[QUOTE="Greatgone12"]You're being a bit... what's the word? Oh yeah, ignorant.
"Emo" is emotional hardcore, hardcore being "hardcore punk." Of course, whatever it is considered to be nowadays isn't related to whatever it was in the 80's. Technically, the first "emo" bands were Rites of Spring and Embrace.
Just sayin'.
Tony-Harrison
I know Emo is Emotional Hardcore, I'm not ignorant of that at all friend. I know that nobody considers The Smiths to be Emo. I'm challenging conventional thinking.
I think I'm still Right. Hardcore is relative to the decade that it's in. The Clash where considered quite hardcore by the mainstream standards of the 1980's and there studio sound isn't far off.
And yes I remember Embrace. Definitly not the first band with lyrics and music like that.
1.) So you're admitting that your thread is worthless?
2.) "Hardcore" doesn't not refer to "Hell yeah! That **** is hardcore!" "Hardcore" refers to hardcore punk, which is different from stuff like The Clash, so whether or not the public "thinks" that the Clash is "quite hardcore" is none of anybody's concern.Â
3.) No **** Embrace wasn't the first band with "lyrics" and "music" like that. They were the first band to sound different enough to be considered a different genre, no matter how useless a genre distinction it may be.
EDIT: This Embrace, and this Rites of Spring
Log in to comment