I think he deserved it, his Character Hans Landa was just excellent.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I agree, its an excellent movie.I agree. He did a good job. Plus, I'm glad Inglourious Basterds at least won one award from all the nominations they got.
Duxsox56
[QUOTE="Duxsox56"]I agree, its an excellent movie.I agree. He did a good job. Plus, I'm glad Inglourious Basterds at least won one award from all the nominations they got.
lordreaven
I didn't think it was INCREDIBLE, but it certianly was amusing. I liked the balance of action and comedy and found the Lieutenant Aldo Raine to be hilarious. The ending kind of made me be like, "wtf were they on when they were making this movie?" but it was still amusing. Plus, Christoph Waltz had an amazing performance, as already stated.
[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="Duxsox56"]
I agree. He did a good job. Plus, I'm glad Inglourious Basterds at least won one award from all the nominations they got.
I agree, its an excellent movie.I didn't think it was INCREDIBLE, but it certianly was amusing. I liked the balance of action and comedy and found the Lieutenant Aldo Raine to be hilarious. The ending kind of made me be like, "wtf were they on when they were making this movie?" but it was still amusing. Plus, Christoph Waltz had an amazing performance, as already stated.
Fair point you made.The best part of Inglorious Basterds was Chirstoph Waltz. The opening scene is just so great, I am shocked that I enjoyed a QT film as much as I did. :PJazz_Fan
Yeah same. I never liked him much as a film maker. Inglorious basterds though really surprised me. It is his best and most consistant film by far. However I think more people should appreciate Woody Harrelson's great performance. Shame The Messenger didn't do very well.
[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]The best part of Inglorious Basterds was Chirstoph Waltz. The opening scene is just so great, I am shocked that I enjoyed a QT film as much as I did. :PFilm-Guy
Yeah same. I never liked him much as a film maker. Inglorious basterds though really surprised me. It is his best and most consistant film by far. However I think more people should appreciate Woody Harrelson's great performance. Shame The Messenger didn't do very well.
I have not seen that yet. Do you know when The Road and Bad Lieutenant get a DVD release?He was great, but I wouldn't mind Woody Harrelson winning either since he was just as good.
Film-Guy
Any other year I would agree, but Waltz just did one of the best performances of any actor in the last 5 years if not more. He acted in three different languages and made the audience believe him in all three. That's acting if there was any definition of what acting is.
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]
He was great, but I wouldn't mind Woody Harrelson winning either since he was just as good.
Buck_Hotep
Any other year I would agree, but Waltz just did one of the best performances of any actor in the last 5 years if not more. He acted in three different languages and made the audience believe him in all three. That's acting if there was any definition of what acting is.
He spoke some Italian in the film too. So make it four languages. :P[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]The best part of Inglorious Basterds was Chirstoph Waltz. The opening scene is just so great, I am shocked that I enjoyed a QT film as much as I did. :PFilm-Guy
Yeah same. I never liked him much as a film maker. Inglorious basterds though really surprised me. It is his best and most consistant film by far.
By far?
No way, unless you're planning on throwing Reservoir Dogs (which I think is clearly superior) out with the dirty bath water, along with the rest of his oeuvre, which really only ranges from good (Jackie Brown, Kill Bill), to good but excessively self indulgent (Pulp Fiction, Death Proof).
I'd say Basterds is one of his better films, but I certainly don't think it makes the rest look bad.
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]
[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]The best part of Inglorious Basterds was Chirstoph Waltz. The opening scene is just so great, I am shocked that I enjoyed a QT film as much as I did. :PDaveyDeathblade
Yeah same. I never liked him much as a film maker. Inglorious basterds though really surprised me. It is his best and most consistant film by far.
By far?
No way, unless you're planning on throwing Reservoir Dogs (which I think is clearly superior) out with the dirty bath water, along with the rest of his oeuvre, which really only ranges from good (Jackie Brown, Kill Bill), to good but excessively self indulgent (Pulp Fiction, Death Proof).
I'd say Basterds is one of his better films, but I certainly don't think it makes the rest look bad.
His other films are fun, but I never feel invested in them. Reservoir dogs is an exception kinda.
[QUOTE="DaveyDeathblade"]
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]
Yeah same. I never liked him much as a film maker. Inglorious basterds though really surprised me. It is his best and most consistant film by far.
Film-Guy
By far?
No way, unless you're planning on throwing Reservoir Dogs (which I think is clearly superior) out with the dirty bath water, along with the rest of his oeuvre, which really only ranges from good (Jackie Brown, Kill Bill), to good but excessively self indulgent (Pulp Fiction, Death Proof).
I'd say Basterds is one of his better films, but I certainly don't think it makes the rest look bad.
His other films are fun, but I never feel invested in them. Reservoir dogs is an exception kinda.
I much preferred City on Fire to Reservoir Dogs.[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]Christoph Waltz winning an Oscar was probably one of my favorite moments of the entire show.Film-Guy
I liked his very metaphorical acceptance speach:)
Yeah I've been watching all his acceptance speeches from from other ceremonies (Golden Globes, Critics Choice Awards, etc.). He always seems to come up with some pretty good speeches that don't fall under the typical "...And I thank my co-worker" crap that everyone else seems to do.
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]The best part of Inglorious Basterds was Chirstoph Waltz. The opening scene is just so great, I am shocked that I enjoyed a QT film as much as I did. :PJazz_Fan
Yeah same. I never liked him much as a film maker. Inglorious basterds though really surprised me. It is his best and most consistant film by far. However I think more people should appreciate Woody Harrelson's great performance. Shame The Messenger didn't do very well.
I have not seen that yet. Do you know when The Road and Bad Lieutenant get a DVD release?I'm pretty sure Bad Lieutenant comes out in early April. No idea when The Road comes out though. You should read some of the reactions Abel Ferrara had to Werner Herzog making a new Bad Lieutenant. Abel really freaked out, he seems a bit immature actually. I also read a really good book by Herzog called Of walking in ice. His book about making Fitzcarraldo was great too.
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]
[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]Christoph Waltz winning an Oscar was probably one of my favorite moments of the entire show.Nerd_Man
I liked his very metaphorical acceptance speach:)
Yeah I've been watching all his acceptance speeches from from other ceremonies (Golden Globes, Critics Choice Awards, etc.). He always seems to come up with some pretty good speeches that don't fall under the typical "...And I thank my co-worker" crap that everyone else seems to do.
I still think Michael Giacinno had the best speach:P
[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]
I liked his very metaphorical acceptance speach:)
Film-Guy
Yeah I've been watching all his acceptance speeches from from other ceremonies (Golden Globes, Critics Choice Awards, etc.). He always seems to come up with some pretty good speeches that don't fall under the typical "...And I thank my co-worker" crap that everyone else seems to do.
I still think Michael Giacinno had the best speach:P
I think they both had great speeches. I also loved the part where they showed those filmmakers who got started with making short films. I loved the part with John Lasseter. I thought he told some great advice to all striving filmmaker's out there who were watching it. Jason Reitman seemed to approve his statement as well... He was just like "yeah!" when they switched the camera to him after that short film segment. :P
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]
[QUOTE="Nerd_Man"]
Yeah I've been watching all his acceptance speeches from from other ceremonies (Golden Globes, Critics Choice Awards, etc.). He always seems to come up with some pretty good speeches that don't fall under the typical "...And I thank my co-worker" crap that everyone else seems to do.
Nerd_Man
I still think Michael Giacinno had the best speach:P
I think they both had great speeches. I also loved the part where they showed those filmmakers who got started with making short films. I loved the part with John Lasseter. I thought he told some great advice to all striving filmmaker's out there who were watching it. Jason Reitman seemed to approve his statement as well... He was just like "yeah!" when they switched the camera to him after that short film segment. :P
I remember that:) I tried to meet Jason Reitman at the Governer's ball but I kept mistaking Mark Boal for him since they look very similar.
I agree. It was a well made movie, but I felt it dragged along in some parts.The film kinda bored me in some bits, but Waltz was definitely excellent.
one_plum
Dude deserved it. I feared his character more than I have any villains from a horror movie... He knows how to act.
I also liked his acceptance speech, in real life he seems like a real lovable guy.
Christoph Waltz winning an Oscar was probably one of my favorite moments of the entire show.Nerd_Man
Could be my favorite moment too. What I did find strange was when he gave his speech he talked just like in the movie. I thought he was making an accent in the film.
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]
The opening scene is just so greatJazz_Fan
That's a UBER bingo!
Fixed :)
Best fix eva! :DPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment