• 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts

watch this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL--ms

fair and balanced eh?

Avatar image for freakyzeeky1986
freakyzeeky1986

19711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 freakyzeeky1986
Member since 2005 • 19711 Posts
Not surprising at all... :roll:
Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts
CREAM - Cash Rules Everything Around Me, dolla dolla bill ya'll
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
that Fox channel should be banned...seriously
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
and CNN is unbiased to right:roll:
Avatar image for -911-
-911-

6177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 -911-
Member since 2006 • 6177 Posts
At first I thought it was an actual fox attacking Obama, oh well, FOX just being racists again. -_-
Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#7 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

Well, here's the basic description of the news channels....

Fox: Republican news channel.

CNN: Democratic news channel.

MSNBC: Uhhhh...I dunno.

Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
that Fox channel should be banned...seriouslyjointed
maybe you should worry about your own countries news organizations
Avatar image for soroush7
soroush7

1968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 soroush7
Member since 2003 • 1968 Posts
Clever like a Fox
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

[QUOTE="jointed"]that Fox channel should be banned...seriouslyUrbanSpartan125
maybe you should worry about your own countries news organizations

lol why?

Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
and CNN is unbiased to right:roll:UrbanSpartan125
It's not anywhere near as biast as fox.
Avatar image for reggie186
reggie186

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#12 reggie186
Member since 2004 • 3910 Posts
Of course Fox attacked Obama. Bunch of dorkheads over there.
Avatar image for reggie186
reggie186

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#13 reggie186
Member since 2004 • 3910 Posts

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"]and CNN is unbiased to right:roll:yoshi-lnex
It's not anywhere near as biast as fox.

Agreed.

Avatar image for SAURON221
SAURON221

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 SAURON221
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
I would not call that an attack many news stations were reporting the same thing. I really saw no problem they were stating things that the average American may feel not so happy about with obama. Wer ein a war with a mostly Muslim country so when news cam out that he was raised as a Muslim by his father for a number of years the news is going to talk about it.
Avatar image for zero9167
zero9167

14554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 zero9167
Member since 2005 • 14554 Posts
At first I thought it was an actual fox attacking Obama, oh well, FOX just being racists again. -_--911-
yeah thats what i thought too, i was getting ready for a good show :(
Avatar image for Homiegesus
Homiegesus

5706

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Homiegesus
Member since 2003 • 5706 Posts
and CNN is unbiased to right:roll:UrbanSpartan125
Were not talking about CNN and I would hope that nots an argument "CNN is biased so FOX news can be as much as they want"...
Avatar image for Squidward117
Squidward117

4374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 Squidward117
Member since 2005 • 4374 Posts
This is part of the reason why I don't watch TV anymore...
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
Xenophobic and racist would better describe what Fox purports to be fair and balanced.
Avatar image for jm4847
jm4847

3535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 jm4847
Member since 2006 • 3535 Posts

watch this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL--ms

fair and balanced eh?

yoshi-lnex
   Now seriously this is a chance for Obama to prove himself to the people. I hope he succeeds.
Avatar image for expertgamer3
expertgamer3

5828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#20 expertgamer3
Member since 2005 • 5828 Posts
well, i don't like him anyway, and i would never vote for him. To me, he doesn't have enough political experience to run the country.
Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#21 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
Who watches FOX anyway?
Avatar image for -911-
-911-

6177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 -911-
Member since 2006 • 6177 Posts
[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]

watch this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL--ms

fair and balanced eh?

jm4847
Now seriously this is a chance for Obama to prove himself to the people. I hope he succeeds.

FOX is both Nazi AND Communist? One hell of a combination their. No Wonder. :wink:
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
People have different views then you, let's banish them
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
People have different views then you, let's banish themLukeAF24
Well I can tolerate most views, just not that, and the issue is that Fox is pushing the mentality.
Avatar image for ULTMT_GMR_LOL__
ULTMT_GMR_LOL__

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ULTMT_GMR_LOL__
Member since 2006 • 113 Posts
Obama is a wretched man. The only true ruler of America ever will be the righteous President George W. Bush. The government is exploring a law to allow him to continue ruling until he passes away.
Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#26 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
Obama is a wretched man. The only true ruler of America ever will be the righteous President George W. Bush. The government is exploring a law to allow him to continue ruling until he passes away.ULTMT_GMR_LOL__
Will you please stop trolling everybody
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
and CNN is unbiased to right:roll:UrbanSpartan125
They don't call it the "Communist News Network" for nothing... :|
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
Osama?
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Another example of that great unbiased american media.
Avatar image for _Goliath_
_Goliath_

12845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 _Goliath_
Member since 2004 • 12845 Posts
People have different views then you, let's banish themLukeAF24
FOX is full of hypocrisy, its not just a different view.
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
Osama?Brainkiller05
Barack Hussein Obama.
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
People have different views then you, let's banish themLukeAF24
It's a basic ethic of journalism to at least try to not to have a political bias, but fox news lacks that ethic, in fact they go several steps beyond that, having some of the most conservativly biast journalists that they can get, constantly having facist speakers like ann coultier and slandering anything left wing......fox is a joke.
Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#33 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
[QUOTE="LukeAF24"]People have different views then you, let's banish themyoshi-lnex
It's a basic ethic of journalism to at least try to not to have a political bias, but fox news lacks that ethic, in fact they go several steps beyond that, having some of the most conservativly biast journalists that they can get, constantly having facist speakers like ann coultier and slandering anything left wing......fox is a joke.

I'm suprised that they're still on the air. 
Avatar image for limpbizkit818
limpbizkit818

15044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 limpbizkit818
Member since 2004 • 15044 Posts
[QUOTE="LukeAF24"]People have different views then you, let's banish themyoshi-lnex
It's a basic ethic of journalism to at least try to not to have a political bias, but fox news lacks that ethic, in fact they go several steps beyond that, having some of the most conservativly biast journalists that they can get, constantly having facist speakers like ann coultier and slandering anything left wing......fox is a joke.

People blow this whole fox news thing out of the water. They have just as many far left people on their shows as they do republicans. I can take clips from any news station and say how they are biased for this and that. And for Ann Coultier, she looks like an idiot no matter what show she is on. People do more then disagree with Fox, they hate it. I am still trying to understand.
Avatar image for yermomsboxx
yermomsboxx

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 yermomsboxx
Member since 2005 • 6348 Posts
Nice editing.
Avatar image for Homiegesus
Homiegesus

5706

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Homiegesus
Member since 2003 • 5706 Posts
Nice editing.yermomsboxx
You obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

"Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"
 

Wow, that had me cracking up.  Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one? 

Avatar image for yermomsboxx
yermomsboxx

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 yermomsboxx
Member since 2005 • 6348 Posts
[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.Homiegesus
You obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.

By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story.
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

[QUOTE="Homiegesus"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.yermomsboxx
You obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.

By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story.

They ran a whole promotion on how he attended a Muslim school in Indonesia.  The fact is that he was in a public school growing up and it wasn't religious.  How is that not promoting a false idea to mar his image?

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="Homiegesus"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.yermomsboxx
You obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.

By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story.

Fox did it to themselves with the madrasa thing. that was absurd.
Avatar image for Funkyhamster
Funkyhamster

17366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Funkyhamster
Member since 2005 • 17366 Posts

Well, here's the basic description of the news channels....

Fox: Republican news channel.

CNN: Democratic news channel.

MSNBC: Uhhhh...I dunno.

THE_DRUGGIE
That's why I like CNN. :oops:
Avatar image for Loonie
Loonie

3455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Loonie
Member since 2003 • 3455 Posts

"Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"

Wow, that had me cracking up. Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one?

Donkey_Puncher
I know, like smoking somehow determines his capability to run a country efficiently, and unless he has came out and said "i do not smoke" then you can hardly call him a liar for simply trying to keep it quiet.
Avatar image for yermomsboxx
yermomsboxx

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 yermomsboxx
Member since 2005 • 6348 Posts

[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"][QUOTE="Homiegesus"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.Donkey_Puncher

You obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.

By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story.

They ran a whole promotion on how he attended a Muslim school in Indonesia. The fact is that he was in a public school growing up and it wasn't religious. How is that not promoting a false idea to mar his image?

They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last.
Avatar image for jm4847
jm4847

3535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#45 jm4847
Member since 2006 • 3535 Posts
[QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"]

"Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"

Wow, that had me cracking up. Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one?

Loonie
I know, like smoking somehow determines his capability to run a country efficiently, and unless he has came out and said "i do not smoke" then you can hardly call him a liar for simply trying to keep it quiet.

Yeah and I bet they never mentioned Bush's past when it comes to drugs...
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. yermomsboxx

Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved. 

Seriously "Obama is a Smoker.  Do you really want a smoker as president?"  That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism. 

It's nothing more than partisan attacks.

Avatar image for yermomsboxx
yermomsboxx

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 yermomsboxx
Member since 2005 • 6348 Posts

[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. Donkey_Puncher

Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved.

Seriously "Obama is a Smoker. Do you really want a smoker as president?" That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism.

It's nothing more than partisan attacks.

Did you read anything that I wrote?
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts
[QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"]

[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. yermomsboxx

Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved.

Seriously "Obama is a Smoker. Do you really want a smoker as president?" That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism.

It's nothing more than partisan attacks.

Did you read anything that I wrote?

This has nothing to do with CNN.  It was never mentioned until FOX news supporters try and divert flack. 

If you were to stay on topic I'd take what you said into contribution.  What's even more ironic is their slogan "fair and balanced" couldn't be farther from the truth.  Hell I'd actually have more respect if they quit the facade and just admit they are a pure partisan news agency. 

Avatar image for Loonie
Loonie

3455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Loonie
Member since 2003 • 3455 Posts
[QUOTE="Loonie"][QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"]

"Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"

Wow, that had me cracking up. Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one?

jm4847
I know, like smoking somehow determines his capability to run a country efficiently, and unless he has came out and said "i do not smoke" then you can hardly call him a liar for simply trying to keep it quiet.

Yeah and I bet they never mentioned Bush's past when it comes to drugs...

:lol: too true
Avatar image for yermomsboxx
yermomsboxx

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 yermomsboxx
Member since 2005 • 6348 Posts
[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"][QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"]

[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. Donkey_Puncher

Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved.

Seriously "Obama is a Smoker. Do you really want a smoker as president?" That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism.

It's nothing more than partisan attacks.

Did you read anything that I wrote?

This has nothing to do with CNN. It was never mentioned until FOX news supporters try and divert flack.

If you were to stay on topic I'd take what you said into contribution. What's even more ironic is their slogan "fair and balanced" couldn't be farther from the truth. Hell I'd actually have more respect if they quit the facade and just admit they are a pure partisan news agency.

It was mentioned in the video in the first post of this thread. It portrayed CNN, who did an investigative report on the story, as the messiah of news channels because of their counter-report to the story, which is why I referenced them . It simply is not the case. Did you watch the video?