On the one hand, we have:
Lieutenant Columbo, an LAPD homicide detective. He's a disheveled old man who uses an absent-minded mannerism to lull the killer into a false sense of security, while badgering them with a never-ending barrage of questions. Whenever he's called in to investigate, no matter how convincing it looks, he always finds one little discrepancy that keeps bugging him, and he just keeps investigating. Despite his bumbling ways, he's very clever, often outsmarting the killer by getting them to incriminate themselves.
On the other hand, we have:
Dexter Morgan, a forensic blood-spatter analyst for the MMPD. In his own time, a serial killer who kills other serial killers. He manages to dispose of his victims in ways that leave virtually no evidence at all. He's also very good at concealing his true personality (just like any self-respecting sociopath). Nobody even remotely suspects him of anything. Except for that one guy. Who's dead.
So, say that Lt. Columbo were to investigate the "Bay Harbor Butcher." What would happen? Would Columbo notice something suspicious about the way Dexter acts and latch onto him, driving him nuts with endless questions? Or would Dexter keep his cool and manage to successfully pull off what every other murderer Columbo faced attempted?
Log in to comment