Danewallacefan is banned!

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/profile/index.php?user=danwallacefan

P1 HE WAS BAN DODGING

P2 BAN DODGING IS NOT ALLOWED

C HE IS BANNED

NB: LOL

ROFLLLL

Who? :?

Thread of the year, I spat my drink out.

The libertarian?

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/profile/index.php?user=danwallacefan

P1 HE WAS BAN DODGING

P2 BAN DODGING IS NOT ALLOWED

C HE IS BANNED

NB: LOL

ROFLLLL

What was his original account?

[QUOTE="super_mario_128"]HAHAHAHA I mean, what a shame. He was such a g- No, I can't do it. :lol:T_P_O

[QUOTE="super_mario_128"]HAHAHAHA I mean, what a shame. He was such a g- No, I can't do it. :lol:T_P_O

Never heard of him XD4NTESINF3RNOX

[QUOTE="XD4NTESINF3RNOX"]Never heard of him Bitter_Altmer

I think I may have seen him post once or twice. Never really knew him though.

P1: It is possible that a maximally great banning exists

P2: If Its possible that a maximally great banning exists, then it exists in some possible world

P3: If a maximally great banning exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.

P4: If a maximally great banning exists in all possible worlds, it exists in the actual world

P5: If a maximally banning exists in the actual world, then it exists

C: Therefore a maximally great banning happened

So...who was he in his past account? Ace6301

P1: If God does not exist, then danwallacefan was not banned.

P2: Danwallacefan is banned.

C: Therefore, by the law of syllogism, God exists

P1: It is possible that a maximally great banning exists

P2: If Its possible that a maximally great banning exists, then it exists in some possible world

P3: If a maximally great banning exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.

P4: If a maximally great banning exists in all possible worlds, it exists in the actual world

P5: If a maximally banning exists in the actual world, then it exists

C: Therefore a maximally great banning happened

Bitter_Altmer

Who is that?GrandJury

P1: He was banned either due to physical necessity, chance, or moderator backlash

P2: He was not banned due to physical necessity or chance

C: He was banned due to modera- LOLOLOLOLOL

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]So...who was he in his past account? LJS9502_basic

EDIT: LovesPr was the other one

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27176231&page=0

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Ace6301"]So...who was he in his past account? Bitter_Altmer

P1: I don't recall a user by the name of Danewallacefan.

P2: I don't recall a user by the name of migkiller2 or migkillertwo.

C: I'm still lost. :?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Ace6301"]So...who was he in his past account? Bitter_Altmer

EDIT: LovesPr was the other one

Good. I won't be missing his philosophical meanderings.

Good. I won't be missing his philosophical meanderings.

foxhound_fox

Good riddance. He had some pretty ridiculous views and was kind of irritating.D_Battery

Not that I ever argued with the dude, but in every post I saw from him, he seemed really annoying. Almost troll-like. This doesn't count as a loss for the community so my feelings on this are "meh."

I heard he's heading to The Board next.:oLJS9502_basic

The same sounds familiar...

Meh, w/e.

P1: If Danewallacefan existed, what existed before Danewallacefan existed?

P2: mig_killer2 and LovesPR?

C: ROFL AT DANWALLACEFAN

P1: It is possible that danwallacefan would be banned from Gamespot
P2: Since it is possible that danwallacefan would be banned from Gamespot, he is banned in at least one possible world
P3: Since Gamespot is uniform across all worlds, danwallacefan is banned in all possible worlds
P4: The Gamespot we are posting on exists in a world
C: danwallacefan is banned

Seriously though, I won't shed any tears. He was incredibly closed-minded in his advocacy of Austrian economics, to the point that it was impossible to have a meaningful argument with him. He also seemed fond of tossing about philosophical terms in an attempt to appear smarter.

all i can say is confused :?

P1: Account dualism is true

P2: If users get banned, then the bannings must have come from something

P3: Bannings, being non-physical, must have their origin in something non-physical

P4: That non-physical being must be a greater mind

C: Therefore this greater mind, the origin of all minds, must exist and is responsible for this cleansing.

P1: The creation of danewallacefan's alt account is the most marvelous achievement imaginable.

P2:The merit of an achievement is the product of (a) its trollish quality, and (b) the overly libertarian views of its creator.

P3:The greater the trollishness of the creator, the more impressive the achievement.

P4:The most formidable moderation for a creator would be bannings

P5: Therefore if we suppose that danwallacefan is the product of an existent creator we can conceive a greater troll — namely, one who created alt accounts while banned

C: Therefore, danwallacefan is banned

Aww, am I the only person that liked dan.

The dude knew his philosophy really well. Anyways yes he was a ban-dodger. He was definitely Mig-Killer2 (or whatever it is) and I also suspect that he was fanofazrienoch and not-conspiracy although I never did confirm it.

Good night sweet prince. I'm sure he'll be back as williamlanecraigfan or fanofparrotingotherphilosophers *no offense Jake*

P1. A maximally great banning necessitates a higher degree of reality than human beings

P2. Beings with lesser degrees of reality cannot conceive of beings or objects with higher degrees of reality

P3. A maxmially great banning would not have occurred and been conceived by human beings unless it existed in reality

P3. A maxmially great banning would have instilled the idea of itself into human beings by necessity)

P4. No greater banning of a user other than danwallace fan can be conceived

P5. This maxmially great banning is of danwallacefan

C. Danwallacefan's banning is the greatest possible banning and necessarily exists