The fact that 99% of the stuff they claim they cannot back up with real facts it's easy just to ignore them. They want attention, no matter what. Their evidence is usually weak and they pull out every argumentative fallacy in the book. They shift the burden of proof onto other people, start using ad hominem when they are actually questioned, informal fallacies (A is C, B is C, so A is B), and tons of other stuff.
Seriously hit up this list next time you see any of their arguments and they'll always fall under a couple of those fallacies.Â
It's extremely rare to hear a well thought out conspiracy theory. Usually if opposing theories with sufficient evidence appear, they are not considered conspiracy theories and are usually up to the indivudal's interpretation of the data to agree or disagree with said theory.Â
Log in to comment