Everything outside of our mind is a mere perception. Our mind creates a reality based on what we can perceive; but what is it that we perceive?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Everything outside of our mind is a mere perception. Our mind creates a reality based on what we can perceive; but what is it that we perceive?
If nothing existed outside the mind then perceptual testing would be all over the chart. As it is, everyone pretty much perceives like stimuli the same as any other person. Therefore, yes.
Â
The universe exists outside our mind. It's existence is not contingent on our ability to perceive it.ZevianderAlthough I agree with you many philosophers have made incredibly compelling arguments to the contrary.
i got bad news, your senses and your brain are in a perpetual tug of war and what you eventually consider as reality is most likely pretty far from the mark of what is actually going on around you.
in other words your senses can never pick up enough information to really let you know whats going  on and your brain fills in the missing pieces by just making stuff up  and on top of that your brain is mostly too busy telling you how great you are to do a decent job on the actual nature of reality.
go ahead and test it.
the next time you see a stranger on the street if you even notice them at all try and see if you can notice how your brain just makes up a bunch of bullshyt about that person and what a piece of shyt that person probably is in comparason to how ****ing great you are.
where does that crap come from? the same place as everything else you think comes from. from nowhere.
i got bad news, your senses and your brain are in a perpetual tug of war and what you eventually consider as reality is most likely pretty far from the mark of what is actually going on around you.
in other words your senses can never pick up enough information to really let you know whats going  on and your brain fills in the missing pieces by just making stuff up  and on top of that your brain is mostly too busy telling you how great you are to do a decent job on the actual nature of reality.
Riverwolf007
What we perceive is what shapes our reality.
If nothing existed outside the mind then perceptual testing would be all over the chart. As it is, everyone pretty much perceives like stimuli the same as any other person. Therefore, yes.br0kenrabbityou need mushrooms
Not necessarily, you could be a program being fed information or some sort of powerful being could be placing thoughts into your mind. Or your mind is completely and utterly mistaken about reality and what you are seeing isn't actually reality just as much as your brain can make of it.Well if nothing exists outside my mind then I gotta say I'm pretty goddamn creative.
worlock77
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
i got bad news, your senses and your brain are in a perpetual tug of war and what you eventually consider as reality is most likely pretty far from the mark of what is actually going on around you.
in other words your senses can never pick up enough information to really let you know whats going  on and your brain fills in the missing pieces by just making stuff up  and on top of that your brain is mostly too busy telling you how great you are to do a decent job on the actual nature of reality.
Primordialous
What we perceive is what shapes our reality.
nope what you perceive gets filtered through a brain that is busting it's ass trying to make you feel good about yourself.it has nothing to do with reality.
[QUOTE="worlock77"]Not necessarily, you could be a program being fed information or some sort of powerful being could be placing thoughts into your mind. Or your mind is completely and utterly mistaken about reality and what you are seeing isn't actually reality just as much as your brain can make of it.Well if nothing exists outside my mind then I gotta say I'm pretty goddamn creative.
ferrari2001
In other words: we cannot prove or disprove that anything exists outside of our mind. But if that were true...
[QUOTE="worlock77"]Not necessarily, you could be a program being fed information or some sort of powerful being could be placing thoughts into your mind. Or your mind is completely and utterly mistaken about reality and what you are seeing isn't actually reality just as much as your brain can make of it.Well if nothing exists outside my mind then I gotta say I'm pretty goddamn creative.
ferrari2001
Even if my mind is completely and utterly mistaken then that means it still imagined the entire Universe and everything in itas it exists (at least to my mind). So again, pretty creative.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]If nothing existed outside the mind then perceptual testing would be all over the chart. As it is, everyone pretty much perceives like stimuli the same as any other person. Therefore, yes.cheese_game619you need mushrooms
Been there, done lots of that. An inebriated brain isn't a baseline for anything.
Â
Not necessarily, you could be a program being fed information or some sort of powerful being could be placing thoughts into your mind. Or your mind is completely and utterly mistaken about reality and what you are seeing isn't actually reality just as much as your brain can make of it.[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Well if nothing exists outside my mind then I gotta say I'm pretty goddamn creative.
Primordialous
In other words: we cannot prove or disprove that anything exists outside of our mind. But if that were true...
I never said multiple minds couldn't exist nor could those minds not experience a consistency of though about the supposed universe around them. Every person in the universe could be mistaken about reality, but everyone is mistaken in the same way so it seems we can prove our scientific theories.[QUOTE="worlock77"]Not necessarily, you could be a program being fed information or some sort of powerful being could be placing thoughts into your mind. Or your mind is completely and utterly mistaken about reality and what you are seeing isn't actually reality just as much as your brain can make of it.Well if nothing exists outside my mind then I gotta say I'm pretty goddamn creative.
ferrari2001
That is still going on the assumption that the neural and somatosensory perception is manipulated by something outside of what we can perceive. Such a thought experiment only concedes that outside stimuli is necessary for a perception of reality to be possible.
First thing that came to mind:
Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather. -Bill Hicks
Not necessarily, you could be a program being fed information or some sort of powerful being could be placing thoughts into your mind. Or your mind is completely and utterly mistaken about reality and what you are seeing isn't actually reality just as much as your brain can make of it.[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Well if nothing exists outside my mind then I gotta say I'm pretty goddamn creative.
SirWander
That is still going on the assumption that the neural and somatosensory perception is manipulated by something outside of what we can perceive. Such a thought experiment only concedes that outside stimuli is necessary for a perception of reality to be possible.
