Also...just went to the site, and it's surprising that the site's visitors are more concerned with homosexuality than they are concerned with anything else. I won't be surprised if the majority of these people have warped and inaccurate views on homosexuals, considering the source they are getting their information from.
Also, anyone who here who claims or actually believes that Conservapedia does not have much heavier bias than Wiki is a fool.
EDIT: I followed the homosexuality link (rank 2) and I love how the first piece of information is a section of biblical statements condeming homosexuality.
Instead of filling people with lies and fictional references, they should try to STOP hate rather than create it. You won't "convert" people by scorning them.
Also...just went to the site, and it's surprising that the site's visitors are more concerned with homosexuality than they are concerned with anything else. I won't be surprised if the majority of these people have warped and inaccurate views of what homosexuals, considering the source they are getting their information from.
Also, anyone who here who claims or actually believes that Conservapedia does not have much heavier bias than Wiki is a fool.
The_Ish
:oops: I need to get more sleep. :oops: I read that as bras.
They accused Wikipedia of being too biased to be trusted, then they turn around and make another biased website. If you go anywhere on that site that isn't about politics or conservatism, the articles are two sentences long.
Log in to comment