do we have the power to destroy earth?

  • 100 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for slipknot0129
slipknot0129

5832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 slipknot0129
Member since 2008 • 5832 Posts

Do we have the power to destroy earth? I dont think we do. Whatever we do the earth will be able to heal itself. The human race can be destroy itself but it cant destroy earth. Radiation goes away after awhile. We probably cant even destroy a small country like japan with all the nukes in the world. Im not sure but thats what I think.

Avatar image for VaguelyTagged
VaguelyTagged

10702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 VaguelyTagged
Member since 2009 • 10702 Posts

if by destroy you mean making it unhabitable,yes we are able to do so.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Of coruse we do, enough to kill Earth many times over.

I suggest reading this:

http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/1997/00/00_babst_consequences.php

Avatar image for Fundai
Fundai

6120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Fundai
Member since 2010 • 6120 Posts

I'm prety sure if Man wanted to spend time crushing the earth to a pulp and blow up every inch of crust we could do it. :P

However we're not ever going to be able to destroy the earth completely by, lets say, Nuclear war, enviormental destruxtion e.t.c.

as long as theres a planet to grow on life will continue in some form.

Avatar image for EmpCom
EmpCom

3451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 EmpCom
Member since 2005 • 3451 Posts

Do we have the power to destroy earth? I dont think we do. Whatever we do the earth will be able to heal itself. The human race can be destroy itself but it cant destroy earth. Radiation goes away after awhile. We probably cant even destroy a small country like japan with all the nukes in the world. Im not sure but thats what I think.

slipknot0129
You would be wrong then
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#7 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
The Large Hadron Collider has the possibility to create a black hole, so yeah, I think we could destroy earth...and our entire solar system
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
No because eventually the Earth will 'fix' itself.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
The Large Hadron Collider has the possibility to create a black hole, so yeah, I think we could destroy earth...and our entire solar systemchaoscougar1
that thing cant create a black hole large enough or stable enough to last longer than a few nanoseconds
Avatar image for slipknot0129
slipknot0129

5832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 slipknot0129
Member since 2008 • 5832 Posts

if by destroy you mean making it unhabitable,yes we are able to do so.

VaguelyTagged

But there has been time in the past were the earth was unhabitable. If thats what you think destroyed is then earth has been destroyed many times.

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#11 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]The Large Hadron Collider has the possibility to create a black hole, so yeah, I think we could destroy earth...and our entire solar systemwis3boi
that thing cant create a black hole large enough or stable enough to last longer than a few nanoseconds

We haven't really had the opportunity to study a black hole up close. Granted that is probably correct as it will by incredibely small. However, black holes grow larger by consuming matter. Thus I still don't like the idea of messing with the most destructive force in the universe
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]

if by destroy you mean making it unhabitable,yes we are able to do so.

slipknot0129

But there has been time in the past were the earth was unhabitable. If thats what you think destroyed is then earth has been destroyed many times.

:? It's been that way twice. One; when it was going through the early stages of its life and Two: When a meteor wiped out the dinosaurs

Avatar image for deactivated-58df4522915cb
deactivated-58df4522915cb

5527

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-58df4522915cb
Member since 2007 • 5527 Posts

no, but i think we are stupid enough to do it if we did

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

if by destroy you mean making it unhabitable,yes we are able to do so.

VaguelyTagged

I doubt that as well. We'd literally have to kill off every living thing on the planet.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]

if by destroy you mean making it unhabitable,yes we are able to do so.

slipknot0129

But there has been time in the past were the earth was unhabitable. If thats what you think destroyed is then earth has been destroyed many times.

If all the nukes on earth detonated, nothing on this planet would survive, the entire ecosystem would be destroyed beyond repair. Don't forget the mass of radiation, the altering of the tectonic plates (bombarding the crust with thousands of nukes is sure to set of record earthquakes and volcanic activity), as well as nuclear winter and enough material shot into the atmosphere to block out the sun for decades or more. Not to mention oceans would shrink or evaporate or at the very least be toxic. Life would have a very hard time recovering if at all
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

I'm prety sure if Man wanted to spend time crushing the earth to a pulp and blow up every inch of crust we could do it. :P

However we're not ever going to be able to destroy the earth completely by, lets say, Nuclear war, enviormental destruxtion e.t.c.

as long as theres a planet to grow on life will continue in some form.

Fundai

We wouldn't be able to spend much time doing it, since we sort of rely on the Earth in order to live. If we tried to do it via some slow process, then we'd kill ourselves off long before we ever got around to finishing our plan.

Only way to do it would be to do it QUICKLY. As in, one huge explosive event, like strategically detonating every nuclear weapon in existence. And even then...we'd fail. Never mind destroying Earth, I seriously doubt that would be enough to destroy all LIFE on Earth.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

The Large Hadron Collider has the possibility to create a black hole, so yeah, I think we could destroy earth...and our entire solar systemchaoscougar1

Microscopic black holes, which decay in a tiny fraction of a second and can't possibly hurt anyone.

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts
Destroy as in destroy the whole planet? No. Destroy as in make in barren of all life, I think were getting to a point where its possible.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#19 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
Radiation goes away after awhile.slipknot0129
Take Eniwetok Atoll, where the first H-Bomb was tested. It vaporized an entire islet of the atoll. They had to dig up all of the contaminated soil (which is still radioactive more than 59 years later), and bury it in concrete 25 feet high, then cover it with an 18-inch thick concrete dome.
Avatar image for VaguelyTagged
VaguelyTagged

10702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 VaguelyTagged
Member since 2009 • 10702 Posts

[QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]

if by destroy you mean making it unhabitable,yes we are able to do so.

MrGeezer

I doubt that as well. We'd literally have to kill off every living thing on the planet.

haven't we already vanished some? we don't need to kill them off by our own hands,we just have to interfere in their food chains,make more deserts and keep damaging the ozone.not everything can be healed over and over again.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

Destroy as in destroy the whole planet? No. Destroy as in make in barren of all life, I think were getting to a point where its possible.rzepak

I severely doubt that.

We could cause a "nuclear winter", but there are species right now that live entirely independant from the sun's energy.

Radiation? We know of species that can survive in space unprotected.

Global warming? Slow process that takes a long time. In order to use global warming to make the earth so hot that no life would survive, we'd have to ensure that we can get the process started very quickly and that it'll keep on going in our absence. And good luck with that.

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]The Large Hadron Collider has the possibility to create a black hole, so yeah, I think we could destroy earth...and our entire solar systemMrGeezer

Microscopic black holes, which decay in a tiny fraction of a second and can't possibly hurt anyone.

It's all a theory until we actually witness it. We have never had the chance to actually study a black hole this close before, how it reacts to differing environments and situations etc
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

[QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]

if by destroy you mean making it unhabitable,yes we are able to do so.

VaguelyTagged

I doubt that as well. We'd literally have to kill off every living thing on the planet.

haven't we already vanished some? we don't need to kill them off by our own hands,we just have to interfere in their food chains,make more deserts and keep damaging the ozone.not everything can be healed over and over again.

There's life living almost entirely off of geothermal and chemical energy which is being expelled from the Earth itself. Life that doesn't rely on "the food chain".

Avatar image for Fundai
Fundai

6120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 Fundai
Member since 2010 • 6120 Posts

[QUOTE="Fundai"]

I'm prety sure if Man wanted to spend time crushing the earth to a pulp and blow up every inch of crust we could do it. :P

However we're not ever going to be able to destroy the earth completely by, lets say, Nuclear war, enviormental destruxtion e.t.c.

as long as theres a planet to grow on life will continue in some form.

MrGeezer

We wouldn't be able to spend much time doing it, since we sort of rely on the Earth in order to live. If we tried to do it via some slow process, then we'd kill ourselves off long before we ever got around to finishing our plan.

Only way to do it would be to do it QUICKLY. As in, one huge explosive event, like strategically detonating every nuclear weapon in existence. And even then...we'd fail. Never mind destroying Earth, I seriously doubt that would be enough to destroy all LIFE on Earth.

What i meant is that the only way we could posibly destroy eart is if we were actively trying to break the planet apart. rendering it inhabitalbe by means of pulution or nukes would only be temporary.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

What i meant is that the only way we could posibly destroy eart is if we were actively trying to break the planet apart. rendering it inhabitalbe by means of pulution or nukes would only be temporary.

Fundai

I seriously doubt that every nuclear weapon ever created, combined, would be even close to being able to do that. We'd literally have to exceed the gravitational binding energy of all the mass on the entire freaking planet. And I'd like to see one person propose a plausible way for us to ever be able to do that.

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#26 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="Fundai"]

What i meant is that the only way we could posibly destroy eart is if we were actively trying to break the planet apart. rendering it inhabitalbe by means of pulution or nukes would only be temporary.

MrGeezer

I seriously doubt that every nuclear weapon ever created, combined, would be even close to being able to do that. We'd literally have to exceed the gravitational binding energy of all the mass on the entire freaking planet. And I'd like to see one person propose a plausible way for us to ever be able to do that.

Wait till 2508 when we have developed Planet Crackers? :P
Avatar image for NiKva
NiKva

8181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 NiKva
Member since 2010 • 8181 Posts

I think we have the ability to kill every living thing on Earth, but not destroy the Earth itself.

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#28 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
Maybe? We're not stupid to try though,
Avatar image for NiKva
NiKva

8181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 NiKva
Member since 2010 • 8181 Posts
Maybe? We're not stupid to try though,racing1750
Challenge accepted.
Avatar image for z827
z827

4731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

#30 z827
Member since 2008 • 4731 Posts

We're breaking apart the ozone layer , feeding the atmosphere with dust , smog and other harmful chemicals , using something as dangerous as nuclear energy , have nukes stored in just about every country , leaving gigantic carbon footprints on this planet of our's , killing thousands of species ever since we set foot on this planet , chopping down the forests which provides oxygen , defiling the seas and oceans with oil and chemicals , melting the ice caps which leads to global warming and the rising of the waters and modifying the genes of other animals.

I think we pretty much have the power and means to destroy this planet by turning it into a ball of waste.
Not smite it into pieces or anything - but we can probably turn it into a ball of brownish waste.

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

Of course we can, but only if we find Earth-Prime and destroy that one

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts
not yet
Avatar image for ZEYAAM898
ZEYAAM898

1921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 ZEYAAM898
Member since 2009 • 1921 Posts
Yep we have it.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I dont know. Nukes seem real scary, but the energy they release is actually dwarfed by a lot of natural disasters. However, its possible we could creat a nuclear winter that could destroy all life on the planet.

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts

However, its possible we could creat a nuclear winter that could destroy all life on the planet.

sonicare

that is a fairy tale

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

We probably cant even destroy a small country like japan with all the nukes in the world.

slipknot0129

I'm almost certain we could.

Avatar image for -TheSecondSign-
-TheSecondSign-

9303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 -TheSecondSign-
Member since 2007 • 9303 Posts

No. We can make it where we can't live anymore, but I doubt the planet will give a rat's ass about that.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

No because eventually the Earth will 'fix' itself.ZumaJones07

Fix it self? the Earth for the majority of its lifespan has been lifeless.. The current and past environments that allowed life to exist on the planet is a rarity/abnormal period to the lifeless streak of the planet.. I would like to know what "fix itself really means.. No mankind can not physically destroy the planet, but something like a nuclear war would wipe out the majority of life.. And who knows if the Earth will ever have a sustainable envirnoment for life to thrive after that.

Avatar image for maheo30
maheo30

5102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 maheo30
Member since 2006 • 5102 Posts
From a purely naturalistic perspective? Yes.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38922 Posts
we don't even have the power to destroy all life on earth. let alone the earth itself..
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#41 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

We can dig to the core and it will melt yes.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Eh yes we do, just look around.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38922 Posts

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]No because eventually the Earth will 'fix' itself.sSubZerOo

Fix it self? the Earth for the majority of its lifespan has been lifeless.. The current and past environments that allowed life to exist on the planet is a rarity/abnormal period to the lifeless streak of the planet.. I would like to know what "fix itself really means.. No mankind can not physically destroy the planet, but something like a nuclear war would wipe out the majority of life.. And who knows if the Earth will ever have a sustainable envirnoment for life to thrive after that.

life has existed on earth for longer than it hasn't existed on earth.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#48 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The Large Hadron Collider has the possibility to create a black hole, so yeah, I think we could destroy earth...and our entire solar systemchaoscougar1
Microscopic black holes that dissolve due to their tiny masses. They don't have the ability to accrete more mass. And no, we don't have the power to destroy the Earth itself. Merely the life on it.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
The earth is just a big rock. It's been through hell and back, and has proven to be extremely resilient. It's probably not going anywhere until the Sun eats it up a few billion years from now. The earth's biosphere, however, is very fragile. With the creation of nuclear weapons, life on earth can now be virtually wiped out with the push of a button.
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts

This is the beginning and end of it really. We can wipe out life on earth with a combination of phased biological, chemical, and nuclear attacks. As you say though, Earth is a big (I'd say massive) rock... or rather molten metals and the magma. If some detonation (and it couldn't be fission, there's a limit) "cracked" the planet, it would just do what it did when it formed; collsapse back to a roughly spherical shape under its own gravity.

I think in this discussion, that consideration has been missing: to destroy a planet you really would need to "sandblast" it bit by bit (as Sol will do eventually), tear it apart with a black hole (not going to happen), or somehow disrupt its orbit and send it into another massive body. Despite some comments here, the LHC has no capacity to create a black hole of the type and mass to cause ANY destruction. Far more energetic collisions occur in the upper atmosphere, and have for billions of years without incident. This also tends to rule out the notion of conversion to "strange" matter, which is highly theoretical.

Destruction of a planet through explosive force would have to eject the bits of planet so far apart that gravity wouldn't cause the mass to "clump" together again and reform. Earth really is incredibly massive, and composed of everything from diamond and iron, to gasses in the upper atmosphere.