything controversial.

Investigating the Bush administration would almost unquestionably lose him the White House in 2012. Only about 15% of America, far-left radical extremists like you, agree with it. That's why we haven't heard anything about it since April.

Well there is a pretty obvious reason why Obama and the Justice Department aren't going to investigate the Bush administration, and it doesn't really have anything to do with getting re-elected. This country doesn't really have any love for the Bush administration. You are partially right, Obama doesn't want to set a precedent, but not the kind of precedent that you described. The precedent that they set has to do with accountability and respecting the law. Being unbound from the law is a tremendous amount of power, and Obama doesn't seem to want to give that up. But war crimes were committed by the Bush administration whether or not you want to accept that fact - in fact the Bush administration has become very blatant about it. Water boarding is torture, torture is illegal; i.e. it is a war crime. If the law means anything at all, there should at least, at the bare minimum, be an investigation. That is after all, the job of the Justice Department - to bring justice.

Go to law school. The Justice Department of the Bush Administration established legal grounds for everything; that is unquestionable. Clinton did the same sort of thing in several controversial situations, but he was never criticized for it. The precedent Obama would be setting is a precedent of criminalizing political differences...essentially taking what was legitimate legal standing and saying, "this is now criminal, because I disagree with it." That's it. It's very simple. People like you, who want an investigation and a potentially a prosecution, don't understand how our legal system works.
Avatar image for the_new_guy_92
the_new_guy_92

884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 the_new_guy_92
Member since 2009 • 884 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

Since the Bush administration committed no war crimes in a legal sense, that would be a waste of time too. Go ahead, prosecute a former administration for political differences. That's a great precedent. Then see if anybody does the bidding of Barack Obama when he proposes anything controversial.

Investigating the Bush administration would almost unquestionably lose him the White House in 2012. Only about 15% of America, far-left radical extremists like you, agree with it. That's why we haven't heard anything about it since April.

Communistik

Well there is a pretty obvious reason why Obama and the Justice Department aren't going to investigate the Bush administration, and it doesn't really have anything to do with getting re-elected. This country doesn't really have any love for the Bush administration. You are partially right, Obama doesn't want to set a precedent, but not the kind of precedent that you described. The precedent that they set has to do with accountability and respecting the law. Being unbound from the law is a tremendous amount of power, and Obama doesn't seem to want to give that up. But war crimes were committed by the Bush administration whether or not you want to accept that fact - in fact the Bush administration has become very blatant about it. Water boarding is torture, torture is illegal; i.e. it is a war crime. If the law means anything at all, there should at least, at the bare minimum, be an investigation. That is after all, the job of the Justice Department - to bring justice.

Go to law school. The Justice Department of the Bush Administration established legal grounds for everything; that is unquestionable. Clinton did the same sort of thing in several controversial situations, but he was never criticized for it. The precedent Obama would be setting is a precedent of criminalizing political differences...essentially taking what was legitimate legal standing and saying, "this is now criminal, because I disagree with it." That's it. It's very simple. People like you, who want an investigation and a potentially a prosecution, don't understand how our legal system works.

Are you forgetting all the misinformation that the Bush Administration fed Congress during his terms to justify the Iraq War? The current administration could easily go after the past administration, to see if they purposely mislead Congress and the American public.
Avatar image for ChiSoxBombers
ChiSoxBombers

3700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ChiSoxBombers
Member since 2006 • 3700 Posts

Bowl games rack in a lot of dough for the NCAA. I doubt they'll break up a tradition like this. Also, the number of teams making the playoffs would be SIGNIFICANTLY reduced seeing as a team can only play one game per week.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Well there is a pretty obvious reason why Obama and the Justice Department aren't going to investigate the Bush administration, and it doesn't really have anything to do with getting re-elected. This country doesn't really have any love for the Bush administration. You are partially right, Obama doesn't want to set a precedent, but not the kind of precedent that you described. The precedent that they set has to do with accountability and respecting the law. Being unbound from the law is a tremendous amount of power, and Obama doesn't seem to want to give that up. But war crimes were committed by the Bush administration whether or not you want to accept that fact - in fact the Bush administration has become very blatant about it. Water boarding is torture, torture is illegal; i.e. it is a war crime. If the law means anything at all, there should at least, at the bare minimum, be an investigation. That is after all, the job of the Justice Department - to bring justice.

the_new_guy_92

Go to law school. The Justice Department of the Bush Administration established legal grounds for everything; that is unquestionable. Clinton did the same sort of thing in several controversial situations, but he was never criticized for it. The precedent Obama would be setting is a precedent of criminalizing political differences...essentially taking what was legitimate legal standing and saying, "this is now criminal, because I disagree with it." That's it. It's very simple. People like you, who want an investigation and a potentially a prosecution, don't understand how our legal system works.

