CIA Agent caught in Pakistan

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/21/AR2011022102801.html

"buh buh he's just a poor diplomat let him go or we cut your aid :cry:"

Been following this case since the first day and it was pretty clear in Pakistan that this guy is CIA but it was not being reported in western media and people said we were just paranoid and he was just a poor innocent who killed 2 people in self defence but now that western media has been allowed to blow the lid off what do you think? Raymond Davis also had ties with TTP (Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan), the terrorists who carry out bombings in Pakistan. Many people in Pakistan already knew these people were backing the bombings in Pakistan to cause unrest and weaken Pakistan from within but hey its just pakistani crazy paranoid conspiracy theorists!

Pakistan needs to get rid of CIAs involvement ASAP.

Edit: When will the badass navy seals come and rescue him? ;)

I know he shot 2 people but I can't see him being behind the bombings.

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

Interesting. But then again, everyone and their dog knows the CIA have at least 1 agent in pretty much every nation.

Interesting. But then again, everyone and their dog knows the CIA have at least 1 agent in pretty much every nation.

lordreaven

all intelligence agencies have agents everywhere but they arent all behind terrorist activities.

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

Pirate700

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Interesting. But then again, everyone and their dog knows the CIA have at least 1 agent in pretty much every nation.

all intelligence agencies have agents everywhere but they arent all behind terrorist activities.

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

Harisemo

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.

In all honesty it does sound like the secret service in Pakistan has serious issues within it's own ranks, but on the other hand I can believe that somebody whose identity has been compromised by muggers might have to kill them just to stay incognito. I think the whole extraction vehicle that accidentally killed somebody on the way to pick up the agent probably made things ten times worse.

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

Harisemo

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

markop2003

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.

Problem is TTP isnt linked with that organization.

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.

Shoulda taken his cynaide pill.

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

sonicare

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.

depends on what you mean by terrorists because if you mean Al-Qaeda then no, they get no support at all from pakistans but if you mean afghani taliban (which we dont consider as terrorists) then you can assured that the current corrupt pakistani government is pro american and doesnt support afghanis but it is correct that Afghan Taliban are pro pakistan and pakistans army knows that which is why Pakistan is reluctant to carry out operations in north waziristan. Pakistan army dont support afghan taliban but they dont want to fight against them either and neither do afghan taliban want to fight Pak.

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.

I knew the second they said a "diplomat" killed 2 guys in Pakistan, I knew it was a CIA agent. No nerdy diplomat has the ability to take out two people one right after the other with such efficiency --- that takes years of training. Then when it was reported that the dead guys were "robbers", I instantly knew that wasn't right. And it turns out I was correct, they were not "robbers" but Pakistani Intelligence Agents. I encourage everyone to do some reading on this through various news sources --- it's extremely interesting.

That guy is a badass and the James Bond appreciating part of me wants him to escape and wreck even more s***

The rational part of me knows this is wrong, but I don't care what it is says :P

i thought the beans had pretty much been spilled when it was released that he shot them off motorcycles from a moving vehicle during the high speed chase.

Interesting. But then again, everyone and their dog knows the CIA have at least 1 agent in pretty much every nation.

lordreaven

i have 6 CIA agents living in my basement

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Are you trying to say we shouldn't have CIA abroad?

Harisemo

a destabilized Pakistan would give US an excuse to "secure" its nukes from falling in the hands of terrorists.....and destabilization is exactly what CIA is trying to do by supporting terrorists.