Copyright Vs Copywrong

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for airmanwilkins
airmanwilkins

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 airmanwilkins
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

I just wanted to see what the general consensus was amongst the GS community about piracy. So what do you think? Consider this a promt.I'm leaving the question vague for a reason. Tell me whats on your mind!

Here's what i think:

The way intellectual property is being shared is changing. Soon the days of wealthy game designers and big buisness corporations holding rights to forms of expression will be gone. What will be left are communities of like-minded individuals, such as you and I, creating something soley because we want to share it with everyone.Profit will be completely out of the picture, leaving only the passion of the creator(s) as the only motivation. You can doubt it all you want but its going to happen! Each day more and more people are getting their media free.

Copy"right" Vs Copy"wrong"... which side are you on?

Avatar image for my_mortal_coil
my_mortal_coil

2839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 my_mortal_coil
Member since 2009 • 2839 Posts

I just wanted to see what the general consensus was amongst the GS community about piracy. So what do you think? Consider this a promt.I'm leaving the question vague for a reason. Tell me whats on your mind!

Here's what i think:

The way intellectual property is being shared is changing. Soon the days of wealthy game designers and big buisness corporations holding rights to forms of expression will be gone. What will be left are communities of like-minded individuals, such as you and I, creating something soley because we want to share it with everyone.Profit will be completely out of the picture, leaving only the passion of the creator(s) as the only motivation. You can doubt it all you want but its going to happen! Each day more and more people are getting their media free.

Copy"right" Vs Copy"wrong"... which side are you on?

airmanwilkins

LOL. What you are saying is the largest growing commodity, multimedia, will become free in the largest Capitalist society in the world? Get real.

Software, music, IPs. These things take money, effort, work, skill and more money. The creators will fight tooth and nail for money they deserve for their wares. Distributers and marketers need to be paid for their services in letting people know about a product and getting it too the masses. The secondary market of used goods would vanish as well, so they will lobby the hell out of making sure the creators get paid.

No friggin way.

Of course community-created freeware, shareware, public access works of entertainment and art ALREADY exist. People DO enjoy these things for free and a lot donate so the creator (if the product is good enough) can make money and continue to hone their skills and put out more stuff. This is inline with what you stated but it exists more as a hobby for a lot of professionals or an altruistic "charity" for the public or for up and comers who WANT to be professionals to get their name and reputation.

When we pirate stuff we steal. Plain and simple. People who make awesome things we enjoy as a consumer deserve to get PAID.

Avatar image for BayAreaX
BayAreaX

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 BayAreaX
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts
i think its all good
Avatar image for WorldOfHurt
WorldOfHurt

5397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 WorldOfHurt
Member since 2006 • 5397 Posts
What's wrong with copyright, ownership, licencing, and everything else to do with possession? If I want to charge for something, that's my right. No-one is forcing you to use it if you don't want to. But if you do, and I want to charge, what right do you have to say that's wrong? Pay up, or move on.
Avatar image for COBRA1138
COBRA1138

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 COBRA1138
Member since 2008 • 54 Posts
No I cant! My work is too boring(sell sim-cards, cellphones...)I got to entertain myself!
Avatar image for Jekken6
Jekken6

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Jekken6
Member since 2008 • 2642 Posts

No I cant! My work is too boring(sell sim-cards, cellphones...)I got to entertain myself!COBRA1138

Watch Borat :P

[spoiler] i heard it was banned in russia and all former USSR nations, that's why i said it [/spoiler]

Avatar image for Mochyc
Mochyc

4421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Mochyc
Member since 2007 • 4421 Posts
Music is bloody expensive in my opinion, I wouldn't blame anyone for pirating it.
Avatar image for Taylor_B
Taylor_B

905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Taylor_B
Member since 2009 • 905 Posts
Just because you want something doesn't mean you're entitled to it. Seriously, parents should have taught their kids that by the time they're at least 8.
Avatar image for DemoniclyAnglic
DemoniclyAnglic

265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 DemoniclyAnglic
Member since 2009 • 265 Posts

Just because you want something doesn't mean you're entitled to it. Seriously, parents should have taught their kids that by the time they're at least 8.Taylor_B

Well yeah, parents can try, but stupid people never learn.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Music is bloody expensive in my opinion, I wouldn't blame anyone for pirating it.Mochyc
Do you feel the same about things like cars and electronics and such?
Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts

I do think copyright is going a bit too far, but that's not necessarily with multimedia. Right now huge corporations are placing patents on genes. They didn't make those, they only discovered them. I think that's outrageous. You can't put a copyright on life. But then again, money is power. And copyrights makes people money.

I hope that in the future copyright will be seriously reduced. Nowadays everything, no matter how non existant, has to be "owned" by someone or some corporation. Maybe through open source and people willing to release their ideas into public domain, copyright will slowly be less of an issue.

Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="Mochyc"]Music is bloody expensive in my opinion, I wouldn't blame anyone for pirating it.Engrish_Major
Do you feel the same about things like cars and electronics and such?

As I said in an earlier thread (I think it got deleted), that's not a 100% correct analogy. When you're pirating music, you're creating another copy of it for your own use. If you steal a car, you don't make a copy, you're just stealing someone elses property.

Of course, if you were about to buy the music and then decided to pirate it, it's the same as stealing. But seeing the price of music, I can understand that you'd never buy together a proper music collection. If you're not prepared to pay 20 dollars for an album, so you decide to pirate it, then it's a victimless crime.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="11Marcel"]

Of course, if you were about to buy the music and then decided to pirate it, it's the same as stealing. But seeing the price of music, I can understand that you'd never buy together a proper music collection. If you're not prepared to pay 20 dollars for an album, so you decide to pirate it, then it's a victimless crime.

It's not victimless, though. Do you really think that everyone that pirates a game, album, or movie, wouldn't have otherwise purchased the item if they were unable to steal it? What about all of the money now spent on DRM, which not only costs developers time and resources, but also inconveniences the honest people that actually pay for the item.
Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]

Of course, if you were about to buy the music and then decided to pirate it, it's the same as stealing. But seeing the price of music, I can understand that you'd never buy together a proper music collection. If you're not prepared to pay 20 dollars for an album, so you decide to pirate it, then it's a victimless crime.

Engrish_Major

It's not victimless, though. Do you really think that everyone that pirates a game, album, or movie, wouldn't have otherwise purchased the item if they were unable to steal it? What about all of the money now spent on DRM, which not only costs developers time and resources, but also inconveniences the honest people that actually pay for the item.

I said that already. Sometimes it's victimless, sometimes it's not victimless. You're just taking the big hump of all pirating that occurs and you call it stealing. I'm looking at it case by case.

Oh, and the DRM is a choice which turned out to be a wrong one.

Avatar image for phillo99
phillo99

2369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 phillo99
Member since 2005 • 2369 Posts

Yes, pirate because the big, bad, rich, music companies have too much money. Piracy is a crime and it's stupid. There's no excuse for it. If the price is too high, don't buy it. If enough people don't buy it, a company will lower prices.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="11Marcel"]

I said that already. Sometimes it's victimless, sometimes it's not victimless. You're just taking the big hump of all pirating that occurs and you call it stealing. I'm looking at it case by case.

Oh, and the DRM is a choice which turned out to be a wrong one.

So you don't think it should be up to the creator of the product then? If an artist wants his product to be available to the public for free, then he has the option to make it available. If the artist wants to recoop the money and time spend creating the product, then that's why they charge money. What you are saying is that it is not up to the creator, but the inhibitions (or lack thereof) of the potential customer.
Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]

I said that already. Sometimes it's victimless, sometimes it's not victimless. You're just taking the big hump of all pirating that occurs and you call it stealing. I'm looking at it case by case.

Oh, and the DRM is a choice which turned out to be a wrong one.

Engrish_Major

So you don't think it should be up to the creator of the product then? If an artist wants his product to be available to the public for free, then he has the option to make it available. If the artist wants to recoop the money and time spend creating the product, then that's why they charge money. What you are saying is that it is not up to the creator, but the inhibitions (or lack thereof) of the potential customer.

No, I'm only saying that it can be a victimless crime. But honestly, if a real artist had the following choice:

Make X amount of money and have Y amount of people enjoying their work, or:

Make X amount of money, and have Y + Z amount of people enjoying their work.

Which do you think would he choose? But then again, most people can't think in these terms. They either think "everything that's illegal is unmoral so I shouldn't do it" or "If I don't have to pay money for it, why should I?". It's more of a fault by the people themselves than the ideology of pirating.

Avatar image for COBRA1138
COBRA1138

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 COBRA1138
Member since 2008 • 54 Posts

[QUOTE="COBRA1138"]No I cant! My work is too boring(sell sim-cards, cellphones...)I got to entertain myself!Jekken6

Watch Borat :P

i heard it was banned in russia and all former USSR nations, that's why i said it

Avatar image for COBRA1138
COBRA1138

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 COBRA1138
Member since 2008 • 54 Posts
I don't know about ban for this film. I have tried to watch it(my friends got pirated version, and I got it from them). But I think this movie is too stupid. And there are no men such stupid as Borat. By the way I heard that some americans think, that there are bears walking on the streets of russian cities and all russians like vodka and wear Shapka-Ushanka Hat(Fur hat with "dog ears")-that's stereotype. Movie "Borat" shows us a lot of stereotypes.(Was he from Kazahstan?)
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
there are bears walking on the streets of russian cities and all russians like vodka and wear Shapka-Ushanka HatCOBRA1138
Yep, that pretty much describes Russia right there.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

I just wanted to see what the general consensus was amongst the GS community about piracy. So what do you think? Consider this a promt.I'm leaving the question vague for a reason. Tell me whats on your mind!

Here's what i think:

The way intellectual property is being shared is changing. Soon the days of wealthy game designers and big buisness corporations holding rights to forms of expression will be gone. What will be left are communities of like-minded individuals, such as you and I, creating something soley because we want to share it with everyone.Profit will be completely out of the picture, leaving only the passion of the creator(s) as the only motivation. You can doubt it all you want but its going to happen! Each day more and more people are getting their media free.

Copy"right" Vs Copy"wrong"... which side are you on?

airmanwilkins
God I hope not; a world where there is nothing but amateur-produced media. Also, "wealthy game designers" == LOL
Avatar image for phillo99
phillo99

2369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 phillo99
Member since 2005 • 2369 Posts

I don't know about ban for this film. I have tried to watch it(my friends got pirated version, and I got it from them). But I think this movie is too stupid. And there are no men such stupid as Borat. By the way I heard that some americans think, that there are bears walking on the streets of russian cities and all russians like vodka and wear Shapka-Ushanka Hat(Fur hat with "dog ears")-that's stereotype. Movie "Borat" shows us a lot of stereotypes.(Was he from Kazahstan?)COBRA1138

I think your friends were pulling your leg. The disc was made to look like a pirated version. It was classic.

Avatar image for vitriolboy
vitriolboy

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 vitriolboy
Member since 2005 • 4356 Posts

I just wanted to see what the general consensus was amongst the GS community about piracy. So what do you think? Consider this a promt.I'm leaving the question vague for a reason. Tell me whats on your mind!

Here's what i think:

The way intellectual property is being shared is changing. Soon the days of wealthy game designers and big buisness corporations holding rights to forms of expression will be gone. What will be left are communities of like-minded individuals, such as you and I, creating something soley because we want to share it with everyone.Profit will be completely out of the picture, leaving only the passion of the creator(s) as the only motivation. You can doubt it all you want but its going to happen! Each day more and more people are getting their media free.

Copy"right" Vs Copy"wrong"... which side are you on?

airmanwilkins

And then all the like minded individuals will starve to death because while they were busy creating and giving it away they had no way to support themselves.

Avatar image for airmanwilkins
airmanwilkins

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 airmanwilkins
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

LOL. What you are saying is the largest growing commodity, multimedia, will become free in the largest Capitalist society in the world? Get real.

Software, music, IPs. These things take money, effort, work, skill and more money. The creators will fight tooth and nail for money they deserve for their wares. Distributers and marketers need to be paid for their services in letting people know about a product and getting it too the masses. The secondary market of used goods would vanish as well, so they will lobby the hell out of making sure the creators get paid.

No friggin way.

Of course community-created freeware, shareware, public access works of entertainment and art ALREADY exist. People DO enjoy these things for free and a lot donate so the creator (if the product is good enough) can make money and continue to hone their skills and put out more stuff. This is inline with what you stated but it exists more as a hobby for a lot of professionals or an altruistic "charity" for the public or for up and comers who WANT to be professionals to get their name and reputation.

