I don't really like what he's doing. He always makes pointless compromises with the Republicans who don't even vote for his bills.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Unfavorable. As the OP said, he's been too comprimising with Republicans, and I would have rather seen GM and Chrysler go under than get bailout money.
Unfavorable. As the OP said, he's been too comprimising with Republicans, and I would have rather seen GM and Chrysler go under than get bailout money.
ProudLarry
Do you have any idea how much of the middle class is supported in one way or another by the auto industry?
Unfavorable. As the OP said, he's been too comprimising with Republicans, and I would have rather seen GM and Chrysler go under than get bailout money.
ProudLarry
Maybe not Chrysler, but GM has already paid their money out, and are back on track to be a great company again. They have improved since the bailout actually.
We couldn't let GM fail.
I'm staying neutral.
I have no idea what he's doing, but I haven't seen any change yet. IppoTenmaThis is exactly the ignorant view that blindly hates Obama. I'd stake my PS3 that 90% of those not in favor has no idea what a president actually does.
[QUOTE="ProudLarry"]
Unfavorable. As the OP said, he's been too comprimising with Republicans, and I would have rather seen GM and Chrysler go under than get bailout money.
topgunmv
Do you have any idea how much of the middle class is supported in one way or another by the auto industry?
Yes, but maybe the shock would have brought about the realization of how poor the options for work that the middle and lower class have. The American automakers also don't seem to ever learn from their mistakes, with regards to pushing large fuel-inefficient vehicles. I mean this is the 3rd time (and admittedly the worst) where they weren't able to stay competitive with international auto-makers simply because of the lure of profit in large expensive cars.[QUOTE="IppoTenma"]I have no idea what he's doing, but I haven't seen any change yet. jeremiah06This is exactly the ignorant view that blindly hates Obama. I'd stake my PS3 that 90% of those not in favor has no idea what a president actually does.Which is why I'm neutral. :|
[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="ProudLarry"]
Unfavorable. As the OP said, he's been too comprimising with Republicans, and I would have rather seen GM and Chrysler go under than get bailout money.
ProudLarry
Do you have any idea how much of the middle class is supported in one way or another by the auto industry?
Yes, but maybe the shock would have brought about the realization of how poor the options for work that the middle and lower class have. The American automakers also don't seem to ever learn from their mistakes, with regards to pushing large fuel-inefficient vehicles. I mean this is the 3rd time (and admittedly the worst) where they weren't able to stay competitive with international auto-makers simply because of the lure of profit in large expensive cars.Because the large cars sells......they adapt to the market. Have you seen what vehicles are on the road? And I'd say unfavorable as of now.[QUOTE="IppoTenma"]I have no idea what he's doing, but I haven't seen any change yet. jeremiah06This is exactly the ignorant view that blindly hates Obama. I'd stake my PS3 that 90% of those not in favor has no idea what a president actually does. Oh please. Even if Obama did everything perfectly according to Democrats, there would still be a large percentage of the informed public who would dislike his performance based on ideological differences. The fact that he's been disappointing democrats and independents as well just increases the number of those who view his performance unfavorably.
[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="ProudLarry"]
Unfavorable. As the OP said, he's been too comprimising with Republicans, and I would have rather seen GM and Chrysler go under than get bailout money.
ProudLarry
Do you have any idea how much of the middle class is supported in one way or another by the auto industry?
Yes, but maybe the shock would have brought about the realization of how poor the options for work that the middle and lower class have. The American automakers also don't seem to ever learn from their mistakes, with regards to pushing large fuel-inefficient vehicles. I mean this is the 3rd time (and admittedly the worst) where they weren't able to stay competitive with international auto-makers simply because of the lure of profit in large expensive cars.All the other automakers received bailouts as well...
I disagree with his viewpoints up until he started to favor nuclear power and drilling... Well with strings attached of course but, to me, Obama is becoming more centrist just like Bill Clinton. I expect that he'll continue to do so when the Republicans gain control of the senate and house. Does anyone else see that?
There is this remarkable idea that the president of the USA is able to fix everything and do everything at once. He's the president. He doesn't have real power in controlling the social and economic lives of everyone in the US. But he's motivational and youthful, and an inspiration to many young people around the US. He has big ideas as well but I don't agree, nor would I like to see them implemented.
[QUOTE="ProudLarry"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]Yes, but maybe the shock would have brought about the realization of how poor the options for work that the middle and lower class have. The American automakers also don't seem to ever learn from their mistakes, with regards to pushing large fuel-inefficient vehicles. I mean this is the 3rd time (and admittedly the worst) where they weren't able to stay competitive with international auto-makers simply because of the lure of profit in large expensive cars.Because the large cars sells......they adapt to the market. Have you seen what vehicles are on the road? And I'd say unfavorable as of now.Do you have any idea how much of the middle class is supported in one way or another by the auto industry?
LJS9502_basic
No, they don't adapt to the market, that's the whole problem. Its why they almost failed in the 70s, during the oil embargoes, and they refused to invest in smaller less profitable cars. Then in the middle of the last decade when gas got up to $4/gallon, again they took it in the pants because they were only pushing SUVs/Crossovers. Then the financial crisis put the nail in the coffin, because they couldn't keep up with Japanese automakers who, as always, didn't rely so heavily on one type of car. If they wanted to avoid all this they would have learned from their mistakes the first time they made them.
Yes, but maybe the shock would have brought about the realization of how poor the options for work that the middle and lower class have. The American automakers also don't seem to ever learn from their mistakes, with regards to pushing large fuel-inefficient vehicles. I mean this is the 3rd time (and admittedly the worst) where they weren't able to stay competitive with international auto-makers simply because of the lure of profit in large expensive cars.[QUOTE="ProudLarry"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]
Do you have any idea how much of the middle class is supported in one way or another by the auto industry?
topgunmv
All the other automakers received bailouts as well...
No, only GM and Chrysler. Ford didn't take any government money. And from what I can find, Japan wasn't handing out money to their automakers either.He's doing a fine job imo in terms of not pissing off the rest of the world.
one_plum
I don't care what the world thinks of us because they will always find an excuse to hate us while sipping coke and listening to Hannah Montana. Right now, he's pissing off the entire United States for not following up on some of his promises even though he kept most of them while in office.
[QUOTE="one_plum"]
He's doing a fine job imo in terms of not pissing off the rest of the world.
leviathan91
I don't care what the world thinks of us because they will always find an excuse to hate us while sipping coke and listening to Hannah Montana. Right now, he's pissing off the entire United States for not following up on some of his promises even though he kept most of them while in office.
Yeah, cause it's so stupid to try to form bonds with other countries and reach out.
[QUOTE="one_plum"]
He's doing a fine job imo in terms of not pissing off the rest of the world.
leviathan91
I don't care what the world thinks of us because they will always find an excuse to hate us while sipping coke and listening to Hannah Montana. Right now, he's pissing off the entire United States for not following up on some of his promises even though he kept most of them while in office.
Not true that the world hates the US for no reason. The US became one of the most beloved countries again after Obama became president.
[QUOTE="leviathan91"]
[QUOTE="one_plum"]
He's doing a fine job imo in terms of not pissing off the rest of the world.
SgtKevali
I don't care what the world thinks of us because they will always find an excuse to hate us while sipping coke and listening to Hannah Montana. Right now, he's pissing off the entire United States for not following up on some of his promises even though he kept most of them while in office.
Yeah, cause it's so stupid to try to form bonds with other countries and reach out.
I'm not suggesting that we start alienating ourselves from the rest of the world. However, we must keep ourselves, as well as our interests, in tact and well from terrorist and opposing powers, in spite of global criticism.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
[QUOTE="leviathan91"]
I don't care what the world thinks of us because they will always find an excuse to hate us while sipping coke and listening to Hannah Montana. Right now, he's pissing off the entire United States for not following up on some of his promises even though he kept most of them while in office.
leviathan91
Yeah, cause it's so stupid to try to form bonds with other countries and reach out.
I'm not suggesting that we start alienating ourselves from the rest of the world. However, we must keep ourselves, as well as our interests, in tact and well from terrorist and opposing powers, in spite of global criticism.
What are you referring to, specifically.
He's following thru on many of his campaign promises so far. Those are the reasons I voted & volunteered for him, so I think he's doing a fairly good job. Still very concerned about job growth.
He is the same as bush cowering in the corner when it comes to illegal immigration. if he is going to whine about states making laws about it he should do it himself.
Anway i have a very unfavorable opinion right now hes done nothing but lie and lie about his promises.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment