Eating the face of another man in Florida.

Guy was shot by police in Florida because a naked man was eating the face of another naked man. The guy growled at the police officer before he was shot dead. Victim is in critical condition.

"The cannibal who was discovered eating a a man?s face on the side of a Florida highway, and had to be shot at least six times before he stopped, has been identified by the Miami-Dade County Medical Examiner?s Office as Rudy Eugene, 31, reports CBS Miami.''

I wonder, what the hell did this guy smoke?

Source.

Old.

Edit: Wait, didn't realise he was actually identified...nvm

Sounds crazy, what a horrible situation for anyone involved.

I hope no one accuses the cops of racism. The guy was clearly a threat and deserved it.

Where can I watch the original video uncensored? I've always wanted to see cannibals in action.

Meth is a hell of a drug.

.

I hope no one accuses the cops of racism. The guy was clearly a threat and deserved it.

Vac87

Ah damn it zombies.

Where can I watch the original video uncensored? I've always wanted to see cannibals in action.

Animatronic64

That's... really screwed up. I'm guessing Meth, PCP or LSD.

Also being shot six times isn't unheard of... I read an article saying that there's only like a 5% chance of dying from a gunshot wound.

[QUOTE="Vac87"]

I hope no one accuses the cops of racism. The guy was clearly a threat and deserved it.

kuraimen

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Vac87"]

I hope no one accuses the cops of racism. The guy was clearly a threat and deserved it.

horgen123

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Vac87"]

I hope no one accuses the cops of racism. The guy was clearly a threat and deserved it.

horgen123

WTF is up with Florida?PrototypeTheKid

[QUOTE="horgen123"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] It's racism against cannibals.Nibroc420

I would imagine it has something to do with the fact that they eat people.

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="horgen123"] Not a protected minority. turtlethetaffer

I would imagine it has something to do with the fact that they eat people.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Why because YOU personally dont like them?Nibroc420

I would imagine it has something to do with the fact that they eat people.

Well... the thing is that killing people is illegal and since canibalism would ultimately end with the death of the person being eaten, I don't tihnk it's too difficult to understand why canibals aren't protected minorities.

Well... the thing is that killing people is illegal turtlethetaffer

Incorrect, only murder is illegal.
Homicide itself, or "killing people" isn't illegal by default.

and since canibalism would ultimately end with the death of the person being eaten,turtlethetaffer

Unless the person was already dead.

I don't tihnk it's too difficult to understand why canibals aren't protected minorities.

turtlethetaffer

Because you believe the propoganda that suggests they're evil people who will... you know what? forget it.
No point in me wasting my time arguing with a bigot.

Hmmm...could be a test subject. Years ago an article surfaced about homeless people being used as lab rats. Perhaps a neuro disorder can be implemented by way of injections. This is interesting....why?..because of the following article. If anything I'm sure you'll find it a good read... CDC warns Americans to prepare for zombie apocalypse (really) (NaturalNews) Although it may seem unbelievable, this is not a satire piece or a joke. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control, which has been deeply engaged in the fictions of Swine Flu and other so-called "pandemics," is now publicly warning Americans to prepare for a zombie apocalypse. In a May 16th blog entry on the CDC.gov website (http://blogs.cdc.gov/publichealthma...), author Ali S. Khan asks the question, "Where do zombies come from and why do they love eating brains so much?" The article then goes on to suppose that "zombies would take over entire countries, roaming city streets eating anything living that got in their way. The proliferation of this idea has led many people to wonder - How do I prepare for a zombie apocalypse?" The CDC has apparently been listening to my hip-hop song Vaccine Zombie (http://www.naturalnews.com/vaccine_...) and decided to run with the concept. Vaccines, of course, are the real source of zombies because they eat your brain (and cause autism, too). For some reason, the CDC didn't mention that... Government preparedness tips... much like military intelligence The CDC's zombie apocalypse article is, of course, an effort to reach a younger crowd by appealing to mainstream youth interests which now include anything having to do with vampires and zombies. The article actually offers a useful but rudimentary set of preparedness tips that include gathering up emergency medicine supplies, food, water and tools. Some of the strategies include preparing all your "important documents" such as your passport and birth certificate. This is obviously based on the idea that you are going to be relocated and will probably end up as a refugee of some sort (in a FEMA camp, no doubt). So remember to bring your birth certificate. Of course, if you don't actually have a birth certificate, you can always use Photoshop to create one from a collage of random scanned documents and no one will notice the difference these days. Not even the mainstream media. Not surprisingly, the CDC also strongly suggests that you should bring your medications with you, because of course the entire U.S. public has already been infected with a zombie-like medical mythology that causes them to believe the human body is somehow deficient in prescription drugs. Without their meds, people think they might die! Although there are a few cases where this is true, by and large medications harm far more people than they help. But that's another story... CDC: Do not defend yourself against the attacking zombies One thing the CDC has utterly left out of its preparedness list, not surprisingly, is any kind of self defense weapon. Zombie lore is rife with all kinds of weapons: shotguns, chain saws, flamethrowers, swords and knives. Hand grenades, explosives and rockets are also prominently featured in zombie flicks. These weapons are usually what save the movie characters from being overrun by marauding zombies. But the CDC says nothing about weapons. Not even a basic combat knife or a 22 pistol to keep handy. I guess the idea of people preparing for emergencies with some citizen weaponry isn't something the government wants to encourage, huh? Just be sure to have your papers in order but not your personal safety. Instead, the CDC says it will save you. "Never Fear - CDC is Ready!" it says. It goes on to explain: CDC would provide technical assistance to cities, states, or international partners dealing with a zombie infestation. This assistance might include consultation, lab testing and analysis, patient management and care, tracking of contacts, and infection control (including isolation and quarantine). "Infection control" means arrested infected people at gunpoint and moving them into "infection zones" where everybody is infected and anyone who tries to flee is shot. That's how a quarantine actually works, in case you didn't know. Ask the CDC yourself if you don't believe me. How to get yourself killed? Follow the CDC So here's the CDC's advice so far. If there's a zombie apocalypse, then according to the CDC you're supposed to evacuate with your prescription medications and your birth certificate, then head out into the zombie-infested world without a weapon? And then somehow you're supposed to magically survive a zombie assault long enough for the CDC to come quarantine you and your neighbors because you've probably already been exposed since you were totally defenseless. Gee, is there any doubt this is a government plan? Don't protect yourself, folks, the government will save you! Grab your passport (they'll be checking your papers at police checkpoints) and remember your meds (because that will keep you docile and suggestible), but don't bring anything like a 45-caliber Glock pistol that might actually help you fend off the zombies. Or a pump action Remington 12 gauge with a couple hundred extra rounds of home defense shells. Seriously, you can't have a zombie invasion without a 12 gauge shotgun being involved, can ya? Or some 40mm grenade launchers. That's how you really take out a bunch of zombies. At least that's how it works in Hollywood. If you're in a city where you're not allowed to own firearms, you can always try to fight off the zombies with golf clubs. That never works out very well in the zombie movies, however. Just so you know. One enterprising inventor has strapped a chainsaw to the underside of an AR-15 and developed the ultimate zombie-killing weapon: The AR-15AZ (Anti-Zombie) device, which he demonstrates on a collection of pumpkins in a video you'll find on this page: http://mazurland.typepad.com/mywebl... All he needs now is to add a flamethrower, and he's all set. CDC has lost all credibility and now resorts to B-movie fictions to push its propaganda The sad part in all this is that thanks to the swine flu fiasco which was an obvious fabrication of a pandemic in order to sell useless vaccines to people, the CDC has lost a lot of its credibility. Hey, even I used to respect the CDC as a serious agency that was dedicated to trying to stop infectious disease, but after the swine flu situation, it became completely obvious that the CDC is now just Big Pharma's vaccine pimp squad. It is so steeped in corruption that even one of its own former scientists has now been indicted by a federal jury on charges of money laundering and fraud (http://www.naturalnews.com/032216_T...). On top of that, the former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding -- who was also one of the top disease mongers pushing vaccines over the last few years -- now runs the global vaccine division for Merck. How's that for a revolving door between the CDC and the vaccine makers? (http://www.naturalnews.com/027789_D...) So now the CDC is basically a joke to anyone really paying attention to health and infectious disease. We now know that almost everything coming out of the CDC's press office is a politically motivated, profit-driven fabrication designed to push useless vaccines or scare people into thinking they're about to be killed by some other mutating flu virus. That's why it's no surprise to see the CDC using the zombie apocalypse fiction as a propaganda catapult. And hey, why not? The CDC is already steeped in complete fictions and B-movie fabrications. They might as well just start interviewing fairies, leprechauns and garden gnomes, too. They're about as credible as CDC scientists these days. But at least the CDC's preparedness advice offers tidbits of real value: Have an emergency kit with food, water, tools and first aid. That's more than what President Obama says. In response to the Fukushima meltdown -- which has now been confirmed to be a far worse disaster than Chernobyl, with multiple core meltdowns -- Obama told Americans to not prepare at all! (http://www.naturalnews.com/031735_O...) Just listen to the government and await instructions, he said. That's the official White House preparedness plan. If you can even call it a plan. The NaturalNews preparedness plan is a far better choice if you want to survive what's coming. Because, as you'll see below, a zombie apocalypse actually isn't as far-fetched as it sounds. Why a zombie apocalypse may be more real than you think The average American consumer is already a half-zombie right now. They eat prion-infected meat; they drink fluoride in the water; they get vaccinated every year with neurological irritants (adjuvants); they watch network television news for "programming" and they take psychiatric medications that alter their brain chemistry. That pushes quite a large number of them into the "functioning zombie" realm of cognitive dysfunction. In other words, they still manage to dress themselves, eat some food, use the toilet and punch a time card working some government job, but behind the apparent human face, they are already 50% zombie. It won't take much to push these near-zombies over the edge into total zombiehood. A bit of radiation, a couple more winter flu shots, or even a series of neurologically-engineered red flashes broadcast on the evening news could activate the zombie brains of the American masses, causing them to spill out into the streets in their underwear, with Doritos crumbling down the front of their wife beater T-shirts, mouths gaping wide open as they stumble down the sidewalks of America's suburbs looking for fresh flesh to feed upon. This part is not fiction, by the way. I'm serious about this. The zombie mind of the masses has already been prepped by mercury poisoning, pesticides, fluoride, aspartame and other chemical exposures. It will only take the right trigger to unleash the zombie masses, at which point you will definitely wish you went beyond the CDC's silly advice and got yourself a 12 gauge (or a really good pair of sneakers with which to flee). The real question is: Do you have enough zombie ammo? And how fast can you reload? Sadly, the CDC did not address these questions. The truth is that most people do not have much zombie ammo at all, so after a few rounds, it's going to be like click... pause... gobble, gobble, slurp. And then suddenly you're a zombie and you'll be roaming the streets of a large American city looking for fresh flesh, much like a Congressman or the head of the IMF. Truthfully, we need more fiction In a way, I actually kind of admire this fictional approach by the CDC. I wish more government agencies would just admit they're writing fictions from the get go. Wouldn't it be more useful for us all if the DEA, for example, just admitted its entire War On Drugs was one great big fiction? Wouldn't it save us all a few trillion dollars if the Department of War (oops, I mean, the Department of Defense) openly admitted that its multiple imperialist wars were all based on fictional justifications? I think other U.S. departments should take a cue from the CDC and start writing fictions to explain all their actions. It would be a lot more entertaining and, in a strange way, actually more honest. The White House, of course, has a huge head start in this realm going all the way back to George W. Bush and his "war on terror" -- which is the intellectual equivalent to the CDC's "zombie apocalypse." Both are entirely imaginary, yet useful as metaphors for the weak-minded. The bottom line is that you and I should always be prepared to protect ourselves not only from unexpected events but also from the government's bizarre, distorted attempts to feed our brains conveniently processed tidbits of disinformation. And if zombies really do hit the streets, bring out your flamethrower and get to work like a contestant in a flame-broiled frying contest. Somebody has to save humanity during the next outbreak of mental madness, and it sure won't be the CDC. -- Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032454_zo...#ixzz1eKJU8Rtk -- and just to add....http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2012/05/british-columbia-zombies/bnarmz

Holy wall of text Batman!

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

Incorrect, only murder is illegal.
Homicide itself, or "killing people" isn't illegal by default.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]and since canibalism would ultimately end with the death of the person being eaten,Nibroc420

Unless the person was already dead.

I don't tihnk it's too difficult to understand why canibals aren't protected minorities.

turtlethetaffer

Because you believe the propoganda that suggests they're evil people who will... you know what? forget it.
No point in me wasting my time arguing with a bigot.

Lolwhut? Are you seriously trying to make a case for canibals? I'm a bigot because I don't approve of a human eating another, live human? Holy smokes I've seen everything now.

And somehow I knew you'd pull that "killing isn't illegal" card. Should have reworked my phrasing.

I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that if someone was a canibal they would want fresher meat, not meat that has been in the ground for a bunch of years.

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

Unless the person was already dead.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

I don't tihnk it's too difficult to understand why canibals aren't protected minorities.

turtlethetaffer

Because you believe the propoganda that suggests they're evil people who will... you know what? forget it.
No point in me wasting my time arguing with a bigot.

Lolwhut? Are you seriously trying to make a case for canibals? I'm a bigot because I don't approve of a human eating another, live human? Holy smokes I've seen everything now.

And somehow I knew you'd pull that "killing isn't illegal" card. Should have reworked my phrasing.

I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that if someone was a canibal they would want fresher meat, not meat that has been in the ground for a bunch of years.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

Because you believe the propoganda that suggests they're evil people who will... you know what? forget it.
No point in me wasting my time arguing with a bigot.

Nibroc420

Lolwhut? Are you seriously trying to make a case for canibals? I'm a bigot because I don't approve of a human eating another, live human? Holy smokes I've seen everything now.

And somehow I knew you'd pull that "killing isn't illegal" card. Should have reworked my phrasing.

I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that if someone was a canibal they would want fresher meat, not meat that has been in the ground for a bunch of years.

Well canibalism is still illegal, so you're going to have to let me know when that fateful day comes and canibalism is legalized. The world will be a better place. And by fresher meat I meant meat from people who were up until recently alive, not dead bodies that have been decaying. You said "what about dead bodies" or whatever.

I tihnk people who eat other people kinda open themselves up to being judged. If disagreeing with canibals/ canibalism makes me a bigot then yes I am the single most bigoted human being on this planet.

And I find it ironic that you're criticising me based on one opinion I have about someone who commits canibalism.

I wonder, what the hell did this guy smoke?DeadMan1290

Holy wall of text Batman!

Well canibalism is still illegal, so you're going to have to let me know when that fateful day comes and canibalism is legalized.turtlethetaffer

"Herpderp, the law defines what is moral and what is not"
FunFact: In arizona it's illegal to let your donkey sleep in a bathtub.

And by fresher meat I meant meat from people who were up until recently alive, not dead bodies that have been decaying. You said "what about dead bodies" or whatever.turtlethetaffer

I tihnk people who eat other people kinda open themselves up to being judged. If disagreeing with canibals/ canibalism makes me a bigot then yes I am the single most bigoted human being on this planet.

And I find it ironic that you're judging me for judging someone else based off like one opinion I've expressed. Nice job being consistent there chief!

turtlethetaffer

I'm judging you based on your blatent hate for anyone who doesn't share your thoughts. You're unable to see this man as a person, simply because he has different dietary preferences. Then you use the same "Well, if they didn't want to be judged, they'd try to be less stupid" arguement that racists used to use against the blacks.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

"Herpderp, the law defines what is moral and what is not"
FunFact: In arizona it's illegal to let your donkey sleep in a bathtub.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]And by fresher meat I meant meat from people who were up until recently alive, not dead bodies that have been decaying. You said "what about dead bodies" or whatever.Nibroc420

I tihnk people who eat other people kinda open themselves up to being judged. If disagreeing with canibals/ canibalism makes me a bigot then yes I am the single most bigoted human being on this planet.

And I find it ironic that you're judging me for judging someone else based off like one opinion I've expressed. Nice job being consistent there chief!

turtlethetaffer

I'm judging you based on your blatent hate for anyone who doesn't share your thoughts. You're unable to see this man as a person, simply because he has different dietary preferences. Then you use the same "Well, if they didn't want to be judged, they'd try to be less stupid" arguement that racists used to use against the blacks.

Wha? When I was talking about "fresher" meat it was reffering to you saying "the person could already be dead." The odds of the person being dead when they are canibalized or not being killed beforehand for the purpose of eating would be slim, I would imagine. I wouldn't know, I don't know too many canibals.

I don't beleive I EVER said I hated the guy. I don't hate you even though we clearly don't share the same opinions and I don't hate this guy who was eating the otehr guys face. You know what they say about assuming, right? And, no, I'm not using the same argument used against blacks or whatever. Being black doesn't make you any different from being white or any other race imo. (In that everyone should be treated equally.) However being canibalistic is just... like... why? Seriously? I don't get it. I don't hate the guy but come on. You're eating someone who is still alive and if the person actually allowed this man to eat him, why in god's name would they do it naked... in public? really? You're not seeing this? so yes I'm discriminant against this guy because, if you really think about it, it doesn't make sense that the person being eaten consented to it. At the very least you'd think they would do it in private. So, there's two explanations. First, the guy didn't consent to it and was being forcefully eaten, and, yes, I have a problem with that. The other, the guy consented to being eaten and they did it in public which is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. And I think we can guess drugs were involved somehow.

You know what they say about assuming, right?turtlethetaffer

So, there's two explanations. First, the guy didn't consent to it and was being forcefully eaten, and, yes, I have a problem with that. The other, the guy consented to being eaten and they did it in public which is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. And I think we can guess drugs were involved somehow.

turtlethetaffer

Quit assuming you know both outcomes.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

You know what they say about assuming, right?Nibroc420

So, there's two explanations. First, the guy didn't consent to it and was being forcefully eaten, and, yes, I have a problem with that. The other, the guy consented to being eaten and they did it in public which is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. And I think we can guess drugs were involved somehow.

turtlethetaffer

Quit assuming you know both outcomes.

Well those are the ones that make the most sense. Love how you completely disregarded every other part of the post. You don't like people judging other people? you should try that yourself. You instantly assumed I hated the guy, which I don't, among other things.

So I'm guessing based on this discussion that you think pedohpiles shouldn't be so looked down upon?

You instantly assumed I hated the guy, which I don't, among other things.

turtlethetaffer

I'm discriminant against this guyturtlethetaffer

Good to know you're singling this guy out for eating his favorite meal.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]You instantly assumed I hated the guy, which I don't, among other things.

Nibroc420

I'm discriminant against this guyturtlethetaffer

Good to know you're singling this guy out for eating his favorite meal.

Again, completely ignoring every other part of my post. Nice work.

So is it worng in your eyes to single out a pedohphile for having sex with whoever he prefers?

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]I'm discriminant against this guyturtlethetaffer

Good to know you're singling this guy out for eating his favorite meal.

Again, completely ignoring every other part of my post. Nice work.

it is pretty common for gunshots to take a while before the guy goes down.

you just don't know it because everything you know about guns comes from hollywood.

if it is not a direct shot to the heart or in the orbital area around the eyes it normally takes minutes before you are no longer functional.

little known stat, 95% of all gunshot victims that arrive at the hospital with a beating heart live.

it is pretty common for gunshots to take a while before the guy goes down.

you just don't know it because everything you know about guns comes from hollywood.

if it is not a direct shot to the heart or in the orbital area around the eyes it normally takes minutes before you are no longer functional.

little known stat, 95% of all gunshot victims that arrive at the hospital with a beating heart live.

Riverwolf007

I read that Cracked article too.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

Good to know you're singling this guy out for eating his favorite meal.

Nibroc420

Again, completely ignoring every other part of my post. Nice work.

You're basically admitting that you've lost the argument. You're, basically, saying this. "I have not found anything you said to be of value, so I won't respond."

Tell me, is it wrong to dislike and discriminate against a pedophile for having sex with their preffered age group? Let's say, a 40 year old who has sex with a five year old.

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

Again, completely ignoring every other part of my post. Nice work.

turtlethetaffer

You're basically admitting that you've lost the argument. You're, basically, saying this. "I have not found anything you said to be of value, so I won't respond."

Tell me, is it wrong to dislike and discriminate against a pedophile for having sex with their preffered age group? Let's say, a 40 year old who has sex with a five year old.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Ignoring every other part of your post? Of course, they're unfounded assumptions made by a bigot. You've openly stated you're discriminating against him, for eating his favorite meal. You've made statements suggesting that assumptions are bad, and then gone and made several assumptions. Post something of value and perhaps i'll respond, until then there's no sense in you mindless hating on someone for having lunch.Nibroc420

You're basically admitting that you've lost the argument. You're, basically, saying this. "I have not found anything you said to be of value, so I won't respond."

Tell me, is it wrong to dislike and discriminate against a pedophile for having sex with their preffered age group? Let's say, a 40 year old who has sex with a five year old.

No I don't want to talk about pedophiles but it was an example of a tabboo in society that people general frown upon. You can do it with other topics too.

And you don't know that there was consent on the part of the guy being eaten. Maybe there was maybe there wasn't. You don't know. You tell me not to assume the theoretical outcomes but you assume there was consent.

No I don't want to talk about pedophilesturtlethetaffer

Why continously bring them up then? You're the one who keeps trying to talk about them, I'm only responding.

And you don't know that there was consent on the part of the guy being eaten. Maybe there was maybe there wasn't. You don't know. You tell me not to assume the theoretical outcomes but you assume there was consent.

turtlethetaffer

You dont know that there wasn't consent, and correct me if i'm wrong, but weren't you the person going on about how assumptions were bad?

Why continously bring them up then? You're the one who keeps trying to talk about them, I'm only responding.Nibroc420

I explained in the previous post why I kept bringing it up. I was applying your logic to other taboo topics. Read it carefully, it's there.

You dont know that there wasn't consent, and correct me if i'm wrong, but weren't you the person going on about how assumptions were bad?

Nibroc420

I was saying that you weren't being very consistent when you were talking about how I shouldn't judge someone based on their diet, yet you were judging/ criticizing me based on my own opinion. You were calling me a bigot among other things. You instantly assumed I hated the guy. And I was simply stating that you don't know if there was consent. I never claimed to know one way or the other. We won't find out right away either way. What would you say if the guy being eaten didn't consent to it?

the whole "what if..." argument doesn't work, not really. Not saying I haven't been guilty of using it. But what if scenarios don't work as arguments since it's all hypothetical.