http://pubrecord.org/nation/2821/cheney-pressured-bush-military/
Sorry, i don't know how to link yet, but i amazed at what that administration did or even considered doing.
Edit: I guess it automatically links.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://pubrecord.org/nation/2821/cheney-pressured-bush-military/
Sorry, i don't know how to link yet, but i amazed at what that administration did or even considered doing.
Edit: I guess it automatically links.
You would be in Texas. The south shall rise again!I'm guessing he figured we'd be welcomed as liberators.
duxup
At first I was surprised, but then I got over it. It was just to get six terrorist, but I imagine he was contemplating the military because he really wanted them captured. He decided against it though so that shows something.
Probably that the White House Counsel's Office mentioned that it would be wildly illegalAt first I was surprised, but then I got over it. It was just to get six terrorist, but I imagine he was contemplating the military because he really wanted them captured. He decided against it though so that shows something.
Ragnarok1051
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]Probably that the White House Counsel's Office mentioned that it would be wildly illegal Yeah well they didn't seem to have too many problems interpreting the laws how they wished anyway ;)At first I was surprised, but then I got over it. It was just to get six terrorist, but I imagine he was contemplating the military because he really wanted them captured. He decided against it though so that shows something.
xaos
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]Probably that the White House Counsel's Office mentioned that it would be wildly illegal True, but wasn't there also something that made it legal under certain situations?At first I was surprised, but then I got over it. It was just to get six terrorist, but I imagine he was contemplating the military because he really wanted them captured. He decided against it though so that shows something.
xaos
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]Probably that the White House Counsel's Office mentioned that it would be wildly illegal True, but wasn't there also something that made it legal under certain situations? None I know of; that's why National Guard are deployed in emergencies and for situations like ensuring school integrationAt first I was surprised, but then I got over it. It was just to get six terrorist, but I imagine he was contemplating the military because he really wanted them captured. He decided against it though so that shows something.
Ragnarok1051
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="xaos"] Probably that the White House Counsel's Office mentioned that it would be wildly illegalxaosTrue, but wasn't there also something that made it legal under certain situations? None I know of; that's why National Guard are deployed in emergencies and for situations like ensuring school integration I'm not sure either, but I thought I read something about it in the yahoo article I read about this.
It is legal to send troops on domestic soil in the upmost case that it is for the protection of the Constution or the American people.
US Troops would be deployed in the case of a disease outbreak and granted emergency powers of quarantine and such. And in natural disasters, the National Guard is sent.
Also, the military is sent in times of social unrest such as the LA Riots when it became apparent that other people's lives were at stake.
But the government cannot just send troops willy nilly here and there with out due cause or reason. That is where the FBI or local law enforcement come in.
Just skimming over the article, it looks like it was Cheney's idea and Bush was opposed to it. Hey, he has to have done a few things right at least.
[QUOTE="SpaceMoose"]If only he had been smart enough to do the same for Iraq.Just skimming over the article, it looks like it was Cheney's idea and Bush was opposed to it. Hey, he has to have done a few things right at least.
duxup
If only he had been smart enough to do the same for Iraq.[QUOTE="duxup"][QUOTE="SpaceMoose"]
Just skimming over the article, it looks like it was Cheney's idea and Bush was opposed to it. Hey, he has to have done a few things right at least.
carrot-cake
No, Hoover did plenty wrong. He signed Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act which was absolutely moronic.The president always gets blamed for everything. In the Depression, Hoover was the better president to fix it, but they went for FDR's charisma. Hoover did nothing wrong, yet people believed he was the cause.
Jfisch93
No your in OT, therefore it is Bush's fault. Even if it wasn't.Just skimming over the article, it looks like it was Cheney's idea and Bush was opposed to it. Hey, he has to have done a few things right at least.
SpaceMoose
[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]No, Hoover did plenty wrong. He signed Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act which was absolutely moronic. And FDR invented welfare. lol.The president always gets blamed for everything. In the Depression, Hoover was the better president to fix it, but they went for FDR's charisma. Hoover did nothing wrong, yet people believed he was the cause.
-Sun_Tzu-
[QUOTE="SpaceMoose"]No your in OT, therefore it is Bush's fault. Even if it wasn't. Well, Bush did pick Cheney as his VP.Just skimming over the article, it looks like it was Cheney's idea and Bush was opposed to it. Hey, he has to have done a few things right at least.
blackngold29
Which Bush though...that's the real question. :P
No, Hoover did plenty wrong. He signed Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act which was absolutely moronic. And FDR invented welfare. lol. Yes, shame on FDR for creating programs that benefit the poor and elderly :|[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Jfisch93"]
The president always gets blamed for everything. In the Depression, Hoover was the better president to fix it, but they went for FDR's charisma. Hoover did nothing wrong, yet people believed he was the cause.
Jfisch93
Umm, social security is a social welfare program buddy. Moreover, welfare fraud is not as big a problem as you make it out to be. The funding for it may very well run out if no action is taken, but not because of fraud.welfare doesn't go to elderly and welfare was so poorly formed that people abuse it and the funds for it will run out soon.
Jfisch93
If you want to blame FDR for something blame him for stealing peoples gold, but don't equivocate social welfare programs to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, because the two are incomparable.
:o Dude.. what the? I wanna know where my payroll tax is going to if the elderly aren't receiving any form of financial aid. If it's not going to some old nice grandma who has a passion for baking cookies and knitting holiday sweaters I'll be pissed.[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]
welfare doesn't go to elderlyduxup
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment