Engineers Reveal Hard Evidence of Explosive Demolition at World Trade Center

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20100907/pl_usnw/DC60870

:o

thoughts?

WOW. I've heard the theories, seen some of the evidence, but never been 100% convinced. This could change that, depending on how it is presented. What does this say about America, and the world that we live in? If 9/11 could be a conspiracy, almost anything could be.

thoughts?

.

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

BTW, this is the website where the "evidence" is found:

http://ae911truth.org/

It's about time the truth was revealed.

The World Trade Center was America's Reichstag.

Title couldn't be more misleading

Where is this hard evidence?

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

Samurai_Xavier

Precisely what evidence? And it's entirely possible that these 1200 engineers are quacks.

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

Samurai_Xavier

I wonder where the CIA will find 2540 women willing to bring false claims of rape and molestation against the 1270 architects and engineers.

:|

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

comp_atkins

Exactly. I find that using big numbers of engineers like that is less informative than using a percentage figure. There's bound to be a thousand loonies out there with degrees.

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

comp_atkins

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

Samurai_Xavier

You really think that something like this would be on the national news? It doesn't benefit the national media to try to undermine the public's faith in the US government in such a sudden, dramatic way. This is too big a bombshell to drop on the public as fact, especially without full government backing. I'm not saying that it's true.. I'm just saying that I don't think it rational to expect that it would show up on the evening news if it were.

I wonder where the CIA will find 2540 women willing to bring false claims of rape and molestation against the 1270 architects and engineers.

:|

Stesilaus

I wonder when you'll start backing up your claims with actual evidence. Most of these conspiracies come about because people use reverse scientific method and simply look for evidence they think matches a conclusion they have already come up with.

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

hartsickdiscipl

You really think that something like this would be on the national news? It doesn't benefit the national media to try to undermine the public's faith in the US government in such a sudden, dramatic way. This is too big a bombshell to drop on the public as fact, especially without full government backing. I'm not saying that it's true.. I'm just saying that I don't think it rational to expect that it would show up on the evening news if it were.

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

hartsickdiscipl

You really think that something like this would be on the national news? It doesn't benefit the national media to try to undermine the public's faith in the US government in such a sudden, dramatic way. This is too big a bombshell to drop on the public as fact, especially without full government backing. I'm not saying that it's true.. I'm just saying that I don't think it rational to expect that it would show up on the evening news if it were.

Right, its not as if it wouldn't make a reporter's career or anything. :|

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

UnknownSniper65

You really think that something like this would be on the national news? It doesn't benefit the national media to try to undermine the public's faith in the US government in such a sudden, dramatic way. This is too big a bombshell to drop on the public as fact, especially without full government backing. I'm not saying that it's true.. I'm just saying that I don't think it rational to expect that it would show up on the evening news if it were.

Right, its not as if it wouldn't make a reporter's career or anything. :|

You won't have much of a career in this country after you've just reported that the nation's leadership was part of a conspiracy of this magnitude. Do you know what would happen to this country's economy if this came out in the national media and became accepted as fact by most Americans? It would be catastrophic.

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

hartsickdiscipl

You really think that something like this would be on the national news? It doesn't benefit the national media to try to undermine the public's faith in the US government in such a sudden, dramatic way. This is too big a bombshell to drop on the public as fact, especially without full government backing. I'm not saying that it's true.. I'm just saying that I don't think it rational to expect that it would show up on the evening news if it were.

You won't have much of a career in this country after you've just reported that the nation's leadership was part of a conspiracy of this magnitude.

hartsickdiscipl

I wonder where the CIA will find 2540 women willing to bring false claims of rape and molestation against the 1270 architects and engineers.

:|

Stesilaus

:roll:

^ my response. Oh boy, here we go again. Tell me, how exactly did they plant THOUSANDS of pounds of explosives in all three buildings undetected?

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

Samurai_Xavier

You really think that something like this would be on the national news? It doesn't benefit the national media to try to undermine the public's faith in the US government in such a sudden, dramatic way. This is too big a bombshell to drop on the public as fact, especially without full government backing. I'm not saying that it's true.. I'm just saying that I don't think it rational to expect that it would show up on the evening news if it were.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]You won't have much of a career in this country after you've just reported that the nation's leadership was part of a conspiracy of this magnitude.

PannicAtack

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]You won't have much of a career in this country after you've just reported that the nation's leadership was part of a conspiracy of this magnitude.

PannicAtack

Not even remotely close to the same thing. Watergate was not even close to what happened on 9/11. We would be talking about the supreme commander of our armed forces, his aids, and numerous other government agencies participating in the cold-blooded murder of thousand of US citizens in the middle of NYC. Watergate is nothing compared to this.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

1,270 architects and engineers is a pretty large number. This is definitely going to be interesting.

EDIT: Wait, this article is 2 days old, and this press conference was held today. The fact that its not all over the news seems to indicate nothing big will come out of it.

Samurai_Xavier

You really think that something like this would be on the national news? It doesn't benefit the national media to try to undermine the public's faith in the US government in such a sudden, dramatic way. This is too big a bombshell to drop on the public as fact, especially without full government backing. I'm not saying that it's true.. I'm just saying that I don't think it rational to expect that it would show up on the evening news if it were.

No, this type of event would go beyond the media's apparent "obligation" that you believe in. This is on a whole different level.

:roll:

^ my response. Oh boy, here we go again. Tell me, how exactly did they plant THOUSANDS of pounds of explosives in all three buildings undetected?

herpderp9000

thermite paint!

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]You won't have much of a career in this country after you've just reported that the nation's leadership was part of a conspiracy of this magnitude.

hartsickdiscipl

No even remotely close to the same thing. Watergate was not even close to what happened on 9/11. We would be talking about the supreme commander of our armed forces, his aids, and numerous other government agencies participating in the cold-blooded murder of thousand of US citizens in the middle of NYC. Watergate is nothing compared to this.

Leading to the reporting getting his or name forever ingrained in history as the person who discovered it. The fame that would come along with such a huge discovery is too much to believe at least one reporter wouldn't run the story.

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]You won't have much of a career in this country after you've just reported that the nation's leadership was part of a conspiracy of this magnitude.

hartsickdiscipl

No even remotely close to the same thing. Watergate was not even close to what happened on 9/11. We would be talking about the supreme commander of our armed forces, his aids, and numerous other government agencies participating in the cold-blooded murder of thousand of US citizens in the middle of NYC. Watergate is nothing compared to this.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Worked for Bernstein and Woodward.

UnknownSniper65

No even remotely close to the same thing. Watergate was not even close to what happened on 9/11. We would be talking about the supreme commander of our armed forces, his aids, and numerous other government agencies participating in the cold-blooded murder of thousand of US citizens in the middle of NYC. Watergate is nothing compared to this.

Leading to the reporting getting his or name forever ingrained in history as the person who discovered it. The fame that would come along with such a huge discovery is too much to believe at least one reporter wouldn't run the story.

Assuming that said reporter had the interest to view all of the evidence, had the backing of his or her superiors, and wasn't under threat of death, yeah.. I would agree.

I try really hard to be open minded about this kind of stuff, because in the off chance any of it is true, I would like to be one of the ones to know it is true. However, I have a hard time believing new evidence has come out this late in the game.

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]You won't have much of a career in this country after you've just reported that the nation's leadership was part of a conspiracy of this magnitude.

clayron

OMG LOL its a conspiracy run

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

No even remotely close to the same thing. Watergate was not even close to what happened on 9/11. We would be talking about the supreme commander of our armed forces, his aids, and numerous other government agencies participating in the cold-blooded murder of thousand of US citizens in the middle of NYC. Watergate is nothing compared to this.

hartsickdiscipl

Leading to the reporting getting his or name forever ingrained in history as the person who discovered it. The fame that would come along with such a huge discovery is too much to believe at least one reporter wouldn't run the story.

Assuming that said reporter had the interest to view all of the evidence, had the backing of his or her superiors, and wasn't under threat of death, yeah.. I would agree.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Worked for Bernstein and Woodward.

PannicAtack

No even remotely close to the same thing. Watergate was not even close to what happened on 9/11. We would be talking about the supreme commander of our armed forces, his aids, and numerous other government agencies participating in the cold-blooded murder of thousand of US citizens in the middle of NYC. Watergate is nothing compared to this.

People have a very different idea of what "conclusive" means, especially in matters of this magnitude. I still don't think you have any concept of the magnitude of something like this getting out and gaining acceptance from the majority of Americans. When you can prove that even one part of the official story can't be true, you've discredited the entire story. People don't seem to understand this. It's like taking the cornerstone out of a building.

I'm surprised people still go on about this...

But then again, people still think we never went to the moon and JFK wasn't killed by Lee Harvey Oswald.

I'm surprised people still go on about this...

But then again, people still think we never went to the moon and JFK wasn't killed by Lee Harvey Oswald.

foxhound_fox

I'm surprised people still go on about this...

But then again, people still think we never went to the moon and JFK wasn't killed by Lee Harvey Oswald.

foxhound_fox

You might want to check this out:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/11/20/opinion/main23166.shtml

This is an old story, but I haven't seen anything more recent indicating that public opinon has changed drastically on this. It's not just some people that think JFK was killed as part of a conspiracy, it's most people.

A massive plane flies into a building. Building falls down. Why is that so hard for people to follow? It's sad that we have to hear this same garbage every single year on the anniversary of 9/11.limpbizkit818

If you knew a little bit more about the buildings in question, it might be a little bit harder for you to believe. I'm not a 100% believer in the 9/11 inside job theories, but I do know that it should've taken more than a plane flying into the WTC towers to bring them down.

[QUOTE="limpbizkit818"]A massive plane flies into a building. Building falls down. Why is that so hard for people to follow? It's sad that we have to hear this same garbage every single year on the anniversary of 9/11.hartsickdiscipl

If you knew a little bit more about the buildings in question, it might be a little bit harder for you to believe. I'm not a 100% believer in the 9/11 inside job theories, but I do know that it should've taken more than a plane flying into the WTC towers to bring them down.

[QUOTE="limpbizkit818"]A massive plane flies into a building. Building falls down. Why is that so hard for people to follow? It's sad that we have to hear this same garbage every single year on the anniversary of 9/11.hartsickdiscipl

If you knew a little bit more about the buildings in question, it might be a little bit harder for you to believe. I'm not a 100% believer in the 9/11 inside job theories, but I do know that it should've taken more than a plane flying into the WTC towers to bring them down.

Why am I not surprised that Mike Gravel is a truther?

My God.....I may actually have to take a conspiracy theory seriously instead of hand waving it away on the basis of being a conspiracy theory.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="limpbizkit818"]A massive plane flies into a building. Building falls down. Why is that so hard for people to follow? It's sad that we have to hear this same garbage every single year on the anniversary of 9/11.limpbizkit818

If you knew a little bit more about the buildings in question, it might be a little bit harder for you to believe. I'm not a 100% believer in the 9/11 inside job theories, but I do know that it should've taken more than a plane flying into the WTC towers to bring them down.

People like to live in a fantasy world with broad government conspiracies. It's a lot more fun than real life.