Conspiracy time: Who was responsible for JFK's murder?

For those of you who don't know what happened, President John F Kennedy was assissnated in Dallas, Texas. in November 22, 1963. Lee Harvey Oswald was the suspected killer, but that was never provem for he was shot by someone else while the Police were leading him to a van in their garage. That someone else died later of cancer. People have blamed the CIA, the FBI, the KGB, and the lone shooter. So, OT, what is your theory on what happened? remember, no one knows who really did it.

Bigfoot did it with technology he stole from the wreckage of the Roswell incident

Bigfoot did it with technology he stole from the wreckage of the Roswell incident

n00bproof

Lee Harvey Oswald.

The Comedian.

Duh.

I do think Oswald was the fall man and was killed to keep him quiet. I don't know who called the hit though.

Obama did it, with the aid of the illuminati!

Edit: And an alien time machine gained by the illuminati at Rosewell.

[QUOTE="n00bproof"]

Bigfoot did it with technology he stole from the wreckage of the Roswell incident

killyou060606

Of course he wouldn't, he did it because he was possessed by the ghost of Abe Lincoln, who knew JFK's secret heritage as a reptile shapeshifter

The Comedian.

Duh.

xerxes5678

False. I can vouch for the Comedian's whereabouts on the day in question.

I was. ;)

MugatuSaintLeonidas

LOL most of you, but in all seriousness, whodo you think it was? Oh yeah, the Mob (Mafia) is another theory I forgot to mention in my initial post.

[QUOTE="xerxes5678"]

The Comedian.

Duh.

Silverbond

False. I can vouch for the Comedian's whereabouts on the day in question.

I know its not me.GazaAli

we going to need proof for that

[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]MugatuDarth-Caedus

No...Mugatu

:P

^ He probably just looked at Kennedy... :P

You know, I find this topic pretty fascinating. "JFK" is one of my favorite movies, and while a lot of that movie was BS, the assasination video really shows that there were multiple bullets shot from different angles. There was also too many bullets for a single shooter. And according to the movie, it was impossible for a target to shoot Kennedy that many times and that perfectly from the distance of the warehouse.

People that are interested in this topic should check out "JFK". Just a terrific and fascinating movie. Sure, a lot of people hate it because they claim its complete BS, but there's no denying its a terrific and well-made movie. Amazing editing.

You know, I find this topic pretty fascinating. "JFK" is one of my favorite movies, and while a lot of that movie was BS, the assasination video really shows that there were multiple bullets shot from different angles. There was also too many bullets for a single shooter. And according to the movie, it was impossible for a target to shoot Kennedy that many times and that perfectly from the distance of the warehouse.

People that are interested in this topic should check out "JFK". Just a terrific and fascinating movie. Sure, a lot of people hate it because they claim its complete BS, but there's no denying its a terrific and well-made movie. Amazing editing.

Samurai_Xavier

Is this asking who shot JFK, or what led to the shooting of JFK?

The answer to the first is Lee Harvey Oswald. It has been proven that shots from the sixth floor of the book depository created wounds consistent with those seen in the Zapruder footage. As such, there is no evidence left unaccounted for by that explanation, so it should be accepted in lieu of others that include unnecessary suppositions.

The answer to the second is whatever one wants it to be. :P I don't think speculations on Mafia connections are unreasonable given what JFK did once in office, but at the same time there's no real evidence.

Whomever the government tells you who did it.

Gilligan did it. You can tell by just glancing at him. Pure Evil.

Gilligan did it. You can tell by just glancing at him. Pure Evil.

StrawberryHill

Bullets.

Bullets.

Elephant_Couple

:lol: This is definitely the best post in the thread.

[QUOTE="Elephant_Couple"]

Bullets.

GabuEx

:lol: This is definitely the best post in the thread.

No sense in wastsing time trying to figure it out. There's just a lot strange things that occured. It may have just been Oswald alone and Jack Ruby thought he was a hero.

Who has personal records? The government. Who would have access to change or destroy records? The government. So for all we know Oswald was much more than what people think. Or maybe not.

The rifleOswald elegidlyused isin fact is a piece of junk. The action is sloppy and fumblesome. So foe a lone gunman to get that grouping that quickly on a moving target would have to be an experienced as well asadvanced rifleman. Because the action is sloppy I can't see cycling, shouldering, aiming and firing that rifle. I guess his follow up shots were lucky if they were his shots and if there was a lone gunman.

two words: grassy knoll. =PAllicrombie

You may have a point. Given the extent of the injury to JFK, one would think one shot came towards him from that knoll.

Well so far everything that I've seen that has attempted to debunk the Oswald on his own theory with his little old rifle has horribly failed so until I see anything that causes me to doubt the simple facts I'm sticking with Oswald as the man.

Well so far everything that I've seen that has attempted to debunk the Oswald on his own theory with his little old rifle has horribly failed so until I see anything that causes me to doubt the simple facts I'm sticking with Oswald as the man.

Lord_Daemon

Now, I have no idea, but I used to think that Oswald did it; case closed. But if Oswald really was the lone man, how was Jack Ruby able to kill Oswald in a police line? Why did Ruby die of cancer mysteriously a few months later? How did the Police know who to go after if there were mutiple gunmen? How did they know where he was? I heard from an American now living in Canada, that Edgar J. Hoover, head of the FBI hated JFK. Is he the mastermind?

