This topic is locked from further discussion.
Castro? He's been chillin' in his tropical house viewing Havana and the beach since Batista's death.
i'm awareIt's almost like OP thinks that Germany didn't know of the Fuher's love for Jews and war.
coolbeans90
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]i'm awareIt's almost like OP thinks that Germany didn't know of the Fuher's love for Jews and war.
LiquidAjax
point being, he was not a secretive man
i'm aware[QUOTE="LiquidAjax"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
It's almost like OP thinks that Germany didn't know of the Fuher's love for Jews and war.
coolbeans90
point being, he was not a secretive man
He laid his plans out in mein kampf and published it for all to see. His dominating will wasn't recognized until too much damage was done. The world didn't get involved until it was necessary. Will we be able to see it before it unfolds with our current media?[QUOTE="coolbeans90"][QUOTE="LiquidAjax"] i'm awareLiquidAjax
point being, he was not a secretive man
He laid his plans out in mein kampf and published it for all to see. His dominating will wasn't recognized until too much damage was done. The world didn't get involved until it was necessary. Will we be able to see it before it unfolds with our current media?Erm, the U.S. saw him ripping apart Europe and still stayed out of it. It was really a matter of wanting to stop him.
Hitler is a product of eurocentrism, and imperialism. The ideas he had in his book were nothing at all new, they were a product of the thinking that was going on at that time. When he was growing up the extinction of human races was being explained by respected scholars of the time. These people were seen as experts on the issue and it was being justified with their theories. Racism was accepted and became a central element in British imperial ideology. The British committed genocide against the Tasmanians, but nobody ever talks about that.. No Tasmanians exist today. Churchill was just as racist as Hitler and shared a lot of the same ideology, yet he is seen as a hero... The thinking at the time was the racism was scientific, it could be explained with science, giving it justification. If one were upset about genocide, that person would be looked at as uneducated. Germany's intention wasn't to kill Jews, much like the American's intention wasn't to kill Indians, but it was to expand Germany. Germany was only doing what the other European countries had been doing for a long time before it.. Yes, Hitler was bad, I'm not saying he wasn't but the idea I want people to understand is that Hitler was a product of something bigger. He wasn't the root of the problem only a product of it. So your question should be more like will there ever be some bogus excuse that "justifies" killing people..
There has been people that shared Ideology with Hitler both before and after Hitler I mean whats worse, to name a few, what the Americans did? What the Germans did? What the British did? What the Spanish did? Because they're all the same to me. Not to cheapen anything that happened, they are all equally heinous. If you're interested, Exterminate all the Brutes is a good book, that talks all about this..
It's not like Hitler was the only evil dictator ever. There were many before him and unfortunately there have already been quite a few after him.
Don't make it sound like only Tyrants are corrupt; wall street is just as crooked.It's not like Hitler was the only evil dictator ever. There were many before him and unfortunately there have already been quite a few after him.
jim_shorts
[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Don't make it sound like only Tyrants are corrupt; wall street is just as crooked. Corrupt? Yes. On par with Adolf Hitler No.It's not like Hitler was the only evil dictator ever. There were many before him and unfortunately there have already been quite a few after him.
Fightingfan
I don't think that anti-semitic sentiment has waned over the last 70 years at all -- I daresay it's only gotten worse... [some] people have just learned to be a little more discreet about it since WWII, that's all... so yes, I think the possibility that the world could see yet another Hitler is almost a certainty... 67gt500I'd change anti-semitic with intolerance, remember, Hitler targeted more then just those of jewish descent
[QUOTE="67gt500"]I don't think that anti-semitic sentiment has waned over the last 70 years at all -- I daresay it's only gotten worse... [some] people have just learned to be a little more discreet about it since WWII, that's all... so yes, I think the possibility that the world could see yet another Hitler is almost a certainty... rilpasI'd change anti-semitic with intolerance, remember, Hitler targeted more then just those of jewish descent That's true -- thank you for pointing that out because the difference is signifigant... people often forget that only 6 million of the alleged 14 million or so souls who perished in the Holocaust were jews...
I don't think we would know until all hell started breakin loose. I mean Hitler was a pretty good leader. He probably would have been remembered as great had the holocaust and other various crimes not happened. Interesting thing is that Hitler was voted Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1938.
Does anybody else think that Adolf is a handsome name?
He wasn't man of the year because he was a good person. It was because of how influential he was.I don't think we would know until all hell started breakin loose. I mean Hitler was a pretty good leader. He probably would have been remembered as great had the holocaust and other various crimes not happened. Interesting thing is that Hitler was voted Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1938.
Does anybody else think that Adolf is a handsome name?
chaosclown17
[QUOTE="chaosclown17"]He wasn't man of the year because he was a good person. It was because of how influential he was.I thought it was how he reformed Germany. Plus, that year the Olympics were hosted in Berlin. Where he and Germany as a whole, made a good impression. To the outside world it probably looked like Hitler was a great leader.Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he was a great guy or anything. I'm just saying that had he gone a different path he could have been remembered as a great leader.I don't think we would know until all hell started breakin loose. I mean Hitler was a pretty good leader. He probably would have been remembered as great had the holocaust and other various crimes not happened. Interesting thing is that Hitler was voted Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1938.
Does anybody else think that Adolf is a handsome name?
LiquidAjax
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"][QUOTE="LiquidAjax"] i'm awareLiquidAjax
point being, he was not a secretive man
He laid his plans out in mein kampf and published it for all to see. His dominating will wasn't recognized until too much damage was done. The world didn't get involved until it was necessary. Will we be able to see it before it unfolds with our current media? Nazi Germany was causing all sorts of havoc in Europe. It wasn't until Hitler declared war on the US that all out war broke out.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment