Bitrates? =S (in sound files)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xArticulus
xArticulus

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 xArticulus
Member since 2006 • 351 Posts

what are they? =s

does the larger the number mean the better quality or something? im just really not too sure, thanks for any help =)!

Avatar image for BeeefIsGoood
BeeefIsGoood

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 BeeefIsGoood
Member since 2007 • 1418 Posts
like framerates, but for sound.
Avatar image for Cyrax-Sektor
Cyrax-Sektor

12060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#3 Cyrax-Sektor
Member since 2006 • 12060 Posts

All I know is this: you're correct that the more bitrates, the better quality.

So the more the merrier! ^_^

Avatar image for MrPenguinKing
MrPenguinKing

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MrPenguinKing
Member since 2006 • 612 Posts

Larger number mean better quality but only those with a trained ear can usually spot the differences which are subtle.

Also, the larger the bitrate the more space it takes up.

Avatar image for xArticulus
xArticulus

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 xArticulus
Member since 2006 • 351 Posts

ooooh got yer ;)

so does anyone know like what the standard bitrate (number) is from like a cd?

Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#6 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
bitrate? sound frame? later ya'll.
Avatar image for luke1889
luke1889

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 luke1889
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts
To a lot of people, 128 Kbps is perfectly acceptable sound quality. Above that, all you're really getting is a bigger file size, because the difference in actual sound quality is harldy noticeable.
Avatar image for BeeefIsGoood
BeeefIsGoood

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BeeefIsGoood
Member since 2007 • 1418 Posts

ooooh got yer ;)

so does anyone know like what the standard bitrate (number) is from like a cd?

xArticulus

dunno... try google

Avatar image for xArticulus
xArticulus

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 xArticulus
Member since 2006 • 351 Posts

To a lot of people, 128 Kbps is perfectly acceptable sound quality. Above that, all you're really getting is a bigger file size, because the difference in actual sound quality is harldy noticeable.luke1889

ahah, right, thanks for everyones help, im shocked actually how much help i did just get! the gamespot community pulls through once again, thanks guys!!

Avatar image for Cyrax-Sektor
Cyrax-Sektor

12060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#10 Cyrax-Sektor
Member since 2006 • 12060 Posts

[QUOTE="luke1889"]To a lot of people, 128 Kbps is perfectly acceptable sound quality. Above that, all you're really getting is a bigger file size, because the difference in actual sound quality is harldy noticeable.xArticulus

ahah, right, thanks for everyones help, im shocked actually how much help i did just get! the gamespot community pulls through once again, thanks guys!!

We do that a lot, yet people are always surprised. :P

Avatar image for Saveour
Saveour

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Saveour
Member since 2007 • 60 Posts
Well higher bitrate = better sound quality. But not that much that you can hear a difference.
Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#12 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts

Bitrate, as everyone else has mentioned, is basically an indicator of sound quality - mp3s are a lossy format, like JPEGs, and are compressed a certain amount from their source.

128kbps used to be the standard, though it's really only suitable if you've got an mp3 player with very little memory and you listen to it while exercising or something. The instant you listen to it with good headphones in a quiet area it'll sound mediocre.

192kbps is a good bet for general use, since the files aren't huge and they sound pretty good. It's also overkill if you're using stock earbuds (like the terrible included iPod headphones).

You'll want 320kbps if you're playing it back via studio speakers or something, and even then you'll be able to pick out the difference between CD and mp3 with a bit of listening.

I think CDs are 1440kbps, though they're totally uncompressed.

Avatar image for Vortexx
Vortexx

1466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Vortexx
Member since 2005 • 1466 Posts
My music plays at 192kbps. I personally find it smoother than 128kbps, but as others have said, it's very subtle. Most high quality music is set to play at 192/s by default. A four minute song at this rate is about 6 MB in size.
Avatar image for Vortexx
Vortexx

1466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Vortexx
Member since 2005 • 1466 Posts
EDIT: It should be mentioned that 192kbps was achieved by downloading from a music provide (EX: Urge). I set WMP11 to rip music files from disks at 192/s also. That is the highest quality available through WMP.
Avatar image for GeForce2187
GeForce2187

2963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 GeForce2187
Member since 2006 • 2963 Posts
Files gotten off of file sharing services are usually noticibly lower quality. Alot of times, the file could be saved as a 320kbps, but is actually a 128kpbs file that was re-saved as a 320kpbs file, but its still 128kpbs quality. I'm working on replacing all of my music with AAC files off of iTunes because most of the .mp3s I have sound so bad.