This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Tykain
Tykain

3887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Tykain
Member since 2008 • 3887 Posts

From what I understand, basically physicists found that there is not enough mass (gravity) considering the rotational speeds of galaxies, so they came up with the idea that there must be invisible matter to account for the theorically missing mass, and called it dark matter.

Well, there might very well be such a thing as dark matter (It's a valid theory) But it's like it's just something that was invented to fill a gap to make everything conveniently fit our current mathematic model of the universe, and many people believe it as a fact, it just must be there...

Now why couldn't it be simply that we have incomplete understanding of large scale gravitation ? which would make the calculation obsolete.

And also, while we're still finding new planets and stars even in our own gallaxy, not to mention black holes which are believed to be the most massive objects in space and we have no idea how many are there even in our own galaxy as they are very hard to find since they absorb even light; how can we determine that there must be "invisible" matter, when we have no idea how much mass constitute the actual "visible" matter ?

Just some thoughts I had earlier when talking about dark matter with a friend, and was wondering what OT think about it as we have some very knowledgeable people in physics here (I'm looking at you, Frame_Dragger!)

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Dark matter makes sense. There is a lot of stuff out there we can't see. Why can't some of it have mass.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
It's certainly possible, but dark matter is considered the leading contender for a couple of reasons. If gravity behaved differently over larger scales, it would defy a guiding metaprinciple of physics that physical laws do not vary from one place to another in the universe. Also, the universe is really only illuminated by starlight; by far the vast majority of the universe is space between those stars and even more so between galaxies, so it seems completely reasonable to believe that there is matter that is not observed simply because there is no light on it, hence the name.
Avatar image for TheFlush
TheFlush

5965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 TheFlush
Member since 2002 • 5965 Posts

Yeah I know what you mean, I feel the same about m-theory, string theory or the 11 dimensions needed for those theories.
Last week I was watching a docu about membrane theory, which in itself is still an unproven theory. And it needed a bunch of other unproven theories to make it work. In the documentary it was just assumed that it all made sense, but they never explained WHY they assumed that something like m-theory or 11 dimensions exist.

I'm not saying that these theories cannot possibly be true, because I'm obviously not very skilled in science. It was said that the big bang happened because 2 membranes in a higher dimension touched each other. How do they know that those membranes actually exist? How do they know that those higher dimensions actually exist? How do they know that if those membranes exist they can actually touch each other? There are so many gaps that weren't explained. That really frustrated me haha.

Avatar image for Mephers
Mephers

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Mephers
Member since 2010 • 720 Posts
Science is still young. Thats probably gods aura or something.
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06297_CHANDRA_Dark_Matter.html

Avatar image for Jackc8
Jackc8

8515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#7 Jackc8
Member since 2007 • 8515 Posts

I agree completely with the original poster. Though dark matter and energy is certainly a reasonable theory, it seems very much like an ad-hoc solution. I think there might very well be some area of physics we haven't yet discovered. Much like we thought Newtonian physics was the be-all and end-all until Einstein came along, there might very well be another branch of physics we don't yet understand which explains immensely large interactions among galaxies and that sort of thing.

There are plenty of other theories out there besides dark matter, and they always seem to be finding things which don't fit at all with the currently held beliefs about dark matter.

Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
That is how science works, you can never prove a theory, you can only disprove it, as long as it is not disproved, it holds. If disproven, needs refining, or more/better detail is needed. For example if neutrinos are indeed faster than the speed of light, doesn't mean Einstein was wrong, it means there is more to it. Einstein's theory has held pretty well against all the tests.
Avatar image for Tykain
Tykain

3887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Tykain
Member since 2008 • 3887 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"]It's certainly possible, but dark matter is considered the leading contender for a couple of reasons. If gravity behaved differently over larger scales, it would defy a guiding metaprinciple of physics that physical laws do not vary from one place to another in the universe. Also, the universe is really only illuminated by starlight; by far the vast majority of the universe is space between those stars and even more so between galaxies, so it seems completely reasonable to believe that there is matter that is not observed simply because there is no light on it, hence the name.