Well so far everything that I've seen that has attempted to debunk the Oswald on his own theory with his little old rifle has horribly failed so until I see anything that causes me to doubt the simple facts I'm sticking with Oswald as the man.

Lord_Daemon

From experience shooting rifles I know and anyone else will tell you that getting of consistent shots with a sloppy action is chaos when the target is moving.

They made him out tobe some novice but I don't believe so. He had a lot of experience with rifles if he was the one who placed all of those shots with THAT rifle. The rifle had to be sighted in. So he was the one who sighted it.

If it was him and him alone he was well trained rifleman. Otherwise he had help.

My hunch would be that if itwas a conspiracy that rifle was not his and it wasn't used to shoot JFK. The rifle claimed to be Oswald's is so because a quality rifle with aprecision action and good optics (the kind an experienced marksmanwould have would havebeen suspicious.

[QUOTE="Lord_Daemon"]

Well so far everything that I've seen that has attempted to debunk the Oswald on his own theory with his little old rifle has horribly failed so until I see anything that causes me to doubt the simple facts I'm sticking with Oswald as the man.

MagnumPI

From experience shooting rifles I know and anyone else will tell you that getting of consistent shots with a sloppy action is chaos when the target is moving.

They made him out tobe some novice but I don't believe so. He had a lot of experience with rifles if he was the one who placed all of those shots with THAT rifle. The rifle had to be sighted in. So he was the one who sighted it.

If it was him and him alone he was well trained rifleman. Otherwise he had help.

My hunch would be that if itwas a conspiracy that rifle was not his and it wasn't used to shoot JFK. The rifle claimed to be Oswald's is so because a quality rifle with aprecision action and good optics (the kind an experienced marksmanwould have would havebeen suspicious.

Well there's always that debate amongst people for and against various theories insisting that he wasn't very good and others insisting he was or must have been. Recently though I did watch a program in which they used the rifle in question and had three different people with various degrees of skill level (none, some, and expert) and all were able to hit within a small circle on a target moving at the speed the president's car was moving at with relative ease from the distance that Oswald shot at. It just didn't seem that hard and thus wasn't a factor in the debate.

[QUOTE="MagnumPI"]

[QUOTE="Lord_Daemon"]

Well so far everything that I've seen that has attempted to debunk the Oswald on his own theory with his little old rifle has horribly failed so until I see anything that causes me to doubt the simple facts I'm sticking with Oswald as the man.

Lord_Daemon

From experience shooting rifles I know and anyone else will tell you that getting of consistent shots with a sloppy action is chaos when the target is moving.

They made him out tobe some novice but I don't believe so. He had a lot of experience with rifles if he was the one who placed all of those shots with THAT rifle. The rifle had to be sighted in. So he was the one who sighted it.

If it was him and him alone he was well trained rifleman. Otherwise he had help.

My hunch would be that if itwas a conspiracy that rifle was not his and it wasn't used to shoot JFK. The rifle claimed to be Oswald's is so because a quality rifle with aprecision action and good optics (the kind an experienced marksmanwould have would havebeen suspicious.

Well there's always that debate amongst people for and against various theories insisting that he wasn't very good and others insisting he was or must have been. Recently though I did watch a program in which they used the rifle in question and had three different people with various degrees of skill level (none, some, and expert) and all were able to hit within a small circle on a target moving at the speed the president's car was moving at with relative ease from the distance that Oswald shot at. It just didn't seem that hard and thus wasn't a factor in the debate.

Mother Nature.

two words: grassy knoll. =PAllicrombie

Bigfoot would have totally blended into the grassy knoll.

[QUOTE="MagnumPI"]

[QUOTE="Lord_Daemon"]

Well so far everything that I've seen that has attempted to debunk the Oswald on his own theory with his little old rifle has horribly failed so until I see anything that causes me to doubt the simple facts I'm sticking with Oswald as the man.

Lord_Daemon

From experience shooting rifles I know and anyone else will tell you that getting of consistent shots with a sloppy action is chaos when the target is moving.

They made him out tobe some novice but I don't believe so. He had a lot of experience with rifles if he was the one who placed all of those shots with THAT rifle. The rifle had to be sighted in. So he was the one who sighted it.

If it was him and him alone he was well trained rifleman. Otherwise he had help.

My hunch would be that if itwas a conspiracy that rifle was not his and it wasn't used to shoot JFK. The rifle claimed to be Oswald's is so because a quality rifle with aprecision action and good optics (the kind an experienced marksmanwould have would havebeen suspicious.

Well there's always that debate amongst people for and against various theories insisting that he wasn't very good and others insisting he was or must have been. Recently though I did watch a program in which they used the rifle in question and had three different people with various degrees of skill level (none, some, and expert) and all were able to hit within a small circle on a target moving at the speed the president's car was moving at with relative ease from the distance that Oswald shot at. It just didn't seem that hard and thus wasn't a factor in the debate.

Lee Harvey Oswald.

Silverbond

Why cant people believe the most plausible answer?

On a tangent, 911 conspiracy mongers make me sick. I guess conspiracies are easier to believe then admitting people hate you half way across the world just because you are alive.