When we pirate stuff we steal. Plain and simple. People who make awesome things we enjoy as a consumer deserve to get PAID.

my_mortal_coil

Im not saying there will be a law passed were all intellectual property will be free. What I am saying is it will become the dominant way we receive our entertainment. it will happen regardless. Of coarse the copyright holders will fight piracy... they dont want to give up their position of power (Money). Honestly, I wouldnt give up the money without a fight either. But you CAN NOT win the battle against piracy. I liken it to events in history such as the printing press, when we first started to print information en mass. It was considered evil and at times outlawed. Same thing with movie theatres and HBO. HBO came out and theatre revenue dropped dramatically. My point is, Information is getting easier to obtain and its only a matter of time before it will no longer become piracy... but a socially acceptable form of receiving information And yes, I am aware that the communities I spoke of already exist... I love the fact that people donate money to game designers, ive done it myself. I'm just stating that game making will no longer be an industry. sharing is caring!

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

Im not saying there will be a law passed were all intellectual property will be free. What I am saying is it will become the dominant way we receive our entertainment. it will happen regardless. Of coarse the copyright holders will fight piracy... they dont want to give up their position of power (Money). Honestly, I wouldnt give up the money without a fight either. But you CAN NOT win the battle against piracy. I liken it to events in history such as the printing press, when we first started to print information en mass. It was considered evil and at times outlawed. Same thing with movie theatres and HBO. HBO came out and theatre revenue dropped dramatically. My point is, Information is getting easier to obtain and its only a matter of time before it will no longer become piracy... but a socially acceptable form of receiving information And yes, I am aware that the communities I spoke of already exist... I love the fact that people donate money to game designers, ive done it myself. I'm just stating that game making will no longer be an industry. sharing is caring!

airmanwilkins

Er... except for the minor detail that 600 years after the first printing press, the publishing industry is still going strong. Your comparison doesn't work.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#29 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Just because you want something doesn't mean you're entitled to it. Seriously, parents should have taught their kids that by the time they're at least 8.Taylor_B
Just because you make something doesn't mean you're entitled to it. There are lots of communal properties in lots of societies. Software is a huge grey area for a lot of people because the law behind copyrighted software is really fishy. You used to not be able to copyright mathmatical algorithims, which is essentially what software is. Pirates think that stuff is communal property, so they aren't erally stealing from anyone.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Taylor_B"]Just because you want something doesn't mean you're entitled to it. Seriously, parents should have taught their kids that by the time they're at least 8.Vandalvideo
Just because you make something doesn't mean you're entitled to it. There are lots of communal properties in lots of societies. Software is a huge grey area for a lot of people because the law behind copyrighted software is really fishy. You used to not be able to copyright mathmatical algorithims, which is essentially what software is. Pirates think that stuff is communal property, so they aren't erally stealing from anyone.

Huh? Very little software is designed from a "mathematical algorithm" perspective. Math software and encryption stuff aside, I can't think of a single example that could be accurately described this way. And, as a software engineer myself, I fully support ownership of one's created work.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#31 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"] Huh? Very little software is designed from a "mathematical algorithm" perspective. Math software and encryption stuff aside, I can't think of a single example that could be accurately described this way. And, as a software engineer myself, I fully support ownership of one's created work.

I may be misrepresenting their stance to some degree. I do know it involves the philosophy that what they are accessing is communal, and that companies shouldn't be entitled to copyright it. From there, I just took a jab at the reasoning. I was only at ITT for a little while before leaving for law. Thats the gist I know of the argument.
Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#32 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts
it really doesnt matter...
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

Then prepare to say goodbye to huge movies, deep games, and essentially everything that takes more than just passion to make.

Sure free stuff is nice, but having everything free means there's no point in sinking millions of dollars into development of movies, games, music etc...

Avatar image for airmanwilkins
airmanwilkins

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#34 airmanwilkins
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="airmanwilkins"]Im not saying there will be a law passed were all intellectual property will be free. What I am saying is it will become the dominant way we receive our entertainment. it will happen regardless. Of coarse the copyright holders will fight piracy... they dont want to give up their position of power (Money). Honestly, I wouldnt give up the money without a fight either. But you CAN NOT win the battle against piracy. I liken it to events in history such as the printing press, when we first started to print information en mass. It was considered evil and at times outlawed. Same thing with movie theatres and HBO. HBO came out and theatre revenue dropped dramatically. My point is, Information is getting easier to obtain and its only a matter of time before it will no longer become piracy... but a socially acceptable form of receiving information And yes, I am aware that the communities I spoke of already exist... I love the fact that people donate money to game designers, ive done it myself. I'm just stating that game making will no longer be an industry. sharing is caring!

Oleg_Huzwog

Er... except for the minor detail that 600 years after the first printing press, the publishing industry is still going strong. Your comparison doesn't work.

My comparison works perfectly... perhaps i didnt explain well enough. Let me connect the dots for you. I never said the publishing industry was dead or even declining. What i was alluding to, for the sake of brevity, was that before the printing press was invented there were scribes who wrote everything down. The printing press threatend the way information was distributed back then, just as P2P sharing is now. The publishing industry is now the "scribe" of out time. Do you not see history repeating itself?

Avatar image for Trinners
Trinners

2537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Trinners
Member since 2009 • 2537 Posts

[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

[QUOTE="airmanwilkins"]Im not saying there will be a law passed were all intellectual property will be free. What I am saying is it will become the dominant way we receive our entertainment. it will happen regardless. Of coarse the copyright holders will fight piracy... they dont want to give up their position of power (Money). Honestly, I wouldnt give up the money without a fight either. But you CAN NOT win the battle against piracy. I liken it to events in history such as the printing press, when we first started to print information en mass. It was considered evil and at times outlawed. Same thing with movie theatres and HBO. HBO came out and theatre revenue dropped dramatically. My point is, Information is getting easier to obtain and its only a matter of time before it will no longer become piracy... but a socially acceptable form of receiving information And yes, I am aware that the communities I spoke of already exist... I love the fact that people donate money to game designers, ive done it myself. I'm just stating that game making will no longer be an industry. sharing is caring!

airmanwilkins

Er... except for the minor detail that 600 years after the first printing press, the publishing industry is still going strong. Your comparison doesn't work.

My comparison works perfectly... perhaps i didnt explain well enough. Let me connect the dots for you. I never said the publishing industry was dead or even declining. What i was alluding to, for the sake of brevity, was that before the printing press was invented there were scribes who wrote everything down. The printing press threatend the way information was distributed back then, just as P2P sharing is now. The publishing industry is now the "scribe" of out time. Do you not see history repeating itself?

QFT, the publishing industry is a sinking boat.

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

My comparison works perfectly... perhaps i didnt explain well enough. Let me connect the dots for you. I never said the publishing industry was dead or even declining. What i was alluding to, for the sake of brevity, was that before the printing press was invented there were scribes who wrote everything down. The printing press threatend the way information was distributed back then, just as P2P sharing is now. The publishing industry is now the "scribe" of out time. Do you not see history repeating itself?

airmanwilkins

Yes, you did. You used the printing press to convey your point of "Information is getting easier to obtain and its only a matter of time before it longer become piracy" which led to your summation of "I'm just stating that game making will no longer be an industry."

So either yes, you directly implied the publishing industry was dead or dying... or your comparison doesn't work.

Avatar image for airmanwilkins
airmanwilkins

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 airmanwilkins
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="airmanwilkins"]My comparison works perfectly... perhaps i didnt explain well enough. Let me connect the dots for you. I never said the publishing industry was dead or even declining. What i was alluding to, for the sake of brevity, was that before the printing press was invented there were scribes who wrote everything down. The printing press threatend the way information was distributed back then, just as P2P sharing is now. The publishing industry is now the "scribe" of out time. Do you not see history repeating itself?

Oleg_Huzwog

Yes, you did. You used the printing press to convey your point of "Information is getting easier to obtain and its only a matter of time before it longer become piracy" which led to your summation of "I'm just stating that game making will no longer be an industry."

So either yes, you directly implied the publishing industry was dead or dying... or your comparison doesn't work.

Take it as you will. I think you're misunderstanding the purpose of this thread. Its to spark debate, not to argue semantics. You have nothing constructive to say?