This topic is locked from further discussion.
He started off well, then he made a stimulus package and became exactly the opposite of what his party was supposed to be stand for (even though it stands for nothing anymore) and he wound up creating out current economic collapse. So no, he was not a good leader.Pyro767He did not actually create the economic collapse. Many other factors
He was a pretty decent president until he brought up the stimulus package. From there it went seriously downhill.
He started off well, then he made a stimulus package and became exactly the opposite of what his party was supposed to be stand for (even though it stands for nothing anymore) and he wound up creating out current economic collapse. So no, he was not a good leader.Pyro767The people created the economic collapse. Not Bush.
The people created the economic collapse. Not Bush. No, no Bush pretty much started it. People may have helped by going "SAVE US GOVERNMENT" but you know, mostly Bush.[QUOTE="Pyro767"]He started off well, then he made a stimulus package and became exactly the opposite of what his party was supposed to be stand for (even though it stands for nothing anymore) and he wound up creating out current economic collapse. So no, he was not a good leader.Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]The people created the economic collapse. Not Bush. No, no Bush pretty much started it. People may have helped by going "SAVE US GOVERNMENT" but you know, mostly Bush.[QUOTE="Pyro767"]He started off well, then he made a stimulus package and became exactly the opposite of what his party was supposed to be stand for (even though it stands for nothing anymore) and he wound up creating out current economic collapse. So no, he was not a good leader.Pyro767
:| If you didn't like Bush's stimulus, I'd like to hear what you think of Obama's.
I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.mattykovaxAgreed
I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.mattykovaxI'm wide awake and fairly peppy. That veto power you mentioned is the most powerful ability available to anyone in the country, and you know what? He didn't stop that stimulus package that sent us into a downward economic spiral. He could have stopped it easily, but he didn't.
I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.mattykovaxMany just find it easier to blame Bush. Sad but true
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]The people created the economic collapse. Not Bush. No, no Bush pretty much started it. People may have helped by going "SAVE US GOVERNMENT" but you know, mostly Bush. Clinton's pushing for the legalization of the loan practices used helped quite a bit more than anything Bush did to cause the present problem :?[QUOTE="Pyro767"]He started off well, then he made a stimulus package and became exactly the opposite of what his party was supposed to be stand for (even though it stands for nothing anymore) and he wound up creating out current economic collapse. So no, he was not a good leader.Pyro767
No, no Bush pretty much started it. People may have helped by going "SAVE US GOVERNMENT" but you know, mostly Bush.[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]The people created the economic collapse. Not Bush.
Pirate700
:| If you didn't like Bush's stimulus, I'd like to hear what you think of Obama's.
It's a super piece of ****. Bush started it, Obama isn't helping.[QUOTE="mattykovax"]I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.Oblivionfan10Many just find it easier to blame Bush. Sad but trueBoy aint that the truth. What's really sad is Obama is still blaming Bush for everything instead if just taking on his tasks as president.
*shrugs* didn't like him, didn't hate him. They way I feel about Bush pretty much equals the way I feel about Obama, and most other presidents.
[QUOTE="mattykovax"]I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.Pyro767I'm wide awake and fairly peppy. That veto power you mentioned is the most powerful ability available to anyone in the country, and you know what? He didn't stop that stimulus package that sent us into a downward economic spiral. He could have stopped it easily, but he didn't. And how did the stimulus package send us into a downward economic spiral?
Many just find it easier to blame Bush. Sad but trueBoy aint that the truth. I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibility[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.Pirate700
Many just find it easier to blame Bush. Sad but trueBoy aint that the truth. What's really sad is Obama is still blaming Bush for everything instead if just taking on his tasks as president. You edited as soon as I posted the same thing[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Boy aint that the truth. I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibility i believe the media is doing this[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"] Many just find it easier to blame Bush. Sad but trueOblivionfan10
[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.-Sun_Tzu-I'm wide awake and fairly peppy. That veto power you mentioned is the most powerful ability available to anyone in the country, and you know what? He didn't stop that stimulus package that sent us into a downward economic spiral. He could have stopped it easily, but he didn't. And how did the stimulus package send us into a downward economic spiral. Because that's what "stimulus" packages do, they attempt to help when all they really do is spend money on useless causes, attempt to save doomed businesses, and create temporary jobs that won't make it more than 2 years.
[QUOTE="mattykovax"]I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.Pyro767I'm wide awake and fairly peppy. That veto power you mentioned is the most powerful ability available to anyone in the country, and you know what? He didn't stop that stimulus package that sent us into a downward economic spiral. He could have stopped it easily, but he didn't.But even if he did,they can still overide him. Thats politics and knowledge of the branches of the government. Its still not his or anyone including obama in the highest offices fault. they are figureheads. there job si to keep us debating this while the other branches do things and by teh time we realize its over becaue we are dabating this ****. I do not often debate politics but I know my ****.
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Boy aint that the truth. I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibilityExactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president.[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"] Many just find it easier to blame Bush. Sad but trueOblivionfan10
[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Boy aint that the truth.
I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibilityExactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president. dont most presidents blame the previous admin every now and thenI believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibilityExactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president. Oh the Humanity![QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Boy aint that the truth.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Boy aint that the truth.
I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibilityExactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president. I think he is just too full of himself[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]I think he was the same as most presidents. A figurehead that takes the heat and the blame for what the congress,senate,and his own administration does,and than has to take the heat and deal with other world leaders like he is important when he has nothing but a veto and controll of the armed forces IF the other branches approve war. Just like ALL presidents. People wake up.mattykovaxI'm wide awake and fairly peppy. That veto power you mentioned is the most powerful ability available to anyone in the country, and you know what? He didn't stop that stimulus package that sent us into a downward economic spiral. He could have stopped it easily, but he didn't.But even if he did,they can still overide him. Thats politics and knowledge of the branches of the government. Its still not his or anyone including obama in the highest offices fault. they are figureheads. there job si to keep us debating this while the other branches do things and by teh time we realize its over becaue we are dabating this ****. I do not often debate politics but I know my ****. Yes, well the President used to be the person with the power to make decisions that reflect the interests of the county. If the president won't take charge and the other branches of government take over, then we're pretty much screwed aren't we?
[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] And how did the stimulus package send us into a downward economic spiral.-Sun_Tzu-Because that's what "stimulus" packages do, they attempt to help when all they really do is spend money on useless causes, attempt to save doomed businesses, and create temporary jobs that won't make it more than 2 years. That's not explaining at all how the stimulus package that he signed in 2008 caused anything. All you did was spew some conservative talking points. That's what his stimulus package did though. If it did anything except spend millions in tax payer dollars. And those aren't conservative talking point you speak of are no longer conservative, the two political parties are the same now.
[QUOTE="mattykovax"][QUOTE="Pyro767"] I'm wide awake and fairly peppy. That veto power you mentioned is the most powerful ability available to anyone in the country, and you know what? He didn't stop that stimulus package that sent us into a downward economic spiral. He could have stopped it easily, but he didn't.Pyro767But even if he did,they can still overide him. Thats politics and knowledge of the branches of the government. Its still not his or anyone including obama in the highest offices fault. they are figureheads. there job si to keep us debating this while the other branches do things and by teh time we realize its over becaue we are dabating this ****. I do not often debate politics but I know my ****. Yes, well the President used to be the person with the power to make decisions that reflect the interests of the county. If the president won't take charge and the other branches of government take over, then we're pretty much screwed aren't we? Democratic goven't is socialist ~ all is democratic we're shunted!
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Exactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president. dont most presidents blame the previous admin every now and thenNot like Obama is doing. He is ALWAYS talking about how he has to clean up Bush's "mess". It's absolutely despicable. He needs to start taking the reigns and stop point the finger. All he's doing is building up the blame on Bush for when all his (Obama's) spending blows up in his face. It will still be "Bushes Fault".[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"] I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibilityBayAreaX
He kept us safe post-9/11. No attacks afterwards.
He ordered aircraft carrier task groups to New York City, and the U.S. Navy flew protective sorties over the city 24-7.
That's ultra-protection there: carriers & fighters, destroyers, frigates, guided-missile cruisers, the whole nine yards.
The Secret Service did not want President Bush to return to the White House, but he overrode their protective stance: he said he had to lead the nation, to let the people see he was leading without fear.
[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]But even if he did,they can still overide him. Thats politics and knowledge of the branches of the government. Its still not his or anyone including obama in the highest offices fault. they are figureheads. there job si to keep us debating this while the other branches do things and by teh time we realize its over becaue we are dabating this ****. I do not often debate politics but I know my ****.eno_cruxYes, well the President used to be the person with the power to make decisions that reflect the interests of the county. If the president won't take charge and the other branches of government take over, then we're pretty much screwed aren't we? Democratic goven't is socialist ~ all is democratic we're shunted! But don't the democrats/republicans stand for increasing government power through the addition of social health care, pension plans, and GHG emission taxes?
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Exactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president. I think he is just too full of himself Well, all presidents are full of themselves. I mean, only someone extremely arrogant would decide that the country requires their leadership. There's no such thing as a humble president. (Well, maybe George Washington :P).[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"] I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibilityOblivionfan10
dont most presidents blame the previous admin every now and thenNot like Obama is doing. He is ALWAYS talking about how he has to clean up Bush's "mess". It's absolutely despicable. He needs to start taking the reigns and stop point the finger. All he's doing is building up the blam on Bush for when all his (Obama's) spending blows up in his face. It will still be "Bushes Fault". Information is misleading coming from misleading media[QUOTE="BayAreaX"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Exactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="mattykovax"][QUOTE="Pyro767"] I'm wide awake and fairly peppy. That veto power you mentioned is the most powerful ability available to anyone in the country, and you know what? He didn't stop that stimulus package that sent us into a downward economic spiral. He could have stopped it easily, but he didn't.Pyro767But even if he did,they can still overide him. Thats politics and knowledge of the branches of the government. Its still not his or anyone including obama in the highest offices fault. they are figureheads. there job si to keep us debating this while the other branches do things and by teh time we realize its over becaue we are dabating this ****. I do not often debate politics but I know my ****. Yes, well the President used to be the person with the power to make decisions that reflect the interests of the county. If the president won't take charge and the other branches of government take over, then we're pretty much screwed aren't we?Actually he never was. Our country was set up so one man could only oversee but never take charge. Kind of how we just rebelled at the time agains monarchy. So your understanding of american democratic government is wrong. the branches were set like that on purpouse,nothing new. When you figure out how it works the come back and lambast any president you want.
