ESPN pulls Hank Williams Jr. intro after his anti-Obama comments

  • 153 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#1 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
BRISTOL, Conn. - ESPN is pulling Hank Williams Jr.'s classic intro song from its broadcast of Monday night's NFL game after the country singer famous for the line "Are you ready for some football?" used an analogy to Adolf Hitler in discussing President Barack Obama. In an interview Monday morning on Fox News' "Fox & Friends," Williams said of Obama's outing on the links with House Speaker John Boehner: "It'd be like Hitler playing golf with (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu." Asked to clarify, Williams said: "They're the enemy," adding that by "they" he meant Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. "While Hank Williams Jr. is not an ESPN employee, we recognize that he is closely linked to our company through the open to 'Monday Night Football,'" ESPN said in a statement. "We are extremely disappointed with his comments, and as a result we have decided to pull the open from tonight's telecast." ESPN did not say whether the intro, synonymous with "Monday Night Football" since 1989, would be used again after this week's Buccaneers-Colts game. Story here. Seems a bit harsh for one political statement, the guy was just stating his own personal opinion. Thoughts, OT?
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Sounds silly. How do his comments reflect on the intro to Monday Night Football?

Avatar image for bleehum
bleehum

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 bleehum
Member since 2004 • 5321 Posts
I'm sure people would have turned off MNF in disgust as they saw Hank Williams Jr. still doing the introduction. /sarcasm
Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts
Whats with people refering to all of our presidents as hitler
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Meh, they're under no obligation to use his music.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

I didn't think I could hate BSPN any more...I was wrong.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts
People should watch what they say.
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

I'm sure people would have turned off MNF in disgust as they saw Hank Williams Jr. still doing the introduction. /sarcasmbleehum

Nobody tunes in just to see the opening song, either. If they want to distance themselves from this nutjob I don't blame them.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="bleehum"]I'm sure people would have turned off MNF in disgust as they saw Hank Williams Jr. still doing the introduction. /sarcasmJML897

Nobody tunes in just to see the opening song, either. If they want to distance themselves from this nutjob I don't blame them.

His intro is iconic though.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23338 Posts
Seems like ESPN was afraid of being associated with poor analogies.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

If you are part of, even if just providing theme music, for a national and widely viewed program you don't go around making ignorant and idiotic comments that could reflect badly on the only organization that helps remind the rest of the country you even still exist. Dumb move on his part and I can't blame ESPN for making the decision.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23338 Posts

I didn't think I could hate BSPN any more...I was wrong.

Pirate700
Really? Why? This seems like a straight-up business decision.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

Seems like ESPN was afraid of being associated with poor analogies. mattbbpl
ESPN should be afraid of being associated with horrible sports analysis and made up stories. Unfortunately they aren't.

Avatar image for fidosim
fidosim

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#14 fidosim
Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts
Godwin's Law. Not even once.
Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]Seems like ESPN was afraid of being associated with poor analogies. Pirate700

ESPN should be afraid of being associated with horrible sports analysis and made up stories. Unfortunately they aren't.

:lol: I agree with you when it comes to that.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23338 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]Seems like ESPN was afraid of being associated with poor analogies. Pirate700

ESPN should be afraid of being associated with horrible sports analysis and made up stories. Unfortunately they aren't.

Haha, I would never defend their sports coverage :P
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
I thought something was off. . . I hated that intro anyway.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
ESPN is covering their ass in trying to ensure they are as neutral as possible to maximize viewership..
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
Referring to someone as Hitler and "the enemy" on TV generally isn't a good move on a professional level.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]Seems like ESPN was afraid of being associated with poor analogies. JML897

ESPN should be afraid of being associated with horrible sports analysis and made up stories. Unfortunately they aren't.

:lol: I agree with you when it comes to that.

:P Good to hear.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

Referring to someone as Hitler and "the enemy" on TV generally isn't a good move on a professional level. Ace6301
I doubt he really cares. He doesn't need the money.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23338 Posts
ESPN is covering their *** in trying to ensure they are as neutral as possible to maximize viewership.. sSubZerOo
Yeah, this is pretty standard practice for inflammatory remarks.
Avatar image for CJL13
CJL13

19137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 CJL13
Member since 2005 • 19137 Posts

ARE YOU READY FOR SOME CENSORSHIP?!

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

ARE YOU READY FOR SOME CENSORSHIP?!

CJL13

:| Except this wasn't censorship.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

ARE YOU READY FOR SOME CENSORSHIP?!

CJL13

He wasn't censored...

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

ARE YOU READY FOR SOME CENSORSHIP?!

CJL13

Except there's no censorship involed here.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

One thing to remember, ESPN is owned by Disney (and Hurst) which also owns ABC. All liberal bastions and Michael Eisner former CEO of Disney backed Obama during the 2008 election. It's no wonder that ESPN pulled the song, at least for one night, if not permanently.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

One thing to remember, ESPN is owned by Disney (and Hurst) which also owns ABC. All liberal bastions and Michael Eisner former CEO of Disney backed Obama during the 2008 election. It's no wonder that ESPN pulled the song, at least for one night, if not permanently.

WhiteKnight77

Or the fact that ESPN is a SPORTS based network that wants no part of any political imflamatory comments on either side due to it causing them to drop in viewership.. Their main goal is to get as many sports fans/people as possible to watch, not to promote a certain political agenda which would divide their base..

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

One thing to remember, ESPN is owned by Disney (and Hurst) which also owns ABC. All liberal bastions and Michael Eisner former CEO of Disney backed Obama during the 2008 election. It's no wonder that ESPN pulled the song, at least for one night, if not permanently.

WhiteKnight77

I'm guessing it has less to do with making an Obama comment and more to do with his comparing him to Hitler Regardless of how one may feel about Obama's policies it's a stupid, insensitive comment.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

One thing to remember, ESPN is owned by Disney (and Hurst) which also owns ABC. All liberal bastions and Michael Eisner former CEO of Disney backed Obama during the 2008 election. It's no wonder that ESPN pulled the song, at least for one night, if not permanently.

worlock77

I'm guessing it has less to do with making an Obama comment and more to do with his comparing him to Hitler Regardless of how one may feel about Obama's policies it's a stupid, insensitive comment.

And referring to him as the "enemy". It's a sports show, not Glenn Beck.
Avatar image for lensflare15
lensflare15

6652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 lensflare15
Member since 2010 • 6652 Posts

I'm sure people would have turned off MNF in disgust as they saw Hank Williams Jr. still doing the introduction. /sarcasmbleehum

Lol, exactly. They could've at least waited for someone to make a big deal out of it...

Avatar image for limpbizkit818
limpbizkit818

15044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 limpbizkit818
Member since 2004 • 15044 Posts
I had no idea that he said that. ESPN pulling the intro is only going to spread his words.
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

Sounds silly. How do his comments reflect on the intro to Monday Night Football?

airshocker

I'm guessing their fear is that it would make Obama supporters less likely to watch.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180098 Posts
When it comes to business....one has to be as pc as possible.
Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts
As much as I think his comment is both idiotic and offensive, that's pretty silly for his song to get pulled for that one reason.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

ESPN has every right to pull the intro. They are a private business and may be concerned about how his actions may affect their reputation/customers. Hank Williams is free to say whatever he wants, but ESPN is also free to act however they want.

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

IF they were consistant I would have ZERO proble with this BUT they were not, they never did anything with anti bush comments(and some harsh ones) so I find this very sad

If anything though they did choose a week where nobody would notice it was gone

Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]IF they were consistant I would have ZERO proble with this BUT they were not, they never did anything with anti bush comments(and some harsh ones) so I find this very sad If anything though they did choose a week where nobody would notice it was gone

Who made anti-Bush comments?
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]IF they were consistant I would have ZERO proble with this BUT they were not, they never did anything with anti bush comments(and some harsh ones) so I find this very sad If anything though they did choose a week where nobody would notice it was gonescorch-62
Who made anti-Bush comments?

dixie chicks I believe who were with espn in some capacity I believe at the time

Avatar image for CommanderShiro
CommanderShiro

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 CommanderShiro
Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts

ESPN has every right to pull the intro. They are a private business and may be concerned about how his actions may affect their reputation/customers. Hank Williams is free to say whatever he wants, but ESPN is also free to act however they want.

sonicare

I agree with this.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

ESPN has every right to pull the intro. They are a private business and may be concerned about how his actions may affect their reputation/customers. Hank Williams is free to say whatever he wants, but ESPN is also free to act however they want.

sonicare

Nobody is disputing their right to do it. Just weather is was the correct move or a smart one.

Avatar image for Bucked20
Bucked20

6651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Bucked20
Member since 2011 • 6651 Posts
Who cares maybe he shouldn't talk so reckless
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts

[QUOTE="scorch-62"][QUOTE="fueled-system"]IF they were consistant I would have ZERO proble with this BUT they were not, they never did anything with anti bush comments(and some harsh ones) so I find this very sad If anything though they did choose a week where nobody would notice it was gonefueled-system

Who made anti-Bush comments?

dixie chicks I believe who were with espn in some capacity I believe at the time

I didn't realize the Dixie Chicks were ever affiliated with ESPN. Nor do I recall them saying anything particularly harsh. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure all they said was that they were ashamed that Bush was from the same state as them.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

Seems a bit harsh for one political statement, the guy was just stating his own personal opinion. Thoughts, OT?topsemag55

And ESPN is stating theirs.

Harsh or not, they're concerned about their public image. They probably think that it'd be damaging to their image if they came off as condoning or accepting of Williams' comments, so they're trying to distance thmselves from those comments.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#45 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"] Seems a bit harsh for one political statement, the guy was just stating his own personal opinion. Thoughts, OT?MrGeezer

And ESPN is stating theirs.

Harsh or not, they're concerned about their public image. They probably think that it'd be damaging to their image if they came off as condoning or accepting of Williams' comments, so they're trying to distance thmselves from those comments.

It isn't as though Williams is hosting a show on the network, all he did was record a theme song. People don't even see an image of him on ESPN.
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
[QUOTE="topsemag55"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"]And ESPN is stating theirs. Harsh or not, they're concerned about their public image. They probably think that it'd be damaging to their image if they came off as condoning or accepting of Williams' comments, so they're trying to distance thmselves from those comments.

It isn't as though Williams is hosting a show on the network, all he did was record a theme song. People don't even see an image of him on ESPN.

Except multiple times during the intro that plays on a weekly basis.
Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#47 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

It's funny how everyone absolutely jumped on Williams Jr.'s comments as being "anti-Obama." Re-read that statement, and tell me exactly where he refers to Obama as Hitler.

Go ahead... I'll wait right over here...

...didn't see it either, did you? For all anyone knows, he was referring to Boehner as Hitler.

It's a stupid thing to say... but it's in no way anti-Obama.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

It's funny how everyone absolutely jumped on Williams Jr.'s comments as being "anti-Obama." Re-read that statement, and tell me exactly where he refers to Obama as Hitler.

Go ahead... I'll wait right over here...

...didn't see it either, did you? For all anyone knows, he was referring to Boehner as Hitler.

It's a stupid thing to say... but it's in no way anti-Obama.

OrkHammer007
Oh I had no idea the US is enemies with Israel. It's pretty obvious he was referring to Obama as Hitler there. Even if he was referring to Boehner it doesn't change a thing.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

It's funny how everyone absolutely jumped on Williams Jr.'s comments as being "anti-Obama." Re-read that statement, and tell me exactly where he refers to Obama as Hitler.

Go ahead... I'll wait right over here...

...didn't see it either, did you? For all anyone knows, he was referring to Boehner as Hitler.

It's a stupid thing to say... but it's in no way anti-Obama.

OrkHammer007

Even if he were referring to Boehner as Hitler it is still a stupid, insensitive comment to make.

Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#50 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

It's funny how everyone absolutely jumped on Williams Jr.'s comments as being "anti-Obama." Re-read that statement, and tell me exactly where he refers to Obama as Hitler.

Go ahead... I'll wait right over here...

...didn't see it either, did you? For all anyone knows, he was referring to Boehner as Hitler.

It's a stupid thing to say... but it's in no way anti-Obama.

Ace6301

Oh I had no idea the US is enemies with Israel. It's pretty obvious he was referring to Obama as Hitler there. Even if he was referring to Boehner it doesn't change a thing.

If it's so obvious, then point out the exact quote that says "Obama is Hitler I bet you can't do it, because it doesn't exist.