Why does there have to be neural perception. Do we have to have neural anything? Could we not be just minds floating in a vacuum or code in a computer receiving information making us believe we actually have perception in the first place. Perception itself could actually be an illusion.[QUOTE="SirWander"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Not necessarily, you could be a program being fed information or some sort of powerful being could be placing thoughts into your mind. Or your mind is completely and utterly mistaken about reality and what you are seeing isn't actually reality just as much as your brain can make of it. ferrari2001
That is still going on the assumption that the neural and somatosensory perception is manipulated by something outside of what we can perceive. Such a thought experiment only concedes that outside stimuli is necessary for a perception of reality to be possible.
Why does there have to be neural perception. Do we have to have neural anything? Could we not be just minds floating in a vacuum or code in a computer receiving information making us believe we actually have perception in the first place. Perception itself could actually be an illusion.How do we perceive perception? And how do we perceive perception of perception?
Why does there have to be neural perception. Do we have to have neural anything? Could we not be just minds floating in a vacuum or code in a computer receiving information making us believe we actually have perception in the first place. Perception itself could actually be an illusion.[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="SirWander"]
That is still going on the assumption that the neural and somatosensory perception is manipulated by something outside of what we can perceive. Such a thought experiment only concedes that outside stimuli is necessary for a perception of reality to be possible.
Primordialous
How do we perceive perception? And how do we perceive perception of perception?
Now your just being ridiculous.[QUOTE="Primordialous"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Why does there have to be neural perception. Do we have to have neural anything? Could we not be just minds floating in a vacuum or code in a computer receiving information making us believe we actually have perception in the first place. Perception itself could actually be an illusion. ferrari2001
How do we perceive perception? And how do we perceive perception of perception?
Now your just being ridiculous.Everything is ridiculous.
As with many philosophical ideas it's better just to remain ignorant and trust your underlying beliefs.Yes. Delving too deep into such an idea, you're bound to go crazy though
wis3boi
Why does there have to be neural perception. Do we have to have neural anything? Could we not be just minds floating in a vacuum or code in a computer receiving information making us believe we actually have perception in the first place. Perception itself could actually be an illusion. ferrari2001
Going on the assumption that you aren't really pulling things out of your ass and just playing with semantics: The neural network it is by far the most efficient and compact way of storing information that is known to mankind, so yes the neural network is definitely necessary for our ability to gather and store information about outside stimuli. Even if you are nothing but a brain in a vat, there needs to be something to process the information that is being fed. We could be, that doesn't eliminate the need for a space that exists outside our minds/code to be manipulating our senses.
Our perception is limited as is; we cannot see the full spectrum of light, smell every smell, hear every sound. That gives a limited perception of the world/universe around us. To that point, it can be said that our perception is an illusion as it is based on limited information on what is really there. That doesn't make the illusion any more false than it makes it the truth.
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]As with many philosophical ideas it's better just to remain ignorant and trust your underlying beliefs.Yes. Delving too deep into such an idea, you're bound to go crazy though
ferrari2001
Depends on what you're talking about. Existing things beyond our mind, do we exist at all, etc......that stuff is a waste of time
Been there, done lots of that. An inebriated brain isn't a baseline for anything.br0kenrabbitthats something someone who hasnt done mushrooms says
If nothing existed outside the mind then perceptual testing would be all over the chart. As it is, everyone pretty much perceives like stimuli the same as any other person. Therefore, yes.
Â
br0kenrabbit
But if everything that exists is just my imagination how come I can't get laid with Megan Fox :(kuraimenUse your hand, and if you believe it's real, then it is.
I wouldn't describe myself as a solipsist, but I do think that solipsism asks a meaningful question (yet at the same time gives a pretty awful answer) - i.e. what the fvck is going on? On its face it's a painfully naive question, but a lot of the time the most naive of questions are the most meaningful ones. -Sun_Tzu-Yes indeed, like what is the meaning of life. Is there one? Also even though I'm blabbering on here, as this philosophical thinking interests me greatly, life in itself is very very strange. Just think about life in general. We live on a sphere traveling at high rates of speed across a galaxy that is so large it takes a 100,000 years for you to travel across it going at the speed of light. Insane stuff.
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]I wouldn't describe myself as a solipsist, but I do think that solipsism asks a meaningful question (yet at the same time gives a pretty awful answer) - i.e. what the fvck is going on? On its face it's a painfully naive question, but a lot of the time the most naive of questions are the most meaningful ones. xscrapzxYes indeed, like what is the meaning of life. Is there one? Also even though I'm blabbering on here, as this philosophical thinking interests me greatly, life in itself is very very strange. Just think about life in general. We live on a sphere traveling at high rates of speed across a galaxy that is so large it takes a 100,000 years for you to travel across it going at the speed of light. Insane stuff.
The only purpose is the one you give it. Looking for a universal purpose is a fruitless endeavor
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]I wouldn't describe myself as a solipsist, but I do think that solipsism asks a meaningful question (yet at the same time gives a pretty awful answer) - i.e. what the fvck is going on? On its face it's a painfully naive question, but a lot of the time the most naive of questions are the most meaningful ones. xscrapzxYes indeed, like what is the meaning of life. Is there one? Also even though I'm blabbering on here, as this philosophical thinking interests me greatly, life in itself is very very strange. Just think about life in general. We live on a sphere traveling at high rates of speed across a galaxy that is so large it takes a 100,000 years for you to travel across it going at the speed of light. Insane stuff. Even asking what the meaning of life is takes a lot for granted. What does it even mean to live? It's a similar, yet deceptively different question to think about.
The opposite is true. Our mind doesn't conjure reality. Reality is already here and our mind just translates it into something we can interact with.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment