How do you fight back conspiracy theories?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for IronBeaver
IronBeaver

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 IronBeaver
Member since 2009 • 1986 Posts

Basically any time they are "disproven" the people are accused of being in on it. And then that leaves some like myself wondering "oh god...what if they are right?"

I am not saying the consporacy theorists evidence isn't paper thin, but what do we do?

Avatar image for konvikt_17
konvikt_17

22378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 konvikt_17
Member since 2008 • 22378 Posts

nothing

Avatar image for BenedictArnold7
BenedictArnold7

743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 BenedictArnold7
Member since 2012 • 743 Posts
it's like talking to religious people... they are immune to rationality. Nothing can be done.
Avatar image for Laihendi
Laihendi

5872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Laihendi
Member since 2009 • 5872 Posts

Basically any time they are "disproven" the people are accused of being in on it. And then that leaves some like myself wondering "oh god...what if they are right?"

I am not saying the consporacy theorists evidence isn't paper thin, but what do we do?

IronBeaver
You are being irrational to write off an idea just because it is labeled as a "conspiracy theory". Conspiracies really happen.
Avatar image for Lord_Daemon
Lord_Daemon

24535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 Lord_Daemon
Member since 2005 • 24535 Posts

Nothing. In much the same way generally speaking you aren't going to sway anybody away from their chosen religion but providing historical and/or scientific data. Most folks that passionately adhere to conspiracy theories will ignore any facts disproving their accepted sense of reality...so there's really no point in engaging them. They want to believe, let them believe and move on to another subject matter. 

Avatar image for Chemistian
Chemistian

635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Chemistian
Member since 2003 • 635 Posts
There is a "case-specific" dynamic involving conspiracy theories. For instance: theories involving conspiracies around the death of JFK are often theoretically sound, if simply unlikely. In this case, applying Occam's Razor is the best way. In the case of more grandiose ones, such as some of those relating to 9/11, ignoring them is the best route, as they are not worthy of discussion.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
Don't give them the time of day. Personally I'll argue with them once. Give them a fair shot of supporting their claims. But after hearing the same, paranoid arguments over and over again...I've begun to realize that there are innumerable interpretations of conspiracy theories. For example, every 'truther' seems to pull different accounts of what 'really happened', and brand it as an objective truth. I approach it as I would approach a shizotypal person who's telling me that the government has hidden cameras in my toilet that analyzes the contents of my fecal matter in a global effort to control our bodies. There's no level of rational conversation that can convince this person otherwise. I approach things with skepticism, as I think anyone with a mind should. But there's a point where skepticism can actually take control of a persons personality, and they become overly paranoid and filled with an extreme sense of mistrust in everyone and everything.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
You step back, realize that they are incapable of reaching a logical conclusion and just make the best of it.
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

I am not saying the consporacy theorists evidence isn't paper thin, but what do we do?

IronBeaver

That depends on the conspiracy theory. Many of them have evidence that is far more than "paper thin". 

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

You realize those people are morons, if you show them facts and they refuse to believe them or call you a liar, then they have lost the argument

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
With more theories.
Avatar image for trick_man01
trick_man01

11441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#13 trick_man01
Member since 2003 • 11441 Posts
You just make the theories more and more ridiculous until most reasonable minded people have stopped caring.
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

I like conspiracy theories. They make great fiction.

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#15 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

You make it sound like all conspiracy theories are made up by crazy people.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#16 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

The fact that 99% of the stuff they claim they cannot back up with real facts it's easy just to ignore them. They want attention, no matter what. Their evidence is usually weak and they pull out every argumentative fallacy in the book. They shift the burden of proof onto other people, start using ad hominem when they are actually questioned, informal fallacies (A is C, B is C, so A is B), and tons of other stuff.

Seriously hit up this list next time you see any of their arguments and they'll always fall under a couple of those fallacies. 

It's extremely rare to hear a well thought out conspiracy theory. Usually if opposing theories with sufficient evidence appear, they are not considered conspiracy theories and are usually up to the indivudal's interpretation of the data to agree or disagree with said theory. 

Avatar image for rastotm
rastotm

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 rastotm
Member since 2011 • 1380 Posts

99,99% of all conspiracy theories have no reasonable, logic motive behind them.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#18 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts

By educating yourself. Don't use youtube or biased conspiracy sites as legitimate resource.

Avatar image for lensflare15
lensflare15

6652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 lensflare15
Member since 2010 • 6652 Posts

Don't worry about them, really no point in arguing conspiracy theorists with them since their mind is made up. Also, if you need reassuring, look up all the failed conspiracy/debunked theories out there (like the RFID chips on March 23 thing) and realize that nothing ever happens the way they imagine it. The theories can also be pretty entertaining if you look at them as fiction.

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#21 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

By educating yourself. Don't use youtube or biased conspiracy sites as legitimate resource.

Gaming-Planet

Dude, you don't use youtube and wikipedia research?

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

[QUOTE="rastotm"]

99,99% of all conspiracy theories have no reasonable, logic motive behind them.

thegerg

On what do you base that statistic?

Most statistics tend to be exaggerated anyways.

But hey who knows? Perhaps there are aliens in Area 51 and perhaps JFK was killed by LBJ. Or maybe it was the wife of JFK! :o Or maybe...

[spoiler] ALIENS! [/spoiler]

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#23 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
9/11
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

9/11k2theswiss

family-guy-9-11-o.gif

First thing I though of when I read this post.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] On what do you base that statistic? thegerg

Most statistics tend to be exaggerated anyways.

But hey who knows? Perhaps there are aliens in Area 51 and perhaps JFK was killed by LBJ. Or maybe it was the wife of JFK! :o Or maybe...

[spoiler] ALIENS! [/spoiler]

Not all conspiracy theories are outlandish, you know. Many conspiracies are demonstrable through evidence.

Such as?

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Not all conspiracy theories are outlandish, you know. Many conspiracies are demonstrable through evidence. thegerg

Such as?

Just last week 2 of my office's clients were convicted of conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance. The state had a theory about their activity and was able to provide evidence to show conspiracy.

True but the subject is on conspiracy theories such as government or business or whatever. Granted, some conspiracies are true (maybe some exaggerated) such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the KGB's plan to undermine the US government through the assassination of JFK.

Avatar image for IronBeaver
IronBeaver

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 IronBeaver
Member since 2009 • 1986 Posts

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="leviathan91"]

Such as?

leviathan91

Just last week 2 of my office's clients were convicted of conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance. The state had a theory about their activity and was able to provide evidence to show conspiracy.

True but the subject is on conspiracy theories such as government or business or whatever. Granted, some conspiracies are true (maybe some exaggerated) such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the KGB's plan to undermine the US government through the assassination of JFK.

I feel like JFK's is the most realistic one.

Avatar image for Chemistian
Chemistian

635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 Chemistian
Member since 2003 • 635 Posts

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Just last week 2 of my office's clients were convicted of conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance. The state had a theory about their activity and was able to provide evidence to show conspiracy. IronBeaver

True but the subject is on conspiracy theories such as government or business or whatever. Granted, some conspiracies are true (maybe some exaggerated) such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the KGB's plan to undermine the US government through the assassination of JFK.

I feel like JFK's is the most realistic one.

JFK conspiracy theories are fascinating and many are worthy of a second look. However, the likelihood of any of them is far lower than Oswald acting alone. Once you start adding individuals or entities and stacking the plausibility of each on top of one another, the percentages become clear.
Avatar image for CKYguy25
CKYguy25

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 CKYguy25
Member since 2012 • 2087 Posts

i'm sick of these theories

Avatar image for CyberLips
CyberLips

1826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 1

#33 CyberLips
Member since 2009 • 1826 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBeaver"]

Basically any time they are "disproven" the people are accused of being in on it. And then that leaves some like myself wondering "oh god...what if they are right?"

I am not saying the consporacy theorists evidence isn't paper thin, but what do we do?

Laihendi

You are being irrational to write off an idea just because it is labeled as a "conspiracy theory". Conspiracies really happen.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

it's like talking to religious people... they are immune to rationality. Nothing can be done.BenedictArnold7

You sure as hell aren't a beacon of tolerance with that attitude.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Not all conspiracy theories are outlandish, you know. Many conspiracies are demonstrable through evidence. thegerg

Such as?

Just last week 2 of my office's clients were convicted of conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance. The state had a theory about their activity and was able to provide evidence to show conspiracy.

facepalm-gif-33.gif.

Avatar image for Stesilaus
Stesilaus

4999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Stesilaus
Member since 2007 • 4999 Posts

Some "conspiracy theories" can be fought only with lies.

:|

Avatar image for Angie7F
Angie7F

1175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Angie7F
Member since 2011 • 1175 Posts

i dont. I listen and enjoy their rant.

then I think of the ancient aliens guy and his hair.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#38 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21106 Posts

[QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"]

By educating yourself. Don't use youtube or biased conspiracy sites as legitimate resource.

cain006

Dude, you don't use youtube and wikipedia research?

I use wikipedia for some things, but I never go to a biased site that its only agenda is to make one side look bad than the other. By youtube, I mean people like Alex Jones. That guy is pathetic.
Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBeaver"]

Basically any time they are "disproven" the people are accused of being in on it. And then that leaves some like myself wondering "oh god...what if they are right?"

I am not saying the consporacy theorists evidence isn't paper thin, but what do we do?

Laihendi
You are being irrational to write off an idea just because it is labeled as a "conspiracy theory". Conspiracies really happen.

Avatar image for dagreenfish
dagreenfish

1818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 dagreenfish
Member since 2010 • 1818 Posts

I don't bother to fight back, but I do follow a basic procedure to find out what I believe.

step 1) Does it pass the face palm/ bust out laughing test?

step 2) Is it actually possible?

step 3) Is it remotely plausible?

step 4) Is it likely based off of evidence?

step 5) Freak out. "Holy Shit, the illuminait/aliens/government control the world towards sinister goals!"

Avatar image for Jackboot343
Jackboot343

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Jackboot343
Member since 2007 • 2574 Posts

Ignore it or use it for comical conversation

Avatar image for Goyoshi12
Goyoshi12

9687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#42 Goyoshi12
Member since 2009 • 9687 Posts

You can't.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#43 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45452 Posts
you can't, the more you try to disprove it the more convoluted it gets, the more people are claimed to be involved in covering it up
Avatar image for CKYguy25
CKYguy25

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 CKYguy25
Member since 2012 • 2087 Posts

You can't.

Goyoshi12

and why do you say that?

Avatar image for Thirty4Fifty
Thirty4Fifty

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Thirty4Fifty
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts

How do you fight back conspiracy theories? Depends on the conspiracy.

Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts

Why bother, unless you're looking for a little fun in a debate?  Fanatics will believe what they want to believe.  No argument, no matter how sound, will be enough to sway that belief.  Sometimes we seem to forget that not everyone we encounter is a rational thinker.

Avatar image for CKYguy25
CKYguy25

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 CKYguy25
Member since 2012 • 2087 Posts

How do you fight back conspiracy theories? Depends on the conspiracy.

Thirty4Fifty

like the aliens?

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

The fact that 99% of the stuff they claim they cannot back up with real facts it's easy just to ignore them. They want attention, no matter what. Their evidence is usually weak and they pull out every argumentative fallacy in the book. They shift the burden of proof onto other people, start using ad hominem when they are actually questioned, informal fallacies (A is C, B is C, so A is B), and tons of other stuff.

Seriously hit up this list next time you see any of their arguments and they'll always fall under a couple of those fallacies. 

It's extremely rare to hear a well thought out conspiracy theory. Usually if opposing theories with sufficient evidence appear, they are not considered conspiracy theories and are usually up to the indivudal's interpretation of the data to agree or disagree with said theory. 

Wasdie
Didn't read any of that.