Global Warming? Today was colder than yesterday.

  • 156 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#51 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

I thought it was a fact that global temperatures have been rising? However, I don't believe that it is man caused.

Though, wouldn't melting glaciers make the water colder, therefore making winds colder, and temperatures colder? (in some areas?)

howlrunner13
no. because the glaciers reflect a lot of the suns rays. while water hold them and gets warmer. as more glaciers melt the process accelerates. at some point the salinity of the water will have changed enough that even more climate change takes place. like wind pattern changing.
Avatar image for howlrunner13
howlrunner13

4408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 howlrunner13
Member since 2005 • 4408 Posts

[QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

I thought it was a fact that global temperatures have been rising? However, I don't believe that it is man caused.

Though, wouldn't melting glaciers make the water colder, therefore making winds colder, and temperatures colder? (in some areas?)

Ontain

no. because the glaciers reflect a lot of the suns rays. while water hold them and gets warmer. as more glaciers melt the process accelerates. at some point the salinity of the water will have changed enough that even more climate change takes place. like wind pattern changing.

Ah, ok. My mistake. Didn't think that was right. :P

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127738 Posts
Yeah I'm surprised we still have winter and snow. I mean, as you say the temperature should only go up, day by day because of this global warming. Yet during autumn it only gets colder. Explain that global warming :x :P
Avatar image for kaangonultas
kaangonultas

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 kaangonultas
Member since 2008 • 1647 Posts
There are much bigger problems on earth at the moment. Population anyone? Climate change should be the least of worries.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Yeah I'm surprised we still have winter and snow. I mean, as you say the temperature should only go up, day by day because of this global warming. Yet during autumn it only gets colder. Explain that global warming :x :Phorgen123
You sounds kind of like Edward Current on youtube with your last statement yet you forgot to add a "checkmate global warming activists!"

Avatar image for zarkon9
zarkon9

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#56 zarkon9
Member since 2010 • 767 Posts

There are much bigger problems on earth at the moment. Population anyone? Climate change should be the least of worries.kaangonultas

i donate to greenpeace. from what i have read and heard they are still warring amongst themselves but i tend to side with greenpeace on this global warming issue. sometimes things the government in this country, mainly from heres johnny, say on global warming is suspect when compared to greenpeace. greenpeace told me it is about for the government protecting the interests of dairy companies... of power companies... the interests of companies that are creating this problem in the first place. providing global warming is this serious threat to the planet and is "accelerating". it annoys me much what comes out of the mouth of this prime minister here. it is as if he is intentionally lying with a smile on his face.

Avatar image for Reaper2209
Reaper2209

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Reaper2209
Member since 2010 • 36 Posts

Few weeks ago we got a stunning -47 & (-59 with wind chill) :o

Avatar image for JC346
JC346

4886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#58 JC346
Member since 2007 • 4886 Posts
Oh lawd.
Avatar image for rocafelon1001
rocafelon1001

1207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 rocafelon1001
Member since 2003 • 1207 Posts

Climate Gate anyone? Every year for thye past ten years the climate has dropped...explain that you climate nazi's.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127738 Posts

[QUOTE="horgen123"]Yeah I'm surprised we still have winter and snow. I mean, as you say the temperature should only go up, day by day because of this global warming. Yet during autumn it only gets colder. Explain that global warming :x :PBumFluff122

You sounds kind of like Edward Current on youtube with your last statement yet you forgot to add a "checkmate global warming activists!"

Does he sound ironic?
Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#61 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
Solar activity has diminished over the last 10 years...hence it's gotten colder...and will continue to get colder...while we have an effect on the earth....it's minimal to say....the sun.....people need to stop worrying about warming and invest in snow pants cause it's about to get a whole lot colder....
Avatar image for Shame-usBlackley
Shame-usBlackley

18266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#62 Shame-usBlackley
Member since 2002 • 18266 Posts

It's a money-making scam. Tenuous assumptions based around political and economic agendas more than ones rooted in conservation of the planet or the human race. Just look at Al Gore and ask yourself if that guy really believes what he preaches. I had a GreenPeace girl roll up on me on a college campus who threw her things on the ground and stormed off when I started laughing and pointing at her real loud when she started preaching about "climate change" (the new term they use, because global warming makes them look like idiots). I just laugh at them. Hard. They usually get all frustrated and walk away, and to that I say good -- maybe they'll go take a frigging shower and get a job.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
:o TC, you have stumbled onto something significant! Notify the scientific community at once!! They must know about this!
Avatar image for Penguinchow
Penguinchow

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 Penguinchow
Member since 2006 • 1629 Posts
I for one believe that the climate goes in cycles. Sure it's getting warmer. Is it our fault? Probably not, definitely not totally. And it'll get colder again years from now. Now excuse me while I go drive donuts in my truck powered by spotted owls and the souls of environmentalists.
Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

I'm waiting for Al Gore to come out and blame the Haiti earthquake on global climate change and tell us how its all the republican's fault.

Any geologist worth his credentials will tell you we are living between ice ages.

When I was a kid (a very long time ago) the big scare was the coming ice age.

You know, all these predictions are based on mathematical models. Given the immense size of the earth's atmosphere, and the incredible number of variables that effect it, and the almost inconceivable amount of interaction between all those variables, I seriously question the accuracy of the models.

Add to that all these emails revealing the effort to corrupt the data and de-legitimize any scientists that offered an opposing view, and I'm not sure how you can advocate drastic measures based on these models.

Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#66 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="rook2rook"]

i think global warming is a joke people trying to get rich off books and other stuff its just sad.

BumFluff122

Yes. The only reason why this global warming phiasco is on us and all these hundreds of thousands of scientists agree with it is because they all want to sell books on it. I completely agree.

I hate to burst your bubble, but there is more money being made off industry that pollutes. Anti polution regulation cost them a lot of money, hence the reason for anti-climate propaganda. The goal is to get people to believe the air they breath contains magic dust that nulifies the greenhouse effect of pumping an aditional 28billion tons of CO2 into the air.

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#67 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts

It's a money-making scam. Tenuous assumptions based around political and economic agendas more than ones rooted in conservation of the planet or the human race. Just look at Al Gore and ask yourself if that guy really believes what he preaches. I had a GreenPeace girl roll up on me on a college campus who threw her things on the ground and stormed off when I started laughing and pointing at her real loud when she started preaching about "climate change" (the new term they use, because global warming makes them look like idiots). I just laugh at them. Hard. They usually get all frustrated and walk away, and to that I say good -- maybe they'll go take a frigging shower and get a job.

Shame-usBlackley
Of course, because governments are going to make tonnes of money by spending billions on tackling climate change...
Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

It's a money-making scam. Tenuous assumptions based around political and economic agendas more than ones rooted in conservation of the planet or the human race. Just look at Al Gore and ask yourself if that guy really believes what he preaches. I had a GreenPeace girl roll up on me on a college campus who threw her things on the ground and stormed off when I started laughing and pointing at her real loud when she started preaching about "climate change" (the new term they use, because global warming makes them look like idiots). I just laugh at them. Hard. They usually get all frustrated and walk away, and to that I say good -- maybe they'll go take a frigging shower and get a job.

Shame-usBlackley
Except, that's not true.. more money is being made by the people who don't support green technology or global warming. Than anyone else in the world.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#69 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

I for one believe that the climate goes in cycles. Sure it's getting warmer. Is it our fault? Probably not, definitely not totally. And it'll get colder again years from now. Now excuse me while I go drive donuts in my truck powered by spotted owls and the souls of environmentalists. Penguinchow
CO2 adds to the greenhouse effect, and humans produce a lot of it. How much effect does it have? That should be the debate, not that it doesn't exist. It's not too inconceivable that we could have a huge effect on climate change. There is a reason why CFCs were banned from commercial products. Because there was measurable proof that human emitted CFC emissions were tearing a hole in the ozone layer.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#70 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Penguinchow"]I for one believe that the climate goes in cycles. Sure it's getting warmer. Is it our fault? Probably not, definitely not totally. And it'll get colder again years from now. Now excuse me while I go drive donuts in my truck powered by spotted owls and the souls of environmentalists. Darthmatt

CO2 adds to the greenhouse effect, and humans produce a lot of it. How much effect does it have? That should be the debate, not that it doesn't exist. It's not too inconceivable that we could have a huge effect on climate change. There is a reason why CFCs were banned from commercial products. Because there was measurable proof that human emitted CFC emissions were tearing a hole in the ozone layer.

Measureable proof? No, mere correlation. Merely because I have six soggy bananas next to a bowl of milk doesn't mean they were all put in that bowl of milk.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Measureable proof? No, mere correlation. Merely because I have six soggy bananas next to a bowl of milk doesn't mean they were all put in that bowl of milk.Vandalvideo
...and what exactly were you doing with my bananas? :evil:
Avatar image for howlrunner13
howlrunner13

4408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#72 howlrunner13
Member since 2005 • 4408 Posts

[QUOTE="Penguinchow"]I for one believe that the climate goes in cycles. Sure it's getting warmer. Is it our fault? Probably not, definitely not totally. And it'll get colder again years from now. Now excuse me while I go drive donuts in my truck powered by spotted owls and the souls of environmentalists. Darthmatt

CO2 adds to the greenhouse effect, and humans produce a lot of it. How much effect does it have? That should be the debate, not that it doesn't exist. It's not too inconceivable that we could have a huge effect on climate change. There is a reason why CFCs were banned from commercial products. Because there was measurable proof that human emitted CFC emissions were tearing a hole in the ozone layer.

Methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide, and termites and cows produce more methane then all the cars on the road combined produce carbon dioxide.

Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#73 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]

[QUOTE="Penguinchow"]I for one believe that the climate goes in cycles. Sure it's getting warmer. Is it our fault? Probably not, definitely not totally. And it'll get colder again years from now. Now excuse me while I go drive donuts in my truck powered by spotted owls and the souls of environmentalists. Vandalvideo

CO2 adds to the greenhouse effect, and humans produce a lot of it. How much effect does it have? That should be the debate, not that it doesn't exist. It's not too inconceivable that we could have a huge effect on climate change. There is a reason why CFCs were banned from commercial products. Because there was measurable proof that human emitted CFC emissions were tearing a hole in the ozone layer.

Measureable proof? No, mere correlation. Merely because I have six soggy bananas next to a bowl of milk doesn't mean they were all put in that bowl of milk.

Correlation? CFC is like the terminator to ozone.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

Methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide, and termites and cows produce more methane then all the cars on the road combined produce carbon dioxide.

...and environmentalists often call for reduced consumption of beef because of that. What's your point?
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#75 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

Methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide, and termites and cows produce more methane then all the cars on the road combined produce carbon dioxide.

Engrish_Major
...and environmentalists often call for reduced consumption of beef because of that. What's your point?

That maybe you should be supporting the Orkin man.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#76 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]

[QUOTE="Penguinchow"]I for one believe that the climate goes in cycles. Sure it's getting warmer. Is it our fault? Probably not, definitely not totally. And it'll get colder again years from now. Now excuse me while I go drive donuts in my truck powered by spotted owls and the souls of environmentalists. howlrunner13

CO2 adds to the greenhouse effect, and humans produce a lot of it. How much effect does it have? That should be the debate, not that it doesn't exist. It's not too inconceivable that we could have a huge effect on climate change. There is a reason why CFCs were banned from commercial products. Because there was measurable proof that human emitted CFC emissions were tearing a hole in the ozone layer.

Methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide, and termites and cows produce more methane then all the cars on the road combined produce carbon dioxide.

But that doesn't detract from the potency of unmitigated CO2 emission. If anything that is even more reason why we need to regulate greenhouse gas as much as we can. I know there are a lot of factors that influence natural global warming, but the point is, adding an un-natural amount of CO2 amongst other GHG into the atmosphere will likely have an additive effect to global warming.

Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#77 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts
if that is true and it makes global warming "a sham" then this country made one big mistake by spending one billion dollars signing to something called the kyoto protocol. that money could have gone somewhere else... such as health and education but only given that there is no such thing as global warming. just given that global warming is a generation of the media, for instance.zarkon9
They signed it but never ratified it. And without ratifying it it's non-binding. Just sayin'.
Avatar image for howlrunner13
howlrunner13

4408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#78 howlrunner13
Member since 2005 • 4408 Posts

[QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

Methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide, and termites and cows produce more methane then all the cars on the road combined produce carbon dioxide.

Engrish_Major

...and environmentalists often call for reduced consumption of beef because of that. What's your point?

I have no point, why are you so mean to me? :cry:

Avatar image for ArmoredAshes
ArmoredAshes

4025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#79 ArmoredAshes
Member since 2005 • 4025 Posts

Eventually something is going to doom the earth. In the mean time...I'll have fun laughing at all the tin-foil-hat crazies. HAHAHAH

Avatar image for howlrunner13
howlrunner13

4408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#80 howlrunner13
Member since 2005 • 4408 Posts

[QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]CO2 adds to the greenhouse effect, and humans produce a lot of it. How much effect does it have? That should be the debate, not that it doesn't exist. It's not too inconceivable that we could have a huge effect on climate change. There is a reason why CFCs were banned from commercial products. Because there was measurable proof that human emitted CFC emissions were tearing a hole in the ozone layer.

Darthmatt

Methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide, and termites and cows produce more methane then all the cars on the road combined produce carbon dioxide.

But that doesn't detract from the potency of unmitigated CO2 emission. If anything that is even more reason why we need to regulate greenhouse gas as much as we can. I know there are a lot of factors that influence natural global warming, but the point is, adding an un-natural amount of CO2 amongst other GHG into the atmosphere will likely have an additive effect to global warming.

Yeah, I agree. I didn't really think of what I was saying when I said it. I was thinking of something else at the time. :P

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

I have no point, why are you so mean to me? :cry:

I didn't mean to be mean. What I meant was that cows, just like cars, are a man-made factor in the release of greenhouse gasses.
Avatar image for howlrunner13
howlrunner13

4408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#82 howlrunner13
Member since 2005 • 4408 Posts

[QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

I have no point, why are you so mean to me? :cry:

Engrish_Major

I didn't mean to be mean. What I meant was that cows, just like cars, are a man-made factor in the release of greenhouse gasses.

I was just joking about you being mean.

And yes, I agree with what you said, I wasn't really thinking when I wrote what I did.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#83 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Correlation? CFC is like the terminator to ozone.Darthmatt
All we really know is that CFCs go in the air, and then the ozone dissapears if enough are present. That does not necessitate cause and effect.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#84 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="howlrunner13"]

I have no point, why are you so mean to me? :cry:

howlrunner13

I didn't mean to be mean. What I meant was that cows, just like cars, are a man-made factor in the release of greenhouse gasses.

I was just joking about you being mean.

And yes, I agree with what you said, I wasn't really thinking when I wrote what I did.

Civil discussions, I like. I think what really needs to be agreed on is the basic science behind the causes of the green house effect. Green house gases trapped in the atmosphere. How long it takes to increase or decrease and how much effect man has is more complicated debate. But when you consider the vast increase of green house gases due to human activity vs natural sources, the question I pose is how can they not have an affect?

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Climate Gate anyone? Every year for thye past ten years the climate has dropped...explain that you climate nazi's.

rocafelon1001

No it hasn't. you're referring to 1998 and the El Nino that was in effect then. 1998 ws actually the second warmest yeat on record. It's tied with 2007 as the second. The warmest year on record is 2005.

Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#86 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Correlation? CFC is like the terminator to ozone.Vandalvideo
All we really know is that CFCs go in the air, and then the ozone dissapears if enough are present. That does not necessitate cause and effect.

CFC, the Chlorine atoms in it cause a catalyst effect when contact with ozone. Something like a single chlorine atom in the atmosphere can break down ten thousand ozone molecules. CFC is also very long lived and hard to extract once added to the atmosphere. Hence it does a lot more damage over time. The Terminator of ozone.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="rook2rook"]

i think global warming is a joke people trying to get rich off books and other stuff its just sad.

Darthmatt

Yes. The only reason why this global warming phiasco is on us and all these hundreds of thousands of scientists agree with it is because they all want to sell books on it. I completely agree.

I hate to burst your bubble, but there is more money being made off industry that pollutes. Anti polution regulation cost them a lot of money, hence the reason for anti-climate propaganda. The goal is to get people to believe the air they breath contains magic dust that nulifies the greenhouse effect of pumping an aditional 28billion tons of CO2 into the air.

Climate change, or global warming, is not based off of some money makign scam. IT's based off of real world scientific data. Some of which I posted earlier in this thread. Do you really think that 97% of scientists (See Link) are in a vast glkobal conspiracy to alter that data associated with climate change?

Avatar image for Lord_Daemon
Lord_Daemon

24535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#88 Lord_Daemon
Member since 2005 • 24535 Posts

Regardless of the reason, I find it somewhat of a bummer that L.A. has become more of a desert climate than ever before. 30 years ago it used to rain for days at a time every winter and then every other year the rain used to be incredibly heavy and would last for weeks. These days it hardly ever rains at all and when it does it's just a brief shower followed quickly by the clouds retreating and the bloody sun coming out once again to dry everything out.

I suppose I should just migrate North.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#89 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
CFC, the Chlorine atoms in it cause a catalyst effect when contact with ozone. Something like a single chlorine atom in the atmosphere can break down ten thousand ozone molecules. CFC is also very long lived and hard to extract once added to the atmosphere. Hence it does a lot more damage over time. The Terminator of ozone.Darthmatt
I'm well aware of the speculative theories behind how CFCs interact with the ozone layer. But all this is based on a correlation between the presence of CFCs in the atmosphere and then a degredation of the ozone layer. That, however, is not proof that it is truly the cause. Those measurements are based on the amount of CFCs present and the resulting degredation. But again, correlation is not causation. It is not an absolute fact that CFCs cause ozone layer depletion, or atleast it has not been established.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#90 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Yes. The only reason why this global warming phiasco is on us and all these hundreds of thousands of scientists agree with it is because they all want to sell books on it. I completely agree.

BumFluff122

I hate to burst your bubble, but there is more money being made off industry that pollutes. Anti polution regulation cost them a lot of money, hence the reason for anti-climate propaganda. The goal is to get people to believe the air they breath contains magic dust that nulifies the greenhouse effect of pumping an aditional 28billion tons of CO2 into the air.

Climate change, or global warming, is not based off of some money makign scam. IT's based off of real world scientific data. Some of which I posted earlier in this thread. Do you really think that 97% of scientists (See Link) are in a vast glkobal conspiracy to alter that data associated with climate change?

I think we are on the same page here. I meant to just qoate the other guy.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
;3 The movie "The Day After Tomorrow" actually explains what global warming is...maybe you should watch.
Avatar image for Dystopian-X
Dystopian-X

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 Dystopian-X
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

;3 The movie "The Day After Tomorrow" actually explains what global warming is...maybe you should watch.killab2oo5
Meh that movie was BS. Global warming is truly explained in Fahrenheit 911.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]I hate to burst your bubble, but there is more money being made off industry that pollutes. Anti polution regulation cost them a lot of money, hence the reason for anti-climate propaganda. The goal is to get people to believe the air they breath contains magic dust that nulifies the greenhouse effect of pumping an aditional 28billion tons of CO2 into the air.

Darthmatt

Climate change, or global warming, is not based off of some money makign scam. IT's based off of real world scientific data. Some of which I posted earlier in this thread. Do you really think that 97% of scientists (See Link) are in a vast glkobal conspiracy to alter that data associated with climate change?

I think we are on the same page here. I meant to just qoate the other guy.

lol ok.

Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#94 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]CFC, the Chlorine atoms in it cause a catalyst effect when contact with ozone. Something like a single chlorine atom in the atmosphere can break down ten thousand ozone molecules. CFC is also very long lived and hard to extract once added to the atmosphere. Hence it does a lot more damage over time. The Terminator of ozone.Vandalvideo
I'm well aware of the speculative theories behind how CFCs interact with the ozone layer. But all this is based on a correlation between the presence of CFCs in the atmosphere and then a degredation of the ozone layer. That, however, is not proof that it is truly the cause. Those measurements are based on the amount of CFCs present and the resulting degredation. But again, correlation is not causation. It is not an absolute fact that CFCs cause ozone layer depletion, or atleast it has not been established.

But it is enough of a plausible outcome that a commonly used component of countless consumer products was banned. The science is good enough to support the claim.

Avatar image for dunl12496
dunl12496

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#95 dunl12496
Member since 2009 • 5710 Posts

It's all a scheme for money and political points and for enviroMENTALists to get what they want. I'm tired of these threads.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"];3 The movie "The Day After Tomorrow" actually explains what global warming is...maybe you should watch.Dystopian-X

Meh that movie was BS. Global warming is truly explained in Fahrenheit 911.

Nah. Global warming was truly explained in Waterworld.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#97 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
*badum tss* srs bsnss in thread must be an elongation of the self-parody me thinks.
Avatar image for dunl12496
dunl12496

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#98 dunl12496
Member since 2009 • 5710 Posts

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"];3 The movie "The Day After Tomorrow" actually explains what global warming is...maybe you should watch.Dystopian-X

Meh that movie was BS. Global warming is truly explained in Fahrenheit 911.

What a waste of millions.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"];3 The movie "The Day After Tomorrow" actually explains what global warming is...maybe you should watch.Dystopian-X

Meh that movie was BS. Global warming is truly explained in Fahrenheit 911.

Yeah, well, read 98 Degrees' autobiography for an even more in-depth explanation.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ZpPXbY3PH1I/SPmXsT7_VPI/AAAAAAAAAiM/C_cONh7grZ8/s320/98degreesalbum.jpg

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#100 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
But it is enough of a plausible outcome that a commonly used component of countless consumer products was banned. The science is good enough to support the claim.Darthmatt
No, not really. It is a logical leap to go from correlation to causation. This is a problem I have with many scientists. They delude themselves into thinking their extravagant, overly glorified post hoc ergo proctor hocs are undisputable facts. The mere probability of something is insufficient to estabilsh it as a certain fact. You may act on uncertainty, but don't have so much hubris that you're unwilling to recognize that you could easily be wrong.