Dinosaurs Co-existing with Robots?

I know, religion might effect peoples answers to this question, but lets put that all behind us.

So, do you think that dinosaurs co-existed with robots?

Not peacefully. The robots programming would never allow for it.Hom3_Pwn3r

Thats true...I suppose if the robots were rewired to be accustomed to the dinos, they're would be a lot less wars between them, though.

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

The robots killed the dinosaurs off actually. The first law of robotics forced them to kill off all the dinosaurs to protect humans.Vaasman

Killed dinos before there were humans...hmmm....wait a second, wait just a gosh darn second...IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!

This just in! Robots and dinosaurs didn't coexist! Dinosaurs WERE robots!!!!

After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...Tylendal

Yes there is.

After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...Tylendal

Ouch. Yes there is.

This just in! Robots and dinosaurs didn't coexist! Dinosaurs WERE robots!!!!

*ROBOSAUR PICTURE*

Vaasman

WOAH NELLY!!!

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...qetuo6

Yes there is.

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...SuperDuper755

Ouch. Yes there is.

Isosceles, scalene, equalateral, right...

what's an obtuse triangle?

[QUOTE="qetuo6"]

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...Tylendal

Yes there is.

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...SuperDuper755

Ouch. Yes there is.

Isosceles, scalene, equalateral, right...

what's an obtuse triangle?

Those are all about side lengths.

acute, obtuse, and right triangles are all about angles.

Oh, my. I got nothing...

[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="qetuo6"]

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...SuperDuper755

Yes there is.

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...SuperDuper755

Ouch. Yes there is.

Isosceles, scalene, equalateral, right...

what's an obtuse triangle?

Those are all about side lengths.

acute, obtuse, and right triangles are all about angles.

Oh, that makes sense. I was thinking "opaque". Been a while since I did geometry. Obtuse angles are angles over 90° right?

[QUOTE="SuperDuper755"][QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="qetuo6"]

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...Tylendal

Yes there is.

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]After I voted, I suddenly realized that there is no such thing as an obtuse triangle...SuperDuper755

Ouch. Yes there is.

Isosceles, scalene, equalateral, right...

what's an obtuse triangle?

Those are all about side lengths.

acute, obtuse, and right triangles are all about angles.

Oh, that makes sense. I was thinking "opaque". Been a while since I did geometry. Obtuse angles are angles over 90° right?

Sure, who cares.

Well if we are talking about robots specificly or their sub-braches of androids and cyborgs...because that makes a huge difference. Techniclly any automoton that is programed to do function is a robot..so a toaster falls in that catagory..However if we apply sentiance(self aware AI) to a non organic lifeform then we have an android...further more if we take a sentiant organic lifeform and fuse it with biomechanical parts then we have a cyborg...so please be more specific with your idoitic questions. Thank you

I can't see how anything but utter anarchy would result from such co-existence. A robot is forced to follow the three laws of robotics :

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Laws one and two are completely void, seeing as humans won't exist for another 65 million years. Therefore it is only reasonable to assume that the entire Mesozoic era was spent waging a conflict of epic proportions between dinosaurs and robots. Such a conflict would have been so epic, that we would have found some paleontological evidence for it, such as anti-pterodactyl bots or velociraptor death warriors. Such fossil evidence has not been found, unfortunately.

bman784

I know, religion might effect peoples answers to this question, but lets put that all behind us.

So, do you think that dinosaurs co-existed with robots?

SuperDuper755

or better yet, did gamers co-exist with girls? hahahaha!

of course

Yes they did and hes a picture to prove it, taken by jesus himself. Who also co-existed with dinosaurs and robots btw...


skivit

Yes they did and hes a picture to prove it, taken by jesus himself. Who also co-existed with dinosaurs and robots btw...


skivit

Jesus is a pretty good photographer, taking the picture at dawn to get a nice depth for the photo.

and look at the hills...they're green, grass must have co-existed with dinosours.sentencedogu