Beyond the standard model.....("God's Particle")

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for thephoenix365
thephoenix365

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 thephoenix365
Member since 2004 • 246 Posts
OK so one for the physics geeks, of which i can't be the only one.
With the switch on of the LHC and CERN later this year, will they find the Higgns boson, the particle responsible for giving other particles mass, something different or maybe even nothing at all?
As a continuation....will they develop a theory of everything as a result of the experiments at the LHC?  Is the a grand unification/sypersymmetric solution to the universe?  Or are we really just miles away from understanding the whole thing?
Avatar image for -Idioteque-
-Idioteque-

257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 -Idioteque-
Member since 2007 • 257 Posts
I thought it wasnt going to be operational until later this year? Maybe it is...its all pretty interesting. The higgs boson theory is def. interesting but im not a physics geek so i can only guess waht we'll learn.
Avatar image for Dark__Link
Dark__Link

32653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Dark__Link
Member since 2003 • 32653 Posts
We're all going to die.
Avatar image for ProudLarry
ProudLarry

13511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 ProudLarry
Member since 2004 • 13511 Posts
I'd put a good amount of money on it finding the Higgs Boson particle, assuming that LHC actually performs as it should. The standard model hasn't let us down much when it comes to sub-atomic particles.
Avatar image for thephoenix365
thephoenix365

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 thephoenix365
Member since 2004 • 246 Posts
I'd put a good amount of money on it finding the Higgs Boson particle, assuming that LHC actually performs as it should. The standard model hasn't let us down much when it comes to sub-atomic particles.
ProudLarry

well yes so far, still has a hole where Gravity should be....:lol:
Avatar image for ProudLarry
ProudLarry

13511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 ProudLarry
Member since 2004 • 13511 Posts

[QUOTE="ProudLarry"]I'd put a good amount of money on it finding the Higgs Boson particle, assuming that LHC actually performs as it should. The standard model hasn't let us down much when it comes to sub-atomic particles.
thephoenix365

well yes so far, still has a hole where Gravity should be....:lol:

Well yeah, and it will have to be replaced becuase it doesn't explain gravity. But its pretty damn good at describing different quanta (except for gravitons, which could very well not exist). 

Avatar image for thephoenix365
thephoenix365

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 thephoenix365
Member since 2004 • 246 Posts
indeed, it's been the best model in physics history in my opinion.  Hopefully I get to play a part in taking things a step further
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts

dont know much on the subject, but for poll and fun purposes i''ll say something completely unexpected...  :D

 

Avatar image for woody998
woody998

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#9 woody998
Member since 2005 • 2719 Posts
can someone give me a detailed yet relitively simple explination of the whole thing? thx
Avatar image for Account_27
Account_27

13426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Account_27
Member since 2005 • 13426 Posts

They'll find a mini dancing Jesus.  Mark my words.
 

Avatar image for thephoenix365
thephoenix365

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 thephoenix365
Member since 2004 • 246 Posts
can someone give me a detailed yet relitively simple explination of the whole thing? thxwoody998

3 types of relativity:
Normal (Newtonian dynamics); Two cars, each going at 50 MPH, hit head on.  Each car has an impact of 50 + 50 = 100 MPH.  If they were heading away from each other at 50 MPH each then they would have a relative speed of 50 - 50 = 0 MPH

Special (Einstein number 1); If you start going at speeds approaching the speed of light in a vaccum then strange things happen.  For example, to a person travling in a ship going at the speed of light, it would appear to take no time at all to get to their destination (literally).  However to an observer outside the ship which is traveling at this speed, it appears to take the ship 5 minutes to travel from (as an example) the sun to the earth.  Also if you look out of a ship going at the spped of light, any object appears to be shorter in the direction you are going, than it would appear to someone going at more normal speeds. (think 30 MPH)

General (Einstein 2);  I'll be honest, I don't know a way to express this one in layman terms.....if anyone else can please have a go.  It's highly complex and i don't study it sadly.