have you ever had a fight with a female?

no but in school a girl who was the temporary monitor for the day, that day in particular slapped me for shouting, we were all kids then though. my mom was angry as she was the one who used to pick me up then.

i have not have fought any females even in arguments, except its my mom that is.

its bad to hurt them its a sin, its sickness, i would rather be happy to be beaten by a female then to beat her.

also needless to repeat i have no experience of marriage but i am moraly coded for perfection in that regards so no beating ever gonna happen.

(and leap do not expose my secret will ya, you can understand my position i hope.)

its bad to hurt them its a sin, its sickness, i would rather be happy to be beaten by a female then to beat her.youruser

I play around with girls at my school. I don't punch'em or hurt'em or nothin I give them shoves and such :P

Besides my mother, no, not any that I immediately recall. atm0073

You have fights with your mother? Do you mean Verbally?

[QUOTE="youruser"]its bad to hurt them its a sin, its sickness, i would rather be happy to be beaten by a female then to beat her.Nude_Dude

And no, not unless she severely pissed me off like any other person would I react.

Verbal arguments however are common.

I play around with girls at my school. I don't punch'em or hut'em or nothin I give them shoves and such :Pturbotoby95

Pretty much this..

I've never gotten into a fight with a female, verbal or physical. It's just not right, I think.

I made the entire lunch room go silent with one fight I had with a girl in school... she was my best friend and we had a huge fight at the lunch table, I pretty much destroyed her verbally. But we moved on about a week later.

yeah i got suspended for a day for calling my science teacher a waste of oxygen!ace-of-spades93

Not no yet...i think i am lucky...:D

Verbally, yes.

Physically, no. Absolutely not.

I wouldn't ever lay my hands on a woman, well in violence :P.

its bad to hurt them its a sin, its sickness, i would rather be happy to be beaten by a female then to beat her.youruser

[QUOTE="youruser"]its bad to hurt them its a sin, its sickness, i would rather be happy to be beaten by a female then to beat her.Funky_Llama

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="youruser"]its bad to hurt them its a sin, its sickness, i would rather be happy to be beaten by a female then to beat her.killab2oo5

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="youruser"]its bad to hurt them its a sin, its sickness, i would rather be happy to be beaten by a female then to beat her.killab2oo5

Yeah, I had a viscious b**** fight once. Only once though.

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Because...? I'm not saying 'go out and punch a women in the face', but why is it any worse to fight a woman than to fight a man?Funky_Llama

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"] It's not a fair fight? We all came from a woman?killab2oo5

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]1. Some women are stronger than some men. 2. If a man who was weaker than you hit you, I doubt you'd have any moral objections to hitting back 3. That we came from a woman was irrelevant.

Funky_Llama

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]1. Majority of the time a man would have the advantage. 2. Depends on how he hit me and how hard. 3. I couldn't think of any other reasons...killab2oo5

2. If you would sometimes hit a weaker man but never hit a weaker woman, then physical strength is not your reason - this belies the fact that the real origin of the 'you don't hit a woman' rule is pure sexism - the attitude that woman are weak and delicate and incapable of defending themselves. You don't refuse to hit women because they're 'weaker', you refuse to hit them simply because they're women.

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"] 1. If you object to hitting people who are weaker, just say 'you shouldn't hit people weaker than you'. To generalise with 'you shouldn't hit a woman' is to stereotype women as weak and incapable of fighting for themselves. 2. Would the same apply if a woman hit you? Would you, depending on the way she hit you, be willing to fight back?

Funky_Llama

2. If you would sometimes hit a weaker man but never hit a weaker woman, then physical strength is not your reason - this belies the fact that the real origin of the 'you don't hit a woman' rule is pure sexism - the attitude that woman are weak and delicate and incapable of defending themselves. You don't refuse to hit women because they're 'weaker', you refuse to hit them simply because they're women.

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]1. Okay...I'm generalizing and still think a man would have the advantage over a woman majority of the time. 2. No, I wouldn't hit a woman back.killab2oo5

2. If you would sometimes hit a weaker man but never hit a weaker woman, then physical strength is not your reason - this belies the fact that the real origin of the 'you don't hit a woman' rule is pure sexism - the attitude that woman are weak and delicate and incapable of defending themselves. You don't refuse to hit women because they're 'weaker', you refuse to hit them simply because they're women.

I don't think I'm gonna piss Llama off any time soon D:

1. If it were absolutely necessary to defend myself, yes. But it's not a good analogy because 12-year-olds' minds simply aren't as developed as adults; hitting a 12-year-old kid back is like prosecuting a baby for shoplifting when it tries to grab some chocolate off a store shelf. 2. I think you were the one beating around the bush by pretending it had to do with physical strength rather than simply that society is sexist and frowns on it. V_V 3. Yes.

Funky_Llama

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]1. If it were absolutely necessary to defend myself, yes. But it's not a good analogy because 12-year-olds' minds simply aren't as developed as adults; hitting a 12-year-old kid back is like prosecuting a baby for shoplifting when it tries to grab some chocolate off a store shelf. 2. I think you were the one beating around the bush by pretending it had to do with physical strength rather than simply that society is sexist and frowns on it. V_V 3. Yes.

killab2oo5

2. Again, gender doesn't matter. It you have to defend yourself, it doesn't matter whether it's against a man or a woman. And if you're stronger, you shouldn't be in a position in which you have to defend yourself anyway.

3. *shrug* I never said I actually have hit a woman. Only that in certain circumstances I'd be justified in doing so. And a word of advice - it's best not to blindly believe everything society teaches you. It might not be right.

Also lawl using part of female anatomy as an insult in discussion of sexism.

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]1. If it were absolutely necessary to defend myself, yes. But it's not a good analogy because 12-year-olds' minds simply aren't as developed as adults; hitting a 12-year-old kid back is like prosecuting a baby for shoplifting when it tries to grab some chocolate off a store shelf. 2. I think you were the one beating around the bush by pretending it had to do with physical strength rather than simply that society is sexist and frowns on it. V_V 3. Yes.

Funky_Llama

2. Again, gender doesn't matter. It you have to defend yourself, it doesn't matter whether it's against a man or a woman. And if you're stronger, you shouldn't be in a position in which you have to defend yourself anyway.

3. *shrug* I never said I actually have hit a woman. Only that in certain circumstances I'd be justified in doing so. And a word of advice - it's best not to blindly believe everything society teaches you. It might not be right.

Also lawl using part of female anatomy as an insult in discussion of sexism.

e_e I LoLed as well. It just seemed to fit.

I don't think I'm gonna piss Llama off any time soon D:

flordeceres

Zat... is wise.

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]1. I've seen a plenty of adults that act much worse than 12 year olds and vice-versa. :roll: Stop generalizing. 2. It has to do with both actually with me. I wouldn't hit a girl because more than likely there will be a strength difference, but mostly because of society. T_T I knew what you were hinting at all along, and you know it too. 3. Pathetic. Yes, I'm calling you pathetic because society has taught me that it's wrong to hit a female, and in my eyes you look like a *slang for female reproductive organ* for doing so.

killab2oo5

2. Again, gender doesn't matter. It you have to defend yourself, it doesn't matter whether it's against a man or a woman. And if you're stronger, you shouldn't be in a position in which you have to defend yourself anyway.

3. *shrug* I never said I actually have hit a woman. Only that in certain circumstances I'd be justified in doing so. And a word of advice - it's best not to blindly believe everything society teaches you. It might not be right.

Also lawl using part of female anatomy as an insult in discussion of sexism.

e_e I LoLed as well. It just seemed to fit.

2. >___>

3. Sure. But being the bigger man and walking away is equally preferable against another man. And in either case, if a person keeps on hitting you, you're justified in defending yourself, no matter what their gender.

1. I wasn't aware I was under some obligation to state everything that is true U_U

2. >___>

3. Sure. But being the bigger man and walking away is equally preferable against another man. And in either case, if a person keeps on hitting you, you're justified in defending yourself, no matter what their gender.

Funky_Llama

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

1. I wasn't aware I was under some obligation to state everything that is true U_U

2. >___>

3. Sure. But being the bigger man and walking away is equally preferable against another man. And in either case, if a person keeps on hitting you, you're justified in defending yourself, no matter what their gender.

killab2oo5

1. 12^2=144.

2.

3. Doesn't that conflict with your objection to hitting the weaker person? D:

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

1.>:[ Well...you are.
2. ^.^
3. Well, I have also been the bigger man in a few conflicts with other men. If a woman were to continually hit me then I would just restrict her, but not hit back. Yes, it would be a different story with another man.

Funky_Llama

1. 12^2=144.

2.

3. Doesn't that conflict with your objection to hitting the weaker person? D:

Llama, are you suggesting that anyone who refuses to hit women is sexist?unholymight

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

1.>:[ Well...you are.
2. ^.^
3. Well, I have also been the bigger man in a few conflicts with other men. If a woman were to continually hit me then I would just restrict her, but not hit back. Yes, it would be a different story with another man.

killab2oo5

1. 12^2=144.

2.

3. Doesn't that conflict with your objection to hitting the weaker person? D:

1. (u*v)'=u'v+v'u

2.

3. Well, surely if you object to hitting someone weaker than yourself and then you go ahead and do so in a fight against another guy... D: