And we must do something about it.
Ron Paul everyone.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Ron Paul Kucinich or Gravel
but sadly they might as well crown hillary, it will be terrible and more the same
[QUOTE="PrimordialMeme"]AgreedRon Paul Kucinich or Gravel
but sadly they might as well crown hillary, it will be terrible and more the same
Bourbons3
Agreed x2 (I especially like Gravel)
but of the candidates with an actual chance of winning..,Clinton is slightly better than Obama or Guiliani imo
Damn, the Americans are really unfortunate when it comes to leadership.Theydeserve better, after 8 years with Bush....
Not ron paul, I can see that being a repeat of the bush years already...
There are better candidates like gravel or edwards though, Hilary is too conservative for my taste.
Not really. We have a few decent candidates (Kucinich and Gravel). But the American people are like sheep. Whomevers face is plastered all over the media the most gets the most votes. I wouldn't be surprised if the majority of voters have never even heard of Kucinich running for president. If you watch the debates, Hilary and Obama get way more time talking than everyone else. Because all the money trails lead to them. So this is how the US gets stuck with crappy leadership, because the people choose to be so easily deceived.Damn, the Americans are really unfortunate when it comes to leadership.Theydeserve better, after 8 years with Bush....
jointed
[QUOTE="jointed"]Not really. We have a few decent candidates (Kucinich and Gravel). But the American people are like sheep. Whomevers face is plastered all over the media the most gets the most votes. I wouldn't be surprised if the majority of voters have never even heard of Kucinich running for president. If you watch the debates, Hilary and Obama get way more time talking than everyone else. Because all the money trails lead to them. So this is how the US gets stuck with crappy leadership, because the people choose to be so easily deceived.It seems like people vote based on name recognition instead of actually looking at each candidate and their ideas. Not to mention physical appearance, like who has the best smile or who's the tallest (the smile and charisma thing goes to Obama...).Damn, the Americans are really unfortunate when it comes to leadership.Theydeserve better, after 8 years with Bush....
GettingTired
Why not Ron Paul? He looks pretty opposite with a lot of stuff, like how he wants to pull all troops out of Iraq right away, and his emphasis on the Constitution: two big things Bush doesn't have in mind.Not ron paul, I can see that being a repeat of the bush years already...
There are better candidates like gravel or edwards though, Hilary is too conservative for my taste.
yoshi-lnex
[QUOTE="GettingTired"][QUOTE="jointed"]Not really. We have a few decent candidates (Kucinich and Gravel). But the American people are like sheep. Whomevers face is plastered all over the media the most gets the most votes. I wouldn't be surprised if the majority of voters have never even heard of Kucinich running for president. If you watch the debates, Hilary and Obama get way more time talking than everyone else. Because all the money trails lead to them. So this is how the US gets stuck with crappy leadership, because the people choose to be so easily deceived.It seems like people vote based on name recognition instead of actually looking at each candidate and their ideas. Not to mention physical appearance, like who has the best smile or who's the tallest (the smile and charisma thing goes to Obama...). Yeah. How many feminists are going to vote for Hilary just because she's a woman, and how many people are going to vote for Obama because he's black? A lot.Damn, the Americans are really unfortunate when it comes to leadership.Theydeserve better, after 8 years with Bush....
camreeno360
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment