Do you think WW3 will ever happen?

Is it even possible?

Is it?

I don't think so.

I really do not see the point of forestalling the inevitable, personally. I would rather swallow the pill while we can still end up ahead.

Hopefully never.

I really do not see the point of forestalling the inevitable, personally. I would rather swallow the pill while we can still end up ahead.

coolbeans90

as long as we're thinking in terms of us or them it is pretty much a likelihoodJandurin

The inevitability of war requires the think us vs. them mentality

WHAT A QUAGMIRE

WHAT A QUAGMIRE

coolbeans90

Yes, not soon, but within the next century or so. And it will begin over dwindling resources.

Maybe some day.

it has already passed, but it was done underground to prevent the sheeple from knowing. all the large earthquakes over the last 10 years, under ground nukes. you cant really believe what your media tells you, the world has been at war with the mole men since 1993, when the mole men acquired soviet surplus equipment. wake TFU people!

I think that is unfortunately quite possible,perhaps even in this century,after natural resources start to dissapear.I would pick that as the most likely reason for a war,I guess the best prevention would be to actively start working on subtitutes for most important of those resources...

Also,I suppose this is my first post ever in the OT section of the forums,I hope I won't be rewarded with a ban :P

it has already passed, but it was done underground to prevent the sheeple from knowing. all the large earthquakes over the last 10 years, under ground nukes. you cant really believe what your media tells you, the world has been at war with the mole men since 1993, when the mole men acquired soviet surplus equipment. wake TFU people!

surrealnumber5

You have opened my eyes good sir. Where can I get more information?

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

it has already passed, but it was done underground to prevent the sheeple from knowing. all the large earthquakes over the last 10 years, under ground nukes. you cant really believe what your media tells you, the world has been at war with the mole men since 1993, when the mole men acquired soviet surplus equipment. wake TFU people!

worlock77

You have opened my eyes good sir. Where can I get more information?

Revelations didn't predict WW1 or 2, just WW3? :|spazzx625

It will be the most bloodiest chapter in human history.

It will be the most bloodiest chapter in human history.

lancea34

"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert EinsteinLordsLoss

[QUOTE="LordsLoss"]"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einsteinfgjnfgh

[QUOTE="lancea34"]

It will be the most bloodiest chapter in human history.

parkurtommo

[QUOTE="fgjnfgh"][QUOTE="LordsLoss"]"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert EinsteinJandurin

^^

Would blank quote, but I don't think the rule changes cover that.

[QUOTE="fgjnfgh"][QUOTE="LordsLoss"]"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert EinsteinJandurin

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="fgjnfgh"] well mister Albert Einstien, if you didnt invent the nuclear bomb or gave it to the wrong hands, we would've been in a better placecoolbeans90

^^

Would blank quote, but I don't think the rule changes cover that.

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="lancea34"]

It will be the most bloodiest chapter in human history.

lancea34

I think it might happen one day. But then again it might not. With each passing decade the world grows smaller, and the interests of the people behind the people in charge are probably more international than they used to be.

If there is a real World War III, I imagine it will be remarkably quick, lasting a few days at most.

As I've heard said somewhere... WW3 will be fought with nukes, WW4 will be fought with sticks and rocks.

[QUOTE="lancea34"][QUOTE="parkurtommo"] not sure if seriousparkurtommo

Enforcement certainly differs from print considering recent events.

Ofcourse, You can't skip WW3 and justgo to WW4...I hope i'm dead by the time it happens

I think the bible predicted WW3 in the book called revelations. Satan will use the anti Christ to manipulate the supreme powers of the world into conflict. This is how God intends to decimate the sinners and bring his chosen people to heaven.StRaItJaCkEt36

Well that or some crazy old hermet was trippin' balls and decided to just write down whatever flashed into his mind.

[QUOTE="LordsLoss"]"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einsteinfgjnfgh

Probably, but I think NATO will remain united, and the opposing side will probably be N Korea, Iran, Pakistan, and maybe some others. I also think it'll probably feel more like the Iraq war (very tactical, with measures taken to keep casualties down) than WWII (where each man was in many ways just a pawn).

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"]I think the bible predicted WW3 in the book called revelations. Satan will use the anti Christ to manipulate the supreme powers of the world into conflict. This is how God intends to decimate the sinners and bring his chosen people to heaven.worlock77

Well that or some crazy old hermet was trippin' balls and decided to just write down whatever flashed into his mind.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"]I think the bible predicted WW3 in the book called revelations. Satan will use the anti Christ to manipulate the supreme powers of the world into conflict. This is how God intends to decimate the sinners and bring his chosen people to heaven.StRaItJaCkEt36

Well that or some crazy old hermet was trippin' balls and decided to just write down whatever flashed into his mind.

Prove that it's any more true than, say, the vivid, and extremely complex, but hallucinogenic writings of William Blake.

Once the Canadians bomb the Baldwins.fidosim

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Well that or some crazy old hermet was trippin' balls and decided to just write down whatever flashed into his mind.

worlock77

Prove that it's any more true than, say, the vivid, and extremely complex, but hallucinogenic writings of William Blake.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"] That's not likely. All you have to do is read revelations and you will see how detailed it is. It was more than a flash. It was concentrated effort.StRaItJaCkEt36

Prove that it's any more true than, say, the vivid, and extremely complex, but hallucinogenic writings of William Blake.

And that is proof of nothing. I don't know of too many Christians even that take the book of Revelation as literal.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"] That's not likely. All you have to do is read revelations and you will see how detailed it is. It was more than a flash. It was concentrated effort.StRaItJaCkEt36

Prove that it's any more true than, say, the vivid, and extremely complex, but hallucinogenic writings of William Blake.

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Prove that it's any more true than, say, the vivid, and extremely complex, but hallucinogenic writings of William Blake.

spazzx625

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Prove that it's any more true than, say, the vivid, and extremely complex, but hallucinogenic writings of William Blake.

worlock77

And that is proof of nothing. I don't know of too many Christians even that take the book of Revelation as literal.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"] William Blake's writings aren't in the bible. StRaItJaCkEt36

And that is proof of nothing. I don't know of too many Christians even that take the book of Revelation as literal.

So your argument is "it's true because it says it's true"?

[QUOTE="StRaItJaCkEt36"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

And that is proof of nothing. I don't know of too many Christians even that take the book of Revelation as literal.

worlock77

So your argument is "it's true because it says it's true"?