[QUOTE="theone86"][QUOTE="SyrupNinja"]2nd had the best acting. The original trilogy had terrible acting (not a popular thing to say but whatever).SyrupNinja
Obviousw troll is obvious.
Luke I am your father, NOOOOOOO, Thats impooosssible, NOOOOOOO! In the 2nd one the acting was much better. The third had worse dialogue than the originals by far I give you that. The 3rd movie was cringe worthy at times. The first one was not amazing either but the 2nd was the best. The ambeince, plotline, and the main downpoint was the cliffhanger but all starwars have those except the last one and that one is flawed for many other reasons. I would rank them 2, 4 , 5, 3, 6, 1Oh my god, you haven't a clue what you're talking about. The dialogue in 2 was sh!te and the entire Anakin/Padme thing that took up half the damn movie was cheesy, melodramatic, and way too long.
The fifth one, yeah, only had Alec Guiness, Harrison Ford, and Carrie FIsher all turning in great performances. It's not Oscar-level acting, but that's not the type of movie it is anyways. At any rate, it's leaps and bounds ahead of two.
Log in to comment