I believe our current President is trying to still blame things on Bush, instead of taking responsibilityExactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president.[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Boy aint that the truth.
Pirate700
All politics is pretty much whining and blaming the other party, Whether it be in the governement, media, or from the public.
[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]But even if he did,they can still overide him. Thats politics and knowledge of the branches of the government. Its still not his or anyone including obama in the highest offices fault. they are figureheads. there job si to keep us debating this while the other branches do things and by teh time we realize its over becaue we are dabating this ****. I do not often debate politics but I know my ****.mattykovaxYes, well the President used to be the person with the power to make decisions that reflect the interests of the county. If the president won't take charge and the other branches of government take over, then we're pretty much screwed aren't we?Actually he never was. Our country was set up so one man could only oversee but never take charge. Kind of how we just rebelled at the time agains monarchy. So your understanding of american democratic government is wrong. the branches were set like that on purpouse,nothing new. When you figure out how it works the come back and lambast any president you want. We live in an anarchy and we don't even know it, yet when is the last time anyone really did anything, we all just follow it for fear something bad will happen
That's not explaining at all how the stimulus package that he signed in 2008 caused anything. All you did was spew some conservative talking points. That's what his stimulus package did though. If it did anything except spend millions in tax payer dollars. And those aren't conservative talking point you speak of are no longer conservative, the two political parties are the same now. Ok, but you haven't explained how spending millions in tax payer dollars led us to our economic situation. And they are conservative talking points. Whether or not they are Republican talking points is another thing entirely.[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Pyro767"] Because that's what "stimulus" packages do, they attempt to help when all they really do is spend money on useless causes, attempt to save doomed businesses, and create temporary jobs that won't make it more than 2 years.Pyro767
[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Exactly what I said after editing.:P Obama is still blaming Bush like a child. Every time Obama falters in his term it will always be Bush's fault. I seriously don't like Obama's mentality as president.
I think he is just too full of himself Well, all presidents are full of themselves. I mean, only someone extremely arrogant would decide that the country requires their leadership. There's no such thing as a humble president. (Well, maybe George Washington :P).I think the first issue is showing that reprasentive government is everything from town to senat and the president is only the figurhead and statesmen. I am sad that I have been out of school for over 13 years and have a better grasp than both students and other voters.[QUOTE="Pyro767"][QUOTE="mattykovax"]But even if he did,they can still overide him. Thats politics and knowledge of the branches of the government. Its still not his or anyone including obama in the highest offices fault. they are figureheads. there job si to keep us debating this while the other branches do things and by teh time we realize its over becaue we are dabating this ****. I do not often debate politics but I know my ****.mattykovaxYes, well the President used to be the person with the power to make decisions that reflect the interests of the county. If the president won't take charge and the other branches of government take over, then we're pretty much screwed aren't we?Actually he never was. Our country was set up so one man could only oversee but never take charge. Kind of how we just rebelled at the time agains monarchy. So your understanding of american democratic government is wrong. the branches were set like that on purpouse,nothing new. When you figure out how it works the come back and lambast any president you want. Actually, the President was in charge of these branches of government that have taken over. I know perfectly well how the founding fathers intended it to be thank you, and when people say things like "The president is just a guy in a chair" or "The president has never had any power," they are fooling themselves.
He kept us safe post-9/11. No attacks afterwards.
He ordered aircraft carrier task groups to New York City, and the U.S. Navy flew protective sorties over the city 24-7.
That's ultra-protection there: carriers & fighters, destroyers, frigates, guided-missile cruisers, the whole nine yards.
The Secret Service did not want President Bush to return to the White House, but he overrode their protective stance: he said he had to lead the nation, to let the people see he was leading without fear.
He did do a great job with 9/11[QUOTE="Pyro767"]That's what his stimulus package did though. If it did anything except spend millions in tax payer dollars. And those aren't conservative talking point you speak of are no longer conservative, the two political parties are the same now. Ok, but you haven't explained how spending millions in tax payer dollars led us to our economic situation. And they are conservative talking points. Whether or not they are Republican talking points is another thing entirely. Gm was bailed out and they're still failing, now part of gm belongs to the govn't but in that case aren't those my cars? If the govn't sells em cheaper monopoly and it's bad ~ too much power to an anarchy If they over price em where's the money going[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] That's not explaining at all how the stimulus package that he signed in 2008 caused anything. All you did was spew some conservative talking points. -Sun_Tzu-
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment