College girl costs parents $80,000 with Facebook post

Story.

Patrick Snay, 69, won $80,000 settlement with her previous employer for age discrimination. As part of the settlement there was a confidentiality clause, preventing both him and his employer from discussing the case.

Enter Dana Snay (above doing her best Miley Cyrus impersonation). She decided to post on Facebook that her folks won their case and are paying for her vacation to Europe in the summer.

As a result word got to the school's lawyers, who turned around and appealed the settlement. The dad said he needed to tell his daughter something but didn't think she would spread the word.

Thoughts?

More communication on the matter would have been good I guess

Ha! That is fantastic. I love people who are willingly stupid.

I'm pretty sure her dad told her not to tell but she trusted her 1200 friends and her privacy settings too much...

Like tell the daughter, "hey heads up, don't tell people I told you because me telling you itself is not allowed but also because you know public"

@ad1x2: and the school probably also trusted the dad not to tell anyone, but we know how that turned out

No surprise there. Kids these days are dumber than shit.

This has taught me to not trust the old and young

what a dumb shit

Add it to her college debt.

Dumb ass bitch...this is why you never post things dealing with court cases that are suppose to be kept private on social media.

aahhahahaha.

Stupid girl. Feel a little bad, just cause she's a kid, but it still is funny.

and lay off the refined sugar. That's why you have disgusting white shit all over your tongue.

I actually thought this article was going to be about a girl who got kicked out of college for a ridiculous FB post after just paying $80,000 in non-refundable tuition.

Dad shouldn't have told his daughter, more fault lies on him imo.

Spoiled dumbass

With the NSA stalkers sticking their noses up everyone's anus like the dogs of the government that they are, these folks would have lost their money regardless.

@ad1x2 said:

Story.

Patrick Snay, 69, won $80,000 settlement with her previous employer for age discrimination. As part of the settlement there was a confidentiality clause, preventing both him and his employer from discussing the case.

Enter Dana Snay (above doing her best Miley Cyrus impersonation). She decided to post on Facebook that her folks won their case and are paying for her vacation to Europe in the summer.

As a result word got to the school's lawyers, who turned around and appealed the settlement. The dad said he needed to tell his daughter something but didn't think she would spread the word.

Thoughts?

Another case of a young girl who doesnt think about how public facecrap really is and that anything she puts up there can come back to haunt you.

But at least this dumb chick isent going to europe.

A child like that isn't worth investing in.

Such a spoiled idiot this girl is.

He was actually my principal in high school before taking the position at that Gulliver school. He was a nice enough guy, but was definitely too lax and carefree to be taken seriously as a principal.

But lol at his stupid daughter.

Would hit.

Yeah the NSA would have probs spilled the beans that the dad did wrong

if you ask me, she did nothing wrong. it's not like they had the $80,000 to begin with. Nothing was lost. What is she, like 18 with that dumb Heat hat?

ignorance + social media = disaster

Miley Cyrus ruins everything.

Wouldn't "not discussing the case with anyone" include your daughter? Even is he did tell her, he obviously didn't make it clear enough that they would lose the money if she talked about it. Point is, teen girl is dumb, but it was the dad who allowed this situation to happen.

what a dumb bitch lol

What you're saying is that even if the daughter had not told anyone he would still have lost the money just because of the sheer fact that he talked with his daughter. That's obviously not the case and you're wrong.

Yes that's what you're saying. Ignorance FTL.

Violating the agreement is in itself not necessarily enough to lose the money, as shown here. In this case he lost the money because of two mutually inclusive events.

No, that is what you are saying.

What has happened to the world nowadays? -__-"

As do you.

Facebook has exposed the stupid people to the rest of the world. They make it easy on criminals by telling the world when they go on vacation, their daily patterns and where they're at 24/7.

This is hilarious. Thank you, Zuckerburg.

What an idiot. Not everything needs to be shared.

But then again, I would think, unless told otherwise, that 'not discussing the case' would mean the DETAILS of the case, like who did or said what. Your dad goes to court and comes back 80k richer, you're going to know whether he won or lost. Still shouldn't have posted about it, but damn.

Stop her from reproducing.