They're much better than The Beetles. They don't even compare to The Beatles though.
Serious response, no. GnR has maybe one "great" album, Appetite for Destruction. I also like Use Your Illusion I, but outside of those, they've released quite a bit of crap. I don't hate GnR, they were actually one of the first bands I ever got into, but to compare them to The Beatles is just lunatic. Also, Axl Rose is a douchenozzle.
Well apart from a few songs I find the Beetles rather meh, so I'd go with Guns N' Roses. And no, even tho I'm a metalhead, I like calm and old music, I just don't like the Beetles :P Plus I always misspell their name xD
They're much better than The Beetles. They don't even compare to The Beatles though.
Serious response, no. GnR has maybe one "great" album, Appetite for Destruction. I also like Use Your Illusion I, but outside of those, they've released quite a bit of crap. I don't hate GnR, they were actually one of the first bands I ever got into, but to compare them to The Beatles is just lunatic. Also, Axl Rose is a douchenozzle.
Um... "Outside of those" they only released one other album, which was all cover songs, "The Spaghetti Incident". The fact that GnR made such an impact with only 3 studio albums (2 being a simultaneous release) speaks volumes in and of itself.
Its a shame you are going to get skewed results because you are pitting a 60's band against an 80's band that was influenced indirectly by the 60's band....and there are a bunch of 15 year old kids here who know nothing about The Beatles.
...and by the way
John Lennon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone or all of Guns and Roses and their 1 good album.
yes my favourite rock band of all time... i dont even rank the beetles...such horrible music and hairstyles...bleghh!! welcome to the jungle ALONE destroys the beetles whole discography... yet alone the rest of their songs
Um... "Outside of those" they only released one other album, which was all cover songs, "The Spaghetti Incident". The fact that GnR made such an impact with only 3 studio albums (2 being a simultaneous release) speaks volumes in and of itself.BrianB0422
Not really. All that says is that they didn't last long enough to have their overall body of work become crap.
Guns N Roses are super overrated, The Beatles have way more songs that I like and they revolutionized music for their time.CMFreezy
A stick could have revolutionized those times. First the early 60's had almost nothing after Buddy Holly, The Big Bopper and Richie Valanz died. In the late 60's ppl were so high a band could play on tin cans and have a cat screaming and it would have revolutionized the time.
Use your Illusions is one of the worst double albums ever, there aren't even enough tracks for one decent album on there. Just November Rain, some covers and a crap ton of filler.. Garbage
the Spagetti Incedent was just a cover album.
And Chinese Democracy speaks for its self...
So no 1 good album doesn't compare to 12 AMAZING Genre defining industry changing albums.. Plus a crap ton of amazing singles. Guns and roses was a mediocre band with a couple really good singles but didn't have any clue how to put together a quality album that was good from start to finish.
While there's a lot better than guns and roses, they easily beat the beatles... easily.
:lol:
most amusing
you can't ask a forum with teenaged kids about a 60's band, they have no clue of the impact The Beatles had.
Guns and Roses had a handfull of great songs. The Beatles had at least 20.
I'm not talking about the impact. Everyone keeps talking about this. I'm talking about the music. Like I said: a turd could have influenced the hippies back in the 60's.
Guns N Roses has had some really enjoyable songs and in fact I don't really care for the Beatles, but I also realise The Beatles accomplished far more and revolutionized the industry. All in all The Beatles win, plus they never came out with Chinese Democracy. I know it's a cheap shot, but I bought that horrible album.
Ive been playing fallout 3 too much, every time i see GNR i think of Galaxy News Radio :P On topic: Im a beatles fanboy and i think they're the best so nope.
Guns N Roses are good in their own way but please do not try to say they are better than the Beatles. The Beatles revolutionized music in general and made songs that no band today could make even if they tried. The Beatles are superior to Guns N Roses but as I said Guns N Roses are good in their own way. Though by no margin are they better than the Beatles.
Oh and please for the love of God spell Beatles right, they didn't crawl on the ground and get stepped on by humans.
Log in to comment