This topic is locked from further discussion.
itd be cool for a season two. i really like the show. ive guessed right on like half of them.:P
i liked the one with spartan vs ninja. at first i didnt know who to choose then i chose spartan:)
When they stuck to similar periods that show was pretty good.
Console_Gamer93
yea true.
i enjoyed the ones like samurai vs (something) and didnt really care for the ones like IRA vs. Taliban
Viking VS Samurai, Mafia VS Yakuza, and Apache VS Gladiator were awesome. Everything else was kinda alright. I don't think they can really come up with many more original but still awesome matches.
how about Masahiko Kimura (legendary judoka who almost killed Helio Gracie, the inventor of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu) vs. Jake Lamotta? similar weights.Viking VS Samurai, Mafia VS Yakuza, and Apache VS Gladiator were awesome. Everything else was kinda alright. I don't think they can really come up with many more original but still awesome matches.
MetroidPrimePwn
The show is interesting sometimes, but it is kind of stupid and arbitrary, the way they compare warriors. Basically, they just look at what weapon does the best job hacking at a dummy. They don't spend any time comparing the tactics and skills of the warrior. Just the weapons. For example, how does a Spartan, who is trained to fight in tight formations as an army, fare while fighting solo?
I too, wished they would explore the methods of warriors over just the weapons.The show is interesting sometimes, but it is kind of stupid and arbitrary, the way they compare warriors. Basically, they just look at what weapon does the best job hacking at a dummy. They don't spend any time comparing the tactics and skills of the warrior. Just the weapons. For example, how does a Spartan, who is trained to fight in tight formations as an army, fare while fighting solo?
Solid_Cobra
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment