watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL--ms
fair and balanced eh?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well, here's the basic description of the news channels....
Fox: Republican news channel.
CNN: Democratic news channel.
MSNBC: Uhhhh...I dunno.
that Fox channel should be banned...seriouslyjointedmaybe you should worry about your own countries news organizations
[QUOTE="jointed"]that Fox channel should be banned...seriouslyUrbanSpartan125maybe you should worry about your own countries news organizations
lol why?
and CNN is unbiased to right:roll:UrbanSpartan125Were not talking about CNN and I would hope that nots an argument "CNN is biased so FOX news can be as much as they want"...
[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]Now seriously this is a chance for Obama to prove himself to the people. I hope he succeeds. FOX is both Nazi AND Communist? One hell of a combination their. No Wonder. :wink:watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL--ms
fair and balanced eh?
jm4847
People have different views then you, let's banish themLukeAF24Well I can tolerate most views, just not that, and the issue is that Fox is pushing the mentality.
Obama is a wretched man. The only true ruler of America ever will be the righteous President George W. Bush. The government is exploring a law to allow him to continue ruling until he passes away.ULTMT_GMR_LOL__Will you please stop trolling everybody
People have different views then you, let's banish themLukeAF24It's a basic ethic of journalism to at least try to not to have a political bias, but fox news lacks that ethic, in fact they go several steps beyond that, having some of the most conservativly biast journalists that they can get, constantly having facist speakers like ann coultier and slandering anything left wing......fox is a joke.
[QUOTE="LukeAF24"]People have different views then you, let's banish themyoshi-lnexIt's a basic ethic of journalism to at least try to not to have a political bias, but fox news lacks that ethic, in fact they go several steps beyond that, having some of the most conservativly biast journalists that they can get, constantly having facist speakers like ann coultier and slandering anything left wing......fox is a joke. I'm suprised that they're still on the air.Â
[QUOTE="LukeAF24"]People have different views then you, let's banish themyoshi-lnexIt's a basic ethic of journalism to at least try to not to have a political bias, but fox news lacks that ethic, in fact they go several steps beyond that, having some of the most conservativly biast journalists that they can get, constantly having facist speakers like ann coultier and slandering anything left wing......fox is a joke. People blow this whole fox news thing out of the water. They have just as many far left people on their shows as they do republicans. I can take clips from any news station and say how they are biased for this and that. And for Ann Coultier, she looks like an idiot no matter what show she is on. People do more then disagree with Fox, they hate it. I am still trying to understand.
Nice editing.yermomsboxxYou obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.
"Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"
Â
Wow, that had me cracking up. Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one?Â
[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.HomiegesusYou obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story.
[QUOTE="Homiegesus"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.yermomsboxxYou obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story.
They ran a whole promotion on how he attended a Muslim school in Indonesia. The fact is that he was in a public school growing up and it wasn't religious. How is that not promoting a false idea to mar his image?
[QUOTE="Homiegesus"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.yermomsboxxYou obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story. Fox did it to themselves with the madrasa thing. that was absurd.
That's why I like CNN. :oops:Well, here's the basic description of the news channels....
Fox: Republican news channel.
CNN: Democratic news channel.
MSNBC: Uhhhh...I dunno.
THE_DRUGGIE
I know, like smoking somehow determines his capability to run a country efficiently, and unless he has came out and said "i do not smoke" then you can hardly call him a liar for simply trying to keep it quiet."Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"
Wow, that had me cracking up. Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one?
Donkey_Puncher
You obviously havent watched much FOX News, if it wasnt edited it would have looked much worse.By summing up an entire, 24 hour a day, seven day a week news channel into a two+ minute video, you are going to offer a skewed view of the network. For instance, a lot of the people, if not all, shown in that video are news commentators, not news casters. I did not see one clip of a newscaster in the entire video. Also, when using a clip of the news commentator, Sean Hannity, "attacking" Obama(he is a hardcore conservative, like O'Reilly, who wears it on his sleeve. It's really not a big surprise), they didn't show Allen Colmes' absolutely certain rebut. That is what I am talking about, when I say, "Nice editing." It's blatantly skewed against Fox and toward CNN when we all know that every news organization makes mistakes(take Dan Rather's Bush bashing, for example.) When the madrossa story was proven to be false, it was reported as such on Fox. You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think that Fox is the only news organization report dirt on candidates before an election. Everyone wants to be the first to break a huge news story.[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"][QUOTE="Homiegesus"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]Nice editing.Donkey_Puncher
They ran a whole promotion on how he attended a Muslim school in Indonesia. The fact is that he was in a public school growing up and it wasn't religious. How is that not promoting a false idea to mar his image?
They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last.[QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"]I know, like smoking somehow determines his capability to run a country efficiently, and unless he has came out and said "i do not smoke" then you can hardly call him a liar for simply trying to keep it quiet.Yeah and I bet they never mentioned Bush's past when it comes to drugs..."Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"
Wow, that had me cracking up. Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one?
Loonie
They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. yermomsboxx
Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved.Â
Seriously "Obama is a Smoker. Do you really want a smoker as president?" That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism.Â
It's nothing more than partisan attacks.
[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. Donkey_Puncher
Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved.
Seriously "Obama is a Smoker. Do you really want a smoker as president?" That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism.
It's nothing more than partisan attacks.
Did you read anything that I wrote?[QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. yermomsboxx
Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved.
Seriously "Obama is a Smoker. Do you really want a smoker as president?" That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism.
It's nothing more than partisan attacks.
Did you read anything that I wrote?This has nothing to do with CNN. It was never mentioned until FOX news supporters try and divert flack.Â
If you were to stay on topic I'd take what you said into contribution. What's even more ironic is their slogan "fair and balanced" couldn't be farther from the truth. Hell I'd actually have more respect if they quit the facade and just admit they are a pure partisan news agency.Â
[QUOTE="Loonie"][QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"]I know, like smoking somehow determines his capability to run a country efficiently, and unless he has came out and said "i do not smoke" then you can hardly call him a liar for simply trying to keep it quiet.Yeah and I bet they never mentioned Bush's past when it comes to drugs... :lol: too true"Guess this, he's a smoker!!!"
Wow, that had me cracking up. Are they really that feable and desperate to rip someone a new one?
jm4847
[QUOTE="yermomsboxx"][QUOTE="Donkey_Puncher"][QUOTE="yermomsboxx"]They were reporting a story that had been published in Insight magazine that was believed to be credible at the time, so they went with it. It's bad reporting, but no one is immune to it; the source was just wrong. There was a report on cnn.com a while ago that claimed that a woman who consumed semen on a regular basis had a less likely chance to develop breast cancer than those who did not. This was later proven to be a absolute hoax, and yet, there it was, in black and white, on CNN's webpage. Also, you seem to forget a little incident involving Dan Rather reporting an utterly bogus story about President Bush's time spent in the military, just months before the 2004 election. You can try to crucify Fox all you want, but the fact of the matter is that they are not the first to report a bogus story, and they certainly won't be the last. Donkey_Puncher
Funny how you try to give credibility where none is deserved.
Seriously "Obama is a Smoker. Do you really want a smoker as president?" That's the quality of their broadcasting and journalism.
It's nothing more than partisan attacks.
Did you read anything that I wrote?This has nothing to do with CNN. It was never mentioned until FOX news supporters try and divert flack.
If you were to stay on topic I'd take what you said into contribution. What's even more ironic is their slogan "fair and balanced" couldn't be farther from the truth. Hell I'd actually have more respect if they quit the facade and just admit they are a pure partisan news agency.
It was mentioned in the video in the first post of this thread. It portrayed CNN, who did an investigative report on the story, as the messiah of news channels because of their counter-report to the story, which is why I referenced them . It simply is not the case. Did you watch the video?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment