[QUOTE="MarineJcksn"]http://www.observer.com/2008/stumping-clinton-steinem-says-mccains-p-o-w-cred-overrated
She goes on to call John McCain's experience as a Prisoner of War "overrated". I'm not the biggest McCain fan, but this type of behavior is detrimental to all our military veterans and a slap in the face to McCain personally. The man lost over 5 years of his life in a bamboo cage being tortured so she'd have the right to free speach, and look how he's thanked.
Don't worry Gloria, For those who've fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.
shivaskunk9mm
While certainly not trying to deprive mcCain of the respect he deserves for enduring what he did, the claim that he was a PoW for your freedom is total BS. The war in Vietnam had nothing, zero, zip to do with liberty or freedom of speech. Also it does not make him more qualified to run your country, and he is milking it for all it's worth.
He fought to liberate the oppresssed. You say that McCain's background as a former prisoner of war has nothing to do with him being more qualified to be president, but what says more about a man's qualifications than his character?
During Vietnam, he was imprisoned along with other U.S. soldiers. After his captors realized that his father was a high-ranking official in the U.S., they offered him the chance to be immediately released, unarmed. His response was that he would not leave without the rest of his men. Instead of being released, he was tortured as a form of punishment for ruining their attempts at using his release as propaganda.
In what way does this not make him more qualified to run a country? Aside from his experience as a POW, he has also served a long time as a U.S. Sentator. Under what grounds does she have the right (not talking legally) to bash him for his background?
Log in to comment