Cloverfield: Failure *SPOILERS*

The topic says *SPOILERS* but I'm spoiling nothing because Cloverfield was one of the flat out worst movies I've ever seen. Probably the second worst after "The Village." I could spend a long time trashing this movie but instead I'll just point out some major things that disapointed this movie:

-The ending was horrible, everybody just died. It left you comletely unsatisfied; I even yelled out "BS" in a completely silent theater because I hated it so much.

-You never know how the monster got their or if it died.

-Their "great" idea of having the camera view being realistic by having a person run around with a camera really pissed me off after a while

Overall this movie was a complete FAILURE. What did you guys think of it?

which sticky?Dargiboo

The Cloverfield sticky.

So you're basically saying you're afraid of endings that are different. You want the same linear movie where they kill the monster and they get married and have kids. There were very innovative features to this movie and people are too afraid of difference to recognize it.SnipeyMcSnipe

That would be nice.

[QUOTE="SnipeyMcSnipe"]So you're basically saying you're afraid of endings that are different. You want the same linear movie where they kill the monster and they get married and have kids. There were very innovative features to this movie and people are too afraid of difference to recognize it.Dargiboo

That would be nice.

Besides, there is a very good chance for a sequel. And if there is, it will most likely be from a different point of view...probably the military's. So all of you quick to judge will probably get your answers. What do you except from JJ Abrahms anyway?

[QUOTE="Dargiboo"]

[QUOTE="SnipeyMcSnipe"]So you're basically saying you're afraid of endings that are different. You want the same linear movie where they kill the monster and they get married and have kids. There were very innovative features to this movie and people are too afraid of difference to recognize it.SnipeyMcSnipe

That would be nice.

Besides, there is a very good chance for a sequel. And if there is, it will most likely be from a different point of view...probably the military's. So all of you quick to judge will probably get your answers. What do you except from JJ Abrahms anyway?

A sequel would help explain it but if there wasn't one the movie had no point.

[QUOTE="SnipeyMcSnipe"][QUOTE="Dargiboo"]

[QUOTE="SnipeyMcSnipe"]So you're basically saying you're afraid of endings that are different. You want the same linear movie where they kill the monster and they get married and have kids. There were very innovative features to this movie and people are too afraid of difference to recognize it.Dargiboo

That would be nice.

Besides, there is a very good chance for a sequel. And if there is, it will most likely be from a different point of view...probably the military's. So all of you quick to judge will probably get your answers. What do you except from JJ Abrahms anyway?

A sequel would help explain it but if there wasn't one the movie had no point.

It did, because even though it was a monster movie it was more about the story of the characters, and him reaching his love. Right before the very first explosion he says "You have to do whatever you need to for your love", and why do you think the tape under that one kept showing them on the train. And they were shown right before the movie was over. It was about them, and they died instead of living, 1 out of 2 possible outcomes. But if you are really that thirsty for answers there is an entire back story that takes place on the internet only, on the websites they created before the movie came out. I suggest you look into it.