Are you forgetting all the misinformation that the Bush Administration fed Congress during his terms to justify the Iraq War? The current administration could easily go after the past administration, to see if they purposely mislead Congress and the American public.

Misinformation based off of intelligence that they were given. And if you're going to prosecute Bush and his administration, you will have to prosecute at least 34 Democrats in Congress and 17 Repubiicans. They were in the controversial closed meetings that Bush officials had, before the general assembly was addressed. This includes Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer, and many others.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

Since the Bush administration committed no war crimes in a legal sense, that would be a waste of time too. Go ahead, prosecute a former administration for political differences. That's a great precedent. Then see if anybody does the bidding of Barack Obama when he proposes anything controversial.

Investigating the Bush administration would almost unquestionably lose him the White House in 2012. Only about 15% of America, far-left radical extremists like you, agree with it. That's why we haven't heard anything about it since April.

Communistik

Well there is a pretty obvious reason why Obama and the Justice Department aren't going to investigate the Bush administration, and it doesn't really have anything to do with getting re-elected. This country doesn't really have any love for the Bush administration. You are partially right, Obama doesn't want to set a precedent, but not the kind of precedent that you described. The precedent that they set has to do with accountability and respecting the law. Being unbound from the law is a tremendous amount of power, and Obama doesn't seem to want to give that up. But war crimes were committed by the Bush administration whether or not you want to accept that fact - in fact the Bush administration has become very blatant about it. Water boarding is torture, torture is illegal; i.e. it is a war crime. If the law means anything at all, there should at least, at the bare minimum, be an investigation. That is after all, the job of the Justice Department - to bring justice.

Go to law school. The Justice Department of the Bush Administration established legal grounds for everything; that is unquestionable. Clinton did the same sort of thing in several controversial situations, but he was never criticized for it. The precedent Obama would be setting is a precedent of criminalizing political differences...essentially taking what was legitimate legal standing and saying, "this is now criminal, because I disagree with it." That's it. It's very simple. People like you, who want an investigation and a potentially a prosecution, don't understand how our legal system works.

Clinton committed his own war crimes, such as the missile attacks on Sudan, but he didn't sign off on torture. Moreover, the legal grounds that the Bush administration established have been critiqued and refuted ad nauseum. Up until the Bush administration, the U.S. saw water boarding as a war crime, and prosecuted individuals as war criminals for water boarding. What the Bush administration did was in clear violation of U.S. law and international law. This has absolutely nothing to do with labeling people as criminals for a mere difference of opinion. And I have a fair grasp on how the legal system works - if it seems as if someone might have broken the law, they are investigated, and then possibly prosecuted.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa
deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa

11536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa
Member since 2007 • 11536 Posts

politics and sports should not be mixed.

Swanogt19

i agree but ncaaf needs a playoff

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Well there is a pretty obvious reason why Obama and the Justice Department aren't going to investigate the Bush administration, and it doesn't really have anything to do with getting re-elected. This country doesn't really have any love for the Bush administration. You are partially right, Obama doesn't want to set a precedent, but not the kind of precedent that you described. The precedent that they set has to do with accountability and respecting the law. Being unbound from the law is a tremendous amount of power, and Obama doesn't seem to want to give that up. But war crimes were committed by the Bush administration whether or not you want to accept that fact - in fact the Bush administration has become very blatant about it. Water boarding is torture, torture is illegal; i.e. it is a war crime. If the law means anything at all, there should at least, at the bare minimum, be an investigation. That is after all, the job of the Justice Department - to bring justice.

-Sun_Tzu-

Go to law school. The Justice Department of the Bush Administration established legal grounds for everything; that is unquestionable. Clinton did the same sort of thing in several controversial situations, but he was never criticized for it. The precedent Obama would be setting is a precedent of criminalizing political differences...essentially taking what was legitimate legal standing and saying, "this is now criminal, because I disagree with it." That's it. It's very simple. People like you, who want an investigation and a potentially a prosecution, don't understand how our legal system works.

Clinton committed his own war crimes, such as the missile attacks on the Sudan, but he didn't sign off on torture. Moreover, the legal grounds that the Bush administration established have been critiqued and refuted ad nauseum. Up until the Bush administration, the U.S. saw water boarding as a war crime, and prosecuted individuals as war criminals for water boarding. What the Bush administration did was in clear violation of U.S. law and international law. This has absolutely nothing to do with labeling people as criminals for a mere difference of opinion. And I have a fair grasp on how the legal system works - if it seems as if someone might have broken the law, they are investigated, and then possibly prosecuted.

They've been critiqued and refuted "ad nauseum" by legal cousel from your side of the spectrum...not by anyone else. That's not going to hold up to srutiny if this actually reaches litigation. It's a farce. The whole problem with this situation is that it's a group of far-left radicals trying to decide whether or not to prosecute a group of conservatives. That doesn't make you at least a little concerned that the actions so far were, in fact, not completely impartial? Why should Obama investigate war crimes of one administration and not another? It's political. It's not a legality issue. Obama's Justice Department is using the law as a way to get back at the opposition.

Avatar image for IrishPunk
IrishPunk

10150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 IrishPunk
Member since 2003 • 10150 Posts

I'm all in favor of a college playoff system. I love college football more than the NFL for many reasons but one of the big ones being the huge range of competition between so many schools. With a playoff system that thing gets a lot better. What I hate most about the BCS is that really good teams get shut out of the chance to be a national champion because they come from a smaller conference or the teams they play are perceived to be too weak. Teams like Boise State, TCU and others should get an equal chance to get the title.

The one concern I have with it, like others have already stated, is that the playoff would have to fit into a certain window of time in order to be fair to the players. However the effort to figure something out, IMO, is well worth the abolition of such a bad system.

I would love for a playoff, but I don't think I want the government spending money on this.

TaCoDuDe


From SI.com: "Second, the federal deficit will not rise one penny if the Justice Department investigates the BCS. The Justice Department employs people, and those people must do something. If they are ordered to investigate the BCS, there is an opportunity cost exacted -- they could have investigated something else -- but not a monetary one."



Bowl games rack in a lot of dough for the NCAA. I doubt they'll break up a tradition like this. Also, the number of teams making the playoffs would be SIGNIFICANTLY reduced seeing as a team can only play one game per week.

ChiSoxBombers


Read the article it discusses this. Schools would actually earn MORE money with a playoff system.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="Communistik"] Go to law school. The Justice Department of the Bush Administration established legal grounds for everything; that is unquestionable. Clinton did the same sort of thing in several controversial situations, but he was never criticized for it. The precedent Obama would be setting is a precedent of criminalizing political differences...essentially taking what was legitimate legal standing and saying, "this is now criminal, because I disagree with it." That's it. It's very simple. People like you, who want an investigation and a potentially a prosecution, don't understand how our legal system works. Communistik

Clinton committed his own war crimes, such as the missile attacks on the Sudan, but he didn't sign off on torture. Moreover, the legal grounds that the Bush administration established have been critiqued and refuted ad nauseum. Up until the Bush administration, the U.S. saw water boarding as a war crime, and prosecuted individuals as war criminals for water boarding. What the Bush administration did was in clear violation of U.S. law and international law. This has absolutely nothing to do with labeling people as criminals for a mere difference of opinion. And I have a fair grasp on how the legal system works - if it seems as if someone might have broken the law, they are investigated, and then possibly prosecuted.

They've been critiqued and refuted "ad nauseum" by legal cousel from your side of the spectrum...not by anyone else. That's not going to hold up to srutiny if this actually reaches litigation. It's a farce. The whole problem with this situation is that it's a group of far-left radicals trying to decide whether or not to prosecute a group of conservatives. That doesn't make you at least a little concerned that the actions so far were, in fact, not completely impartial? Why should Obama investigate war crimes of one administration and not another? It's political. It's not a legality issue. Obama's Justice Department is using the law as a way to get back at the opposition.