What physicists call dark matter is not matter we can't see because there is no light. It's matter that can't be seen and measured by any known method. Just something that is believed to be there somehow. I didn't say physics laws vary from one place to another, but that newtonian laws are incomplete (Not wrong, incomplete). Now i'm not saying that's the case, but just a theory within others. My problem with the dark matter theory is not that I don't believe it's possible (It certainly is), but that the theory has become very popular (And not only based on scientific hypothesis, but science-fiction has helped the theory gain popularity and make it mainstream too) and is to the point some people view it as fact, they ironically believe in it almost religiously, often times without even knowing much or anything about the matter (No pun intended) While in reality we just don't know, it's just a theory among others and while there is some clues pointing to it there isn't any concrete evidences and is not any more valid than some other theories out there.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

From what I understand, basically physicists found that there is not enough mass (gravity) considering the rotational speeds of galaxies, so they came up with the idea that there must be invisible matter to account for the theorically missing mass, and called it dark matter.

Well, there might very well be such a thing as dark matter (It's a valid theory) But it's like it's just something that was invented to fill a gap to make everything conveniently fit our current mathematic model of the universe, and many people believe it as a fact, it just must be there...

Now why couldn't it be simply that we have incomplete understanding of large scale gravitation ? which would make the calculation obsolete.

And also, while we're still finding new planets and stars even in our own gallaxy, not to mention black holes which are believed to be the most massive objects in space and we have no idea how many are there even in our own galaxy as they are very hard to find since they absorb even light; how can we determine that there must be "invisible" matter, when we have no idea how much mass constitute the actual "visible" matter ?

Just some thoughts I had earlier when talking about dark matter with a friend, and was wondering what OT think about it as we have some very knowledgeable people in physics here (I'm looking at you, Frame_Dragger!)

Tykain
We believe dark matter exists for the same reason we believe the higgs boson exists. It basically works as a fill for theory and logically they make sense that they could exist. You're right that we shouldn't believe firmly in them, they could be proven wrong after all. But that's what science is about. As for now they fill a role as hypothetical filler for theories that otherwise work from our observations. They've got evidence but it's not hard enough to consider them really "there". Also we don't have a very good idea of large scale gravitation. We know that gravity exists but the hows and whys aren't well known. There's certainly room for skepticism when it comes to dark matter.
Avatar image for Tykain
Tykain

3887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Tykain
Member since 2008 • 3887 Posts

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06297_CHANDRA_Dark_Matter.html

dramaybaz
Their conclusion from that 2006 report was prematured, there is modified gravity models that explains it without the need for dark matter. While it was an interesting observation, it is not a direct evidence of dark matter. As of now it's still a theory without enough evidence to either prove it or disprove it, same can be said about other theories.
Avatar image for RaptorPen
RaptorPen

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 RaptorPen
Member since 2010 • 103 Posts
I have to ask what is the purpose of all this. What good will come out of such "science" I'm much happier just assuming that all of the stars in the sky are just christmas trees that are really far away and its gotten me through several grades of school just ifne
Avatar image for Tykain
Tykain

3887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Tykain
Member since 2008 • 3887 Posts
I have to ask what is the purpose of all this. What good will come out of such "science" I'm much happier just assuming that all of the stars in the sky are just christmas trees that are really far away and its gotten me through several grades of school just ifneRaptorPen
If we never cared about space and its misteries, the world as we know it wouldn't be the same today. Much of today's technology is directly derived from space exploration.
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts

I have to ask what is the purpose of all this. What good will come out of such "science" I'm much happier just assuming that all of the stars in the sky are just christmas trees that are really far away and its gotten me through several grades of school just ifneRaptorPen
I suppose we are one of those that want to know how and why is everything around us, and how it all works.

Edit: Knowledge is Power!

Why did scientists want to know about gravity, what good has it done for us?

Avatar image for RaptorPen
RaptorPen

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 RaptorPen
Member since 2010 • 103 Posts

[QUOTE="RaptorPen"]I have to ask what is the purpose of all this. What good will come out of such "science" I'm much happier just assuming that all of the stars in the sky are just christmas trees that are really far away and its gotten me through several grades of school just ifnedramaybaz

I suppose we are one of those that want to know how and why is everything around us, and how it all works.

Edit: Knowledge is Power!

Why did scientists want to know about gravity, what good has it done for us?

I don't need gravity to explain why my pizza rolls come out of the microwave tasty and delicious. Why does science feel the need to explain everything. Some things are just better left mysteries
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts

[QUOTE="dramaybaz"]

[QUOTE="RaptorPen"]I have to ask what is the purpose of all this. What good will come out of such "science" I'm much happier just assuming that all of the stars in the sky are just christmas trees that are really far away and its gotten me through several grades of school just ifneRaptorPen

I suppose we are one of those that want to know how and why is everything around us, and how it all works.

Edit: Knowledge is Power!

Why did scientists want to know about gravity, what good has it done for us?

I don't need gravity to explain why my pizza rolls come out of the microwave tasty and delicious. Why does science feel the need to explain everything. Some things are just better left mysteries

As I said before, you just are not one of those who wants to know how it all works, you just take what is given to you without thinking too much. Some people want to know or add to the world, while others live their lives like sheep. If it suits you its perfectly fine, doesn't mean it is fine for the rest of us. And btw, that microwave isn't a product of magic either, it has also come from research and engineering.

And actually the understanding of gravity is the reason why you have satellite TV, internet, mobile phones and GPS, which you seem to take for granted.

Avatar image for Tykain
Tykain

3887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Tykain
Member since 2008 • 3887 Posts
[QUOTE="dramaybaz"]

[QUOTE="RaptorPen"]I have to ask what is the purpose of all this. What good will come out of such "science" I'm much happier just assuming that all of the stars in the sky are just christmas trees that are really far away and its gotten me through several grades of school just ifneRaptorPen

I suppose we are one of those that want to know how and why is everything around us, and how it all works.

Edit: Knowledge is Power!

Why did scientists want to know about gravity, what good has it done for us?

I don't need gravity to explain why my pizza rolls come out of the microwave tasty and delicious. Why does science feel the need to explain everything. Some things are just better left mysteries

Without science, you wouldn't have that microwave. In fact, without science there would be no pizza in america either, it would never have crossed the ocean. (Assuming you're in the US). You don't have to understand how things work yourself, nothing forces you to. but if no one ever cared to find out how things work we would still be in the stone age. It is because of human want to understand life, its mysteries and explore beyond its horizons that civilizations evolved.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Tykain"][QUOTE="xaos"]It's certainly possible, but dark matter is considered the leading contender for a couple of reasons. If gravity behaved differently over larger scales, it would defy a guiding metaprinciple of physics that physical laws do not vary from one place to another in the universe. Also, the universe is really only illuminated by starlight; by far the vast majority of the universe is space between those stars and even more so between galaxies, so it seems completely reasonable to believe that there is matter that is not observed simply because there is no light on it, hence the name.

What physicists call dark matter is not matter we can't see because there is no light. It's matter that can't be seen and measured by any known method.

I wasn't clear; I wasn't just referring to visible spectrum illumination, but all our detection methods, such as microwave, gamma etc. since EM and observation of gravitational effects are pretty much our only source of data on the large scale structure of the universe. I don't see the uncritical acceptance of dark matter via sci fi as being particularly more worthy of concern than the fact that wormholes get the same treatment; string theory I do find more bothersome, just because, unlike dark matter and wormholes, there isn't even a testable prediction built off of that model yet, and it is consuming a vast amount of the attention in theoretical physics these days, as well as having a broad degree of presumptive acceptance among the lay public.