Can someone help me understand something?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#1 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts

Who created creation, and how exactly were they created without creation being created first?

Doesn't it take time to create something? How did something create time without time to create creation itself?

Avatar image for kruesader
kruesader

6443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 kruesader
Member since 2006 • 6443 Posts
In before Lol Wut pear.
Avatar image for sovereign_22
sovereign_22

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 sovereign_22
Member since 2008 • 1190 Posts

dont worry about things like that

Avatar image for Cube_of_MooN
Cube_of_MooN

9286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#4 Cube_of_MooN
Member since 2005 • 9286 Posts
Too tired to think out that sentence...
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
Which arose first: thought or language? Abstract thought requires language and language requires abstraction to assign meaning to sounds. Wow, mind blowing.
Avatar image for Big_player
Big_player

6187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Big_player
Member since 2004 • 6187 Posts
Stop thinking about it as a line with a starting point and an ending point. Think of time as infinite in both direction, no beginning, no ending.
Avatar image for Dracargen
Dracargen

7928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Dracargen
Member since 2007 • 7928 Posts

Who created creation, and how exactly were they created without creation being created first?

Doesn't it take time to create something? How did something create time without time to create creation itself?

Rayk3400

If you're talking about God, then God wa snot created. He is eternal. The universe is not eternal, before you even ask.>_>

Theoretically, God created time first. . .

Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts
The universe has always existed.
Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts

Thomas Aquinas thought about this, he described god as the "Unmoving Mover"

He understood, that for every action, there was a reaction... but he asked "who/what was the original cause" he concluded that god was the original cause

Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#10 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
Yeah but, as far as we know, it takes time and thought to create creation and creation to create time and thought. Thats my point how exactly is it even possible? It obviously it because were here but I just don't get it.
Avatar image for jngbb
jngbb

1593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 jngbb
Member since 2004 • 1593 Posts
Brock Samson.
Avatar image for martialbullet
martialbullet

10948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 martialbullet
Member since 2006 • 10948 Posts

The universe has always existed.--Anna--

but what created it?

Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#13 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts

The universe has always existed.--Anna--

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

Avatar image for Greenwhitegreen
Greenwhitegreen

6315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Greenwhitegreen
Member since 2006 • 6315 Posts
Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!
Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts
No one knows. No one ever has known. No one ever will know. People will spend their whole life wondering about it, but never get an answer. You're no different, so don't bother asking a question that can't be answered, because you're not going to get a comprehensive answer from us.
Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#16 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!Greenwhitegreen
Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#17 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!Greenwhitegreen
Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts

Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!Greenwhitegreen

Not quite. This can be useful information, and could possibly be practical. I'm still waiting for undeniable proof of the exhistance of white holes, as this could be a cause for the creation of matter.

Avatar image for Cube_of_MooN
Cube_of_MooN

9286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#19 Cube_of_MooN
Member since 2005 • 9286 Posts

Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!Greenwhitegreen

You'll be back... oh, you'll be back...

Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts

[QUOTE="Greenwhitegreen"]Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!Sparticus247

Not quite. This can be useful information, and could possibly be practical. I'm still waiting for undeniable proof of the exhistance of white holes, as this could be a cause for the creation of matter.

As he said this is not completely relegion. I am trying to find a logical way to explain my question, like with science.

Just wondering, what are white holes? Some sort or extreme curvature of spacetime that light somehow does not fall into? Mabye you were just BSing...

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="Greenwhitegreen"]Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!Sparticus247

Not quite. This can be useful information, and could possibly be practical. I'm still waiting for undeniable proof of the exhistance of white holes, as this could be a cause for the creation of matter.

Even vague suggestions of evidence supporting the existence of white holes might be helpful :P
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Sparticus247"]

[QUOTE="Greenwhitegreen"]Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!Rayk3400

Not quite. This can be useful information, and could possibly be practical. I'm still waiting for undeniable proof of the exhistance of white holes, as this could be a cause for the creation of matter.

As he said this is not completely relegion. I am trying to find a logical way to explain my question, like with science.

Just wondering, what are white holes? Some sort or extreme curvature of spacetime that light somehow does not fall into? Mabye you were just BSing...

Well, current cosmological thought tends to favor the notion of creation ex nihilo via vacuum fluctuations, positing the creation of a pocket of spacetime with negative energy pressure which caused a massive expansion resulting in our universe. Read up on inflationary theory for more details.
Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.Rayk3400

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.
Avatar image for kirk4ever
kirk4ever

3543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 kirk4ever
Member since 2005 • 3543 Posts

................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

this question makes my mind go like that..itsnot within our logic

Avatar image for thnickaman13
thnickaman13

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 thnickaman13
Member since 2006 • 633 Posts
[QUOTE="Rayk3400"]

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.--Anna--

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.

Anna's right. Plus, for the Big Bang to even work, all of our laws of physics had to be here. But where did they come from? Figure that one out.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Rayk3400"]

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.--Anna--

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.

One caveat; the general idea is that spacetime emerged in the Big Bang so you can't really talk about "before" the Big Bang.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="--Anna--"][QUOTE="Rayk3400"]

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.thnickaman13

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.

Anna's right. Plus, for the Big Bang to even work, all of our laws of physics had to be here. But where did they come from? Figure that one out.

I'm not sure what you mean here; can you clarify?
Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#28 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
[QUOTE="Rayk3400"]

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.--Anna--

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.

Well, as one of Newton's Laws of Motion explains, an object will continue to move in a strait line unless some external force acts upon it. How could any form of external force act upon existence itself? Newtons laws are as far as we know absolutly correct, that's why they are Laws, many scientists tried to disprove it, none successful.

Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#29 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
[QUOTE="Rayk3400"]

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.--Anna--

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.

Well, as one of Newton's Laws of Motion explains, an object will continue to move in a strait line unless some external force acts upon it. How could any form of external force act upon existence itself? Newtons laws are as far as we know absolutly correct, that's why they are Laws, many scientists tried to disprove it, none successful.

Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts
[QUOTE="Rayk3400"][QUOTE="Sparticus247"]

[QUOTE="Greenwhitegreen"]Ahhhh...a religious thread...*quickly leaves*!xaos

Not quite. This can be useful information, and could possibly be practical. I'm still waiting for undeniable proof of the exhistance of white holes, as this could be a cause for the creation of matter.

As he said this is not completely relegion. I am trying to find a logical way to explain my question, like with science.

Just wondering, what are white holes? Some sort or extreme curvature of spacetime that light somehow does not fall into? Mabye you were just BSing...

Well, current cosmological thought tends to favor the notion of creation ex nihilo via vacuum fluctuations, positing the creation of a pocket of spacetime with negative energy pressure which caused a massive expansion resulting in our universe. Read up on inflationary theory for more details.

That's interesting.

There was another theory that I though was intereting about universal creation. I think it was something like the extreme gravity that condenses matter into the singularity which later forms into a black hole, could possibly bend affect space time enough to create a new extrademensional universe with itself. The collapsing matter that formed the singularity could then in turn be fule for a "big bang" in that dimension of space.

I thought this was interesting because the time that passes withing the event horizen is nothing like the time that occurs anywhere else.

Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts

That's interesting.

There was another theory that I though was intereting about universal creation. I think it was something like the extreme gravity that condenses matter into the singularity which later forms into a black hole, could possibly bend affect space time enough to create a new extrademensional universe with itself. The collapsing matter that formed the singularity could then in turn be fule for a "big bang" in that dimension of space.

I thought this was interesting because the time that passes withing the event horizen is nothing like the time that occurs anywhere else.

Sparticus247

well those "mini-universes" never last as long as our universe. One day, I was interested in the fact that "what happens to a black hole, does it ever end?" and after some google-fu, I found that they bleed out, or "radiate-out" in their case.

So the mini universes in this theory only last a few billion years and then collapse in upon themselves.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Sparticus247"]

That's interesting.

There was another theory that I though was intereting about universal creation. I think it was something like the extreme gravity that condenses matter into the singularity which later forms into a black hole, could possibly bend affect space time enough to create a new extrademensional universe with itself. The collapsing matter that formed the singularity could then in turn be fule for a "big bang" in that dimension of space.

I thought this was interesting because the time that passes withing the event horizen is nothing like the time that occurs anywhere else.

blooddemon666

well those "mini-universes" never last as long as our universe. One day, I was interested in the fact that "what happens to a black hole, does it ever end?" and after some google-fu, I found that they bleed out, or "radiate-out" in their case.

So the mini universes in this theory only last a few billion years and then collapse in upon themselves.

Yeah, Hawking radiation is pretty amazing stuff, and also relies on vacuum fluctuations :)
Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts
Simple. The Word is God, who was made by the Word while being created by the Word, so sometimes the Word molded Him while he crafted the Word, and the Word could come first, or maybe God. They were there, and nothing else, except them, and nothing created them but themselves.
Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts
[QUOTE="Sparticus247"]

That's interesting.

There was another theory that I though was intereting about universal creation. I think it was something like the extreme gravity that condenses matter into the singularity which later forms into a black hole, could possibly bend affect space time enough to create a new extrademensional universe with itself. The collapsing matter that formed the singularity could then in turn be fule for a "big bang" in that dimension of space.

I thought this was interesting because the time that passes withing the event horizen is nothing like the time that occurs anywhere else.

blooddemon666

well those "mini-universes" never last as long as our universe. One day, I was interested in the fact that "what happens to a black hole, does it ever end?" and after some google-fu, I found that they bleed out, or "radiate-out" in their case.

So the mini universes in this theory only last a few billion years and then collapse in upon themselves.

Yes, but that can depend on where you are when you measue it. Our universe may seem to last long from our point of view, but in other situations our unierse may not have been around that long, since the intensity of gravity can affect space/time, how can we accuratly measure it. It passes differently depending on where you measure it.

Our universe may have been around for a few trillion years the way we see it, but in other areas of space it really hasn't been around that long at all.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="blooddemon666"][QUOTE="Sparticus247"]

That's interesting.

There was another theory that I though was intereting about universal creation. I think it was something like the extreme gravity that condenses matter into the singularity which later forms into a black hole, could possibly bend affect space time enough to create a new extrademensional universe with itself. The collapsing matter that formed the singularity could then in turn be fule for a "big bang" in that dimension of space.

I thought this was interesting because the time that passes withing the event horizen is nothing like the time that occurs anywhere else.

Sparticus247

well those "mini-universes" never last as long as our universe. One day, I was interested in the fact that "what happens to a black hole, does it ever end?" and after some google-fu, I found that they bleed out, or "radiate-out" in their case.

So the mini universes in this theory only last a few billion years and then collapse in upon themselves.

Yes, but that can depend on where you are when you measue it. Our universe may seem to last long from our point of view, but in other situations our unierse may not have been around that long, since the intensity of gravity can affect space/time, how can we accuratly measure it. It passes differently depending on where you measure it.

Our universe may have been around for a few trillion years the way we see it, but in other areas of space it really hasn't been around that long at all.

But the curvature of spacetime is not relative, so general relativistic affects could be detected. Not everything is relative :)
Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#36 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
[QUOTE="blooddemon666"][QUOTE="Sparticus247"]

That's interesting.

There was another theory that I though was intereting about universal creation. I think it was something like the extreme gravity that condenses matter into the singularity which later forms into a black hole, could possibly bend affect space time enough to create a new extrademensional universe with itself. The collapsing matter that formed the singularity could then in turn be fule for a "big bang" in that dimension of space.

I thought this was interesting because the time that passes withing the event horizen is nothing like the time that occurs anywhere else.

Sparticus247

well those "mini-universes" never last as long as our universe. One day, I was interested in the fact that "what happens to a black hole, does it ever end?" and after some google-fu, I found that they bleed out, or "radiate-out" in their case.

So the mini universes in this theory only last a few billion years and then collapse in upon themselves.

Yes, but that can depend on where you are when you measue it. Our universe may seem to last long from our point of view, but in other situations our unierse may not have been around that long, since the intensity of gravity can affect space/time, how can we accuratly measure it. It passes differently depending on where you measure it.

Our universe may have been around for a few trillion years the way we see it, but in other areas of space it really hasn't been around that long at all.

The universe is everything that exists so their is no stationary viewer. All viewers are relitive to our time, our motion, etc...

Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts
Also if perhaps there was really nothing around before the universe was created, then it could be considered a time where ther was nothing but a true vacuum. And since a true vacuum at it's native state can possibly hold an infinite amount of energy. This is interesting since in general relatively I believe that both matter and energy can be considered the same. So could the "zero-point enrgy" wiithin a vaccum possibly lead to the creation of matter?
Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts
[QUOTE="Sparticus247"][QUOTE="blooddemon666"][QUOTE="Sparticus247"]

That's interesting.

There was another theory that I though was intereting about universal creation. I think it was something like the extreme gravity that condenses matter into the singularity which later forms into a black hole, could possibly bend affect space time enough to create a new extrademensional universe with itself. The collapsing matter that formed the singularity could then in turn be fule for a "big bang" in that dimension of space.

I thought this was interesting because the time that passes withing the event horizen is nothing like the time that occurs anywhere else.

Rayk3400

well those "mini-universes" never last as long as our universe. One day, I was interested in the fact that "what happens to a black hole, does it ever end?" and after some google-fu, I found that they bleed out, or "radiate-out" in their case.

So the mini universes in this theory only last a few billion years and then collapse in upon themselves.

Yes, but that can depend on where you are when you measue it. Our universe may seem to last long from our point of view, but in other situations our unierse may not have been around that long, since the intensity of gravity can affect space/time, how can we accuratly measure it. It passes differently depending on where you measure it.

Our universe may have been around for a few trillion years the way we see it, but in other areas of space it really hasn't been around that long at all.

The universe is everything that exists so their is no stationary viewer. All viewers are relitive to our time, our motion, etc...

Exactly, so could the few billion years that the "mini-universe" be in fact much longer than what we observe?

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
Also if perhaps there was really nothing around before the universe was created, then it could be considered a time where ther was nothing but a true vacuum. And since a true vacuum at it's native state can possibly hold an infinite amount of energy. This is interesting since in general relatively I believe that both matter and energy can be considered the same. So could the "zero-point enrgy" wiithin a vaccum possibly lead to the creation of matter?Sparticus247
Zero point energy is a widely misunderstood term, since it refers to the lowest energy state of a vacuum, which once again is contingent of vacuum fluctuations :)
Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#40 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
Why do I love girls?
Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts
[QUOTE="--Anna--"][QUOTE="Rayk3400"]

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.Rayk3400

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.

Well, as one of Newton's Laws of Motion explains, an object will continue to move in a strait line unless some external force acts upon it. How could any form of external force act upon existence itself? Newtons laws are as far as we know absolutly correct, that's why they are Laws, many scientists tried to disprove it, none successful.

Sorry, but Newton's laws! I think you need a little quantum physics study. Newton's laws don't function on the quantum level and cosmic level. That's why quantum physics was developed.
Avatar image for Quadrifoglio
Quadrifoglio

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#42 Quadrifoglio
Member since 2006 • 5451 Posts
This thread is too intelligent for me. *leaves*
Avatar image for TheZ3nMan
TheZ3nMan

2658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 TheZ3nMan
Member since 2007 • 2658 Posts

To confusing. I'll stick to things that matter, like who would win between King Kong and Mr. T with a robo-suit.

Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts

This thread is too intelligent for me. *leaves*Quadrifoglio

Intelligence? on Gamespot :o I'd never imagine such a thing.

Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts

[QUOTE="Quadrifoglio"]This thread is too intelligent for me. *leaves*blooddemon666

Intelligence? on Gamespot :o I'd never imagine such a thing.

lol, too many people spend their time in System Wars :P

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#46 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Well, the myth of Creation is an invention of man to explain a metaphysical occurrence that may or may not have happened.
Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#47 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts
[QUOTE="Rayk3400"][QUOTE="--Anna--"][QUOTE="Rayk3400"]

[QUOTE="--Anna--"]The universe has always existed.--Anna--

Thats already disproven, no offence. "The Big Bang" is what they call it, the universe is expanding, cosmic backround, etc...

No, just because it's expanding, doesn't mean it hasn't always existed. Science in the most part acknowledges, that science doesn,t know, what was before the big bang. Well, it was the universe before it expanded.

Well, as one of Newton's Laws of Motion explains, an object will continue to move in a strait line unless some external force acts upon it. How could any form of external force act upon existence itself? Newtons laws are as far as we know absolutly correct, that's why they are Laws, many scientists tried to disprove it, none successful.

Sorry, but Newton's laws! I think you need a little quantum physics study. Newton's laws don't function on the quantum level and cosmic level. That's why quantum physics was developed.

Your saying, in the universe, an object won't move in a stright line unless another force acted upon it? I'm pretty sure that law is still correct. For instance take the earth's orbit, many think it is almost a circle, but what really happens is the Earth is moveing in a stright line passed the sun, it falls into the sun's gravitational pull, and therefore is pulled in different directions, in a way the sun launched the earth into space, into a stright line, but then the earth is pulled back again because of an external force ( the sun's gravity). If thats wrong, other than spellng and grammer lol, let me know because im intrested, that is how I learned it.

Avatar image for K-E316
K-E316

1651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 K-E316
Member since 2007 • 1651 Posts
In before Lol Wut pear.kruesader
Avatar image for Rayk3400
Rayk3400

1445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#49 Rayk3400
Member since 2006 • 1445 Posts

[QUOTE="kruesader"]In before Lol Wut pear.K-E316

I wonder why some people stereotype Mexicans....