Well, it's not a farce by any means. What would be a farce is if members of the Bush administration are able to get away with committing war crimes, because it makes a complete mockery of the law and renders it completely meaningless. If the Clinton administration were to be investigated that would be fantastic. As should a number of the "Washington elite" who had committed war crimes throughout the latter half of the 20th century. That would be ideal. But that's not going to happen unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, most of them political. However, the mere fact that these people aren't going to be investigated and/or prosecuted for war crimes does not excuse the Bush administration. There is no reason to make the ideal the enemy of the good.
Avatar image for DeadMagazines
DeadMagazines

1593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DeadMagazines
Member since 2009 • 1593 Posts
Wow..the government is already meddling in the auto business (see: Toyota) and now they want to dip into COLLEGE sports? Gtfo..NOW. I don't care if the BCS is the worst thing man created, we don't need government in any sports entertainment like this.
Avatar image for IrishPunk
IrishPunk

10150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 IrishPunk
Member since 2003 • 10150 Posts

Wow..the government is already meddling in the auto business (see: Toyota) and now they want to dip into COLLEGE sports? Gtfo..NOW. I don't care if the BCS is the worst thing man created, we don't need government in any sports entertainment like this. DeadMagazines

We do when the BCS is affecting the disbursement of millions of dollars to a bunch of public (re: state run) institutions. The BCS is a sham.

Avatar image for ExpiredGhost
ExpiredGhost

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ExpiredGhost
Member since 2010 • 528 Posts
I think it would be awesome if College Football would have a playoff system.
Avatar image for Acemaster27
Acemaster27

4482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Acemaster27
Member since 2004 • 4482 Posts
Lets hope this gets through. The BCS championship does need fixing.
Avatar image for iowastate
iowastate

7922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#34 iowastate
Member since 2004 • 7922 Posts

Don't count on it. The system they have is far from perfect but the reasoning for not expanding it that sports are a SECONDARY part of the university experience.

the post season already cuts into the cIasses too much and they did not use the playoff before because it would extend the postseason into the finals period.

Face it - - whether we like it or not football is not the reason these kids go to school it is an extra curricular activity and if they can not attend their cIasses then they should be booted off the team.

The days of easy schedules for athletes and turning out strong teams of illiterate jocks is a thing of the past.

and who gives a damn what Obama or any politician says. The have not business interfering in the education of our youngsters.

That idiotic No Child Left Behind and other Government programs have caused enough damage and left the public school system miles and miles behind private schools

Why do you think no politician will let his kids go to a PS?

Avatar image for UltimoIce
UltimoIce

3074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 UltimoIce
Member since 2009 • 3074 Posts

About damn time.

Avatar image for starwarsjunky
starwarsjunky

24765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 starwarsjunky
Member since 2009 • 24765 Posts
i love that this might happen, but i hate that its being forced by the government and that the prez is wasting his time on it. they shouldve just changed it a long time ago.
Avatar image for CyleM
CyleM

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#37 CyleM
Member since 2004 • 2546 Posts
Finally! I hope this happens, I'm kinda tired of the big teams always dominating...
Avatar image for UltimoIce
UltimoIce

3074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 UltimoIce
Member since 2009 • 3074 Posts

Finally! I hope this happens, I'm kinda tired of the big teams always dominating... CyleM

I still think that any team without a division championship should never be considered for the national championship. The big 10 or pac-10 doesn't deserve a shot. Go fill out your conference, then they can play in the new tourney :).

Avatar image for Viginti_Tres
Viginti_Tres

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 Viginti_Tres
Member since 2006 • 373 Posts

This Should Be IN The Sports Section,NOt Ot, According TO You Guys.

Avatar image for cybrcatter
cybrcatter

16210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 cybrcatter
Member since 2003 • 16210 Posts

Wow, the mod really helped push this topic off track there for a bit.

The justice department is capable of handling many tasks at once. It's not like there are just two people there and they have to choose one issue over the other.

If BCS is is participating in Ologopolistic business practices, then they need to be investigated. Period.

Would I be happy if there were playoffs instead.........
.........................
HECK YEAH!

Too bad NFL OT rules aren't possible law breakers.
But the NFL is a little less static in tradition than NCAA, so I think there is the possibility of a rule change some day down the road.

Avatar image for shaneomac103
shaneomac103

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 shaneomac103
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts

playoffs sounds way better that way

we can have a more exciting ncaa season

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

I know how everybody hates the BCS and what not, and I don't agree with how they choose #1 and 2, but I think that having bowls at the end of the season is a "tradition" and I don't think we should break it. I like watching all the different bowls during the post-season and I think it'd be a shame to see it go to a playoff.

Alex3796
bowls wouldn't' be removed. Anyways, I doubt this happens and I'll believe it when I see it.