This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yeah, he deserved it. Even if you think that he didn't suck as a president, this **** comes with the job. If he wasn't prepared and willing to become a laughing stock, then he never should have applied for the job.
And the same applies for Obama. 5 or 10 years from now, if and when Obama becomes a joke, I'll be saying the same thing. No one put a gun to his head and made him run for president. You either except that that kind of "abuse" will happen, or you just plain don't run for freaking president.
Well Bush isn't complaining about it. TC is.Yeah, he deserved it. Even if you think that he didn't suck as a president, this **** comes with the job. If he wasn't prepared and willing to become a laughing stock, then he never should have applied for the job.
And the same applies for Obama. 5 or 10 years from now, if and when Obama becomes a joke, I'll be saying the same thing. No one put a gun to his head and made him run for president. You either except that that kind of "abuse" will happen, or you just plain don't run for freaking president.
MrGeezer
MSNBC is STILL taking shots at him. Olbermann has "Bushed", Maddow has "Scrub. Rinse. Repeat." He did not deserve all the abuse, and it was "cool" to hate Bush. And no matter who you asked, whenever you asked WHY they hated him, they could never go beyond, he started a war in Iraq. remmbermytitansI haven't taken MSNBC seriously since Obama's convention speech coverage. "This is how Henry won at Agincourt! This is how Alexander the Great won!" :lol:
Bush hasn't been abused any more than Clinton did (and still does).
Did he deserve it? Just as much as Clinton did.
He should, considering that's the same condition he left his country in.I really pity the guy. Sure, some of the bushism is funny, but they guy must feel like crap.
aliblabla2007
[QUOTE="Serraph105"]Did he deserve the abuse? Well considering the state of the economy, the unjust war in Iraq, *pauses rant and looks at the map on the wall and sees New Orleans* I'm thinking maybe more than just a little.MoonMarvelSee? Blame the ebil repubbycon for everything and ignore the crap the democrats did. Obviously NO was all Bushys fault and the dem gov and mayor deserve no heat....Wait a second, NO was mostly their fault. Of course the economy wasn't his fault either, he didn't force those companies to do anything, but Clinton sure did allow for it. And how is Iraq unjust? Back up your comments with facts! As I said before, he doesn't and only gets it from bitter liberals mad they lost in 2000 and unfairly blame him for stuff that wasn't his fault!
I expect the people America put in place to run the country to step up and take charge and make things right. Especially when Katrina hit and Bush was too busy on vacation to help out. I dont call them evil I think lazy and inept are much more accurate titles
[QUOTE="Scott_Malkinson"]If anything, George Bush deserved more abuse. Also, he should have gotten hit by those shoes!MoonMarvelWhy? Give reason backing your hatred or its unjust. well the shoe thing would be just plain karma at work
See? Blame the ebil repubbycon for everything and ignore the crap the democrats did. Obviously NO was all Bushys fault and the dem gov and mayor deserve no heat....Wait a second, NO was mostly their fault. Of course the economy wasn't his fault either, he didn't force those companies to do anything, but Clinton sure did allow for it. And how is Iraq unjust? Back up your comments with facts! As I said before, he doesn't and only gets it from bitter liberals mad they lost in 2000 and unfairly blame him for stuff that wasn't his fault!MoonMarvel
I expect the people America put in place to run the country to step up and take charge and make things right. Especially when Katrina hit and Bush was too busy on vacation to help out. I dont call them evil I think lazy and inept are much more accurate titles
Then you expect too much. And the dems were in charge as well. expecting the people to do their jobs is too much?[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] Why? Give reason backing your hatred or its unjust.MoonMarvelwell the shoe thing would be just plain karma at work For what? Not being a democrat? look I dont really careabout political parties I just care about doing a good job and Bush obviously didnt do that. To argue that he was a great president is just foolish.
There have been many, many things that have happened in his tenure in office, and much of it was largely uncaused by him and, in many cases, wasn't even worsened by him. However, the man is like velcro. Everything, as long as it is ugly and hooked, sticks to him. Everything smooth and pretty, however, does not.
As a result, I think that he did not deserve all of the hate he has gotten.
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] Then you expect too much. And the dems were in charge as well.MoonMarvelexpecting the people to do their jobs is too much? Since when is it governments job to fix all of americas problems? Ever thought you expect too much from the government? What ever happened to personal responsibility? I do accept personal responsibility when I screw up however I dont decide when the country goes to war on false pretenses. I wouldnt decide to do nothing if I had the power to change the way a Hurricane evac is going when I see it going poorly and I certainly would have set rules as to what people could do with the bailout money because the people in charge proved themselves unable to keep things going themselves. I would have made teams of people who could handle these kinds of things.
Nope. Sure, he made some mistakes, but I think that the 'abuse' was rather excessive.t3hrubikscubeyep, this, everyone who thinks otherwise is just ignorant.
[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] For what? Not being a democrat? MoonMarvellook I dont really careabout political parties I just care about doing a good job and Bush obviously didnt do that. To argue that he was a great president is just foolish. If you can't defend your views with anything and decide to take peoples comments out of context and mildy bait them maybe you should just admit you were wrong about Bush and move on? Right now you haven't given me anything that would indicate that your hatred is founded in actual facts.
i'd say in his decision of to into Iraq based on imaginary WMD's, Guantanamo bay, gas prices, his tax cuts and worst of all, his dictatorship.
I do accept personal responsibility when I screw up however I dont decide when the country goes to war on false pretenses. I wouldnt decide to do nothing if I had the power to change the way a Hurricane evac is going when I see it going poorly and I certainly would have set rules as to what people could do with the bailout money because the people in charge proved themselves unable to keep things going themselves. I would have made teams of people who could handle these kinds of things.[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] Since when is it governments job to fix all of americas problems? Ever thought you expect too much from the government? What ever happened to personal responsibility?MoonMarvel
1. Because mulitple nations all telling you the same thing is soooo bad. I dont even know if your talking about me listening to the media on this or Nations telling Bush what to do either way I just scratched my head at this.
2. Because the GOV refusing to ask for help and years before not using the money given to her to fix the levees deserves no heat, because the Mayor not doing proper Evac deserves no heat. And how much power does Bush even have over FEMA? I dont know about actual power but my guess is if he decided to get involved FEMA wouldnt have simply flipped him the bird and went about as usual.
3. So your blaming him for money he didn't control? I wonder whos job that was. I also wonder why the Dems get no heat over it. But its also nice you focus on one thing and ignore what caused this in the first place, which a lot happened before he was in office. Look farther than 2000. Once again since he controlled it at one point my guess is making a few rules before he gave it wouldnt have been too hard for him to get his way sure it would have been overstepping bounderies but since he had been doing so much of that anyways I dont see why he wouldnt have stopped there of all places.
I have a question for you would you have Bush and his team run the country yet again?
All politicans need some abuse but it did get a little excessive....I mean he's outta office and they were still taking shots...too many people think the president has a magical wand in his hand and can change whatever he wants whenever...The Economy's bad for a number of reasons what Bush wasn't even 1%...Last time I checked the president can't control hurricanes nor take control of FEMA you want fix? how about a less Beuracratic Government? I don't exactly understand what's wrong about the War in Iraq ...I mean unjust? saving peoples lifes is...unjust? Ask the Kurds how they feel about having Saddam removed I don't know if they'll partake in bush bashing =l
And no I'm not spell checking if you try to point out my ignorance I just don't feel like working that hard at this debate so...away with you!
[QUOTE="links136"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] If you can't defend your views with anything and decide to take peoples comments out of context and mildy bait them maybe you should just admit you were wrong about Bush and move on? Right now you haven't given me anything that would indicate that your hatred is founded in actual facts.MoonMarvel
i'd say in his decision of to into Iraq based on imaginary WMD's, Guantanamo bay, gas prices, his tax cuts and worst of all, his dictatorship.
1. Multiple sources told him they were there, even other countries.
2. Was there WAY before he took office.
3. How is that his fault?
4. His tax cuts saved our economy after 9/11. Without them the economy would have crashed sooner.
5. What dictatorship? He never had one.
1. Yet there were none. How is that possible? You can't find nothing.
2. The torture wasn't.
3. The war.
4. No, a lack of taxcuts would be used right now to save the economy. Too many taxcuts. Not enough left for things like a bailout.
5. Things like Guantanamo bay, disobeying over 700 laws, eliminating habeus corpus,throwing anyone in jail without any review, and despite all that, not facing a single charge.
He has walked away scott-free from this mess he has made when he should be in gaol. He's a criminal and a murderer. So yes he does. But really the guy is his own enemy: he is the one who makes a fool out of himself and the media puts it in the news. biggest_loser
Who has he killed?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment