@jak42 said:
@SUD123456: Have you ever been a position where you had to enforce rules, regulations, company policy or laws as a supervisor, security guard. Or anything involving a law enforcement profession including peace officer status ?
If you have, or read anything about any interactions hospital police; like the one in NYC. You would know the surgeon or specialist making $300k, who takes cigarette breaks. Is going to have a bit of an ego, and will either tell you to "piss off". Or start smoking again once you turn your back. Now when the lower level staff members see a supervisor or hospital official, avoiding a confrontation over hospital policies. Whether it be because they're buddies with said person smoking or not. Which would make things worse when that buddy gets away with breaking the rules; while others get told off. Would lead to tension in the workplace, over unequal and unfair enforcement of hospital rules. Which is likely part of the reason, a similar outdoor smoking policy at the hospital by my college failed.
Have you ever heard of the gov't? The same people who own the hospitals in Ontario, who license the doctors, who pay the doctors. Yep, them be the peeps who set the no smoking policy and they are the one's who will enforce it through the chief of staff who can also be readily replaced. I already said I am familiar with hospitals that enforce this... my wife is the head of medical affairs for one... and it is about to come into effect province wide through gov't legislation.
Doctors and employees are the least able to get away with breaking the rules because all it takes is one anti-smoker nurse, RT, or similar unionized staff to complain and the hospital will investigate. If you are a Doctor you get a visit and a lecture from the chief. You get a few of those and your privileges are suspended. You lose that you cannot practice medicine at that hospital.
The examples I am aware of are decisions the CEO and Board of the hospital have made, or in at least one case, the regional authority. The coming step is gov't mandated across the province. Private facilities would be even easier to accomplish if the owners/Board decided this is what they really want to do. It has nothing to do with the security guard because that is only representative of lowest level casual interaction at the point of failure. It has everything to do with culture and tone from the top because those are the people with the big sticks to enforce the policies.
As for creating and enforcing policies, yes I have lots of experience as I am in executive management. I am in the energy sector and safety (for instance) is critically important. If you choose to violate a safety rule then you are choosing to be unemployed. Policy and rule enforcement always succeeds or fails from the top down, not the other way around.
Log in to comment