Has Bush Led a good 8 Year Presidency???

Seriously does everyone think he has done a good job....plz dont come in here with uneducated answers......

i really want to kno what everyones thoughts are on what this country has become and the good and bad things he has done

It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.Chutebox

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.stereointegrity

How is Bush responsible for the economy now?

Sure he made one bad decision on some bad evidence that led to more negative moves, but he was in a really bad position after 9/11.

Worst President in the history of Presidents...

Sure he's not as bad as dictators from around the world but thats like saying stalin wasnt as bad as hitler...

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.Chutebox

How is Bush responsible for the economy now?

Sure he made one bad decision on some bad evidence that led to more negative moves, but he was in a really bad position after 9/11.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.stereointegrity

How is Bush responsible for the economy now?

Sure he made one bad decision on some bad evidence that led to more negative moves, but he was in a really bad position after 9/11.

And Clinton had Osama in our possession and let him go. Clinton also signed NAFTA if I'm not mistaken. Does that make Clinton worse?

Edit: Sorry, meant Osama !

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.Chutebox

How is Bush responsible for the economy now?

Sure he made one bad decision on some bad evidence that led to more negative moves, but he was in a really bad position after 9/11.

And Clinton had Obama in our possession and let him go. Clinton also signed NAFTA if I'm not mistaken. Does that make Clinton worse?

When did Clinton have Obama in his possession? I'd like to hear more about this scandal.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.omfg_its_dally

How is Bush responsible for the economy now?

Sure he made one bad decision on some bad evidence that led to more negative moves, but he was in a really bad position after 9/11.

And Clinton had Obama in our possession and let him go. Clinton also signed NAFTA if I'm not mistaken. Does that make Clinton worse?

When did Clinton have Obama in his possession? I'd like to hear more about this scandal.

You very well know he meant Osama.

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.Chutebox

How is Bush responsible for the economy now?

Sure he made one bad decision on some bad evidence that led to more negative moves, but he was in a really bad position after 9/11.

And Clinton had Obama in our possession and let him go. Clinton also signed NAFTA if I'm not mistaken. Does that make Clinton worse?

You already know what they will say so why ask? And I don't blame him for the economy that would be ignoring all the democratic fingerprints all over it.MoonMarvel

Seriously does everyone think he has done a good job....plz dont come in here with uneducated answers......

i really want to kno what everyones thoughts are on what this country has become and the good and bad things he has done

stereointegrity

lol what do you think?!

When did Clinton have Obama in his possession? I'd like to hear more about this scandal.

omfg_its_dally

haha, crap! I meant Osama...sorry.

It seriously took me 5 minutes staring at the screen to realize what I said...

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]

Seriously does everyone think he has done a good job....plz dont come in here with uneducated answers......

i really want to kno what everyones thoughts are on what this country has become and the good and bad things he has done

Akm4everz

lol what do you think?!

haha, crap! I meant Osama...sorry.

Chutebox

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

haha, crap! I meant Osama...sorry.

stereointegrity

Honest mistake lol

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

haha, crap! I meant Osama...sorry.

Chutebox

Honest mistake lol

It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.Chutebox

Agreed.

The New York Times and MSNBC would want us to believe that the U.S. is doomed because of George Bush. The reality is that George Bush had to deal with the worst attack in the history of the United States less than one year after he was sworn in. Let's not forget that he once had a 90% approval rating and was reelected by a considerable margin in 2004. The real turning point in Bush's popularity coincides with the Democrats winning control of Congress. Too bad most Ameicans don't even know that the Democrats control the congress and harbor the real legislative power in the country.

For the record, I don't think Bush has been a good president, but not for the same reasons that most Americans have. I feel that he has been way too fiscally liberal and has gone too far with deficit spending.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.bungie93

Agreed.

The New York Times and MSNBC would want us to believe that the U.S. is doomed because of George Bush. The reality is that George Bush had to deal with the worst attack in the history of the United States less than one year after he was sworn in. Let's not forget that he once had a 90% approval rating and was reelected by a considerable margin in 2004. The real turning point in Bush's popularity coincides with the Democrats winning control of Congress. Too bad most Ameicans don't even know that the Democrats control the congress and harbor the real legislative power in the country.

For the record, I don't think Bush has been a good president, but not for the same reasons that most Americans have. I feel that he has been way too fiscally liberal and has gone too far with deficit spending.

[QUOTE="bungie93"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]It hasn't been the best, but it is no where near as bad as uneducated/liberals want people to believe.stereointegrity

Agreed.

The New York Times and MSNBC would want us to believe that the U.S. is doomed because of George Bush. The reality is that George Bush had to deal with the worst attack in the history of the United States less than one year after he was sworn in. Let's not forget that he once had a 90% approval rating and was reelected by a considerable margin in 2004. The real turning point in Bush's popularity coincides with the Democrats winning control of Congress. Too bad most Ameicans don't even know that the Democrats control the congress and harbor the real legislative power in the country.

For the record, I don't think Bush has been a good president, but not for the same reasons that most Americans have. I feel that he has been way too fiscally liberal and has gone too far with deficit spending.

Listen, no one could have possibly imagined that terrorists would hi-jack commercial airlines and fly them into a skyscraper. I'm not denying that he has been over-zealous in the war on terror, but think about how he felt after 9/11. He felt personally responsible for all of the lives lost and felt that it was his duty to keep America safer. Like I said, I disagree with many of his policies, but he is undoubtedly a decent human being who loves his country.

He led the country without the support of the UN into a war with false accusations and drag other nations with him.

His government didn't do enough for people during the floods. Mostly because they weren't going to get votes there.

The economy is stuffed and will effect other countries as well.

I don't think it could be much worse. He will be remembered for all the wrong reasons as President.

EDIT: As for "a decent human who loves his country": When his country was under attack he took a holiday!!

I think people are looking at the 9/11 attacks in the wrong way. I agree that it was a big disaster, and the biggest attack to america in a long time, but that doesn't mean it's the biggest threat to america. 9/11 happened because apparantly america didn't see it coming. Just with the extra safety checks that were introduced after 9/11, the chance of an attack anything like 9/11 was decreased dramatically. It's not like america would be invaded by a terrorist army too, because they can't let their flocks of sheep alone. Those people are living in medieval times while america has the biggest army of the world. I'd say that america not being attacked since 9/11 is not really a strong point of bush. If there was another successful attack on america since 9/11, it would pretty much make bush the biggest failure of a president in quite some time.11Marcel

But its been documented that they ignored intelligence regarding 9/11 ...

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]I think people are looking at the 9/11 attacks in the wrong way. I agree that it was a big disaster, and the biggest attack to america in a long time, but that doesn't mean it's the biggest threat to america. 9/11 happened because apparantly america didn't see it coming. Just with the extra safety checks that were introduced after 9/11, the chance of an attack anything like 9/11 was decreased dramatically. It's not like america would be invaded by a terrorist army too, because they can't let their flocks of sheep alone. Those people are living in medieval times while america has the biggest army of the world. I'd say that america not being attacked since 9/11 is not really a strong point of bush. If there was another successful attack on america since 9/11, it would pretty much make bush the biggest failure of a president in quite some time.biggest_loser

But its been documented that they ignored intelligence regarding 9/11 ...

How is Bush responsible for the economy now?

Chutebox

He's the president, he and his government are responsible for your country

I cant believe that republicans are still making excuses for bush

First of all, bush knew nothing about 9/11. You guys are so gullible.

Secondly, beleive it or not, everything isn't his fault. The problem isn't bush. Its the American citizens.

"Lyk, omgz we are broke wuddo we do?" "Omgzz lets blame bush!!"

"Omgz I cnat pay bak mi loan!" "Bush giv us money!!"

"Im faat help help" "It all bush fault!!"

Greedy greedy selfish USA will die within 200 years. I'm smart, I'm gonna move to Wales in a few years =)

If 9/11 didn't happen then Bush would of been one of the presidents the US has had.NZgamer007

It could have been worse.MrLions

hes still has a couple more months to f ever thing up..... but yeah hes was not the best president we have had, i just can believe America voted for him... ive seen a 5 year old talk better

[QUOTE="NZgamer007"]If 9/11 didn't happen then Bush would of been one of the presidents the US has had.Jandurin

pre-bush national debt: ~4.5 trillion

post bush national debt: ~ 10 trillion

/thread

pre-bush national debt: ~4.5 trillion

post bush national debt: ~ 10 trillion

/thread

comp_atkins

Pre 9/11 national debt: 4.5 trillion

NOW: 10 trillion

9/11 was expensive not to mention the Iraq war its not his fault it was/is so expensive.

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

pre-bush national debt: ~4.5 trillion

post bush national debt: ~ 10 trillion

/thread

NZgamer007

Pre 9/11 national debt: 4.5 trillion

NOW: 10 trillion

9/11 was expensive not to mention the Iraq war its not his fault it was/is so expensive.

I do agree that it's a good point that saddam hussein has been caught, but who says the next saddam won't stand up once america leaves? I don't think democracy will work in Iraq, and the people that once had the power will try to reclaim it, either democratically or by shooting the opposition.

It wasn't great, but it wasn't the worst.

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

pre-bush national debt: ~4.5 trillion

post bush national debt: ~ 10 trillion

/thread

NZgamer007

Pre 9/11 national debt: 4.5 trillion

NOW: 10 trillion

9/11 was expensive not to mention the Iraq war its not his fault it was/is so expensive.

it was the bush administrations decision to invade iraq under false pretense therefore they are repsonsible for the ridiculous costs of it

anyway. a little perspective. it took the us government basically 200 years to rack up a debt of about 5 trillion. it took the bush administration 8 years to double it. if the words "epic fail" can not be used to describe that then i do not know what can.

I have always been a big Bush supporter but that doesn't mean my head is stuck in the sand.

I can't blame him for the war.... congress had the same info and voted for the war

The economy...the war is a major factor in the deficit and everyone knew that going in.....that's what happens during a war.
The real culprit here are policies that forced banks to give loans to unqualified people, (Clinton) and the mismanagement by the leaders of freddy mac and fanny mae

Illegal immigration....Bush blew it on this one. Instead of closing the border he decided to look the other way

Homeland security...he has done a great job

PR....he has done a poor job of communicating with us. Of course the media has done everything in its power to crucify him on the way.

Spending....he has done a terrible job of reigning in his team. Its congress who chooses and votes to spend , not Bush. They looked like a bunch of out of control Dems

Gov. is bigger now not smaller...another Bush failure

But all in all Bush has not done the terrible job the media has lead us to believe.